Single-atom manipulations in a microscopic dipole trap

Author(s):  
Georges Reymond ◽  
Nicolas Schlosser ◽  
Igor Protsenko ◽  
Philippe Grangier
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (25) ◽  
pp. 22898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanchun Zuo ◽  
Miho Fukusen ◽  
Yoshihiro Tamaki ◽  
Tomoki Watanabe ◽  
Yusuke Nakagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun He ◽  
Bao-dong Yang ◽  
Yong-jie Cheng ◽  
Tian-cai Zhang ◽  
Jun-min Wang

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
王建龙 WANG Jian-long ◽  
李刚 LI Gang ◽  
田亚莉 TIAN Ya-li ◽  
张天才 ZHANG Tian-cai

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Weber ◽  
Jürgen Volz ◽  
Karen Saucke ◽  
Christian Kurtsiefer ◽  
Harald Weinfurter
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
J. Volz ◽  
M. Weber ◽  
R. Reicold ◽  
K. Saucke ◽  
C. Kurtsiefer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. M. Porozova ◽  
L. V. Gerasimov ◽  
I. B. Bobrov ◽  
S. S. Straupe ◽  
S. P. Kulik ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Georges Reymond ◽  
Nicolas Schlosser ◽  
Philippe Grangier

Author(s):  
Wah Chi

Resolution and contrast are the important factors to determine the feasibility of imaging single heavy atoms on a thin substrate in an electron microscope. The present report compares the atom image characteristics in different modes of fixed beam dark field microscopy including the ideal beam stop (IBS), a wire beam stop (WBS), tilted illumination (Tl) and a displaced aperture (DA). Image contrast between one Hg and a column of linearly aligned carbon atoms (representing the substrate), are also discussed. The assumptions in the present calculations are perfectly coherent illumination, atom object is represented by spherically symmetric potential derived from Relativistic Hartree Fock Slater wave functions, phase grating approximation is used to evaluate the complex scattering amplitude, inelastic scattering is ignored, phase distortion is solely due to defocus and spherical abberation, and total elastic scattering cross section is evaluated by the Optical Theorem. The atom image intensities are presented in a Z-modulation display, and the details of calculation are described elsewhere.


Author(s):  
J. J. Hren ◽  
S. D. Walck

The field ion microscope (FIM) has had the ability to routinely image the surface atoms of metals since Mueller perfected it in 1956. Since 1967, the TOF Atom Probe has had single atom sensitivity in conjunction with the FIM. “Why then hasn't the FIM enjoyed the success of the electron microscope?” The answer is closely related to the evolution of FIM/Atom Probe techniques and the available technology. This paper will review this evolution from Mueller's early discoveries, to the development of a viable commercial instrument. It will touch upon some important contributions of individuals and groups, but will not attempt to be all inclusive. Variations in instrumentation that define the class of problems for which the FIM/AP is uniquely suited and those for which it is not will be described. The influence of high electric fields inherent to the technique on the specimens studied will also be discussed. The specimen geometry as it relates to preparation, statistical sampling and compatibility with the TEM will be examined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document