Incorporating linguistic theories of pronunciation variation into speech–recognition models

2000 ◽  
Vol 358 (1769) ◽  
pp. 1325-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari Ostendorf
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Pronunciation Variation

Cross-word Arabic pronunciation variation modeling for speech recognition

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dia AbuZeina ◽  
Wasfi Al-Khatib ◽  
Moustafa Elshafei ◽  
Husni Al-Muhtaseb
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Pronunciation Variation

scholarly journals Investigating the effects of gender, dialect, and training size on the performance of Arabic speech recognition

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 975-998
Author(s):  
Eiman Alsharhan ◽  
Allan Ramsay
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Arabic Language ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Language Resources ◽  
Acoustic Models ◽  
Pronunciation Variation ◽  
Register Variation ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Dialectal Arabic

Abstract Research in Arabic automatic speech recognition (ASR) is constrained by datasets of limited size, and of highly variable content and quality. Arabic-language resources vary in the attributes that affect language resources in other languages (noise, channel, speaker, genre), but also vary significantly in the dialect and level of formality of the spoken Arabic they capture. Many languages suffer similar levels of cross-dialect and cross-register acoustic variability, but these effects have been under-studied. This paper is an experimental analysis of the interaction between classical ASR corpus-compensation methods (feature selection, data selection, gender-dependent acoustic models) and the dialect-dependent/register-dependent variation among Arabic ASR corpora. The first interaction studied in this paper is that between acoustic recording quality and discrete pronunciation variation. Discrete pronunciation variation can be compensated by using grapheme-based instead of phone-based acoustic models, and by filtering out speakers with insufficient training data; the latter technique also helps to compensate for poor recording quality, which is further compensated by eliminating delta-delta acoustic features. All three techniques, together, reduce Word Error Rate (WER) by between 3.24% and 5.35%. The second aspect of dialect and register variation to be considered is variation in the fine-grained acoustic pronunciations of each phoneme in the language. Experimental results prove that gender and dialect are the principal components of variation in speech, therefore, building gender and dialect-specific models leads to substantial decreases in WER. In order to further explore the degree of acoustic differences between phone models required for each of the dialects of Arabic, cross-dialect experiments are conducted to measure how far apart Arabic dialects are acoustically in order to make a better decision about the minimal number of recognition systems needed to cover all dialectal Arabic. Finally, the research addresses an important question: how much training data is needed for building efficient speaker-independent ASR systems? This includes developing some learning curves to find out how large must the training set be to achieve acceptable performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document