scholarly journals A new chart of hydraulic fracture height prediction based on fluid–solid coupling equations and rock fracture mechanics

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 180600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiang Liu ◽  
Zhanqing Qu ◽  
Tiankui Guo ◽  
Dongying Wang ◽  
Qizhong Tian ◽  
...  

The conventional method to predict hydraulic fracture height depends on linear elastic mechanics, and the typical Gulrajani–Nolte chart fails to reflect fracture height when the net pressure in the fracture is too high. Based on fluid–solid coupling equations and rock fracture mechanics, a new chart is obtained by the ABAQUS extended finite-element method. Compared with the Gulrajani–Nolte chart, this new chart shows that longitudinal propagation of hydraulic fracture is still finite when the net pressure in the fracture is higher than in situ stress difference between reservoir and restraining barrier. The barrier has a significant shielding effect on the longitudinal propagation of hydraulic fracture, and there is a threshold for an injection rate of fracturing fluid to ensure hydraulic fracture propagates in the barrier. Fracture height decreases with the increase of in situ stress difference. When the ratio of net pressure to in situ stress difference is less than 0.56, the propagation of hydraulic fracture is completely restricted in the reservoir. Hydraulic fracturing parameters in Well Shen52 and Well Shen55 are optimized by using the new chart. Array acoustic wave logging shows that the actual fracture height is at an average error within 14.3% of the theoretical value, which proves the accuracy of the new chart for field application.

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songxia Liu ◽  
Peter P. Valkó

Abstract Fracture height is a critical input parameter for 2D hydraulic fracturing design models, and also an important output result of 3D models. While many factors may influence fracture height evolution in multi-layer formations, the consensus is that the so called “equilibrium height belonging to a certain treating pressure” provides an upper limit, at least for non-naturally fractured media. How to solve the “equilibrium height” problem has been known since the 1970s. However, because of the complexity of the algebra involved, published equations are overly simplified and do not provide reliable results. We revisited the equilibrium height problem, and our theoretical and numerical investigations led to a new model that fully characterizes height evolution amid various formation properties (fracture toughness, in-situ stress, thickness, etc.). The new model, for the first time, rigorously solves the equilibrium height mathematically. With the help of computer algebra software, we applied a definition of fracture toughness, incorporated the effects of hydrostatic pressure, and considered non-symmetric variations of layered formation properties. Results were determined for the classic 3-layer problem and then were extended to 6 layers. The effects of reservoir and fluid properties on the fracture height growth were investigated. Tip jump is caused by low in-situ stress; tip stability is imposed by large fracture toughness and/or large in-situ stress. If the fluid density is ignored, the result regarding to which tip will grow into infinity could be totally different. For any multi-layer formation problem, two, 3-layer pseudo problems were constructed to create an outer and inner height envelope, in order to assess the potential effects of reservoir parameter uncertainties on height profile. Second solution pair in the 3-layer problem was investigated numerically and analytically, to avoid misleading results in the 3D models. This improved model can rapidly (in seconds) and reliably calculate the theoretical maximum equilibrium fracture height in layered formations with various rock mechanical properties. Then, the equilibrium height can be used to (1) provide input data for 2D model, (2) improve 3D model governing equations, (3) determine the net pressure needed to achieve a certain height growth, and (4) obtain the maximum net pressure assuring no fracture invasion into aquifers. This model may be incorporated into current hydraulic fracture simulation software to yield more accurate and cost-effective hydraulic fracturing designs.


Author(s):  
Baotang Shen ◽  
Ove Stephansson ◽  
Mikael Rinne

1983 ◽  
pp. 1-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Schmidt ◽  
H. P. Rossmanith

SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 2148-2162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengcheng Fu ◽  
Jixiang Huang ◽  
Randolph R. Settgast ◽  
Joseph P. Morris ◽  
Frederick J. Ryerson

Summary The height growth of a hydraulic fracture is known to be affected by many factors that are related to the layered structure of sedimentary rocks. Although these factors are often used to qualitatively explain why hydraulic fractures usually have well–bounded height growth, most of them cannot be directly and quantitatively characterized for a given reservoir to enable a priori prediction of fracture–height growth. In this work, we study the role of the “roughness” of in–situ–stress profiles, in particular alternating low and high stress among rock layers, in determining the tendency of a hydraulic fracture to propagate horizontally vs. vertically. We found that a hydraulic fracture propagates horizontally in low–stress layers ahead of neighboring high–stress layers. Under such a configuration, a fracture–mechanics principle dictates that the net pressure required for horizontal growth of high–stress layers within the current fracture height is significantly lower than that required for additional vertical growth across rock layers. Without explicit consideration of the stress–roughness profile, the system behaves as if the rock is tougher against vertical propagation than it is against horizontal fracture propagation. We developed a simple relationship between the apparent differential rock toughness and characteristics of the stress roughness that induce equivalent overall fracture shapes. This relationship enables existing hydraulic–fracture models to represent the effects of rough in–situ stress on fracture growth without directly representing the fine–resolution rough–stress profiles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document