scholarly journals Forward modelling the rubber hand: illusion of ownership modifies motor-sensory predictions by the brain

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 160407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Aymerich-Franch ◽  
Damien Petit ◽  
Abderrahmane Kheddar ◽  
Gowrishankar Ganesh
Keyword(s):  
Haptic Perception ◽  
Forward Model ◽  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
Self And Other ◽  
Sensory Predictions ◽  
Motor Actions ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Real Hand

The question of how we attribute observed body parts as our own, and the consequences of this attribution on our sensory-motor processes, is fundamental to understand how our brain distinguishes between self and other. Previous studies have identified interactions between the illusion of ownership, and multi-sensory integration and cross-sensory predictions by the brain. Here we show that illusory ownership additionally modifies the motor-sensory predictions by the brain. In our preliminary experiments, we observed a new numbness illusion following the classical rubber-hand illusion (RHI); brushing only the rubber hand after induction of the RHI results in illusory numbness in one's real hand. Previous studies have shown that self-generated actions (like tickling) are attenuated by motor-sensory predictions by the so-called forward model . Motivated by this finding, here we examined whether the numbness illusion after the RHI is different when the rubber hand is brushed oneself, compared with when the brushing is performed by another. We observed that, all other conditions remaining the same, haptic perception in the real hand was lower (numbness higher) during self-generated brushing. Our result suggests that RHI reorganizes the forward model, such that we predict haptic consequences of self-generated motor actions on the rubber hand.

scholarly journals Direct coupling of haptic signals between hands

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 619-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucile Dupin ◽  
Vincent Hayward ◽  
Mark Wexler
Keyword(s):  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Haptic Perception ◽  
Direct Coupling ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Stationary Object ◽  
General Phenomenon ◽  
Sensory Inputs ◽  
Motor Actions ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Temporal Offset

Although motor actions can profoundly affect the perceptual interpretation of sensory inputs, it is not known whether the combination of sensory and movement signals occurs only for sensory surfaces undergoing movement or whether it is a more general phenomenon. In the haptic modality, the independent movement of multiple sensory surfaces poses a challenge to the nervous system when combining the tactile and kinesthetic signals into a coherent percept. When exploring a stationary object, the tactile and kinesthetic signals come from the same hand. Here we probe the internal structure of haptic combination by directing the two signal streams to separate hands: one hand moves but receives no tactile stimulation, while the other hand feels the consequences of the first hand’s movement but remains still. We find that both discrete and continuous tactile and kinesthetic signals are combined as if they came from the same hand. This combination proceeds by direct coupling or transfer of the kinesthetic signal from the moving to the feeling hand, rather than assuming the displacement of a mediating object. The combination of signals is due to perception rather than inference, because a small temporal offset between the signals significantly degrades performance. These results suggest that the brain simplifies the complex coordinate transformation task of remapping sensory inputs to take into account the movements of multiple body parts in haptic perception, and they show that the effects of action are not limited to moving sensors.

scholarly journals The supernumerary rubber hand illusion revisited: perceived duplication of limbs and visuotactile events

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenggui Fan ◽  
H. Henrik Ehrsson
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Neuroscience ◽  
Body Representation ◽  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Body Ownership ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
Real Right ◽  
The Real ◽  
Skin Conductance Responses ◽  
Supernumerary Limbs ◽  
Real Hand

A controversial and unresolved issue in cognitive neuroscience is whether humans can experience supernumerary limbs as part of their own body. Some previous experiments have claimed that it is possible to elicit supernumerary hand illusions based on modified versions of the rubber hand illusion. However, other studies have provided conflicting results that suggest that only one rubber hand can be perceived as one’s own. To address this issue, we developed a supernumerary hand illusion paradigm that allowed us to disambiguate ownership of individual rubber hands from simultaneous ownership of two fake hands. In our setup, the participant’s real right hand was hidden under a platform, while two identical right rubber hands were placed in parallel on top of the platform in direct view of the participant. We applied synchronous strokes to both rubber hands and the real hand (SS), synchronous strokes to one rubber hand and the real hand and asynchronous strokes to the other model hand (AS and SA) or asynchronous strokes to both fake hands in relation to the real hand (AA). Our results demonstrate that a genuine illusion of owning two rubber hands can be elicited and that such a supernumerary hand illusion can be isolated from the sense of ownership of a single rubber hand both in terms of questionnaire ratings and threat-evoked skin conductance responses (SCRs). These findings advance our knowledge about the dynamic flexibility and fundamental constraints of body representation and emphasize the importance of correlated afferent signals for causal inference in body ownership.

scholarly journals Is This Hand for Real? Attenuation of the Rubber Hand Illusion by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Inferior Parietal Lobule

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1311-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein P. M. Kammers ◽  
Lennart Verhagen ◽  
H. Chris Dijkerman ◽  
Hinze Hogendoorn ◽  
Frederique De Vignemont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Parietal Lobule ◽  
Real Hand

In the rubber hand illusion (RHI), participants incorporate a rubber hand into a mental representation of one's body. This deceptive feeling of ownership is accompanied by recalibration of the perceived position of the participant's real hand toward the rubber hand. Neuroimaging data suggest involvement of the posterior parietal lobule during induction of the RHI, when recalibration of the real hand toward the rubber hand takes place. Here, we used off-line low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in a double-blind, sham-controlled within-subjects design to investigate the role of the inferior posterior parietal lobule (IPL) in establishing the RHI directly. Results showed that rTMS over the IPL attenuated the strength of the RHI for immediate perceptual body judgments only. In contrast, delayed perceptual responses were unaffected. Furthermore, ballistic action responses as well as subjective self-reports of feeling of ownership over the rubber hand remained unaffected by rTMS over the IPL. These findings are in line with previous research showing that the RHI can be broken down into dissociable bodily sensations. The illusion does not merely affect the embodiment of the rubber hand but also influences the experience and localization of one's own hand in an independent manner. Finally, the present findings concur with a multicomponent model of somatosensory body representations, wherein the IPL plays a pivotal role in subserving perceptual body judgments, but not actions or higher-order affective bodily judgments.

Tactile and vestibular mechanisms underlying ownership for body parts: A non-visual variant of the rubber hand illusion

2012 ◽  
Vol 511 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Lopez ◽  
Corinne P. Bieri ◽  
Nora Preuss ◽  
Fred W. Mast
Keyword(s):  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Rubber Hand

scholarly journals Attenuation of sensory processing in the primary somatosensory cortex during rubber hand illusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Sakamoto ◽  
Hirotoshi Ifuku
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
The Body ◽  
Neural Representation ◽  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Somatosensory Processing ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
The Brain

AbstractThe neural representation of the body is easily altered by the integration of multiple sensory signals in the brain. The “rubber hand illusion” (RHI) is one of the most popular experimental paradigms to investigate this phenomenon. During this illusion, a feeling of ownership of the rubber hand is created. Some studies have shown that somatosensory processing in the brain is attenuated when RHI occurs. However, it is unknown where attenuation of somatosensory processing occurs. Here, we show that somatosensory processing is attenuated in the primary somatosensory cortex. We found that the earliest response of somatosensory evoked potentials, which is thought to originate from the primary somatosensory cortex, was attenuated during RHI. Furthermore, this attenuation was observed before the occurrence of the illusion. Our results suggest that attenuation of sensory processing in the primary somatosensory cortex is one of the factors influencing the occurrence of the RHI.

No consistent cooling of the real hand in the rubber hand illusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyanne M. de Haan ◽  
Haike E. Van Stralen ◽  
Miranda Smit ◽  
Anouk Keizer ◽  
Stefan Van der Stigchel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Hand

scholarly journals The body-ownership is unconsciously distorted in the brain: An event-related potential study of rubber hand illusion

Psihologija ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Aitao Lu ◽  
Xuebin Wang ◽  
Xiuxiu Hong ◽  
Tianhua Song ◽  
Meifang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Stage ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
The Body ◽  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Proprioceptive Information ◽  
Body Ownership ◽  
Conflict Monitoring ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
The Brain

Many studies have reported that bottom-up multisensory integration of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive information can distort our sense of body-ownership, producing rubber hand illusion (RHI). There is less evidence about when and how the body-ownership is distorted in the brain during RHI. To examine whether this illusion effect occurs preattentively at an early stage of processing, we monitored the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) component (the index of automatic deviant detection) and N2 (the index for conflict monitoring). Participants first performed an RHI elicitation task in a synchronous or asynchronous setting and then finished a passive visual oddball task in which the deviant stimuli were unrelated to the explicit task. A significant interaction between Deviancy (deviant hand vs. standard hand) and Group (synchronous vs. asynchronous) was found. The asynchronous group showed clear mismatch effects in both vMMN and N2, while the synchronous group had such effect only in N2. The results indicate that after the elicitation of RHI bottom-up integration could be retrieved at the early stage of sensory processing before top-down processing, providing evidence for the priority of the bottom-up processes after the generation of RHI and revealing the mechanism of how the body-ownership is unconsciously distorted in the brain.

Attenuated Input to the Primary Somatosensory Cortex is Associated with the Occurrence of Rubber Hand Illusion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Sakamoto ◽  
Hirotoshi Ifuku
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Early Response ◽  
The Body ◽  
Neural Representation ◽  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Somatosensory Processing ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
Somatosensory Input ◽  
The Brain

Abstract The neural representation of the body is easily altered by the integration of multiple sensory signals in the brain. The “rubber hand illusion” (RHI) is one of the most popular experimental paradigms to investigate this phenomenon. During this illusion, ownership of the rubber hand is created. Some studies have shown that somatosensory processing in the brain is attenuated when RHI occurs. However, it is unknown where attenuation of somatosensory inputs occurs. Here, we show that somatosensory input from the hand is attenuated at the primary somatosensory cortex. We found that the early response of somatosensory evoked potential, which is thought to originate from the primary somatosensory cortex, was attenuated during RHI. Furthermore, this attenuation was observed before the occurrence of the illusion. Our results suggest that attenuation of somatosensory inputs from the hand to the brain is one of the factors influencing the occurrence of the RHI.

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Referral of Touch and the Feeling of Ownership in the Rubber Hand Illusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arran T. Reader ◽  
Victoria S. Trifonova ◽  
H. Henrik Ehrsson
Keyword(s):  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Rubber Hand Illusion ◽  
Body Ownership ◽  
Experimental Paradigm ◽  
Rubber Hand ◽  
The Real ◽  
Strong Positive Relationship ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Real Hand

The rubber hand illusion (RHI) is one of the most commonly used paradigms to examine the sense of body ownership. Touches are synchronously applied to the real hand, hidden from view, and a false hand in an anatomically congruent position. During the illusion one may perceive that the feeling of touch arises from the false hand (referral of touch), and that the false hand is one's own. The relationship between referral of touch and body ownership in the illusion is unclear, and some articles average responses to statements addressing these experiences, which may be inappropriate depending on the research question of interest. To address these concerns, we re-analyzed three freely available datasets to better understand the relationship between referral of touch and feeling of ownership in the RHI. We found that most participants who report a feeling of ownership also report referral of touch, and that referral of touch and ownership show a moderately strong positive relationship that was highly replicable. In addition, referral of touch tends to be reported more strongly and more frequently than the feeling of ownership over the hand. The former observations confirm that referral of touch and ownership are related experiences in the RHI. The latter, however, indicate that when pooling the statements one may obtain a higher number of illusion ‘responders’ compared to considering the ownership statements in isolation. These results have implications for the RHI as an experimental paradigm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document