scholarly journals Limited male incubation ability and the evolution of egg size in shorebirds

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terje Lislevand ◽  
Gavin H Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Egg Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Evolution ◽  
Female Body Mass ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Relationship

In bird species where males incubate but are smaller than females, egg size may be constrained by male body size, and hence ability to incubate the eggs. Using data from 71 such shorebird species, we show that egg size decreases as the degree of female-biased sexual size dimorphism increases, after controlling for female body mass. Relative egg size was not related to mean clutch size. However, when controlling for mating system, the relationship between female-biased sexual size dimorphism and relative egg size was only significant in polyandrous species. The relatively small eggs of socially polyandrous shorebirds have previously been explained as an energy-saving strategy associated with the production of multiple clutches. Our findings suggest that egg size evolution is better explained by male incubation limitation in these birds.

Sexual size dimorphism in the American rubyspot: male body size predicts male competition and mating success

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Serrano-Meneses ◽  
A. Córdoba-Aguilar ◽  
V. Méndez ◽  
S.J. Layen ◽  
T. Székely
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Mating Success ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Competition ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body Size

Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of North American Ratsnakes (Pantherophis spp. s.l.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (11) ◽  
pp. 1196-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A. DeGregorio ◽  
Gabriel Blouin-Demers ◽  
Gerardo L.F. Carfagno ◽  
J. Whitfield Gibbons ◽  
Stephen J. Mullin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Variation ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Complex Species ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Body Size Variation ◽  
Female Body Size

Because body size affects nearly all facets of an organism’s life history, ecologists have long been interested in large-scale patterns of body-size variation, as well as why those large-scale patterns often differ between sexes. We explored body-size variation across the range of the sexually dimorphic Ratsnake complex (species of the genus Pantherophis Fitzinger, 1843 s.l.; formerly Elaphe obsoleta (Say in James, 1823)) in North America. We specifically explored whether variation in body size followed latitudinal patterns or varied with climatic variables. We found that body size did not conform to a climatic or latitudinal gradient, but instead, some of the populations with the largest snakes occurred near the core of the geographic range and some with the smallest occurred near the northern, western, and southern peripheries of the range. Males averaged 14% larger than females, although the degree of sexual size dimorphism varied between populations (range: 2%–25%). There was a weak trend for male body size to change in relation to temperature, whereas female body size did not. Our results indicate that relationships between climate and an ectotherm’s body size are more complicated than linear latitudinal clines and likely differ for males and females.

scholarly journals Sexual Size Dimorphism and Morphological Evidence Supporting the Recognition of two Subspecies in the Galápagos Dove

The Condor ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-141
Author(s):  
Diego Santiago-Alarcon ◽  
Patricia G. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Morphological Evidence ◽  
Life History Variation ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Selective Pressures ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Discriminant Analyses

Abstract Abstract Sexual size dimorphism is a conspicuous trait of many wild bird species. Differences in body size between the sexes might reflect selective pressures and trade-offs to optimize performance. Here, we analyze the size dimorphism of the Galápagos Dove (Zenaida galapagoensis) using principal component and discriminant analyses with samples obtained from six islands: Santiago, Santa Fe, Santa Cruz, Española, Genovesa, and Wolf. We also reanalyze published morphological data but also including additional samples from Wolf Island to account for morphological differences among islands. Males were significantly larger than females. Discriminant analyses correctly classified 98% of males and 100% of females, and cross-validation of the model correctly classified 97% of males and 98% of females. We created two sexual size dimorphism indices using wing chord and tarsus as body-size surrogates. Significant differences were found in the sexual size dimorphism index for both measurements among islands. Significant differences in sexual size dimorphism among islands might indicate the role of different selective pressures acting on individual islands (e.g., competition, predation, resources, sexual selection), which might result in life history variation of the species among islands. For the first time, we provide significant morphological evidence supporting the classification of the Galápagos Dove into two subspecies: Z. g. galapagoensis and Z. g. exsul.

scholarly journals Sneaker Males Affect Fighter Male Body Size and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Salmon

2016 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K. Weir ◽  
Holly K. Kindsvater ◽  
Kyle A. Young ◽  
John D. Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body Size

scholarly journals Macroevolutionary Patterns of Sexual Size Dimorphism Among African Tree Frogs (Family: Hyperoliidae)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M Portik ◽  
David C Blackburn ◽  
Jimmy A McGuire
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Sex Change ◽  
Sexual Dichromatism ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Scaling ◽  
Scaling Relationship ◽  
Size Evolution ◽  
Selective Forces ◽  
Protogynous Sex Change

Abstract Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is shaped by multiple selective forces that drive the evolution of sex-specific body size, resulting in male or female-biased SSD. Stronger selection on one sex can result in an allometric body size scaling relationship consistent with Rensch’s rule or its converse. Anurans (frogs and toads) generally display female-biased SSD, but there is variation across clades and the mechanisms driving the evolution of SSD remain poorly understood. We investigated these topics in a diverse family of African treefrogs (Hyperoliidae). Hyperoliids display traits considered rare among amphibians, including sexual dichromatism and protogynous sex change. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we tested if adult ecology, sexual dichromatism, and sex change were predictors of body size or SSD. We also tested whether hyperoliids displayed allometric interspecific body size scaling relationships. We found a majority of hyperoliid taxa display female-biased SSD, but that adult ecology and sexual dichromatism are poor predictors of sex-specific body size and SSD. Regardless of the groupings analyzed (partitioned by clades or traits), we found support for isometric body size scaling. However, we found that sex change is a significant predictor of SSD variation. Species in the Hyperolius viridiflavus complex, which putatively display this trait, show a significant reduction in SSD and are frequently sexually monomorphic in size. Although protogynous sex change needs to be validated for several of these species, we tentatively propose this trait is a novel mechanism influencing anuran body size evolution. Beyond this association, additional factors that shape the evolution of anuran body size and SSD remain elusive.

Eastern Garter Snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) with proportionally larger heads are in better condition

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Elgee ◽  
Gabriel Blouin-Demers
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Head Size ◽  
Thamnophis Sirtalis ◽  
Garter Snakes ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Trophic Morphology ◽  
Large Head ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractWe investigated sexual size dimorphism and trophic morphology dimorphism in Eastern Garter Snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) to test predictions derived from the reproductive role hypothesis. Our first objective was to examine whether structures involved in feeding (head and jaws) are more divergent than body size. Female T. sirtalis were larger than males and had proportionally larger heads. Our second objective was to look for an advantage of large head size by examining the relationship between body condition and head size. Body condition was positively correlated with relative head size in T. sirtalis for both sexes, in agreement with the reproductive role hypothesis.

scholarly journals Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaž Kuntner ◽  
Chris A. Hamilton ◽  
Cheng Ren-Chung ◽  
Matjaž Gregorič ◽  
Nik Lupše ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Female Body ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Female Size ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Female Body Size ◽  
Size Evolution ◽  
Web Size ◽  
Cope’S Rule

AbstractInstances of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) provide the context for rigorous tests of biological rules of size evolution, such as Cope’s Rule (phyletic size increase), Rensch’s Rule (allometric patterns of male and female size), as well as male and female body size optima. In certain spider groups, such as the golden orbweavers (Nephilidae), extreme female-biased SSD (eSSD, female:male body length ≥ 2) is the norm. Nephilid genera construct webs of exaggerated proportions which can be aerial, arboricolous, or intermediate (hybrid). First, we established the backbone phylogeny of Nephilidae using 367 Anchored Hybrid Enrichment (AHE) markers, then combined these data with classical markers for a reference species-level phylogeny. Second, we used the phylogeny to test Cope and Rensch’s Rules, sex specific size optima, and the coevolution of web size, type, and features with female and male body size and their ratio, SSD. Male, but not female, size increases significantly over time, and refutes Cope’s Rule. Allometric analyses reject the converse, Rensch’s Rule. Male and female body sizes are uncorrelated. Female size evolution is random, but males evolve towards an optimum size (3.2–4.9 mm). Overall, female body size correlates positively with absolute web size. However, intermediate sized females build the largest webs (of the hybrid type), giant female Nephila and Trichonephila build smaller webs (of the aerial type), and the smallest females build the smallest webs (of the arboricolous type). We propose taxonomic changes based on the criteria of clade age, monophyly and exclusivity, classification information content, diagnosability, and arachnological community practice. We resurrect the family Nephilidae Simon 1894 that contains Clitaetra Simon 1889, the Cretaceous Geratonephila Poinar & Buckley 2012, Herennia Thorell 1877, Indoetra Kuntner 2006, new rank, Nephila Leach 1815, Nephilengys L. Koch 1872, Nephilingis Kuntner 2013, and Trichonephila Dahl 1911, new rank. We propose the new clade Orbipurae to contain Araneidae Clerck 1757, Phonognathidae Simon 1894, new rank, and Nephilidae. Nephilid female gigantism is a phylogenetically-ancient phenotype (over 100 ma), as is eSSD, though their magnitudes vary by lineage and, to some extent, biogeographically.

Potential mechanisms of phenotypic divergence in body size between Newfoundland and mainland black bear populations

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 1650-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane P Mahoney ◽  
John A Virgl ◽  
Kim Mawhinney
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Black Bear ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Black Bears ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism

Phenotypic variation in body size and degree of sexual size dimorphism of North American black bears (Ursus americanus) was quantified for populations from New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Maine, Alaska, and the island of Newfoundland. Based on a model of island biogeography developed by Case, we predicted that body size should be larger in Newfoundland bears than in mainland populations. The presence of few large predators and minimal competition between herbivore prey on Newfoundland allow an appropriate test of the model (i.e., food availability for bears may differ between populations on the mainland and in Newfoundland). In addition, sexual-selection theory predicts that the coevolution of polygyny and large size will be coupled with an increase in sexual size dimorphism. Therefore, we also predicted that among the six populations, male body mass should scale hyperallometrically with female body mass (i.e., slope > 1). Analysis of deterministic growth curves indicated that bears from Newfoundland attained greater asymptotic body size than populations on the mainland, which supports our first prediction. On average, the relative difference in asymptotic body mass between females from the island and mainland populations was 55%, while the relative difference between males was 37%. However, we found that sexual size dimorphism did not increase disproportionately with body mass among the six populations, which refuted our second prediction. We discuss a range of abiotic and biotic selection pressures possibly responsible for larger body size in Newfoundland bears. We suggest that the ability to exploit seasonally abundant and spatially dispersed dietary protein by female and male black bears on the island has been and is still a primary environmental factor selecting for large body size in Newfoundland bears. Although the relationship between sexual size dimorphism and body size is tenuous (slope [Formula: see text] 1), it does suggest that (an)other adaptive mechanism(s), opposing sexual selection for extreme male size, explain(s) a large amount of the variation in sexual size dimorphism among black bear populations.

Effects of body size and mass on running speed of male yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus)

2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (9) ◽  
pp. 1584-1587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde ◽  
John S Millar
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Mating Success ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Small Male ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Running Speed ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body Size ◽  
Tamias Amoenus ◽  
Yellow Pine

Male-biased sexual size dimorphism in mammals is usually attributed to the success of large males in intrasexual combat for mates. However, mating success may be determined by contests that are not combative. In the mating chase of the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), a mammalian species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism, fast males may have an advantage in acquiring matings with estrous females. However, the effects of intraspecific variation in body size on running speed are not obvious; heavy individuals may run more slowly than light individuals because excess mass can be a hindrance to locomotion, but individuals that are structurally large may run faster than small individuals because of longer stride length. We examined the effects of both body mass and structural size on running speed in male yellow-pine chipmunks using manipulated runs in which male chipmunks were chased over a known distance. Structurally large male chipmunks had faster running speeds than small males, potentially giving large males an advantage when chasing estrous females. However, small male chipmunks are known to be aggressively dominant over large males. This leads to a potential trade-off in male body size between two behavioural components of mating success (running speed and dominance) that may constrain the evolution of male body size, ultimately leading to female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

scholarly journals Sex-Specific Plasticity Explains Genetic Variation in Sexual Size Dimorphism in Drosophila

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Vea ◽  
Austin S Wilcox ◽  
W Anthony Frankino ◽  
Alexander W Shingleton
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
The Body ◽  
Condition Dependence ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Developmental Genetic ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Genetic Mechanisms

The difference in body size between females and males, or sexual size dimorphism (SSD), is almost ubiquitous, and yet we have a remarkably poor understanding of the developmental-genetic mechanisms that generate it. Such an understanding is important if we are to distinguish between the many theoretical models of SSD evolution. One such model is the condition dependence hypothesis, which proposes that the body size of the larger sex is also more environmentally sensitive, a phenomenon called sex-specific plasticity (SSP). Because SSP generates differences in female and male body size, selection on plasticity may underlie the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. To test this hypothesis, however, we need to know the genetic architecture of both SSD and SSP, which is challenging because both are characteristics of populations not individuals. Here, we overcome this challenge by using isogenic lineages of Drosophila to measure both SSD and SSP for a genotype. We demonstrate extensive genetic variation for SSD among genotypes that is tightly correlated with variation in SSP, indicating that the same developmental-genetic mechanisms regulate both phenomena. These data support the condition dependence hypothesis and suggest that the observed SSD is a consequence of selection on the developmental-genetic mechanisms that regulate SSP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document