Eloxatin Approved for Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
&NA;
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment

Progress in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer

JAMA ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 294 (21) ◽  
pp. 2758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Frederico Costa
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment

Animal Models to Test Adjuvant Treatment: An Experimental Model of Colon Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selma Becherirat ◽  
Fatemeh Valamanesh ◽  
Clarisse Eveno ◽  
Julie Sedbon ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Experimental Model ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment

scholarly journals Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borut Stabuc
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oral Fluoropyrimidines ◽  
Significant Difference

Colorectal cancer alone accounts for around 200,000 deaths in Europe and represents a significant health problem. Although about fifty percent of patients are cured by surgery alone, the other half will eventually die due to metastatic disease, which includes approximately 25% of patients who have evidence of metastases at the time of diagnosis. Surgical resection of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes is the only curative therapy for colorectal cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III for colon cancer following curative resection has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence by 19-40% and of death by 16-33%. Today, 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin given for six months may represent the best adjuvant treatment available The contribution of levamisole to adjuvant treatment seems to be marginal, if any. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for the patients with Dukes B colon cancer is less clear. A meta-analysis of 1,381 patients with advanced colorectal cancer showed a significant increase in response rate with the bolus 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin versus 5-fluoroUracil alone but no significant difference in median survival. Continuous infusion allows higher doses of 5-FU than rapid bolus infusion and improves response rate survival and time to progression. Oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and Uracil/Tegafur [UFT]) are as active as intravenous fluoropyrimidines. Compared to intravenous 5FU, oral fluoropyrimidines have safety advantages clinical benefits, and are more convenient for patients. Phase III randomized clinical trials in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer demonstrate the significant superiority of combining irinotecan with 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin or oxaliplatin with 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin over the same 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin alone. Several phase II studies have shown that the combination of the oral fluoropyrimidines plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin is very active in metastatic colorectal cancer. Trials with agents acting on novel targets in colorectal cancer are progressing rapidly, including doxifluridine, new inhibitors of thymidylate synthase (ZD9331), oral camptothecins (Rubitecan), multitarget antifolate antimetabolite (Premetrexet), inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (Cetuximab), COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib) and farnesyltransferaze inhibitors (Zarnestra). However, a few randomized trials failed to show a survival advantage compared with placebo in patients with advanced refractory colorectal cancer.

Mismatch repair status predicts survival after adjuvant treatment in stage II colon cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 392-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Gkekas ◽  
J. Novotny ◽  
P. Fabian ◽  
R. Nemecek ◽  
R. Palmqvist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Mismatch Repair Status ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

scholarly journals Biopsychosocial and clinical characteristics in patients with resected breast and colon cancer at the beginning and end of adjuvant treatment

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa García-García ◽  
Alberto Carmona-Bayonas ◽  
Paula Jimenez-Fonseca ◽  
Carlos Jara ◽  
Carmen Beato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Perceived Social Support ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to analyze biopsychosocial factors affecting how patients cope with cancer and adjuvant treatment and to appraise psychological distress, coping, perceived social support, quality of life and SDM before and after adjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients compared to colon cancer patients. Methods NEOcoping is a national, multicenter, cross-sectional, prospective study. The sample comprised 266 patients with colon cancer and 231 with breast cancer. The instruments used were the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-Patient (SDM-Q-9) and Physician’s (SDM-Q-Doc), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ). Results Breast cancer patients reacted worse to the diagnosis of cancer with more symptoms of anxiety, depression, and somatization, and were less satisfied with their involvement than those with colon cancer (p = 0.003). Participants with colon cancer were older and had more physical symptoms and functional limitations at the beginning of adjuvant treatment, while there were scarcely any differences between the two groups at the end of adjuvancy, at which time both groups suffered greater psychological and physical effects and scored lower on coping strategies, except for anxious preoccupation. Conclusions Breast cancer patients need more information and involvement of the oncologist in shared decision-making, as well as and more medical and psychological support when beginning adjuvant treatment. Both breast and colon cancer patients may require additional psychological care at the end of adjuvancy.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (9) ◽  
pp. 1195-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Eggington ◽  
P Tappenden ◽  
A Pandor ◽  
S Paisley ◽  
M Saunders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as Adjuvant Treatment for Colon Cancer

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly McLeon
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Study Intervention ◽  
Disease Free

The landmark MOSAIC trial examined whether the addition of oxaliplatin to a postoperative adjuvant treatment regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin affected disease-free survival from colon cancer. The MOSAIC trial established the efficacy of FOLFOX over 5-FU/LV as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer and established FOLFOX4 as the reference standard for adjuvant treatment for stage III disease. This chapter describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document