Air Pollution Toxicity to Eastern White Pine in Indiana and Wisconsin

Plant Disease ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland W. Usher
1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. F. Benoit ◽  
J. M. Skelly ◽  
L. D. Moore ◽  
L. S. Dochinger

Along the Blue Ridge Parkway in Virginia, branchlets and pollen were collected from native eastern white pine (Pinusstrobus L.) trees that were sensitive, intermediate, and tolerant to oxidant air pollution based on foliar symptom expression. Fumigation of branchlets with 0.10 ppm ozone (O3) for 4 or 8 h/day until anthesis did not affect pollen production or germinability. However, the percent germination was significantly (P ≤ 0.01) reduced in pollen exposed under wet conditions to 0.15 O3 for 4 h. The importance of this finding in the reproduction of pines is discussed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Bennett ◽  
Robert L. Anderson ◽  
Manfred L. Mielke ◽  
James J. Ebersole

1973 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Berry

The possibility of selecting clones of eastern white pine (Pinusstrobus L.) with specific sensitivities to different air pollution regimes was investigated. Field screening was carried out by exposing potted seedlings to field conditions for 1 year or longer in each of three areas where a particular phytotoxicant was known to predominate. The areas were characterized by the following pollution sources and major phytotoxicants: (1) power plant, sulfur dioxide; (2) fertilizer plant, fluorides; and (3) vehicular traffic, oxidants. Selections were made of: (1) trees injured during only one season in one area; (2) trees injured during both the summer and winter, but only in one area; (3) trees resistant to air pollution in all three areas; and (4) trees sensitive to air pollution in all three areas. These selections are being propagated for use as specifically sensitive bioindicators of air pollution and as resistant lines for use in seed orchards of white pine.


2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Drever ◽  
James Snider ◽  
Mark C. Drever

Our objective was to assess the relative rarity and representation within protected areas of Standard Forest Units (SFUs) in northeastern Ontario by applying the concepts of geographic range, habitat specificity, and local population size. SFUs are stand type classifications, routinely employed by forest managers, based on tree composition, disturbance history, and prescribed silvicultural system. We identified several SFUs as rare because of a narrow distribution, association with only one landform type, or lack of at least one stand larger than an ecoregion-specific threshold. In the Boreal forest, rare SFUs comprised stands dominated by eastern hemlock ( Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrière), red oak ( Quercus rubra L.), yellow birch ( Betula alleghaniensis Britt.), or eastern white-cedar ( Thuja occidentalis L.). Rare SFUs also included eastern white pine ( Pinus strobus L.) and (or) red pine ( Pinus resinosa Ait.) leading stands managed by shelterwood or seed tree silviculture as well as low-lying deciduous stands and selection-managed stands of shade-tolerant species. In the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence forest, rare SFUs were yellow birch stands, stands dominated by conifer species abundant in the Boreal, and shelterwood-managed hardwood stands. Several rare SFUs had <12% of their total area in protection, i.e., stands dominated by eastern white pine, yellow birch, eastern white pine – red oak, or eastern white-cedar. These rare stand types require increased protection in reserves and tailored silvicultural practices to maintain their probability of persistence.


2013 ◽  
Vol 298 ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Waskiewicz ◽  
Laura Kenefic ◽  
Aaron Weiskittel ◽  
Robert Seymour

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document