scholarly journals DNA Double-Strand Breaks and DNA Recombination in Benzene Metabolite-Induced Genotoxicity

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 569-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. W. Y. Tung ◽  
N. A. Philbrook ◽  
K. D. D. MacDonald ◽  
L. M. Winn
Keyword(s):  
Dna Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

scholarly journals Critical Role of RecN in Recombinational DNA Repair and Survival of Helicobacter pylori

2007 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ge Wang ◽  
Robert J. Maier
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Parent Strain ◽  
Dna Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Air Exposure ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
H Pylori

ABSTRACT Homologous recombination is one of the key mechanisms responsible for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Recombinational repair normally requires a battery of proteins, each with specific DNA recognition, strand transfer, resolution, or other functions. Helicobacter pylori lacks many of the proteins normally involved in the early stage (presynapsis) of recombinational repair, but it has a RecN homologue with an unclear function. A recN mutant strain of H. pylori was shown to be much more sensitive than its parent to mitomycin C, an agent predominantly causing DNA double-strand breaks. The recN strain was unable to survive exposure to either air or acid as well as the parent strain, and air exposure resulted in no viable recN cells recovered after 8 h. In oxidative stress conditions (i.e., air exposure), a recN strain accumulated significantly more damaged (multiply fragmented) DNA than the parent strain. To assess the DNA recombination abilities of strains, their transformation abilities were compared by separately monitoring transformation using H. pylori DNA fragments containing either a site-specific mutation (conferring rifampin resistance) or a large insertion (kanamycin resistance cassette). The transformation frequencies using the two types of DNA donor were 10- and 50-fold lower, respectively, for the recN strain than for the wild type, indicating that RecN plays an important role in facilitating DNA recombination. In two separate mouse colonization experiments, the recN strain colonized most of the stomachs, but the average number of recovered cells was 10-fold less for the mutant than for the parent strain (a statistically significant difference). Complementation of the recN strain by chromosomal insertion of a functional recN gene restored both the recombination frequency and mouse colonization ability to the wild-type levels. Thus, H. pylori RecN, as a component of DNA recombinational repair, plays a significant role in H. pylori survival in vivo.

scholarly journals Mdt1 Facilitates Efficient Repair of Blocked DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Recombinational Maintenance of Telomeres

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 6532-6545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brietta L. Pike ◽  
Jörg Heierhorst
Keyword(s):  
Dna Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Telomere Maintenance ◽  
Type I ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dramatic Shift ◽  
Recombination Pathway

ABSTRACT DNA recombination plays critical roles in DNA repair and alternative telomere maintenance. Here we show that absence of the SQ/TQ cluster domain-containing protein Mdt1 (Ybl051c) renders Saccharomyces cerevisiae particularly hypersensitive to bleomycin, a drug that causes 3′-phospho-glycolate-blocked DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). mdt1Δ also hypersensitizes partially recombination-defective cells to camptothecin-induced 3′-phospho-tyrosyl protein-blocked DSBs. Remarkably, whereas mdt1Δ cells are unable to restore broken chromosomes after bleomycin treatment, they efficiently repair “clean” endonuclease-generated DSBs. Epistasis analyses indicate that MDT1 acts in the repair of bleomycin-induced DSBs by regulating the efficiency of the homologous recombination pathway as well as telomere-related functions of the KU complex. Moreover, mdt1Δ leads to severe synthetic growth defects with a deletion of the recombination facilitator and telomere-positioning factor gene CTF18 already in the absence of exogenous DNA damage. Importantly, mdt1Δ causes a dramatic shift from the usually prevalent type II to the less-efficient type I pathway of recombinational telomere maintenance in the absence of telomerase in liquid senescence assays. As telomeres resemble protein-blocked DSBs, the results indicate that Mdt1 acts in a novel blocked-end-specific recombination pathway that is required for the efficiency of both drug-induced DSB repair and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance.

scholarly journals DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Telomeres Play Important Roles in Trypanosoma brucei Antigenic Variation

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bibo Li
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Surface Antigen ◽  
Antigenic Variation ◽  
Dna Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Microbial Pathogens ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Major Surface

ABSTRACTHuman-infecting microbial pathogens all face a serious problem of elimination by the host immune response. Antigenic variation is an effective immune evasion mechanism where the pathogen regularly switches its major surface antigen. In many cases, the major surface antigen is encoded by genes from the same gene family, and its expression is strictly monoallelic. Among pathogens that undergo antigenic variation,Trypanosoma brucei(a kinetoplastid), which causes human African trypanosomiasis,Plasmodium falciparum(an apicomplexan), which causes malaria,Pneumocystis jirovecii(a fungus), which causes pneumonia, andBorrelia burgdorferi(a bacterium), which causes Lyme disease, also express their major surface antigens from loci next to the telomere. Except forPlasmodium, DNA recombination-mediated gene conversion is a major pathway for surface antigen switching in these pathogens. In the last decade, more sophisticated molecular and genetic tools have been developed inT. brucei, and our knowledge of functions of DNA recombination in antigenic variation has been greatly advanced. VSG is the major surface antigen inT. brucei. In subtelomeric VSG expression sites (ESs),VSGgenes invariably are flanked by a long stretch of upstream 70-bp repeats. Recent studies have shown that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), particularly those in 70-bp repeats in the active ES, are a natural potent trigger for antigenic variation inT. brucei. In addition, telomere proteins can influence VSG switching by reducing the DSB amount at subtelomeric regions. These findings will be summarized and their implications will be discussed in this review.

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Region ◽  
Gene Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document