scholarly journals Reliable Phylogenetic Regressions for Multivariate Comparative Data: Illustration with the MANOVA and Application to the Effect of Diet on Mandible Morphology in Phyllostomid Bats

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Clavel ◽  
Hélène Morlon

Abstract Understanding what shapes species phenotypes over macroevolutionary timescales from comparative data often requires studying the relationship between phenotypes and putative explanatory factors or testing for differences in phenotypes across species groups. In phyllostomid bats for example, is mandible morphology associated to diet preferences? Performing such analyses depends upon reliable phylogenetic regression techniques and associated tests (e.g., phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares, pGLS, and phylogenetic analyses of variance and covariance, pANOVA, pANCOVA). While these tools are well established for univariate data, their multivariate counterparts are lagging behind. This is particularly true for high-dimensional phenotypic data, such as morphometric data. Here, we implement much-needed likelihood-based multivariate pGLS, pMANOVA, and pMANCOVA, and use a recently developed penalized-likelihood framework to extend their application to the difficult case when the number of traits $p$ approaches or exceeds the number of species $n$. We then focus on the pMANOVA and use intensive simulations to assess the performance of the approach as $p$ increases, under various levels of phylogenetic signal and correlations between the traits, phylogenetic structure in the predictors, and under various types of phenotypic differences across species groups. We show that our approach outperforms available alternatives under all circumstances, with greater power to detect phenotypic differences across species group when they exist, and a lower risk of improperly detecting nonexistent differences. Finally, we provide an empirical illustration of our pMANOVA on a geometric-morphometric data set describing mandible morphology in phyllostomid bats along with data on their diet preferences. Overall our results show significant differences between ecological groups. Our approach, implemented in the R package mvMORPH and illustrated in a tutorial for end-users, provides efficient multivariate phylogenetic regression tools for understanding what shapes phenotypic differences across species. [Generalized least squares; high-dimensional data sets; multivariate phylogenetic comparative methods; penalized likelihood; phenomics; phyllostomid bats; phylogenetic MANOVA; phylogenetic regression.]

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Clavel ◽  
Hélène Morlon

ABSTRACTUnderstanding what shapes species phenotypes over macroevolutionary time scales from comparative data requires the use of reliable phylogenetic regression techniques and associated tests (e.g. phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares, pGLS and phylogenetic analyses of variance and covariance, pANOVA, pANCOVA). While these tools are well established for univariate data, their multivariate counterparts are lagging behind. This is particularly true for high dimensional phenotypic data, such as morphometric data. Here we implement well-needed likelihood-based multivariate pGLS, pMANOVA and pMANCOVA, and use a recently-developed penalized likelihood framework to extend their application to the difficult case when the number of traits p approaches or exceeds the number of species n. We then focus on the pMANOVA and use intensive simulations to assess the performance of the approach as p increases, under various levels of phylogenetic signal and correlations between the traits, phylogenetic structure in the predictors, and under various types of phenotypic differences across species groups. We show that our approach outperforms available alternatives under all circumstances, with a greater power to detect phenotypic differences across species group when they exist, and a low risk to improperly detect inexistent differences. Finally, we provide an empirical illustration of our pMANOVA on a geometric-morphometric dataset describing mandible morphology in phyllostomid bats along with data on their diet preferences. Our approach, implemented in the R package mvMORPH, provides efficient multivariate phylogenetic regression tools for understanding what shapes phenotypic differences across species.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Saulsbury

AbstractThe analysis of patterns in comparative data has come to be dominated by least-squares regression, mainly as implemented in phylogenetic generalized least-squares (PGLS). This approach has two main drawbacks: it makes relatively restrictive assumptions about distributions and can only address questions about the conditional mean of one variable as a function of other variables. Here I introduce two new non-parametric constructs for the analysis of a broader range of comparative questions: phylogenetic permutation tests, based on cyclic permutations and permutations conserving phylogenetic signal. The cyclic permutation test, an extension of the restricted permutation test that performs exchanges by rotating nodes on the phylogeny, performs well within and outside the bounds where PGLS is applicable but can only be used for balanced trees. The signal-based permutation test has identical statistical properties and works with all trees. The statistical performance of these tests compares favorably with independent contrasts and surpasses that of a previously developed permutation test that exchanges closely related pairs of observations more frequently. Three case studies illustrate the use of phylogenetic permutations for quantile regression with non-normal and heteroscedastic data, testing hypotheses about morphospace occupation, and comparative problems in which the data points are not tips in the phylogeny.


Author(s):  
Simone Persiano ◽  
Jose Luis Salinas ◽  
Jery Russell Stedinger ◽  
William H. Farmer ◽  
David Lun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document