Comparing three models of arousal in the human brain
Abstract The bipolar valence–arousal model is assumed by many to be an underlying structure of conscious experience of core affect and emotion. In this work, we compare three versions of the bipolar valence–arousal model at the neural domain, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Specifically, we systematically contrast three models of arousal: model 1—‘arousal as a separate quale from valence’, model 2—‘arousal as intensity of bipolar valence’ and model 3—‘arousal as a linear combination of unipolar pleasant and unpleasant’. Using parametric modulation analysis, we estimated the ability of each model to predict activation in arousal-related brain regions, in response to affective stimuli. The results suggest that arousal is not separable from valence in its ability to predict arousal-related neural activity. The relevance of the results to the theory of conscious affect is discussed.