scholarly journals Methods of defining hypertension in electronic medical records: validation against national survey data

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. e392-e399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingkai Peng ◽  
Guanmin Chen ◽  
Gilaad G. Kaplan ◽  
Lisa M. Lix ◽  
Neil Drummond ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 080
Author(s):  
Curt G Tribble

The message that patients are frequently dissatisfied with their interactions with their physicians is a common one. And, articles about physician burnout are plentiful [Shanafelt 2015]. Indeed, a recent national survey showed a nearly 9 percent increase in burnout rates over just the last 3 years [Peckham 2015]. Many factors contribute to this problem, not the least of which is the push to use electronic medical records systems, as evidenced by the recent comment from the acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, Mr. Andy Slavitt, who said “we have to get the hearts and minds of physicians back. I think we’ve lost them” [McKnight 2016]. <br />While many of the factors contributing to physician dissatisfaction are, and will be, difficult to control, there is at least one source of satisfaction that is within the relatively easy purview of virtually all practicing physicians, and that source is the patients for whom all physicians care.  Fortunately, there are some straightforward, simple, and efficient ways to improve the view patients have of their physicians and the satisfaction that physicians can derive from caring for their patients. Three simple steps that can make both physicians and their patients more satisfied with the interactions between patients and physicians are outlined here. These suggestions are primarily oriented toward physicians in training caring for hospitalized patients, though they are most certainly applicable to all physicians. These suggestions are based on what younger physicians can say to, ask of, or do for a patient under their care, all of which can be easily and efficiently accomplished.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Osborne ◽  
Yannick Dufresne ◽  
Gregory Eady ◽  
Jennifer Lees-Marshment ◽  
Cliff van der Linden

Abstract. Research demonstrates that the negative relationship between Openness to Experience and conservatism is heightened among the informed. We extend this literature using national survey data (Study 1; N = 13,203) and data from students (Study 2; N = 311). As predicted, education – a correlate of political sophistication – strengthened the negative relationship between Openness and conservatism (Study 1). Study 2 employed a knowledge-based measure of political sophistication to show that the Openness × Political Sophistication interaction was restricted to the Openness aspect of Openness. These studies demonstrate that knowledge helps people align their ideology with their personality, but that the Openness × Political Sophistication interaction is specific to one aspect of Openness – nuances that are overlooked in the literature.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. McKenna ◽  
B. Gaines ◽  
C. Hatfield ◽  
S. Helman ◽  
L. Meyer ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 908-P
Author(s):  
SOSTENES MISTRO ◽  
THALITA V.O. AGUIAR ◽  
VANESSA V. CERQUEIRA ◽  
KELLE O. SILVA ◽  
JOSÉ A. LOUZADO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document