scholarly journals Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verity Watson ◽  
Andrew Carnon ◽  
Mandy Ryan ◽  
Derek Cox
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiments ◽  
The Public

scholarly journals Public, medical professionals’ and patients’ preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e026040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Oedingen ◽  
Tim Bartling ◽  
Christian Krauth
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Fractional Factorial ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiments ◽  
Medical Professionals ◽  
The Public ◽  
Donor Organs

IntroductionOrgan transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with severe organ failure. Nevertheless, donor organs are a scarce resource resulting in a large mismatch between supply and demand. Therefore, priority-setting leads to the dilemma of how these scarce organs should be allocated and who should be considered eligible to receive a suitable organ. In order to improve the supply–demand mismatch in transplantation medicine, this study explores preferences of different stakeholders (general public, medical professionals and patients) for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation in Germany. The aims are (1) to determine criteria and preferences, which are relevant for the allocation of scarce donor organs and (2) to compare the results between the three target groups to derive strategies for health policy.Methods and analysisWe outline the study protocol for discrete choice experiments, where respondents are presented with different choices including attributes with varied attribute levels. They were asked to choose between these choice sets. First, systematic reviews will be conducted to identify the state of art. Subsequently, focus group discussions with the public and patients as well as expert interviews with medical professionals will follow to establish the attributes that are going to be included in the experiments and to verify the results of the systematic reviews. Using this qualitative exploratory work, discrete choice studies will be designed to quantitatively assess preferences. We will use a D-efficient fractional factorial design to survey a total sample of 600 respondents according to the public, medical professionals and patients each. Multinomial conditional logit model and latent class model will be analysed to estimate the final results.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received Ethics Approval from the Hannover Medical School Human Ethics Committee (Vote number: 7921_BO_K_2018). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations, workshops with stakeholders and peer-reviewed journal articles.

scholarly journals How psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 273-282
Author(s):  
Jorien Veldwijk ◽  
Catharina G.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn ◽  
Ulrik Kihlbom ◽  
Sophie Langenskiöld ◽  
Evelien Dekker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Psychological Distance ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiments ◽  
Preference Measurement

Discrete-choice experiments valuing local environmental impacts of renewables: two approaches to a case study in Portugal

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. 145-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabela Botelho ◽  
Lina Lourenço-Gomes ◽  
Lígia M. Costa Pinto ◽  
Sara Sousa ◽  
Marieta Valente
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Impacts ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiments

scholarly journals Examining ordering effects in discrete choice experiments: A case study in Vietnam

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 39-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh Cong Nguyen ◽  
Jackie Robinson ◽  
Shinji Kaneko ◽  
The Chinh Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiments ◽  
Ordering Effects

scholarly journals Do Looks Matter? A Case Study on Extensive Green Roofs Using Discrete Choice Experiments

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Vanstockem ◽  
Liesbet Vranken ◽  
Brent Bleys ◽  
Ben Somers ◽  
Martin Hermy
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Green Roofs ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiments ◽  
Extensive Green Roofs

scholarly journals Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments: A case study in a developing country

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 22-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh Cong Nguyen ◽  
Jackie Robinson ◽  
Jennifer A. Whitty ◽  
Shinji Kaneko ◽  
The Chinh Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Developing Country ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiments
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document