Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Landmark and Ultrasound-Guided Glossopharyngeal Nerve in Eagle Syndrome

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1208-1215
Author(s):  
Shanmuga Sundaram ◽  
Jyotsna Punj

Abstract Introduction The glossopharyngeal nerve lies posterior to the internal carotid artery at the submandibular region. The primary objective of this study was to compare ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block (UGPNB) and landmark glossopharyngeal nerve block (GPNB). Materials & Methods Inclusion criteria were patients with unilateral Eagle syndrome and ear pain. Group UGPNB (N = 25) received three UGPNBs at weekly intervals with 1.5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 20 mg of methylprednisolone. Group GPNB (N = 26) received landmark GPNB. Pain intensity was evaluated with the numerical rating scale (NRS) before every block, 30 minutes after every block, and at one, three, and five weeks after the third block. Quality of life, assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and satisfaction scores were noted. Results NRS scores before the second and third blocks and a week after were significantly lower in group UGPNB and comparable at weeks 3 and 5. NRS scores 30 minutes after every block were significantly decreased from the preblock values but were comparable between groups. In 68% of patients, a curvilinear probe delineated the internal carotid artery (ICA). Out-of-plane needle trajectory was required in 64% of patients. BPI and satisfaction scores were significantly better in the UGPNB group in the “block” weeks. Conclusions UGPNB with 1.5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 20 mg of methylprednisolone injected posterior to the ICA in the submandibular region provides better pain relief for at least a week compared with an extraoral landmark technique when three weekly consecutive blocks are given. In most patients, a curvilinear probe and out-of-plane needle trajectory are most suitable for ultrasound block.

Author(s):  
Birame Loum ◽  
Cheikh Ahmedou Lame ◽  
Cheikhna B. Ndiaye ◽  
Kamadore Toure ◽  
Mouhamadou Mansour Ndiaye

<p>Eagle syndrome is a rare condition, often characterized by nonspecific symptoms. It is due to an abnormally long or compressive styloid process on surrounding structures. Exceptionally, it can cause neuro-vascular manifestations. We report an observation of Eagle syndrome discovered incidentally in presence of recurrent transient ischemic stroke. A 74-year-old man with no cardiovascular risk factors, was admitted to our department following 4 episodes of transient ischemic stroke with right hemiplegia and aphasia, always rapidly resolving. Head and neck CT scan showed 2 long styloid processes with a marked impingement of the left one against the ipsilateral internal carotid artery. Intraoral styloidectomy was performed. The patient recovered fully and remained free of symptoms without neurological impairment, at 6 months. Eagle syndrome is a rare condition which may lead, exceptionally, to repetitive transient ischemic stroke. Surgical styloidectomy must be considered to reduce the risk of new vascular events and prevent serious complications such as dissection of the internal carotid artery.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadaharu Torikoshi ◽  
Yukihiro Yamao ◽  
Eiji Ogino ◽  
Waro Taki ◽  
Tadashi Sunohara ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 193 (28) ◽  
pp. E1091-E1091
Author(s):  
Joel W. Howlett ◽  
Matthew Hearn ◽  
Cameron Bakala

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinícius de Queiroz Aguiar ◽  
Gustavo Sales França ◽  
Bernardo Costa Berriel Abreu ◽  
Talles Henrique Caixeta ◽  
Alexandre Henrique de Azevedo Dias ◽  
...  

Context: Eagle syndrome is characterized by the elongation or disfiguration of the styloid process, which leads to a range of clinical manifestations resulting from the structures that are affected by the prolongation of the bone, and the classic presentation is composed of pain and foreign body sensation in the throat, otalgia, and dysphagia. Case report: We describe the case of a 60-year-old man with an ischemic stroke due to dissection of the left internal carotid artery, associated with compression resulting from Eagle syndrome. At clinical presentation, the patient presented right hemiparesis and severe dysphagia, with NIH=18, characterizing the stroke. An angiotomography of the skull and brain was performed, which showed an image compatible with dissection of the left internal carotid artery from the prolongation of the styloid process, characterizing Eagle syndrome stylocarotid syndrome. The patient was submitted to thrombolysis with rt-PA, presenting a partial response, and surgical bone reduction. Patient evolved with partial recovery, with NIH=10, and, at the time of discharge, presented RANKIN 1, symptoms without disabilities. Conclusion: The Eagle syndrome, while it occurs more frequently in women, in general, with the classic presentation, can evolve with a more severe picture, associated with vessel dissection and brain involvement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karol Galletta ◽  
Francesca Granata ◽  
Marcello Longo ◽  
Concetta Alafaci ◽  
Francesco S. De Ponte ◽  
...  

Background: Eagle syndrome (ES) is a rare symptomatic condition generally caused by an elongated styloid process (SP) or calcification of the stylohyoid complex. On the diagnosis is made, its treatment remains subjective since the indications for surgical intervention are still not standardized. Although styloidectomy is the surgical treatment of choice, no consensus exists regarding the transcervical or/and transoral route. Here, we report our experience in a patient with bilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection caused by ES, who underwent innovative surgical technique. Case Description: A 53-year-old man, with the right-sided middle cerebral artery acute stroke, underwent computed tomography angiography 3 days after a successful endovascular treatment. The study showed a bilateral ICA dissection with bilateral hypertrophic SPs and a close relationship of ICAs with both SPs anteriorly and C1 transverse process posteriorly. Considering the occurrence of ICA compression by a styloid/C1 transverse process juxtaposition, the patient underwent the left partial C1 transversectomy by an extraoral approach. A temporary paresis of the ipsilateral lower lip lasted 1 month, with a partial remission after 3 months. The patient reported significant improvement of symptoms with a good esthetics and functional outcome. Conclusion: A styloid/C1 transverse process juxtaposition should be considered as an alternative pathogenetic mechanism in vascular ES. When a posterior ICA compression by C1 transverse process is present, a bone reshaping of C1 rather than a conventional styloidectomy can be considered an efficacious treatment which allows a good preservation of the styloid muscles and ligaments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document