scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for Chronic Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by Guideline-Concordant Dual Comparative Medial Branch Blocks

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 902-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Conger ◽  
Taylor Burnham ◽  
Fabio Salazar ◽  
Quinn Tate ◽  
Mathew Golish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Height Loss ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Abstract Objectives Although the effectiveness of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of zygapophyseal joint (z-joint)–mediated low back pain has been characterized, few studies have described outcomes in patients selected using a guideline-concordant paradigm of ≥80% pain relief with dual comparative medial branch blocks (MBBs). We investigated long-term treatment outcomes of patients selected according to this paradigm. Design Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods The medical records of 111 consecutive patients were reviewed; 85 met inclusion criteria. A standardized telephone survey was used to capture current numerical rating scale (NRS) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting ≥50% reduction of index pain. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to explore associations between the primary outcome and covariates, including age, duration of pain, presence of scoliosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and >75% disc height loss. Results At six to 12, 12–24, and >24 months, 63.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41–85%), 65.6% (95% CI = 49–82%), and 44.1% (95% CI = 27–61%) of patients reported a ≥50% pain reduction (P = 0.170), respectively. At a minimum of six months, 70.6% of patients reported a pain reduction of two or more points (minimally clinically important change), and 54.1% reported a PGIC score consistent with “much improved” or better. Older age and a smaller Cobb angle were associated with a ≥50% pain reduction (P < 0.05). Conclusion Lumbar medial branch RFA is an effective, durable treatment for a significant proportion of patients with recalcitrant lumbar z-joint pain when candidacy is determined by the guideline-concordant paradigm of ≥80% pain relief with dual comparative MBBs.

scholarly journals Bilateral Intra-Articular Radiofrequency Ablation for Cervicogenic Headache

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Odonkor ◽  
Teresa Tang ◽  
David Taftian ◽  
Akhil Chhatre
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Cervicogenic Headache ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Neck Stiffness ◽  
Intervertebral Disks ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Improved Function

Introduction. Cervicogenic headache is characterized by unilateral neck or face pain referred from various structures such as the cervical joints and intervertebral disks. A recent study of patients with cervical pain showed significant pain relief after cervical medial branch neurotomy but excluded patients with C1-2 joint pain. It remains unclear whether targeting this joint has potential for symptomatic relief. To address this issue, we present a case report of C1-2 joint ablation with positive outcomes. Case Presentation. A 27-year-old female presented with worsening cervicogenic headache. Her pain was 9/10 by visual analog scale (VAS) and described as cramping and aching. Pain was localized suboccipitally with radiation to her jaw and posterior neck, worse on the right. Associated symptoms included clicking of her temporomandibular joint, neck stiffness, bilateral headaches with periorbital pain, numbness, and tingling. History, physical exam, and diagnostic studies indicated localization to the C1-2 joint with 80% decrease in pain after C1-2 diagnostic blocks. She underwent bilateral intra-articular radiofrequency ablation of the C1-C2 joint. Follow-up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks showed improved function and pain relief with peak results at 12 weeks. Conclusion. Clinicians may consider C1-C2 joint ablation as a viable long-term treatment option for cervicogenic headaches.

The Effectiveness of Cervical Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by a Practical Medial Branch Block Paradigm

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2071-2076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor Burnham ◽  
Aaron Conger ◽  
Fabio Salazar ◽  
Russell Petersen ◽  
Richard Kendall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Spine Intervention ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation (CMBRFA) is an effective treatment for facetogenic pain in patients selected by Spine Intervention Society (SIS) guidelines of 100% symptom improvement with dual medial branch blocks (MBBs) ± placebo block. Patient selection for CMBRFA using ≥80% symptom improvement after dual concordant MBBs is common; however, this has not been studied. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of CMBRFA and compare outcomes in individuals selected by 80–99% vs 100% symptom improvement with dual concordant MBBs. Design Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods Medical records of 87 consecutive patients were reviewed; 50 met inclusion criteria. A standardized telephone survey was performed at six or more months post-CMBRFA to query numerical rating scale (NRS) pain and patient global impression of change (PGIC) scores. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients reporting ≥50% reduction of index pain. Results At a mean follow-up time of 16.9 ± 12.7 months, 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 35–73%) and 54% (95% CI = 32–74%) of the 80–99% and 100% MBBs groups, respectively, reported ≥50% pain reduction. Between-group comparison showed a relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.59–1.66) for meeting the primary outcome. Seventy percent (95% CI = 56–81%) of patients reported a PGIC score consistent with “improved or very much improved” at follow-up. Conclusions CMBRFA is an effective treatment in patients who report ≥80% symptom relief with dual concordant MBBs. The present study demonstrated an overall ≥50% pain reduction rate of 54% and no significant difference between those selected by 80–99% vs 100% symptom relief with dual concordant MBBs.

Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful osseous metastases: A comparative correlation meta-analysis of pain relief.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24156-e24156
Author(s):  
Tej Mehta ◽  
Caleb Heiberger ◽  
Stephanie Kazi ◽  
Boggy Anton ◽  
Mark Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Osseous Metastases ◽  
Meta Regression

e24156 Background: Osseous metastases (OMs), a common cause of cancer pain, are only partially palliated by analgesics. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are increasingly used, but the comparative effectiveness of SBRT vs. RFA for OMs has not been adequately evaluated. Herein we analyzed palliative benefits of SBRT and RFA in terms of pain relief from OMs. Methods: A systematic review was performed for all studies reporting palliative outcomes of SBRT (defined as five or fewer fractions of radiation) or RFA for palliation of OMs. Studies not reporting pain palliation were excluded. Random effects model determined the net Pearson correlation (R2) for post-SBRT and post-RFA pain reduction over time. The pooled correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval were calculated using Fisher r-to- z transformation. Risk of bias was assessed using sunset plots; heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and meta-regression. Results: Seven full-text articles assessed a total of 1100 SBRT patients and 22 full-text articles assessed a total of 557 RFA patients. No studies directly compared SBRT to RFA. All included studies collected data on pain related to OM disease pre- and post-therapy. The scales used included the visual analog scale (2 SBRT, 15 RFA), brief pain inventory (4 SBRT, 4 RFA), numeric rating scale (0 SBRT, 2 RFA), QLQ-15 (1 SBRT, 0 RFA), or the memorial pain index card (0 SBRT, 1 RFA). Mean SBRT dose and fractions were 17.3 gy and 2.6. Median follow-up was 24 weeks for SBRT and 18 weeks for RFA, with median pain reduction of 59% (R2=0.83, 95%CI:0.80-0.87, I2=58.63%) and 64% (R2=0.52, 95%CI:0.41-0.62, I2=48.16%) respectively. Meta-regression by number of fractions and reporting metric fully accounted for heterogeneity in the SBRT and RFA data respectively. Sunset plots did not indicate significant publication bias. Conclusions: The published literature is predominately non-randomized, limiting the evidence level. Pain reduction and durability post-SBRT or post-RFA are comparable. Pre-SBRT or RFA therapies may obscure the full effect of either treatment modality. SBRT and RFA for painful OMs are associated with pain relief in a majority of patients, but the durability of this relief and the comparative efficacy of SBRT vs. RFA for this purpose has been inadequately reported in the literature. Future, combinatorial therapies as opposed to single-modality approaches may help to increase overall pain relief and durability as well as efficaciously palliating treatment-resistant patients.

What is the Effect of Lumbar Medial Branch Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation on Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center, Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trusharth Patel ◽  
Christopher Watterson ◽  
Anne Marie McKenzie-Brown ◽  
Boris Spektor ◽  
Katherine Egan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Lumbar Pain ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Spine Imaging ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Abstract Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a denervation therapy commonly performed for pain of facet etiology. Degenerative spondylolisthesis, a malalignment of the spinal vertebrae, may be a co-existing condition contributing to pain; yet the effect of RFA on advancing listhesis is unknown. To the extent that denervating RFA can weaken paraspinal muscles that provide stability to the spine, the therapy can potentially contribute to progressive spinal instability. Objectives To test the hypothesis that RFA of painful facets in the setting of spondylolisthesis may contribute to advancement of further degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods Single-center, prospective, observational pilot study in an interventional pain practice. Fifteen participants with pre-existing degenerative Grade I or Grade II spondylolisthesis and coexisting axial lumbar pain underwent lumbar RFA encompassing spondylolisthesis level and followed with post-RFA imaging at 12 months and beyond to measure percent change in spondylolisthesis. Results The primary outcome was the percent advancement of spondylolisthesis per year measured on post-RFA lateral lumbar spine imaging compared to non-intervention baseline advancement of 2.6% per limited observational studies. Among the 15 participants enrolled, 14 completed the study (median age 66; 64.3% women; median BMI 33.5; mean follow-up time 23.9 months). The mean advancement of spondylolisthesis per year after RFA was 1.30% (95% CI -0.14 to 2.78%), with 9/14 below 1.25%. Conclusion Among patients with lumbar pain originating from facets in the setting of degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent lumbar RFA, the observed advancement of spondylolisthesis is clinically similar to the baseline of 2.6% per year change. The study findings did not find a destabilizing effect of lumbar RFA in advancing spondylolisthesis in this patient population.

scholarly journals Randomized prospective trial of cooled versus traditional radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch nerves for the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary L McCormick ◽  
Heejung Choi ◽  
Rajiv Reddy ◽  
Raafay H Syed ◽  
Meghan Bhave ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Lumbar Facet Joint ◽  
Facet Joint Pain ◽  
Lumbar Facet

Background and objectivesNo previous study has assessed the outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation (C-RFA) of the medial branch nerves (MBN) for the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain nor compared its effectiveness with traditional RFA (T-RFA). This study evaluated 6-month outcomes for pain, function, psychometrics, and medication usage in patients who underwent MBN C-RFA versus T-RFA for lumbar Z-joint pain.MethodsIn this blinded, prospective trial, patients with positive diagnostic MBN blocks (>75% relief) were randomized to MBN C-RFA or T-RFA. The primary outcome was the proportion of ‘responders’ (≥50% Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) reduction) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included NRS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Patient Global Impression of Change.ResultsForty-three participants were randomized to MBN C-RFA (n=21) or T-RFA (n=22). There were no significant differences in demographic variables (p>0.05). A ≥50% NRS reduction was observed in 52% (95% CI 31% to 74%) and 44% (95% CI 22% to 69%) of participants in the C-RFA and T-RFA groups, respectively (p=0.75). A ≥15-point or ≥30% reduction in ODI score was observed in 62% (95% CI 38% to 82%) and 44% (95% CI 22% to 69%) of participants in the C-RFA and T-RFA groups, respectively (p=0.21).ConclusionsWhen using a single diagnostic block paradigm with a threshold of >75% pain reduction, both treatment with both C-RFA and T-RFA resulted in a success rate of approximately 50% when defined by both improvement in pain and physical function at 6-month follow-up. While the success rate was higher in the C-RFA group, this difference was not statistically significant.Trial registration numberNCT02478437.

scholarly journals Effect of Lumbar Medial Branch Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation on Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trusharth Patel ◽  
Christopher Watterson ◽  
Anne Marie McKenzie-Brown ◽  
Boris Spektor ◽  
Katherine Egan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Lumbar Pain ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Spine Imaging ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

AbstractImportanceRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a denervation therapy commonly performed for pain of facet etiology. Degenerative spondylolisthesis may be a co-existing condition; yet the effect of RFA on advancing listhesis is unknown.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that RFA of painful facets in the setting of spondylolisthesis may contribute to advancement of further degenerative spondylolisthesis.DesignRetrospective and prospective, observational study conducted at a single academic center among 15 participants with pre-existing degenerative Grade I or Grade II spondylolisthesis undergoing lumbar RFA encompassing spondylolisthesis level and followed with post-RFA imaging at 12 months and beyond to measure percent change in spondylolisthesis.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the percent advancement of spondylolisthesis per year measured on post-RFA lateral lumbar spine imaging compared to non-intervention baseline advancement of 2.6% per limited observational studies.ResultsAmong the 15 participants enrolled, 14 completed the study (median age 66; 64.3% women; median BMI 33.5; mean follow-up time 23.9 months). The mean advancement of spondylolisthesis per year after RFA was 1.30% (95% CI −0.14 to 2.78%), with 9/14 below 1.25%.Conclusion and RelevanceAmong patients with lumbar pain originating from facets in the setting of degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent lumbar RFA, the observed advancement of spondylolisthesis is clinically similar to the baseline of 2.6% per year change. The study findings did not find a destabilizing effect of lumbar RFA in advancing spondylolisthesis in this patient population.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Blocks and Predictive Value before Radiofrequency Denervation

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. Cohen ◽  
Tina L. Doshi ◽  
Octav C. Constantinescu ◽  
Zirong Zhao ◽  
Connie Kurihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Medial Branch Block ◽  
Lumbar Facet

Abstract What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background With facet interventions under scrutiny, the authors’ objectives were to determine the effectiveness of different lumbar facet blocks and their ability to predict radiofrequency ablation outcomes. Methods A total of 229 participants were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive intraarticular facet injections with bupivacaine and steroid, medial branch blocks, or saline. Those with a positive 1-month outcome (a 2-point or more reduction in average pain score) and score higher than 3 (positive satisfaction) on a 5-point satisfaction scale were followed up to 6 months. Participants in the intraarticular and medial branch block groups with a positive diagnostic block (50% or more relief) who experienced a negative outcome proceeded to the second phase and underwent radiofrequency ablation, while all saline group individuals underwent ablation. Coprimary outcome measures were average reduction in numerical rating scale pain score 1 month after the facet or saline blocks, and average numerical rating scale pain score 3 months after ablation. Results Mean reduction in average numerical rating scale pain score at 1 month was 0.7 ± 1.6 in the intraarticular group, 0.7 ± 1.8 in the medial branch block group, and 0.7 ± 1.5 in the placebo group; P = 0.993. The proportions of positive blocks were higher in the intraarticular (54%) and medial branch (55%) groups than in the placebo group (30%; P = 0.01). Radiofrequency ablation was performed on 135 patients (45, 48, and 42 patients from the intraarticular, medial branch, and saline groups, respectively). The average numerical rating scale pain score at 3 months was 3.0 ± 2.0 in the intraarticular, 3.2 ± 2.5 in the medial branch, and 3.5 ± 1.9 in the control group (P = 0.493). At 3 months, the proportions of positive responders in the intraarticular, medial branch block, and placebo groups were 51%, 56%, and 24% for the intraarticular, medial branch, and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.005). Conclusions This study establishes that facet blocks are not therapeutic. The higher responder rates in the treatment groups suggest a hypothesis that facet blocks might provide prognostic value before radiofrequency ablation.

scholarly journals Two-Needle Technique for Lumbar Radiofrequency Medial Branch Denervation: A Technical Note

2020 ◽  
Vol 5;23 (9;5) ◽  
pp. E507-E516
Author(s):  
Kenneth Chapman Kenneth Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Short Period

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the medial branches of the dorsal rami has been reported to relieve facet joint–related back pain for 6 months to 1 year in 60% of patients. Although providing benefit in a significant proportion of patients, there remains a group of patients who do not experience any pain relief from RFA or experience only benefit from the ablation for a short period. Failure of RFA has been attributed to technical failure of coagulating the nerve or coagulation of a minimal section of the nerve, allowing for early reinnervation. Increasing the success rate and duration of relief may require techniques that increase the likelihood of successful nerve ablation over a relevant distance by maximizing lesion size. Objectives: The aim of this technical note is to detail a modification to the current commonly used lumbar medial branch radiofrequency (RF) denervation approach to increase lesion size. Study Design: This is a technical report describing a novel two-needle approach to lumbar RF medial branch denervation. Setting: Large private interventional pain management institute. Methods: A dual needle placement of two 10-mm active tip RF cannulas separated by 6 mm is used to optimally contact the superior articular process (SAP) from its ventral to dorsal borders, which encompasses the anticipated course of the medial branch nerves. Results: The described technique creates a lesion that we estimate to be 11.0-mm wide and 11.6-mm long along the course of the medial branch adjacent to the SAP ensuring adequate coverage and treatment. Limitations: This report does not encompass a systematic evaluation of the clinical safety and efficacy of the two-needle RFA approach. Future studies will have to assess the longterm efficacy and safety of the approach. Conclusions: The detailed two-needle approach to lumbar RF medial branch denervation appears to be promising in terms of projected treatment success by coagulating a large volume of tissue, in a cost- and time-efficient manner. Key words: Radiofrequency ablation, RFA, lumbar, medial branch, facet joint, pain, rhizotomy

scholarly journals CT-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injections with Local Anesthetic, Steroid, and Tramadol for the Treatment of Persistent Lumbar Radicular Pain

2012 ◽  
Vol 2;15 (2;3) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Wewalka
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Nerve Root ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Ct Guided ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Serial Ct

Background: A substantial number of patients with persistent lumbar radicular pain are treated with a multimodal spectrum of conservative therapies without lasting effect. The duration of pain is certainly a risk factor for chronification. There is evidence that guided periradicular infiltrations are a valid option in the treatment of radiculopathies. Usually a combination of local anesthetic and/or corticosteroid is injected. Tramadol is being used for perioperative analgesia and has been shown to provide effective, long-lasting pain relief after epidural administration. Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy of serial CT-guided transforaminal nerve root infiltrations with a supplement of tramadol for patients with persistent, radicular pain. Study Design: Interventional cohort study. Setting: Outpatient department for interdisciplinary pain medicine. Methods: 37 patients who had radicular leg pain for over 9 weeks received up to 3 CTguided transforaminal nerve root infiltrations at intervals of 2 weeks as long as their level of pain was over 3 on a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. 50 mg of Tramadol were added to a combination of local anesthetic (Ropivacain, 2 mg) and corticosteroid (Triamcinolon, 40 mg). Evaluations were carried out 24 hours after the Infiltration as well as 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after the treatment series. The intensity of their radicular pain was measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS). Pain reduction of at least 50% was defined as successful outcome. Results: In total, 65 infiltrations were carried out with pain relief in more than 90% of the patients within 24 hours and an average pain reduction of 64%. Six months post-injection 23 of 34 patients available for follow-up (67.6%) had a successful pain reduction of 84% on average. No adverse effects ascribable to the use of tramadol were noted. Limitations: Due to the lack of a control group we cannot make any statement if tramadol improves short-term pain reduction. Conclusion: Fast and lasting pain relief is the key to optimize rehabilitation for patients with radicular pain. There is a physiological rationale that the opioid receptors at the spinal level could be used to optimize the analgetic effect of guided periradicular injections. In our case series, serial CT-guided selective nerve root infiltrations with the supplement of tramadol were found to be highly effective in the treatment of persistant radiculopathies. Randomized controlled trials will be necessary to clarify the possible benefit of the supplement of an opioid. Key words: Serial, nerve root infiltration, tramadol, chronic pain, outcome.

Preliminary Results of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Treatment of the Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Woiciechowsky ◽  
Leonie Mercedes Richter
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Medial Branch ◽  
Endoscopic Ablation

Abstract Background and Study The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) may be the primary source of pain in 15 to 25% of patients with axial low back pain. Furthermore, 75% of patients who have had fusion surgery develop SIJ pain within 10 years. Treatment options include SIJ blocks, radiofrequency (RF) denervation, and fusion. The RF techniques range from ablation of the nerves supplying the joint, creating lesions to the joint itself, or a combination of both techniques. However, different clinical studies could only identify a limited or, in some cases, no effect in decreasing of pain intensity and duration of the effect. Methods In this retrospective study, we selected 23 patients with SIJ pain, with a duration of more than 12 months and a 50% pain reduction on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) after diagnostic block. All patients received endoscopic ablation of the medial branch L5/S1 and the lateral branches, exiting the sacral foramina on S1/S2 and S2/S3 on both sides while using only one incision on each side. Telephone interviews were conducted with all patients. The outcome was determined with Odom's criteria, percent reduction NRS, subjective assessment of the patient, and duration of the effect. Results According to Odom's criteria, 79% of the patients showed acceptable to excellent results and confirmed that denervation helped them to manage their daily lives better. The average pain reduction in the responder group was 57% with an average duration of 13.4 months. Conclusion In this retrospective study, we could demonstrate the practicability and effectiveness of endoscopic SIJ denervation in the treatment of SIJ pain using only one incision for three levels on each side. Further studies should investigate if this procedure is more effective than percutaneous RF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document