scholarly journals Effect of Preoperative Opioid Use on Adverse Outcomes, Medical Spending, and Persistent Opioid Use Following Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study of Administrative Claims Data

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meridith Blevins Peratikos ◽  
Hannah L Weeks ◽  
Andrew J B Pisansky ◽  
R Jason Yong ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Stringer
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Dose ◽  
Opioid Users

Abstract Objective Between 17% and 40% of patients undergoing elective arthroplasty are preoperative opioid users. This US study analyzed patients in this population to illustrate the relationship between preoperative opioid use and adverse surgical outcomes. Design Retrospective study of administrative medical and pharmaceutical claims data. Subjects Adults (aged 18+) who received elective total knee, hip, or shoulder replacement in 2014–2015. Methods A patient was a preoperative opioid user if opioid prescription fills occurred in two periods: 1–30 and 31–90 days presurgery. Zero-truncated Poisson (incidence rate ratio [IRR]), logistic (odds ratio [OR]), Cox (hazard ratio [HR]), and quantile regressions modeled the effects of preoperative opioid use and opioid dose, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and utilization. Results Among 34,792 patients (38% hip, 58% knee, 4% shoulder), 6,043 (17.4%) were preoperative opioid users with a median morphine equivalent daily dose of 32 mg. Preoperative opioid users had increased length of stay (IRR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.05), nonhome discharge (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.21), and 30-day unplanned readmission (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.74); experienced 35% higher surgical site infection (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.59) and 44% higher surgical revision (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.71); had a median $1,084 (95% CI = $833 to $1334) increase in medical spend during the 365 days after discharge; and had a 64% lower rate of opioid cessation (HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.35) compared with patients not filling two or more prescriptions across periods. Conclusions Preoperative opioid users had longer length of stay, increased revision rates, higher spend, and persistent opioid use, which worsened with dose. Adverse outcomes after elective joint replacement may be reduced if preoperative opioid risk is managed through increased monitoring or opioid cessation.

scholarly journals Patterns of Long-Term Prescription Opioid Use Among Older Adults in the United States: A Study of Medicare Administrative Claims Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 1;24 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Administrative Claims Data

BACKGROUND: Long-term opioid therapy was prescribed with increasing frequency over the past decade. However, factors surrounding long-term use of opioids in older adults remains poorly understood, probably because older people are not at the center stage of the national opioid crisis. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual utilization and trends in long-term opioid use among older adults in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data from Medicare-enrolled older adults. METHODS: This study utilized a nationally representative sample of Medicare administrative claims data from the years 2012 to 2016 containing records of health care services for more than 2.3 million Medicare beneficiaries each year. Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older and who were enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, but not Part C, for at least 10 months in a year were included in the study. We measured annual utilization and trends in new long-term opioid use episodes over 4 years (2013–2016). We examined claims records for the demographic characteristics of the eligible individuals and for the presence of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), cancer, and other comorbidities. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, administrative claims of approximately 2.3 million elderly Medicare beneficiaries were analyzed in each year with a majority of them being women (~56%) and white (~82%) with a mean age of approximately 75 years. The proportion of all eligible beneficiaries with at least one new opioid prescription increased from 6.64% in 2013, peaked at 10.32% in 2015, and then decreased to 8.14% in 2016. The proportion of individuals with long-term opioid use among those with a new opioid prescription was 12.40% in 2013 and 10.20% in 2016. Among new long-term opioid users, the proportion of beneficiaries with a cancer diagnosis during the study years increased from 13.30% in 2013 to 15.67% in 2016, and the proportion with CNCP decreased from 30.25% in 2013 to 27.36% in 2016. Across all years, long-term opioid use was consistently high in the Southern states followed by the Midwest region. LIMITATIONS: This study used Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data to capture prescription fill patterns, which do not allow for the capture of individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, cash prescriptions, or for the evaluation of appropriateness of prescribing, or the actual use of medication. This study only examined long-term use episodes among patients who were defined as opioid-naive. Finally, estimates captured for 2016 could only utilize data from 9 months of the year to capture 90-day long-term-use episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Using a national sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries, we observed that from 2013 to 2016 the use of new prescription opioids increased from 2013 to 2014 and peaked in 2015. The use of new long-term prescription opioids peaked in 2014 and started to decrease from 2015 and 2016. Future research needs to evaluate the impact of the changes in new and long-term prescription opioid use on population health outcomes. KEY WORDS: Long-term, opioids, older adults, trends, Medicare, chronic non-cancer pain, cancer, cohort study

Pre-operative opioid use in gynecologic oncology: a common comorbidity relevant to the peri-operative period

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1411-1416
Author(s):  
Megan Elizabeth Ross ◽  
Lindsay J Wheeler ◽  
Dina M Flink ◽  
Carolyn Lefkowits
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Operative Planning ◽  
Opioid Users ◽  
The Relationship

ObjectivesPre-operative opioid use is common and should be considered a comorbidity among surgical candidates. Our objective was to describe the rate of pre-operative opioid use and patterns of post-operative outpatient opioid prescribing in a cohort of gynecologic oncology patients.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted with 448 gynecologic oncology surgical patients undergoing surgery for a suspected or known cancer diagnosis from January 2016 to December 2016. Pre-operative opioid users (n=97) were identified. Patient and surgical characteristics were abstracted, as was post-operative opioid prescription (type of opioid, oral morphine equivalents amount) and length of stay. For pre-operative opioid users, the type of opioid prescribed post-operatively was compared with the type of pre-operative opioid. Pre-operative opioid users were compared with non-users, stratified by surgery type. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using χ2 statistic, and medians were compared using a Mann-Whitney U statistic.ResultsPre-operative opioid prescriptions were noted in 21% of patients, and 24% of these had two or more opioid prescriptions before surgery. The majority of pre-operative opioid users (51%) were maintained on the same agent post-operatively at the time of discharge, but 36% were switched to a different opioid and 7% were prescribed an additional opioid. Overall and in laparotomies, pre-operative opioid users received higher volume post-operative prescriptions than non-users. There was no difference in post-operative prescription volume for minimally invasive surgeries or in length of stay between pre-operative users and non-users.ConclusionsPre-operative opioid use is common in gynecologic oncology patients and should be considered during pre-operative planning. Pre-operative opioid use was associated with a higher volume and wider range of post-operative prescription. Over 40% of opioid users were discharged with either an additional opioid or a new opioid, highlighting a potential missed opportunity to optimize opioid safety. Further research is needed to characterize the relationship between pre-operative opioid use and peri-operative outcomes and to develop strategies to manage pain effectively in this population without compromising opioid safety.

EPR19-069: Opioid Use Among Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery and Their Associated Risk of Re-admissions and Emergency Department Visits in the 1-Year Postsurgical Period

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. EPR19-069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siyana Kurteva ◽  
Robyn Tamblyn ◽  
Ari Meguerditchian
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Opioid Users ◽  
The Impact

Background: Prescription opioid use and overdose has steadily increased over the past years, resulting in a dramatic increase in opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Methods: This study used a prospective cohort of cancer patients having undergone surgery in Montreal (Quebec) to describe their post-discharge opioid use and identify potential patterns of unplanned health service use (ED visits, hospitalizations). Provincial health administrative claims were used to measure opioid dispensation as well as hospital re-admissions and ED visits. The hospital warehouse, patient chart and patient interview will be used to further describe patient’s medical profile. Marginal structural models will be used to model the association between use of opioids and risk of ED visits and hospitalizations. Inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights will be constructed to properly adjust for confounders that may be unbalanced between the opioid and non–opioid users as well as to account for competing risk due to mortality. Reasons for the re-admissions will also be presented as part of the analyses. Covariates will include patient comorbidities, medication history, and healthcare system characteristics such as nurse-to-patient and attending physician-to-patient ratios. Results (interim): A total of 821 were included in the study; of these, 73% (n=597) were admitted for a cancer procedure. At postoperative discharge, 605 (74%) of patients had at least one opioid dispensation, of which the majority (67%) were oxycodone with hydromorphone being the second most prescribed (28%). Among those who filled a prescription, mean age was 66 (13.4), 68% had no previous history of opioid use, and 10% have had 3 or more dispensing pharmacies in the year prior to admission, compared to less than 1% for the non–opioid users. Overall, 343 people refilled their opioid prescription at least once and 128 at least twice during the 1-year postoperative period. Among cancer patients who were opioid users, 214 ED visits occurred in the 1 year after surgery compared to only 40 for the non-cancer opioid users. Conclusion: This study will help to identify the risk profile of cancer patients who are most likely to continue using opioids for prolonged periods following surgical procedures as well as quantify the impact of opioid use and its associated burden on the healthcare system in order to identify areas for possible interventions.

scholarly journals Oral Opioid Prescribing Trends in the United States, 2002–2018

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3215-3223
Author(s):  
David M Kern ◽  
M Soledad Cepeda ◽  
Anthony G Sena
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
The Past ◽  
Prescribing Trends ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Objective To conduct a retrospective analysis of sequential cross-sectional data of opioid prescribing practices in patients with no prior history of opioid use. Methods Individuals filling an oral opioid prescription who had 1 year of prior observation were identified from four different administrative claims databases for the period between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018: IBM MarketScan® Commercial Database (CCAE), Multi-State Medicaid Database (MDCD), Medicare Supplemental Database (MDCR), and Optum© De-Identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Outcomes included incidence of new opioid use and characteristics of patients’ first opioid prescription, including dispensed morphine milligram equivalent (MME) per day, total MME dispensed, total MME ≥300, and days’ supply of prescription for ≤3 or ≥30 days. Results There were 40,600,696 new opioid users identified. The incidence of new opioid use in the past 17 years ranged from 6% to 11% within the two commercially insured databases. Incidence decreased over time in MDCD and was consistently higher in MDCR. Total MME dispensed decreased in MDCD and increased in CCAE, with no major changes in the other databases. The proportion of patients receiving ≥30-day prescriptions decreased and the proportion of patients receiving ≤3-day prescriptions increased in MDCD, while ≥30-day prescriptions in the Optum database dramatically increased (low of 3.0% in 2003 to peak of 16.9% in 2017). Conclusions Opioid prescribing practices varied across different populations of insured individuals during the past 17 years. The most substantial changes in opioid prescriptions over time have occurred in MDCD, with reductions in use across multiple metrics.

US Trends in Opioid Access Among Patients With Poor Prognosis Cancer Near the End-of-Life

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00476
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Enzinger ◽  
Kaushik Ghosh ◽  
Nancy L. Keating ◽  
David M. Cutler ◽  
Mary Beth Landrum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE Heightened regulations have decreased opioid prescribing across the United States, yet little is known about trends in opioid access among patients dying of cancer. METHODS Among 270,632 Medicare fee-for-service decedents with poor prognosis cancers, we used part D data to examine trends from 2007 to 2017 in opioid prescription fills and opioid potency (morphine milligram equivalents per day [MMED]) near the end-of-life (EOL), defined as the 30 days before death or hospice enrollment. We used administrative claims to evaluate trends in pain-related emergency department (ED) visits near EOL. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2017, the proportion of decedents with poor prognosis cancers receiving ≥ 1 opioid prescription near EOL declined 15.5% (relative percent difference [RPD]), from 42.0% (95% CI, 41.4 to 42.7) to 35.5% (95% CI, 34.9 to 36.0) and the proportion receiving ≥ 1 long-acting opioid prescription declined 36.5% (RPD), from 18.1% (95% CI, 17.6 to 18.6) to 11.5% (95% CI, 11.1 to 11.9). Among decedents receiving opioids near EOL, the mean daily dose fell 24.5%, from 85.6 MMED (95% CI, 82.9 to 88.3) to 64.6 (95% CI, 62.7 to 66.6) MMED. Overall, the total amount of opioids prescribed per decedent near EOL (averaged across those who did and did not receive an opioid) fell 38.0%, from 1,075 morphine milligram equivalents per decedent (95% CI, 1,042 to 1,109) to 666 morphine milligram equivalents per decedent (95% CI, 646 to 686). Simultaneously, the proportion of patients with pain-related ED visits increased 50.8% (RPD), from 13.2% (95% CI, 12.7 to 13.6) to 19.9% (95% CI, 19.4 to 20.4). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar declines in opioid utilization in the 60 and 90 days before death or hospice, and suggested that trends in opioid access were not confounded by secular trends in hospice utilization. CONCLUSION Opioid use among patients dying of cancer has declined substantially from 2007 to 2017. Rising pain-related ED visits suggests that EOL cancer pain management may be worsening.

scholarly journals Early Outcomes After Surgical Management of Geriatric Patella Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932098769
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Kapilow ◽  
Junho Ahn ◽  
Kathryn Gallaway ◽  
Megan Sorich
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
The United States ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Patella Fracture ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Prolonged Hospitalization ◽  
Patella Fractures

Objectives: To report the incidence and risk factors for prolonged hospitalization, discharge to a facility, and postoperative complications in geriatric patients who underwent surgery for patella fracture. Design: Retrospective database review. Setting: The American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) collects data from 600 hospitals across the United States. Patients/Participants: NSQIP patients over 65 years of age with patella fractures. Intervention: Surgical fixation of patella fracture including extensor mechanism repair. Main Outcome Measurements: Prolonged hospitalization, discharge to a facility, and 30-day post-operative complications. Results: 1721 patients were included in the study. The average age was 74.9 years. 358 (20.8%) patients were male. 122 (7.1%) patients had a length of stay greater than 7 days. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay include pre-existing renal failure, need for emergent surgery, and time to surgery greater than 24 hours from admission. 640 patients (37.2%) of patients were discharged to a facility after surgery. Discharge to facility was associated with age >77 years, obesity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, pre-operative SIRS, and CCI > 0.5. Admission from home decreased the odds of discharge to a facility. The most common postoperative complications in this population were unplanned readmission (3.4%), unplanned reoperation (2.7%), surgical site infection (1.1%), mortality (1.0%), venous thromboembolism (0.8%), and wound dehiscence (0.2%). Complication rates increased with anemia and ASA class IV-V. Conclusions: Geriatric patients undergoing operative intervention for patella fractures are at high risk for prolonged hospitalization, discharge to facility, unplanned readmission or reoperation, and surgical site complications in the first 30 days following surgery. This study highlights modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with adverse events. Early recognition of these factors can allow for close monitoring and multidisciplinary intervention in the perioperative period to improve outcomes. Level of Evidence: Prognostic level III.

scholarly journals The association between initial opioid type and long-term opioid use after hip fracture surgery in elderly opioid-naïve patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-764
Author(s):  
Amalie H. Simoni ◽  
Lone Nikolajsen ◽  
Anne E. Olesen ◽  
Christian F. Christiansen ◽  
Søren P. Johnsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Calendar Time ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
Opioid Users ◽  
Fracture Surgery

AbstractObjectivesLong-term opioid use after hip fracture surgery has been demonstrated in previously opioid-naïve elderly patients. It is unknown if the opioid type redeemed after hip surgery is associated with long-term opioid use. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the opioid type redeemed within the first three months after hip fracture surgery and opioid use 3–12 months after the surgery.MethodsA nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using data from Danish health registries (2005–2015). Previously opioid-naïve patients registered in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry, aged ≥65 years, who redeemed ≥1 opioid prescription within three months after the surgery, were included. Long-term opioid use was defined as ≥1 redeemed prescription within each of three three-month periods within the year after hip fracture surgery. The proportion with long-term opioid use after surgery, conditioned on nine-month survival, was calculated according to opioid types within three months after surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for different opioid types were computed by logistic regression analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using morphine as reference. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, comorbidity and calendar time before and after 2010.ResultsThe study included 26,790 elderly, opioid-naïve patients with opioid use within three months after hip fracture surgery. Of these patients, 21% died within nine months after the surgery. Among the 21,255 patients alive nine months after surgery, 15% became long-term opioid users. Certain opioid types used within the first three months after surgery were associated with long-term opioid use compared to morphine (9%), including oxycodone (14%, aOR; 1.76, 95% CI 1.52–2.03), fentanyl (29%, aOR; 4.37, 95% CI 3.12–6.12), codeine (13%, aOR; 1.55, 95% CI 1.14–2.09), tramadol (13%, aOR; 1.56, 95% CI 1.35–1.80), buprenorphine (33%, aOR; 5.37, 95% CI 4.14–6.94), and >1 opioid type (27%, aOR; 3.83, 95% CI 3.31–4.44). The proportion of long-term opioid users decreased from 18% before 2010 to 13% after 2010.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that use of certain opioid types after hip fracture surgery is more associated with long-term opioid use than morphine and the proportion initiating long-term opioid use decreased after 2010. The findings suggest that some elderly, opioid-naïve patients appear to be presented with untreated pain conditions when seen in the hospital for a hip fracture surgery. Decisions regarding the opioid type prescribed after hospitalization for hip fracture surgery may be linked to different indication for pain treatment, emphasizing the likelihood of careful and conscientious opioid prescribing behavior.

New Persistent Opioid Use and Associated Risk Factors Following Treatment of Ankle Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1043-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Gossett ◽  
Fred T. Finney ◽  
Hsou Mei Hu ◽  
Jennifer F. Waljee ◽  
Chad M. Brummett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Distal Fibula ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Dose ◽  
Closed Treatment ◽  
Open Treatment

Background:The aim of this study was to define the rate of new persistent opioid use and risk factors for persistent opioid use after operative and nonoperative treatment of ankle fractures.Methods:Using a nationwide insurance claims database, Clinformatics DataMart Database, we identified opioid-naïve patients who underwent surgical treatment of unstable ankle fracture patterns between January 2009 and June 2016. Patients who underwent closed treatment of a distal fibula fracture served as a comparative group. We evaluated peritreatment and posttreatment opioid prescription fills. The primary outcome, new persistent opioid use, was defined as opioid prescription fulfillment between 91 and 180 days after the procedure. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of patient factors, and the differences of the effect were tested using Wald statistics. The adjusted persistent use rates were calculated. A total of 13 088 patients underwent treatment of an ankle fracture and filled a peritreatment opioid prescription.Results:When compared with closed treatment of a distal fibula fracture, only 2 surgical treatment subtypes demonstrated significantly increased rates of persistent use compared with the closed treatment group: open treatment of bimalleolar ankle fracture (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.58; P = .002) and open treatment of trimalleolar ankle fracture with fixation of posterior lip (aOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04-2.07; P = .027). Rates were significantly increased (aOR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82; P < .001) among patients who received a total peritreatment opioid dose that was in the top 25th percentile of total oral morphine equivalents. Factors independently associated with new persistent opioid use included mental health disorders, comorbid conditions, tobacco use, and female sex.Conclusion:All ankle fracture treatment groups demonstrated high rates of new persistent opioid use, and persistent use was not directly linked to injury severity. Instead, we identified patient factors that demonstrated increased risk of persistent opioid use. Limiting the peritreatment opioid dose was the largest modifiable risk factor related to new persistent opioid use in this privately insured cohort.Level of Evidence:Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The impact of beta-lactam allergy labels on hospitalized children

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Trahern W. Jones ◽  
Nora Fino ◽  
Jared Olson ◽  
Adam L. Hersh
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
The United States ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Antibiotic Allergy ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and objectives: Antibiotic allergy labels are common and are frequently inaccurate. Previous studies among adults demonstrate that β-lactam allergy labels may lead to adverse outcomes, including prescription of broader-spectrum antibiotics, increased costs, and increased lengths of stay, among others. However, data among pediatric patients are lacking, especially in the United States. In this study, we sought to determine the impact of β-lactam allergy labels in hospitalized children with regards to clinical and economic outcomes. Method: This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients 30 days to 17 years old, hospitalized at Intermountain Healthcare facilities from 2007 to 2017, who received ≥1 dose of an antibiotic during their admission. Patients with β-lactam allergies were matched to nonallergic patients based on age, sex, clinical service line, admission date, academic children’s hospital or other hospital admission, and the presence of chronic, comorbid conditions. Outcomes included receipt of broader-spectrum antibiotics, clinical outcomes including length of stay and readmission, and antibiotic and hospitalization costs. Results: In total, 38,906 patients were identified. The prevalence of antibiotic allergy increased from 0.9% among those < 1 year peaked at 10.6% by age 17. Patients with β-lactam allergy received broader-spectrum antibiotics and experienced higher antibiotic costs than nonallergic controls. However, there were no differences in the length of stay, readmission rates, or total number of days of antibiotics between allergic and nonallergic patients. Conclusions: Hospitalized pediatric patients with β-lactam allergy labels receive broader-spectrum antibiotics and experience increased antibiotic costs. This represents an important opportunity for allergy delabeling and antibiotic stewardship.

scholarly journals Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use Following Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0033
Author(s):  
Matthew Pate ◽  
Jacob Hall ◽  
John Anderson ◽  
Donald Bohay ◽  
John Maskill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Medication

Category: Ankle, Bunion, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Chronic opioid abuse is one of the greatest public health challenges in the United States. The most common first exposure to opioids comes from acute care prescriptions, such as those after surgery. Moreover, opioids are often prescribed excessively, with current estimates suggesting ˜75% of the pills prescribed are unused. Ankle fractures are the most common operatively treated fracture in orthopaedic surgery, and management of acute pain following surgery is challenging. The optimal perioperative pain regimen is still a point of controversy, as there is limited data available regarding appropriate amount of opioid to prescribe. This study evaluates opioid prescribing techniques of multiple foot and ankle surgeons, and associated patient outcomes. We aim to help surgeons improve their pain management practices and to limit opioid overprescription. Methods: Chart review and phone survey were performed on forty two adult patients within three to six months of ankle fracture fixation at our institution. These patients were offered to voluntarily participate in a standardized questionnaire regarding pain scores, opioid use, non-opioid analgesic use, pain management satisfaction, and patient prescription education. Results: 57% of patients reported that they were given “more” or ”much more” opioid medication than needed, 38% stated that they were given the “right amount”, and 5% reported that they were given ”less” or “much less” than needed. 40.0% were on opioids prior to operation. 53.5% did not require refill of discharge opioid prescriptions, 30.2% of patients did not fill any posteroperative opioid prescription. 16.3% of patients filled their discharge prescription and at least one additionall refill (mean refill = 2.22). Mean number of reported opioid pills taken after surgery was 17.4. Mean satisfaction with overall pain management at phone follow up was 8.6/10. Conclusion: While postoperative pain and management vary substantially, a majority of patients feel that they are given more opioid medication than necessary following ankle fracture repair, and a majority of opioid prescriptions are not completely used. Going forward, it is likely that a majority of patients could experience the same beneficial results with less prescription opioid pain medication, which would reduce overpresciption and potential misuse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document