scholarly journals Pain Management Strategies and Health Care Use in Community-Dwelling Individuals Living with Chronic Pain

Pain Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2267-2279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth G Mann ◽  
Ana Johnson ◽  
Ian Gilron ◽  
Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Health Care Use

scholarly journals An Integrated Pain Team Model: Impact on Pain-Related Outcomes and Opioid Misuse in Patients with Chronic Pain

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1977-1984
Author(s):  
Carolyn J Gibson ◽  
Joseph Grasso ◽  
Yongmei Li ◽  
Natalie Purcell ◽  
Jennifer Tighe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Treatment Satisfaction ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Opioid Misuse

Abstract Objective Biopsychosocial integrated pain team (IPT) care models are being implemented in Veterans Health Administration (VA) and other health care systems to address chronic pain and reduce risks related to long-term opioid therapy, with little evaluation of effectiveness to date. We examined whether IPT improves self-reported pain-related outcomes and opioid misuse. Design Single-group quality improvement study. Setting Large VA health care system. Subjects Veterans with chronic pain (N = 99, 84% male, mean age [SD] = 60 [13] years). Methods Using paired t tests and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks tests, we examined pain experience (Brief Pain Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale), opioid misuse (Current Opioid Misuse Measure), treatment satisfaction (Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale), and pain management strategies among patients with chronic pain before and after three or more IPT encounters. Results After an average (SD) of 14.3 (9) weeks engaged in IPT, patients reported improvement in pain interference (mean [SD] = 46.0 [15.9] vs 40.5 [16.2], P < 0.001), pain catastrophizing (mean [SD] = 22.9 [13.0] vs 19.3 [14.1], P = 0.01), treatment satisfaction (i.e., “very satisfied” = 13.1% at baseline vs 25.3% at follow-up, P = 0.01), and reduced opioid misuse (mean [SD] = 11.0 [7.5] vs 8.2 [6.1], P = 0.01). Patients reported increased use of integrative (i.e., acupuncture, 11% at baseline vs 26% at follow-up, P < 0.01) and active pain management strategies (i.e., exercise, 8% at baseline vs 16% at follow-up, P < 0.01) and were less likely to use only pharmacological pain management strategies after IPT engagement (19% at baseline vs 5% at follow-up, P < 0.01). Conclusions Biopsychosocial, integrated pain care may improve patient-centered outcomes related to opioid misuse and the subjective experience and nonpharmacological self-management of chronic pain.

Use of multidomain management strategies by community dwelling adults with chronic pain: evidence from a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Axon ◽  
Mira J. Patel ◽  
Jennifer R. Martin ◽  
Marion K. Slack
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Pain Outcomes

AbstractBackground and aimsMultidomain strategies (i.e. two or more strategies) for managing chronic pain are recommended to avoid excessive use of opioids while producing the best outcomes possible. The aims of this systematic review were to: 1) determine if patient-reported pain management is consistent with the use of multidomain strategies; and 2) identify the role of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patient-reported pain management.MethodsBibliographic databases, websites, and reference lists of included studies were searched to identify published articles reporting community-based surveys of pain self-management from January 1989 to June 2017 using controlled vocabulary (and synonyms): pain; self-care; self-management; self-treatment; and adult. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data on subject demographics, pain characteristics, pain self-management strategies, and pain outcomes. Pain self-management strategies were organized according to our conceptual model. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Differences between the researchers were resolved by consensus.ResultsFrom the 3,235 unique records identified, 18 studies published between 2002 and 2017 from 10 countries were included. Twenty-two types of pharmacological strategies were identified (16 prescription, six non-prescription). NSAIDs (15 studies, range of use 10–72%) and opioids (12 studies, range of use 5–72%) were the most commonly reported prescription pharmacological strategies. Other prescription pharmacological strategies included analgesics, acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, anxiolytics, salicylates, β-blockers and calcium channel blockers, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and steroids, muscle relaxants, topical products, triptans, and others. Twenty-two types of non-pharmacological strategies were identified: four medical strategies (10 studies), 10 physical strategies (15 studies), four psychological strategies (12 studies), and four self-initiated strategies (15 studies). Medical strategies included consulting a medical practitioner, chiropractic, and surgery. Physical strategies included exercise, massage, hot and cold modalities, acupuncture, physical therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, activity modification or restriction, assistive devices, and altering body position/posture. Psychological strategies included relaxation, prayer or meditation, therapy, and rest/sleep. Self-initiated strategies included dietary or herbal supplements, dietary modifications, and complementary and alternative medicine. Overall, the number of strategies reported among the studies ranged from five to 28 (out of 44 identified strategies). Limited data on pain outcomes was reported in 15 studies, and included satisfaction with pain management strategies, pain interference on daily activities, adverse events, lost work or restricted activity days, emergency department visits, and disabilities.ConclusionsA wide variety and large number of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to manage chronic pain were reported, consistent with the use of multidomain strategies. High levels of use of both NSAIDs and opioids also were reported.ImplicationsComprehensive review and consultation with patients about their pain management strategies is likely needed for optimal outcomes. Additional research is needed to determine: how many, when, and why multidomain strategies are used; the relationship between opioid use, multidomain management strategies, and level of pain; how multidomain strategies relate to outcomes; and if adding strategies to a pain management plan increases the risk of adverse events or interactions, and increases an individuals pain management burden.

scholarly journals iCanCope with Pain™: User-Centred Design of a Web- and Mobile-Based Self-Management Program for Youth with Chronic Pain Based on Identified Health Care Needs

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer N Stinson ◽  
Chitra Lalloo ◽  
Lauren Harris ◽  
Lisa Isaac ◽  
Fiona Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Barriers To Care ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Care Providers

BACKGROUND: While there are emerging web-based self-management programs for children and adolescents with chronic pain, there is currently not an integrated web- and smartphone-based app that specifically addresses the needs of adolescents with chronic pain.OBJECTIVES: To conduct a needs assessment to inform the development of an online chronic pain self-management program for adolescents, called iCanCope with Pain™.METHODS: A purposive sample of adolescents (n=23; 14 to 18 years of age) was recruited from two pediatric chronic pain clinics in Ontario. Interdisciplinary health care providers were also recruited from these sites. Three focus groups were conducted with adolescents (n=16) and one with pediatric health care providers (n=7). Individual adolescent interviews were also conducted (n=7).RESULTS: Qualitative analysis uncovered four major themes: pain impact; barriers to care; pain management strategies; and transition to adult care. Pain impacted social, emotional, physical and role functioning, as well as future goals. Barriers to care were revealed at the health care system, patient and societal levels. Pain management strategies included support systems, and pharmacological, physical and psychological approaches. Transition subthemes were: disconnect between pediatric and adult systems; skills development; parental role; and fear/anxiety. Based on these identified needs, the iCanCope with Pain™ architecture will include the core theory-based functionalities of: symptom self-monitoring; personalized goal setting; pain coping skills training; peer-based social support; and chronic pain education.CONCLUSIONS: The proposed iCanCope with Pain™ program aims to address the self-management needs of adolescents with chronic pain by improving access to disease information, strategies to manage symptoms and social support.

Chronic pain is associated with increased health care use among community-dwelling older adults in Brazil: the Pain in the Elderly (PAINEL) Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 594-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana L Torres ◽  
Silvia L A da Silva ◽  
Fabiane R Ferreira ◽  
Liliane P S Mendes ◽  
Luciana A Machado
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Doctor Visits

Abstract Background Chronic pain is known to increase health care use in high-income countries, but in Brazil, little is known. Objective To investigate the association between chronic pain and health care use among Brazilian older adults and explore the relationship between pain severity and health care use. Methods This cross-sectional study was derived from the population-based study Frailty in Brazilian Older People-FIBRA. Chronic pain, pain intensity and pain-related disability were assessed through additional telephone interviews. Health care use was measured by the number of doctor visits, hospitalization events and high health care use (highest quartile of the distribution for number of doctor visits) in the last 12 months. Associations were tested in regression analyses adjusted for predisposing, enabling and illness-level components from the Andersen Model. Results The 383 participants were predominantly female (71.0%), mean age was 75.6 (6.1 SD). The prevalence of chronic pain was 30.0%. Chronic pain was associated with number of doctor visits [unstandardized B coefficient 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.35–2.62] and high health care use [odds ratios (OR) = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.39–3.72]. Pain intensity was associated with high health care use in univariate (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.06–1.20) but not multivariate analysis (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.94–1.33). Pain-related disability was not associated with any outcome. Conclusion Chronic pain increased health care use among Brazilian older adults. Improving the quality of primary care management of individuals at greater risk of chronic pain should be a cornerstone of health policies directed towards reducing the personal and societal burden of ageing.

Opioid-Related Adverse Events: Incidence and Impact in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith B. Allen ◽  
Ethan Y. Brovman ◽  
Adnan K. Chhatriwalla ◽  
Katherine J. Greco ◽  
Nikhilesh Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Care Costs

Purpose. Opioid-related adverse drug events (ORADEs) increase patient length of stay (LOS) and health care costs. However, ORADE rates may be underreported. This study attempts to understand the degree to which ORADEs are underreported in Medicare patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Materials and Methods. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services administrative claims database was used to identify ORADEs in 110 158 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent cardiac valve (n = 50 525) or coronary bypass (n = 59 633) surgery between April 2016 and March 2017. The International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes specifically linked to ORADEs were used to identify an actual ORADE rate, while additional ICD codes, clinically associated with butas not specific to adverse drug events were analyzed as potential ORADEs. Length of stay (LOS) and hospital daily revenue were analyzed among patients with or without a potential ORADE. Results. Among patients undergoing valve or bypass surgery, the documented ORADE rate was 0.7% (743/110 158). However, potential ORADEs may have occurred in up to 32.4% (35 658/110 158) of patients. In patients with a potential ORADE, mean LOS was longer (11.4 vs 8.2 days; P < .0001) and mean Medicare revenue/day was lower ($4016 vs $4412; P < .0001). The mean net difference in revenue/day between patients with and without an ORADE varied between $231 and $1145, depending on the Diagnosis-Related Group analyzed. Conclusions. ORADEs are likely underreported following cardiac surgery. ORADEs can be associated with increased LOS and decreased hospital revenue. Understanding the incidence and economic impact of ORADEs may expedite changes to postoperative pain management. Adopting multimodal pain management strategies that reduce exposure to opioids may improve outcomes by reducing complications, side effects, and health care costs.

scholarly journals Pain Management Best Practices from Multispecialty Organizations During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Public Health Crises

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1331-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P Cohen ◽  
Zafeer B Baber ◽  
Asokumar Buvanendran ◽  
Brian C McLean ◽  
Yian Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Management Services

Abstract Background It is nearly impossible to overestimate the burden of chronic pain, which is associated with enormous personal and socioeconomic costs. Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability in the world, is associated with multiple psychiatric comorbidities, and has been causally linked to the opioid crisis. Access to pain treatment has been called a fundamental human right by numerous organizations. The current COVID-19 pandemic has strained medical resources, creating a dilemma for physicians charged with the responsibility to limit spread of the contagion and to treat the patients they are entrusted to care for. Methods To address these issues, an expert panel was convened that included pain management experts from the military, Veterans Health Administration, and academia. Endorsement from stakeholder societies was sought upon completion of the document within a one-week period. Results In these guidelines, we provide a framework for pain practitioners and institutions to balance the often-conflicting goals of risk mitigation for health care providers, risk mitigation for patients, conservation of resources, and access to pain management services. Specific issues discussed include general and intervention-specific risk mitigation, patient flow issues and staffing plans, telemedicine options, triaging recommendations, strategies to reduce psychological sequelae in health care providers, and resource utilization. Conclusions The COVID-19 public health crisis has strained health care systems, creating a conundrum for patients, pain medicine practitioners, hospital leaders, and regulatory officials. Although this document provides a framework for pain management services, systems-wide and individual decisions must take into account clinical considerations, regional health conditions, government and hospital directives, resource availability, and the welfare of health care providers.

Pain medicine

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Prout ◽  
Tanya Jones ◽  
Daniel Martin
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Multidisciplinary Management ◽  
Pain Medicine ◽  
Pain Pathways ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Chronic Pain Conditions ◽  
Sites Of Action ◽  
Specific Management

This chapter summarizes the assessment and management of acute and chronic pain for FRCA. Pain pathways and physiological consequences of pain are considered along with sites of action and the pharmacology of common analgesics. Assessment of pain for different patient groups and settings is explained. Pain management strategies, pharmacological, non-interventional and interventional techniques are described, including multidisciplinary management of chronic pain. Specific management of some common chronic pain conditions, such as trigeminal neuralgia, are discussed in more detail.

scholarly journals Acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain situations among the working population and their pain education needs: an exploratory study

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-452
Author(s):  
Shuk Kwan Tang ◽  
Mimi Mun Yee Tse ◽  
Sau Fong Leung ◽  
Theofanis Fotis
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Work Performance ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Management Education ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Working Population ◽  
Pain Education

Abstract Background Pain affects a person’s physical and psychological well-being, work performance and productivity. Working population bear their pain and continue to work which may contribute to the worsening of their pain condition. However, their pain situation was not well-examined. Objective The aim of the study was to explore the prevalence of acute and chronic pain in the working population in Hong Kong, understand their pain management strategies and determine their preferences with regard to the use of electronic pain management materials. Methods This was an exploratory online survey. The participants’ pain history, their preferences in methods of pain management, the source of the pain management education that they had received, sources and preferences in relation to the use of the Internet for pain education, and the participants’ demographic characteristics were collected. Results A total of 210 participants joined the study, 67% of whom were experiencing pain. Of the group in pain, 71.6% were in chronic pain that has persisted for 3 months or more. Pain intensities ranged from 2.82 to 3.82 on a 10-point numeric scale. Of the participants, 85.7% reported not receiving adequate pain management education, and 91.4% of those agreed pain services were inadequate. Websites and health care professionals were the sources from which they obtained their pain management education. Conclusions The high prevalence of pain in the working population requires special attention. Health care professionals should be proactive and an online pain management programme can be a solution to address the critical problem of pain in the working population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document