scholarly journals Investigating the Effects of Pulsed Radiofrequency on Dorsal Root Ganglion in Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain Patients: Is It Not Important That We Ask the Right Question, the Right Way, on an Appropriate Sample of Patients?

Pain Medicine ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. pnv050
Author(s):  
Harsha Shanthanna
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Lumbar Radicular Pain ◽  
The Right ◽  
Pain Patients

scholarly journals Pulsed Radiofrequency Dorsal Root Ganglion-Fluoroscopy Guide for Lumbar Radicular Pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
Nugroho Wicaksono ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Positive Outcome ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Disc Protrusion ◽  
Lumbar Radicular Pain

Background: Lumbosacral radicular pain is the most common neuropathic pain. Pulsed Radio Frequency (PRF) is a method that believes to be safe and effective for reducing pain. Case: A 43-year-old woman experiences chronic right lumbar radiculopathy due to Herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) L4-5. Anamnesis and physical examination show a sign of neuropathic pain. The MRI examination shows a paracentral disc protrusion L4-5 that compresses the transversing nerve L5. The conservative management did not produce a satisfying result indicated by the patient still experience pain with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 4-5. Patient unable to do activity properly. We perform pain management using the dorsal root ganglion L5 pulsed radiofrequency-fluoroscopy (PRF) and producing a positive outcome. Patients experience a decrease in pain intensity with NRS 1. The examination on one and two months post-intervention show an improvement. Patient able to do the daily activity with NRS 1-2. Conclusion: Pulsed radiofrequency dorsal root ganglion-fluoroscopy guide that relatively safe, minimum complications, and minimal side effects, making it the preferred treatment for chronic lumbar radicular pain.

Pulsed radiofrequency adjacent to the cervical dorsal root ganglion in chronic cervical radicular pain: A double blind sham controlled randomized clinical trial

Pain ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Van Zundert ◽  
Jacob Patijn ◽  
Alfons Kessels ◽  
Inge Lamé ◽  
Hans van Suijlekom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Double Blind

scholarly journals The Effect of Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment on Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Refractory to Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. E97-E103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Cheol Chang
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy ◽  
Radiofrequency Treatment ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Stimulation Of

Background: Patients with lumbosacral radicular pain may complain of persisting pain after monopolar pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment. Objective: We evaluated the effect of bipolar PRF stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain who were unresponsive to both monopolar PRF stimulation of the DRG and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). Study Design: This is a prospective observational study. Setting: The outpatient clinic of a single academic medical center in Korea. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 102 patients who had received monopolar PRF to the DRG for management of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Of these, 32 patients had persistent radicular pain that was scored at least 5 on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Twenty-three of them were included in this study and underwent bipolar PRF of the DRG. The outcomes after the procedure were evaluated using the NRS for radicular pain before treatment and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Successful pain relief was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the NRS score compared with the score prior to treatment. Furthermore, at 3 months after treatment, patient satisfaction levels were examined. Patients reporting very good (score = 7) or good results (score = 6) were considered to be satisfied with the procedure. Results: The NRS scores changed significantly over time. At 1, 2, and 3 months after bipolar PRF, the NRS scores were significantly reduced compared with the scores before the treatment. Twelve (52.2%) of the 23 patients reported successful pain relief and were satisfied with treatment results 3 months after bipolar PRF. No serious adverse effects were recorded. Limitations: A small number of patients were recruited and we did not perform long-term follow-up. Conclusion: We believe the use of bipolar PRF of the DRG can be an effective and safe interventional technique for chronic refractory lumbosacral radiculopathy. It appears to be a potential option that can be tried before proceeding to spinal surgery. Key words: Bipolar, pulsed radiofrequency, lumbosacral radicular pain, chronic pain, dorsal root ganglion, spinal stenosis, herniated disc

scholarly journals Response to Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency Lesioning of the Dorsal Root Ganglion and Segmental Nerves in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain

2008 ◽  
Vol 2;11 (3;2) ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Thomas T. Simopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Segmental Nerve ◽  
Number Of Patients

Objectives: We aimed to prospectively evaluate the response and safety of pulsed and continuous radiofrequecy lesioning of the dorsal root ganglion/segmental nerves in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain. Methods: Seventy-six patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain refractory to conventional therapy met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to one of 2 types of treatment, pulsed radiofrequency lesioning of the dorsal root ganglion/segmental nerve or pulsed radiofrequency followed immediately by continuous radiofrequency. Patients were carefully evaluated for neurologic deficits and side effects. The response was evaluated at 2 months and was then tracked monthly. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to illustrate the probability of success over time and a Box-Whisker analysis was applied to determine the mean duration of a successful analgesic effect. Results: Two months after undergoing radiofrequency treatment, 70% of the patients treated with pulsed radiofrequency and 82% treated with pulsed and continuous radiofrequency had a successful reduction in pain intensity. The average duration of successful analgesic response was 3.18 months (± 2.81) in the group treated with pulsed radiofrequency and 4.39 months (±3.50) in those patients treated with pulsed and continuous radiofrequency lesioning. A Kaplan-Meier analysis illustrated that in both treatment groups the chance of success approached 50% in each group at 3 months. The vast majority of patients had lost any beneficial effects by 8 months. There was no statistical difference between the 2 treatment groups. No side effects or neurological deficits were found in either group. Conclusion: Pulsed mode radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglion of segmental nerves appears to be a safe treatment for chronic lumbosacral radicular pain. A significant number of patients can derive at least a short-term benefit. The addition of heat via continuous radiofrequency does not offer a significant advantage. A randomized controlled trial is now required to determine the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency. Key words: Pulsed radiofrequency lesioning, dorsal root ganglion, segmental nerve, continuous radiofrequency lesioning, chronic lumbosacral radicular pain

scholarly journals Ultrasound-guided fluoroscopic-verified trans-foraminal lumbar dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency modulation for radicular pain relief: clinical and cadaveric evaluation of the technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaaban Omar ◽  
Sherif El-Sayed Hegab ◽  
Mohamed Ihab Samy Reda ◽  
Sahar Ahmed El-Karadawy ◽  
Mowaffak Moustafa Saad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Lumbar Pain ◽  
Lumbar Region ◽  
Pulsed Radiofrequency ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Sonographic Guidance ◽  
Spine Injections ◽  
Fluoroscopic Imaging

Abstract Background Ultrasound-guided lumbar pain interventions were thought to be difficult; the high acoustic impedance of bone hides the underling structures and needle path. Reviewing the sonoanatomy of the lumbar region using different planes and angles made better sonographic guidance for spine injections. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the accuracy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided lumbar trans-foraminal pulsed radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglion confirmed by fluoroscopic imaging in management of chronic radicular pain. Results Thirty-two patients, with 34 lumbar interventions, were included in the study. Thirty-one interventions out of 34 were performed successfully with overall accuracy of 91.18% and with minimal complications. The successful first trial placement of the cannula was calculated in 44.1% of interventions; multiple trials were needed in 47.1% while incorrect level was encountered in 8.8%. Visual analogue scale of pain and Oswestry Disability Index decreased significantly after intervention up to 3 months compared to the pre-intervention value. The analgesic consumption was reduced by mean of 73.44 ± 31.07% 1 month after intervention. Conclusions US-guided fluoroscopic-verified trans-foraminal PR of lumbar DRG is accurate, safe, and effective for CRP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document