Change in brain oscillations as a mechanism of mindfulness-meditation, cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A Day ◽  
Natasha Matthews ◽  
Jason B Mattingley ◽  
Dawn M Ehde ◽  
Aaron P Turner ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Psychological treatments for chronic low back pain (CLBP) are effective. However, limited research has investigated their neurophysiological mechanisms. This study examined electroencephalography- (EEG-) assessed brain oscillation changes as potential mechanisms of cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness-meditation (MM), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for CLBP. The a priori bandwidths of interest were changes in theta, alpha and beta power, measured at pre- and post-treatment. Design A secondary analysis of a clinical trial. Setting University of Queensland Psychology Clinic. Subjects Adults (N = 57) with CLBP who completed pre- and post-treatment EEG and pain outcome assessments. Methods EEG data were examined for five regions of interest (ROIs); the primary outcome was pain intensity. Results A significant reduction in theta (p=.015) and alpha (p=.006) power in the left frontal ROI across all treatments was found, although change in theta and alpha power in this region was not differentially associated with outcome across treatments. There were significant reductions in beta power in all five ROIs across all treatments (ps≤.013). Beta power reduction in the central ROI showed a significant association with reduced pain intensity in MBCT only (p=.028). Changes in other regions were not statistically significant. Conclusions These findings provide support for the capacity of psychological CLBP treatments to induce changes in brain activity. The reduced beta power in all five ROIs indicated that all three treatments engendered a state of lowered cortical arousal. The growing body of research in this area could potentially inform novel directions towards remedying central nervous system abnormalities associated with CLBP.

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-334
Author(s):  
Brittany K. Cattanach ◽  
Beverly E. Thorn ◽  
Dawn M. Ehde ◽  
Mark P. Jensen ◽  
Melissa A. Day

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 740-749
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Day ◽  
L. Charles Ward ◽  
Beverly E. Thorn ◽  
John Burns ◽  
Dawn M. Ehde ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 161-169
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Day ◽  
Beverly E. Thorn ◽  
Dawn M. Ehde ◽  
John W. Burns ◽  
Amanda Barnier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pongsatorn Saiklang ◽  
Rungthip Puntumetakul ◽  
James Selfe ◽  
Gillian Yeowell

Objective The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of a novel supported dynamic lumbar extension with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) technique on stature change, deep abdominal muscle activity, trunk muscle fatigue, and pain intensity during prolonged sitting in chronic low back pain (CLBP) participants. Background Prolonged sitting can cause trunk muscle fatigue from continuous contraction of deep trunk muscles in seated postures. Deficiency of activity of deep muscles can reduce muscular support of the spine, causing stress on spinal structures, which could result in pain. Method Thirty participants with CLBP were randomly allocated: (a) control—sitting without exercise, and (b) intervention—supported dynamic lumbar extension with the ADIM technique. Results Compared to the intervention condition, the control condition demonstrated significantly greater deterioration in stature change, increased levels of deep trunk muscle fatigue, and an increase in pain during prolonged sitting. Conclusion The supported dynamic lumbar extension with the ADIM technique appears to provide a protective effect on detrimental stature change and deep trunk muscle fatigue. In addition, it prevented an increase in pain intensity during prolonged sitting in people with CLBP. Application Sedentary behavior harms health, particularly affecting the lower back. Clinicians can use the intervention to induce dynamic lumbar movement, and this exercise can maintain deep trunk muscle activity during prolonged sitting, thereby helping to prevent low back pain (LBP) problems.


Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (15) ◽  
pp. E889-E898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalyah M. Alamam ◽  
Niamh Moloney ◽  
Andrew Leaver ◽  
Hana I. Alsobayel ◽  
Martin G. Mackey

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 1049-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey B. Simon ◽  
Trevor A. Lentz ◽  
Mark D. Bishop ◽  
Joseph L. Riley ◽  
Roger B. Fillingim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Because of its high global burden, determining biopsychosocial influences of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a research priority. Psychological factors such as pain catastrophizing are well established. However, cognitive factors such as working memory warrant further investigation to be clinically useful. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine how working memory and pain catastrophizing are associated with CLBP measures of daily pain intensity and movement-evoked pain intensity. Design This study was a cross-sectional analysis of individuals with ≥3 months of CLBP (n=60) compared with pain-free controls (n=30). Method Participants completed measures of working memory, pain catastrophizing, and daily pain intensity. Movement-evoked pain intensity was assessed using the Back Performance Scale. Outcome measures were compared between individuals with CLBP and those who were pain-free using nonparametric testing. Associations were determined using multivariate regression analyses. Results Participants with CLBP (mean age=47.7 years, 68% female) had lower working memory performance (P=.008) and higher pain catastrophizing (P<.001) compared with pain-free controls (mean age=47.6 years, 63% female). For individuals with CLBP, only working memory remained associated with daily pain intensity (R2=.07, standardized beta=−.308, P=.041) and movement-evoked pain intensity (R2=.14, standardized beta=−.502, P=.001) after accounting for age, sex, education, and interactions between pain catastrophizing and working memory. Limitations The cross-sectional design prevented prospective analysis. Findings also are not indicative of overall working memory (eg, spatial) or cognitive performance. Conclusion Working memory demonstrated the strongest association with daily pain and movement-evoked pain intensity compared with (and after accounting for) established CLBP factors. Future research will elucidate the prognostic value of working memory on prevention and recovery of CLBP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document