Modification of the Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Technique Based Upon the Anatomic Angle of the Superior Articular Process on MRI

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2090-2099
Author(s):  
David Levi ◽  
Scott Horn ◽  
Jestine Murphy ◽  
Matt Smuck ◽  
Josh Levin

Abstract Objective A modification of the conventional technique for cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (CTFESI) has been developed. This technique may, theoretically, decrease the likelihood of the needle encountering the vertebral artery and spinal nerve. The approach uses angle measurements of the superior articular process ventral surface from the patient’s axial MRI as a guide for fluoroscopic set-up and needle trajectory. This report aims to compare contrast flow patterns of the modified approach with those of the conventional technique. Design Retrospective chart review and prospective blinded analysis of contrast flow patterns. Setting. Outpatient interventional physiatry practice. Methods A retrospective blinded qualitative review of fluoroscopic images was performed to compare contrast flow patterns of CTFESIs performed using the modified approach with those using the conventional technique. A detailed description of the modified approach is provided in this report. Results Ninety-seven CTFESI procedures were used for flow analysis. The modified approach resulted in a statistically significant greater percentage of injections with epidural flow: 69% [95% CI = 57–82%] modified approach vs. 42% [95% CI = 28–56%] conventional approach. The modified technique also showed a statistically significant higher percent of injections categorized as having an ideal flow pattern, that of predominate epidural and/or intraforaminal flow: 65% [95% CI = 52–78%] vs. 27% [95% CI = 14–40%]. Conclusions A modification of the conventional CTFESI technique, developed for the purpose of improved safety, may provide superior contrast flow patterns when compared to the conventional approach.

2012 ◽  
Vol 5;15 (5;9) ◽  
pp. 415-420
Author(s):  
Joon-Hee Park

Background: Owing to the anatomical difference between the far lateral herniation of the lumbar disc (FHLD) and the intraspinal herniation of lumbar disc (iHLD), the outcome of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) in patients with FHLD seems to be different from that in patients with iHLD. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of TFESI in FHLD. Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of TFESI in FHLD and iHLD patients. Study Design: A retrospective design. Methods: There were 15 and 70 patients in the FHLD and iHLD groups, respectively. Patients received a fluoroscopically guided TFESI. Failure rates of TFESI were recorded, and questionnaires, including a visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered before the initial injection, at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after the injections. Results: There was no failure for TFESI in the iHLD group, while 9 patients had to undergo alternative blocks in the FHLD group due to lancinating leg pain when the needle was advanced for TFESI. In the iHLD group, there was a statistically significant improvement in the VAS and ODI score 12 weeks after injection. Considering only successful cases of the FHLD group, significant improvement in the VAS and ODI score was also demonstrated in the FHLD group 12 weeks after injection. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference of the VAS and ODI between the both groups. Limitations: A relatively small numbers of cases were included in the FHLD group. Conclusion: The current study suggests that an alternative needle placement technique for TFESI appears to be necessary for FHLD patients. Key words: Far lateral herniation of lumbar disc, intraspinal herniation of lumbar disc, transforaminal epidural steroid injection, safe triangle, herniated lumbar disc, visual analog pain scale, Oswestry disability index, radiculopathy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document