Music Intervention in Pain Relief of Cardiovascular Patients in Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3055-3065
Author(s):  
Yiru Wang ◽  
Jing Wei ◽  
Xinzhu Guan ◽  
Yifan Zhang ◽  
Yiyi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Respiration Rate ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Music Intervention ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cardiac Procedures ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Numerous meta-analyses have been conducted on music and pain, but no studies have investigated music and cardiac procedural pain. Objective To assess the effects of music intervention on pain in cardiac procedures in the published randomized controlled trials. Methods This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the included randomized controlled studies were published between 1999 and 2016. Studies were obtained from electronic databases or by hand-searching of related journals and reference lists. The main outcome was pain intensity, and the secondary outcomes were vital signs such as heart rate, respiration rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. Risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Results Analysis of 14 studies indicated that music interventions had statistically significant effects on decreasing pain scales (mean deviation [MD] = –1.84), heart rate (MD = –2.62), respiration rate (MD = –2.57), systolic blood pressure (MD = –5.11), and diastolic blood pressure (MD = 0.44). The subgroup analysis method was used in all five outcomes. Conclusions Considering all the possible benefits, music intervention may provide an effective complement for the relief of cardiac procedural pain.

Cardiovascular Responding during Anger and Fear Imagery

1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Roberts ◽  
Theodore C. Weerts
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Scene Change ◽  
Emotional Responding ◽  
Analysis Of Change ◽  
Screening Interview

This study was designed to determine if visualization of anger- and fear-provoking scenes produced differential physiological patterns similar to those produced by in vivo manipulations. Normotensive college students were selected on the basis of their responses to newly developed Anger and Fear/Anxiety questionnaires and for their ability to construct arousing scenes during a screening interview. In a 2 × 2 design (intensity × emotion), four scenes (high and low anger, high and low fear) were constructed individually for each of 16 subjects to imagine. Diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored during visualization of each scene. Change in diastolic blood pressure was significantly greater for high anger than for high fear as predicted. Analysis of change in heart rate and systolic blood pressure showed significant effects for intensity only. These results provide further support for the concept of physiological differentiation in human emotion and suggest the utility of imagery for systematic study of human emotional responding.

scholarly journals The Antihypertensive Effects and Safety of LCZ696 in Patients with Hypertension: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2824
Author(s):  
Su-Kiat Chua ◽  
Wei-Ting Lai ◽  
Lung-Ching Chen ◽  
Huei-Fong Hung
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Background: The management of hypertension remains suboptimal throughout the world. Methods: We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the effectiveness and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) for the treatment of high arterial pressure. Relevant published articles from PubMed, Cochrane base, and Medline were examined, and the last search date was December 2020. Only published randomized controlled trials and double-blind studies were selected for further analysis. The mean reductions in systolic blood pressure (msSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) in the sitting position, as well as the mean reductions in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP), were assumed as efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were considered as safety outcomes. Results: Ten studies with a total of 5931patients were included for analysis. Compared with placebo, LCZ696 had a significant reduction in msSBP (weight mean difference (WMD) = −6.52 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): −8.57 to −4.47; p < 0.001), msDBP (WMD = −3.32 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.57 to −2.07; p < 0.001), maSBP (WMD = −7.08 mmHg, 95% CI: −10.48 to −3.68; p < 0.001), maDBP (WMD = −3.28 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.55 to −2.02, p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, only 200 mg and 400 mg LCZ696 showed a significant BP reduction. There was no difference in the AE rate between the LCZ696 and placebo groups (WMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.27, p = 0.54). Egger’s test revealed a potential publication bias for msSBP (p = 0.025), but no publication bias for other outcomes. Conclusion: LCZ696 may reduce blood pressure more efficaciously than traditional therapy in hypertensive patients without increasing adverse effects.

scholarly journals COMPARISON STUDY OF IVABRADINE WITH METOPROLOL IN MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishman Tandi ◽  
Tanvi Kumar ◽  
Amritpal Singh Kahlon ◽  
Aaftab Sethi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome remains as one of the most important causes for morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Therefore, evidence-based management strategy is required to offset the loss of health during an acute coronary syndrome. An effective approach includes both medical and surgical methods. This study was conducted to evaluate the medical method of management. Objective: To study blood pressure and heart rate variability after administration of Ivabradine or metoprolol in cases with acute coronary syndrome. Materials and methods: The study was a Prospective single center observational study conducted in patients attending Cardiology Intensive Care Unit in Nayyar Heart and Superspecialty Hospital, a tertiary care centre located in an urban area. All patients with Acute coronary syndrome admitted to the emergency or cardiac care unit were analysed with ECG as a preliminary diagnostic test and confirmed with troponin markers. They were either given Ivabradine or Metoprolol. Baseline evaluation and follow up was done and necessary data was collected and analysed.   Results: 100 patients were included in the study out of which 50 were given Metoprolol (Group A) and 50 were given Ivabradine (Group B). Themean age of studied cases was found to be 66.54 years in group A and 68.69 years in group B. It was observed that there was a fall in heart rate by 26.8 beats per minute with beta blocker and 24.4 beats per minute with Ivabradine. In case of blood pressure measurement, in patients with beta blocker administration, there was a fall of 25 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure and 17 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure However, with Ivabradine there was only a fall of 8mm Hg in systolic Blood pressure and 6 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion: Although Metoprolol is the drug of choice to decrease heart rate and blood pressure in acute coronary syndrome, Ivabradine is being increasingly used in cases where beta blockers are contraindicated as it has similar efficacy in lowering heart rate without compromising contractility of cardiac muscle, thereby maintaining LVEF and blood pressure. Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, Beta Blockers, Metoprolol, Ivabradine.

scholarly journals Variable versus fixed-rate infusion of phenylephrine during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Hasanin ◽  
Sara Habib ◽  
Yaser Abdelwahab ◽  
Mohamed Elsayad ◽  
Maha Mostafa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Lower Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Phenylephrine Infusion ◽  
Infusion Regimen

Abstract Background Phenylephrine is the most commonly used vasopressor for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery; however, the best regimen for its administration is not well established. Although variable infusion protocols had been suggested for phenylephrine infusion, evidence-based evaluation of variable infusion regimens are lacking. The aim of this work is to compare variable infusion, fixed on-and-off infusion, and intermittent boluses of phenylephrine for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Methods A randomized controlled study was conducted, including full-term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. Participants were divided into three groups which received phenylephrine by either intermittent boluses (1.5 mcg/Kg phenylephrine), fixed on-and-off infusion (with a dose of 0.75 mcg/Kg/min), or variable infusion (with a starting dose of 0.75 mcg/Kg/min). The three groups were compared with regard to frequency of: maternal hypotension (primary outcome), second episode hypotension, reactive hypertension, and bradycardia. Other outcomes included heart rate, systolic blood pressure, physician interventions, and neonatal outcomes. Results Two-hundred and seventeen mothers were available for final analysis. The 2 infusion groups showed less incidence of maternal hypotension {26/70 (37%), 22/71 (31%), and (51/76 (67%)} and higher incidence of reactive hypertension compared to the intermittent boluses group without significant differences between the two former groups. The number of physician interventions was highest in the variable infusion group compared to the other two groups. The intermittent boluses group showed lower systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate compared to the two infusion groups; whilst the two later groups were comparable. Conclusion Both phenylephrine infusion regimens equally prevented maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery compared to intermittent boluses regimen. Due to higher number of physician interventions in the variable infusion regimen, the current recommendations which favor this regimen over fixed infusion regimen might need re-evaluation.

scholarly journals A randomized comparative study of preloading with Ringers lactate and intravenous Ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension due to propofol during induction of general anesthesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha Pradhan ◽  
Brahma Dev Jha
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Volume Loading

Background: The ideal method to prevent hypotension due to intravenous propofol for induction of anesthesia is still debatable. The aim of the study was to compare the hemodynamic response of ephedrine and volume loading with ringer lactate in preventing the hypotension caused by propofol as inducing agent in patients scheduled for elective surgeries requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.Methods: This was prospective randomized study conducted in 40 patients of ASA physical status I, aged 20-50 years, scheduled for elective surgeries requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Group I received intravenous ephedrine sulphate (70 mcg/kg) just before induction of anaesthesia, and patients assigned to Group II received preloading with Ringer's lactate (12 ml/kg) over the 10-15 minutes before the administration of propofol. The variables compared were heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure following induction of anesthesia till 10 minutes after intubation of trachea.Results: We found that there were increase in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure after induction in both the groups but the difference between the groups was not significant. The increase in heart rate was found to be significantly higher in ephedrine group in comparison to volume loading group.Conclusion: Our study showed that both the methods used were equally effective in preventing hypotension induced by propofol in the adult ASA physical status I patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. However, the heart rate was significantly higher in patients receiving ephedrine in comparison to volume loading group.

scholarly journals Influence of body length on orthostatic test parameters of student-athletes

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
I.V. Borysenko ◽  
Cretu Marian ◽  
Z.L. Kozina
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Volume ◽  
Body Length ◽  
Standing Position ◽  
Vertical Position ◽  
Orthostatic Test

Aim: to identify the influence of body length on the indicators of vegetative-vascular regulation of student-athletes.  Material and methods. The study involved 42 second-year students who play sports at the amateur level (qualification level - 2-3 sports degree). The following research methods were used in the work: method of analysis of literary sources; method of determining body length; orthostatic test method; method of determining stroke volume and minute blood volume. Results. It was found that the increase in systolic blood pressure during the transition from horizontal to vertical position in students whose body length is above 190, significantly higher than in students whose body length does not exceed 175 cm (p <0.01) diastolic blood pressure, then in students whose body length is above 190 cm, this figure is significantly higher (p <0.01) both horizontally and vertically. The stroke volume of tall (more than 190 cm body length) students in the standing position is significantly less than that of students with a body length of 150-175 cm. There is a significant effect of body length on systolic blood pressure in the standing position, diastolic blood pressure in the supine and standing positions, heart rate in the supine and standing positions, stroke volume in the standing position, minute blood volume in the supine position and standing (p <0,001). The effect of body length on the orthostatic test was also significant for the following data: systolic blood pressure in the vertical position, diastolic blood pressure in the vertical position; change in diastolic blood pressure when changing body position from horizontal to vertical; heart rate in vertical and horizontal positions; change in heart rate during the transition from horizontal to vertical position; stroke volume of blood in the vertical position; change in stroke volume of blood during the transition from horizontal to vertical position; all indicators of minute blood volume. Conclusions. The state of the cardiovascular system of student-athletes is characterized by high fitness. It was found that students with a body length of more than 190 cm have difficulty with vegetative-vascular regulation.  

scholarly journals An Automated Blood Pressure Display for Self-Measurement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (iHealth Track): Device Validation Study

10.2196/14702 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e14702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Mazoteras-Pardo ◽  
Ricardo Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo ◽  
Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias ◽  
Daniel López-López ◽  
César Calvo-Lobo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Reference Device ◽  
Device Validation ◽  
Mean Differences

Background Hypertension is a global public health issue and is closely related to chronic kidney disorder (CKD). In people with CKD, strict monitoring of blood pressure is an important part of therapy. Objective The aim of this research was to validate the iHealth Track blood pressure monitoring device for patients with CKD according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol 2010 (ESH-IP2). Methods In total, 33 patients who received hemodialysis in Plasencia participated in the study. There were 9 successive measurements made, which conformed to the ESH-IP2. We calculated the differences between the standard reference device (Omron M3 Intellisense) and the test device (iHealth Track) for blood pressure and heart rate values. For 99 total comparisons of paired measurements, we classified differences into various categories (≤5 mmHg, ≤10 mmHg, and ≤15 mmHg for blood pressure; ≤3, ≤5, and ≤8 beats per minute for heart rate). Results In 90 of 99 systolic blood pressure and 89 of 99 diastolic blood pressure comparisons between the devices, measurement differences were within 5 mmHg. In 81 of 99 heart rate comparisons between the devices, measurement differences were within 3 beats per minute. The mean differences between the test and reference standard measurements were 3.27 (SD 2.99) mmHg for systolic blood pressure, 3.59 (SD 4.55) mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and 2.18 (SD 2.75) beats per minute for heart rate. We also observed that for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, 31 of 33 participants had at least two of three comparisons between the devices with measurement differences less than 5 mmHg. For heart rate, 28 of 33 patients had at least two of three comparisons between the devices with measurement differences less than 3 beats per minute. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that iHealth Track meets the requirements of the ESH-IP2 in patients with CKD. Therefore, the iHealth Track is suitable for use in renal patients.

scholarly journals Oral clonidine versus intravenous fentanyl in attenuation of hemodynamic responses to larngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 623
Author(s):  
Rukmini G. ◽  
Srinivas M. Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Hemodynamic Responses ◽  
Cardiovascular Parameters ◽  
Oral Clonidine ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Background: During endotracheal intubation, it has been observed that there is evolvement of the responses of the circulatory in nature. These are difficult to control using the IV anesthetic drugs. Hence various agents are tried to overcome this drawback. Objective of research work was to study efficacy of oral clonidine on hemodynamic responses compared to IV fentanyl while patients undergo larngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.Methods: The patients were allocated into two groups of 30 each. i.e. 30 patients in clonidine group and 30 patients in fentanyl group. All the patients received were pre-medicated with glycoprrolate 0.2mg, ondansetron 4mg and tramadol 1mg/kg body weight. Cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure,) were recorded at the following intervals: pre-induction, after induction, at endotracheal intubation, one minute, three minutes and five minutes after intubation.Results: The heart rate was significantly more at various intervals in patients who belonged to fentanyl group and it was significantly lesser in clonidine group. The systolic blood pressure was significantly more at various intervals in patients who belonged to fentanyl group and it was significantly lesser in clonidine group. The diastolic blood pressure was significantly more at various intervals in patients who belonged to fentanyl group and it was significantly lesser in clonidine group. Similar was the case with mean arterial blood pressure.Conclusions: Clonidine has been found to be more effective than IV fentanyl in stabilizing the cardiovascular parameters. Not only that orally it is easier to administer and cost effective.

scholarly journals The effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Patoulias ◽  
A Boulmpou ◽  
C E Papadopoulos ◽  
F Siskos ◽  
K Stavropoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Ambulatory Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

Abstract Background Hypertension augments overall cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), constituting a major additional burden for diabetic subjects; however, control rates of hypertension remain suboptimal. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), second-line treatment option for diabetics, have revolutionized the field of T2DM therapeutic management due to their pleiotropic effects, while they seem to hold multiple cardiovascular benefits. A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the effect of GLP-1RAs on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) provides a better method to predict long-term cardiovascular outcomes than office blood pressure. Purpose We sought to determine the effect of GLP-1RAs on ABPM, pooling data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We searched 2 major electronic databases, namely PubMed and Cochrane/CENTRAL, along with grey literature sources, for RCTs assessing the effect of various GLP-1RAs on ABP in patients with T2DM. Results After screening of the potentially eligible records, 7 RCTs were finally included in our meta-analysis (4 parallel-group and 3 cross-over). GLP-1RA treatment compared to placebo or active control resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in 24-h systolic blood pressure (MD=−1.57 mm Hg, 95% CI: −4.12 to 0.98, I2=63%) (Figure 1) and in 24-h diastolic blood pressure (MD=1.28 mmHg, 95% CI: −0.31 to 2.87, I2=49%) (Figure 2). No subgroup differences between the various GLP-1RAs were identified. More specifically, it was demonstrated that liraglutide once daily produced a non-significant decrease in 24-h systolic blood pressure (MD=−1.43 mm Hg, 95% CI: −5.24 to 2.38, I2=72%) and a non-significant increase in 24-h diastolic blood pressure (MD=1.47 mm Hg, 95% CI: −1.12 to 4.05, I2=61%), while data concerning the effect of once weekly dulaglutide and twice daily exenatide on ABPM were pooled from one RCT respectively (Figures 1, 2). Conclusions Antidiabetic treatment with GLP-1RAs does not influence either systolic or diastolic ABP in patients with T2DM. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1 Figure 2

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document