scholarly journals GoverningWellin Community-Based Research: Lessons from Canada’s HIV Research Sector on Ethics, Publics and the Care of the Self: Table 1.

2016 ◽  
pp. phw024
Author(s):  
Adrian Guta ◽  
Stuart J. Murray ◽  
Carol Strike ◽  
Sarah Flicker ◽  
Ross Upshur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Self ◽  
Care Of The Self ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
Hiv Research

scholarly journals Governing through community-based research: Lessons from the Canadian HIV research sector

2014 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 250-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Guta ◽  
Carol Strike ◽  
Sarah Flicker ◽  
Stuart J. Murray ◽  
Ross Upshur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
Hiv Research

scholarly journals Governing through community-based research: Lessons from the Canadian HIV research sector

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Guta ◽  
Carol Strike ◽  
Sarah Flicker ◽  
Stuart J Murray ◽  
Ross Upshur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
State Funding ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Marginalized Communities ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
Hiv Research ◽  
Funding Mechanisms ◽  
Scientific Decision

The “general public” and specific “communities” are increasingly being integrated into scientific decision-making. This shift emphasizes “scientific citizenship” and collaboration between interdisciplinary scientists, lay people, and multi-sector stakeholders (universities, healthcare, and government). The objective of this paper is to problematize these developments through a theoretically informed reading of empirical data that describes the consequences of bringing together actors in the Canadian HIV community-based research (CBR) movement. Drawing on Foucauldian “governmentality” the complex inner workings of the impetus to conduct collaborative research are explored. The analysis offered surfaces the ways in which a formalized approach to CBR, as promoted through state funding mechanisms, determines the structure and limits of engagement while simultaneously reinforcing the need for finer grained knowledge about marginalized communities. Here, discourses about risk merge with notions of “scientific citizenship” to implicate both researchers and communities in a process of governance.

scholarly journals Governing through community-based research: Lessons from the Canadian HIV research sector

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Guta ◽  
Carol Strike ◽  
Sarah Flicker ◽  
Stuart J Murray ◽  
Ross Upshur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
State Funding ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Marginalized Communities ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
Hiv Research ◽  
Funding Mechanisms ◽  
Scientific Decision

The “general public” and specific “communities” are increasingly being integrated into scientific decision-making. This shift emphasizes “scientific citizenship” and collaboration between interdisciplinary scientists, lay people, and multi-sector stakeholders (universities, healthcare, and government). The objective of this paper is to problematize these developments through a theoretically informed reading of empirical data that describes the consequences of bringing together actors in the Canadian HIV community-based research (CBR) movement. Drawing on Foucauldian “governmentality” the complex inner workings of the impetus to conduct collaborative research are explored. The analysis offered surfaces the ways in which a formalized approach to CBR, as promoted through state funding mechanisms, determines the structure and limits of engagement while simultaneously reinforcing the need for finer grained knowledge about marginalized communities. Here, discourses about risk merge with notions of “scientific citizenship” to implicate both researchers and communities in a process of governance.

scholarly journals Governing through community-based research: Lessons from the Canadian HIV research sector

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Myersb
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
State Funding ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Marginalized Communities ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
Hiv Research ◽  
Funding Mechanisms ◽  
Scientific Decision

The “general public” and specific “communities” are increasingly being integrated into scientific decision-making. This shift emphasizes “scientific citizenship” and collaboration between interdisciplinary scientists, lay people, and multi-sector stakeholders (universities, healthcare, and government). The objective of this paper is to problematize these developments through a theoretically informed reading of empirical data that describes the consequences of bringing together actors in the Canadian HIV community-based research (CBR) movement. Drawing on Foucauldian “governmentality” the complex inner workings of the impetus to conduct collaborative research are explored. The analysis offered surfaces the ways in which a formalized approach to CBR, as promoted through state funding mechanisms, determines the structure and limits of engagement while simultaneously reinforcing the need for finer grained knowledge about marginalized communities. Here, discourses about risk merge with notions of “scientific citizenship” to implicate both researchers and communities in a process of governance.

The greater involvement of people living with AIDS principle: theory versus practice in Ontario's HIV/AIDS community-based research sector

AIDS Care ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Travers ◽  
M.G. Wilson ◽  
S. Flicker ◽  
A. Guta ◽  
T. Bereket ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
Theory Versus ◽  
Principle Theory ◽  
Hiv Aids

Decentering Responsibilization: Towards a Nomos of Governmentality in Mexico

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Guy Emerson
Keyword(s):  
Social Order ◽  
Codes Of Conduct ◽  
The Self ◽  
Civic Responsibility ◽  
Care Of The Self ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Institutional Power ◽  
The Social ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Individual Participation

Abstract This paper charts the mechanics of civic responsibility in preventing violence. Attention centers on divergent practices of responsibilization in Puebla, Mexico, which emanate from both state rationales associated with citizen security initiatives and from community-based measures that confound such official logics. Situated in the workings of governmentality beyond advanced liberalism, the paper proposes a decentering of responsibilization. This requires two steps. First, analysis returns to governmentality as the intersection of technologies of domination and the self but locates the former in relation to nomos rather than logos. That is, responsibilization occurs not exclusively in relation to codes of conduct consistent with official determinations (logos) but also as a socially developed order that exceeds the political, economic, and rational dimensions of government (nomos). Second, it positions technologies of the self amid Michel Foucault's work on the empiricohistorical construction of care of the self. This is a situated care, wherein a responsible individual emerges from the constituent complexity of the social order and her interdependence with other living forms. Far from an art of government wherein individual participation becomes the corollary to the withdrawal of the state, civic responsibility in Puebla is socially embedded and, therefore, need not align with institutional power.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document