scholarly journals Apatinib treatment for unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor with synchronous gastric cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70
Author(s):  
Huanji Xu ◽  
Sheng Zhou ◽  
Qiancheng Hu ◽  
Dan Cao
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Simultaneous Occurrence ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Gastric Gist ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Synchronous Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gist

Abstract Nearly one-fifth of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) simultaneously experience a second primary tumor. In particular, coexistence of gastric GISTs and gastric cancer is relatively more common. However, the optimal treatment for advanced GIST with gastric cancer is largely unknown. We report a case of simultaneous occurrence of gastric GIST and gastric cancer that benefited from apatinib. After first-line imatinib and S-1 treatment for 6 months, the GIST and the gastric cancer both progressed. The patient was then treated with apatinib, exhibiting a partial response (PR) both in the GIST and the gastric cancer at 7 months, and continuous PR so far with well-controlled toxic effects of hypertension. Progression-free survival reached 10 months. In view of the relatively high incidence of advanced GIST with synchronous gastric cancer, therapy to simultaneously treat the two kinds of tumors is urgently needed. Apatinib provides promising and well-tolerated therapy for GISTs with synchronous gastric cancer refractory to chemotherapy combined with imatinib.

Patient Outcomes with Proteosome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma at an English District General Hospital

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5745-5745
Author(s):  
Anil Vaikunth Kamat ◽  
Tariq Shafi ◽  
Raphael A. Ezekwesili
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

Abstract Bortezomib is a targeted proteosome inhibitor licensed & approved for in multiple myeloma both as first line and in relapsed setting. This is a retrospective non experimental cross sectional quantitative comparative group study using clinical case notes, laboratory & pharmacy records for patients treated with Bortezomib in 2011 & 2012. Outcomes studied included remission status, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival at follow up. The study also looked at the comparative responses of cohort of patients administered Bortezomib through intravenous & subcutaneous route. The cohort consisted of 33 patients, 21 male, 11 female, median age 71 years, first line 10 patients, second line 23 , median number of cycles in 2011 & 2012 – first line 3 & 8 , second line 5 & 4, respectively. In 2011, 8 received intravenous treatment, 9 were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous route whilst all patients from 2012 received subcutaneous Bortezomib. The most frequently used regimen was Bortezomib Dexamethasone ( VD). The overall response rate ( ORR >/= Minor Response) was: First line 70% (7/10) ; Second line 47.8% ( 11/23); median PFS ( Figure 1) 6 months ( First line: 7 months ; Second line : 6 months) and median overall survival ( Figure 2) at follow up: 9 months ; 39.4 % ( 13/33) First line 8.5 months, Second line 11 months. Subcutaneous Bortezomib was equivalent to intravenous Bortezomib in terms of efficacy & tolerance. Of 33 patients, there were 12 dose reductions. Adverse events reported included: peripheral Neuropathy - grade 3 - 6% ( all grades 27.3%); Diarrhoea - grade 3 - 3% (all grades 6%); Nausea / Vomiting - grade 3 - 3% ( all grades 6%) and Second Primary Malignancies - 12% ( 4 of 33). Mortality at follow up was 20 patients from cohort of 33 ; causes included disease progression in 11, second primary malignancy with disease progression in 4, COPD 2, Systemic Amyloidosis 2, Tuberculosis 1 , Multiple co morbidities 1 and Asthma with mechanical failure in single patient. Second primary malignancies ( 4/33) included Prostate carcinoma ( 1), Renal Cell Carcinoma (1), Neuroendocrine tumour ( 1 ) and Unknown Primary in single patient. Beyond second line treatment, majority (14 of 23 patients; 60.9 %) did not have further active treatment. These data indicate that patient outcomes were modest compared to published data from VISTA and APEX trials. Majority of patients did not have further active treatment beyond second line which suggests the most effective treatment strategy should be used upfront as patients may not be fit to have further lines of therapy despite availability of recently introduced novel targeted agents. A higher percentage of second primary malignancies were noticed in this cohort which should be an area of further clinical research. Figure 1: Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2:. Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Combined analysis of three randomized phase III trials comparing S-1 monotherapy and S-1 combination therapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Madoka Takeuchi ◽  
Wataru Ichikawa ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Yu Sunakawa ◽  
Koji Oba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

49 Background: S-1 is the gold standard for first line therapy of advanced gastric cancer in Asia. There have been multiple meta-analyses published researching and comparing the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy versus combination1,2. However there has been no analysis using actual trial data. Methods: Actual data from three randomized Phase III trials were combined to compare the efficacy of S-1 Monotherapy and S-1 combination therapy. The START trial, comparing S-1 and combination S-1 with docetaxel, SPIRITS, comparing S-1 and combination S-1 with cisplatin and TOP-002, comparing S-1 and S-1 combination with irinotecan, were merged and combined. For this analysis, the three S-1 arms were combined (n = 642) and the different S-1 combination therapy were combined (n = 617) creating two new treatment arms. The primary efficacy outcome of overall survival, progression free survival and subset analysis of overall survival stratified by baseline characteristics were performed. Results: A total of 1248 patients, including 210 Korean patients from the START were used in the analysis. The median overall survival days for S-1 combination and monotherapy was 382 [209, 648] and 321 [177, 597] and median progression free survival days for S-1 combination and monotherapy was 153 [81, 267] and 122 [61, 204]. Both overall survival (p = 0.0088 HR = 0.85 (0.76,0.96)) and progression free survival ( p = < 0.001 HR = 0.75 (0.67,0.85)) was significantly longer in the combination therapy arm compared to the monotherapy arm. Conclusions:Although there are limitations, the analysis re-confirms that S-1 combination therapy shows to be more efficacious compared to S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients. It must be noted that heterogeneity of the S-1 arm was not carefully considered when combining the S-1 data for the trials. In addition, the results are limited to the Asian (Japanese and Korean) population.

scholarly journals Cisplatin, Fluorouracil in Bolus Injection, and Leucovorin in First-Line Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer as an Alternative to Protocols With Infusional Fluorouracil

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael C. Coelho ◽  
Pedro D.P. Abreu ◽  
Mariana R. Monteiro ◽  
Ana Paula Stramosk ◽  
Alvaro Henrique I. Garces ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Platinum Agents

PURPOSE Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Platinum agents and fluoropyrimidines are the main compounds used in the first-line setting for advanced GC. Given the activity of fluorouracil (FU) bolus, the PFL protocol, a chemotherapy regimen combining cisplatin, FU bolus, and leucovorin, was incorporated at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute, because this schedule does not require hospitalization or infusion pumps. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of PFL in the first-line setting for patients with advanced GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with advanced GC treated in the first-line setting with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and FU bolus 400 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 4 weeks, from January 2008 to December 2014. RESULTS A total of 109 patients were enrolled. The median number of cycles received per patient was four (one to 11). Complete responses were achieved in 6.4% and partial responses in 14.7%. Median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.08 to 7.58 months) and median overall survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.79 to 9.87 months). Thirty-four (31.2%) patients were alive in 1 year. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were experienced by 26.6% and 3.7% of patients, respectively, with dose reduction necessary in 9.1%. CONCLUSION PFL is active in advanced GC and could be an alternative for FU continuous infusion protocols in institutions with limited resources and/or low budget, which is the reality in many nations all over the world.

Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (30) ◽  
pp. 3968-3976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Akira Sawaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose The Avastin in Gastric Cancer (AVAGAST) trial was a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of adding bevacizumab to capecitabine-cisplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Patients and Methods Patients received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg or placebo followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. Fluorouracil was permitted in patients unable to take oral medications. Cisplatin was given for six cycles; capecitabine and bevacizumab were administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Log-rank test was used to test the OS difference. Results In all, 774 patients were enrolled; 387 were assigned to each treatment group (intention-to-treat population), and 517 deaths were observed. Median OS was 12.1 months with bevacizumab plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin and 10.1 months with placebo plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03; P = .1002). Both median progression-free survival (6.7 v 5.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93; P = .0037) and overall response rate (46.0% v 37.4%; P = .0315) were significantly improved with bevacizumab versus placebo. Preplanned subgroup analyses revealed regional differences in efficacy outcomes. The most common grade 3 to 5 adverse events were neutropenia (35%, bevacizumab plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin; 37%, placebo plus fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin), anemia (10% v 14%), and decreased appetite (8% v 11%). No new bevacizumab-related safety signals were identified. Conclusion Although AVAGAST did not reach its primary objective, adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy was associated with significant increases in progression-free survival and overall response rate in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Đánh giá kết quả hóa trị triệu chứng bước 1 ở bệnh nhân ung thư dạ dày giai đoạn tiến xa bằng phác đồ có epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabin

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Chuyen Nguyen Thi
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose:to study clinical and subclinical characteristics in advanced stage gastric cancer patients and to evaluate response rate, overall survival, progression free survival and toxicities on advanced stage gastric cancer patients treated with first line chemotherapy using epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabin Methods: A retrospective case series study with 134 advanced stage gastric cancer patients on first line chemotherapy using epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabin recruited from oncology department, the Hospital of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy and Cancer Center at Hue Central Hospital during January 2015 to June 2019. Results: Patient’s mean age was 54,9; men/women was 2,52/1. The most frequent clinical symptom reported was epigastric pain 81,3%. KPS 80-90% presented in almost patient (93.3%). The most common site of cancer was pyloric antrum (61,9%). 58,2% patients had distant metastasis disease which liver was the most frequent site. The overall response rate, partial response rate, complete response rate were 49,2%, 42,5%, 6,7% respectively. The median progression free survival was 8,6 ± 0,15 months and the overall survival was 10,7 ± 1,1 months. The pathologic type and combined salvage surgery status were response correlated factors. Grade 3, 4 toxicities in term of hematology, liver and kidney function were only exhibited in a few cases. Patients were tolerated well with chemotherapy. No deaths related to chemotherapy. Conclusions: This study shows that EOX regimen was safe and effective. As a results, we can apply this for first line pallative chemotherapy on advanced stage gastric cancer which KPS ≥70%.

Treatment efficacy of ramucirumab-based chemotherapy in patients with alpha-fetoprotein producing gastric cancer (AFPGC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 389-389
Author(s):  
Daisaku Kamiimabeppu ◽  
Takeru Wakatsuki ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Naoki Fukuda ◽  
Hiroki Osumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Intestinal Histology ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Low Incidence

389 Background: AFPGC is an aggressive subgroup of gastric cancer and is associated with a worsened survival because of a high incidence of liver metastasis. Ramucirumab-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment as a second line in advanced gastric cancer. Recently ramucirumab has showed survival benefit in hepatocellular carcinoma, but only those with higher AFP levels. However, the efficacy of ramucirumab in AFPGC is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 283 patients who received paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel combined with ramucirumab between July 2015 and December 2018. AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were elevated and correlated with the disease state during treatment. Non-AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were normal when diagnosed. Other patients were excluded. Patients’ demographics, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rates (ORR) were compared between the two groups. Results: Among the 283 patients, 24 patients were AFPGC and 189 patients were non-AFPGC. AFPGC was associated with high incidences of intestinal histology (46%) and liver metastasis (63%), while AFPGC was associated with a low incidence of peritoneal metastasis (21%), compared with non-AFPGC. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two groups. Median PFS were 5.4 (95%CI 3.6-6.7) months in AFPGC and 4.1 (3.7-5.1) months in non-AFPGC (HR 0.93 95%CI 0.60-1.46, p = 0.788), respectively. Median OS were 19.0 (95%CI 13.2-NA) months in AFPGC and 19.3 (17.9-20.1) months in non-AFPGC (HR 1.21 95%CI 0.70-2.10, p = 0.494), respectively. Regarding with ORR, AFPGC showed higher ORR with 52.6% (95%CI 30.2-75.1), while 37.3% (95%CI 26.4-48.3) in non-AFPGC (p = 0.296), although this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Ramucirumab showed comparable survival and higher ORR in AFPGC than in non-AFPGC. Considering the generally poor prognosis of AFPGC, it is speculated that ramucirumab may have compensated for disadvantage in survival.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Albumin to D-Dimer Ratio in Advanced Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Liqun Zhang ◽  
Zhuo Wang ◽  
Jiawen Xiao ◽  
Zhiyan Zhang ◽  
Haijing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Auc Value ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
D Dimer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Notably, patients with advanced GC have a poor prognosis and quality of life, prompting the need for further studies on its prognostic markers. Among these, albumin and D-dimer are often used as prognostic factors in the prediction of a variety of tumors. Moreover, the albumin to D-dimer ratio (ADR) may be an improved predictor of chemotherapy effect and survival compared to albumin and D-dimer alone, but few studies have investigated this issue. Thus, we explored the relationship between pretreatment ADR and prognosis in advanced GC treated with first-line chemotherapy. A total of 247 advanced unresectable GC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy were retrospectively included. The cut-off value for ADR was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The ADR had a cut-off value of 41.64. Compared to albumin and D-dimer alone, ADR had the highest area under curve (AUC) value (AUC = 0.730), followed by albumin (AUC = 0.659) and D-dimer (AUC = 0.719). Additionally, we found that patients with a low ADR (<41.64) had a lower disease control rate (77.9% vs. 92.5%, P < 0.01 ), shorter overall survival (OS) (271 vs. 389 days), and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (118 vs. 192 days) than patients with a high ADR (≥41.64). Similar results were also found on subgroup analysis, and ADR was found to be an independent advanced GC prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (all P < 0.001 ). Low ADR was found to be correlated with poor therapeutic effects of chemotherapy and shortened OS and PFS. Therefore, pretreatment ADR may be a useful tool for predicting the effect of chemotherapy and prognosis in advanced GC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document