Appendix 8 (nos. 4247–4502): Letters Addressed to King Henry II

Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Barbara B. Diefendorf

The 16th century began in France as a time of relative peace, prosperity, and optimism, but horizons soon darkened under the clouds of religious schism, heresy persecutions, and civil war. French theologians condemned Martin Luther’s ideas as early as 1521, but his views continued to spread underground. The movement remained small and clandestine until the 1550s, when the penetration of John Calvin’s ideas from nearby Geneva resulted in the formation of Reformed churches, whose growing membership demanded the right to worship openly. The accidental death of King Henry II in 1559 left France with a religiously divided court and a series of young, inexperienced kings. Henry’s widow, Catherine de Medici, attempted a policy of compromise that backfired. Militancy increased on both sides of the religious divide, and civil war broke out in 1562. Neither side could secure a decisive win on the battlefield, and neither was satisfied with the compromise peace that ended the war. Indeed, war broke out seven more times before a more lasting peace was secured by the first Bourbon king, Henry IV, with the Edict of Nantes in 1598. The edict set the terms for religious coexistence, allowing French Protestants limited rights to worship and certain protections under the law. It also fostered the spread of a movement already underway for the renewal of Catholic spirituality and reform of Catholic church institutions in France. Until the 1970s, the civil and religious wars that afflicted France through the second half of the 16th century were viewed largely as the consequence of political rivalries that spun out of control following the death of King Henry II. More recently, historians have shifted their attention to the social and cultural contexts in which the wars took place, particularly to the fundamentally religious nature of the quarrels. This has led to a profusion of new scholarship on the impact of the Protestant and Catholic Reformations in France, the tensions—and ultimately the violence—generated by competing claims to religious truth, and the difficulty of resolving the quarrels or putting an end to the wars that resulted from them.


Author(s):  
Peter J. A. Jones

Towards the end of the twelfth century, powerful images of laughing kings and saints began to appear in texts circulating at the English royal court. At the same time, contemporaries began celebrating the wit, humour, and laughter of King Henry II (r.1154-89) and his martyred Archbishop of Canterbury, Saint Thomas Becket (d.1170). Taking a broad genealogical approach, Laughter and Power in the Twelfth Century traces the emergence of this powerful laughter through an immersive study of medieval intellectual, literary, social, religious, and political debates. Focusing on a cultural renaissance in England, the book situates laughter at the heart of the defining transformations of the second half of the 1100s. With an expansive survey of theological and literary texts, bringing a range of unedited manuscript material to light in the process, the book exposes how twelfth-century writers came to connect laughter with spiritual transcendence and justice, and how this connection gave humour a unique political and spiritual power in both text and action. Ultimately, the book argues that England’s popular images of laughing kings and saints effectively reinstated a sublime charismatic authority, something truly rebellious at a moment in history when bureaucracy and codification were first coming to dominate European political life.


Author(s):  
Douglas Allchin

Four-leaf clovers are traditional emblems of good luck. Two-headed sheep, five-legged frogs, or persons with six-fingered hands, by contrast, are more likely to be considered repugnant monsters, or “freaks of nature.” Such alienation was not always the case. In sixteenth-century Europe, such “monsters,” like the four-leaf clover today, mostly elicited wonder and respect. People were fascinated with natural phenomena just beyond the edge of the familiar. Indeed, that emotional response—at that juncture in history—helped foster the emergence of modern science. Wonder fostered investigation and, with it, deeper understanding of nature. One might thus well question a widespread but generally unchallenged belief about biology—what one might call a sacred bovine: that emotions can only contaminate science with subjective values. Indeed, delving into how “monsters” once evoked wonder might open a deeper appreciation of how science works today. Consider the case of Petrus Gonsalus, born in 1556 (Figure 1.1). As one might guess from his portrait, Gonsalus (also known as Gonzales or Gonsalvus) became renowned for his exceptional hairiness. He was a “monster”: someone—like dwarves, giants, or conjoined twins—with a body form conspicuously outside the ordinary. But, as his courtly robe might equally indicate, Gonsalus was also special. Gonsalus was born on Tenerife, a small island off the west coast of Africa. But he found a home in the court of King Henry II. Once there, he became educated. “Like a second mother France nourished me from boyhood to manhood,” he recollected, “and taught me to give up my wild manners, and the liberal arts, and to speak Latin.” Gonsalus’s journey from the periphery of civilization to a center of power occurred because he could evoke a sense of wonder. Eventually, he moved to other courts across Europe. Wonder was widely esteemed. For us, Gonsalus may be emblematic of an era when wonder flourished. In earlier centuries monsters were typically viewed as divine portents, or prodigies. Not that they were miracles. The course of nature seemed wide enough to include them.


Author(s):  
Judith N. Shklar
Keyword(s):  

This chapter continues the debate about different interpretations of what it means to remain loyal to God, and the conflict such loyalty can establish and sustain between believers’ religious commitments and earthly powers. It looks particularly into the New Testament’s doctrine of obedience, exemplified in the case of Archbishop Becket and his conflict with King Henry II. The chapter ends with a comparison between Becket and Martin Luther King’s inner struggles over rival loyalties.


1987 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 237-253
Keyword(s):  

1075 Settlement between Reading Abbey and Elias of Englefield over the mill of Russiford [in Sulhamstead Abbots], with the assent of King Henry II and confirmed by Gervase Paynel, overlord of Elias, whereby the abbot and monks have remitted all complaints against Elias regarding the harm caused to their lands by the mill, on condition that they will have half the rents and profits of the same in perpetuity. They will find half the expenditure necessary for the mill, and those in charge of it shall be appointed by common counsel of both parties. Both Parties will have free multure of their demesne at the millSciant filii sancte ecclesie presentes et futuri istam conventionem factam fuisse inter ecclesiam Radingensem et Heliam de Englefeld de molendino de Rissieford, assensu domini nostri Henrici regis Anglorum. Scilicet quod abbas et monachi Radingenses remiserunt querelas suas et calumpnias quas moverant adversus Heliam propter dampna et gravamina que per ipsum molendinum inferebantur terris ecclesie sue. Et hoc fecerunt tali tenore quod habebunt medietatem reddituum et proficuorum ipsius molendini in moltura et piscibus et in omnibus omnino rebus vel exitibus contra Heliam et heredes suos in perpetuum. Et invenient abbas et monachi medietatem omnium que in operibus vel necessitatibus ipsius molendini fuerint expendenda. Ministri autem et custodes ibi constituentur communi utriusque partis consilio et ipsi facient fidelitatem tarn ecclesie Rading(ensi) quam Helie et heredibus suis. Tam vero abbas et monachi Rading(enses) quam Helias et heredes sui habebunt quietantiam molture dominii sui perpetualiter in ipso molendino. Actum fuit hoc concedente Gervasio Painello domino ipsius Helye et sigilli sui impressione id confirmante. Huius conventionis testes fuerunt Robertus de Luci, Petrus de la Mara, Hugo de la Mara, Adam de Cathmera, Petrus de Stanford, et multi alii.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document