Commentary: A Cohort Comparison Analysis of Fixed Pressure Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Valves With Programmable Valves for Hydrocephalus Following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. E102-E103
Author(s):  
Christoph Wipplinger ◽  
Christoph J Griessenauer
Author(s):  
Eduardo Orrego-González ◽  
Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda ◽  
Luis C Ascanio ◽  
Noah Jordan ◽  
Khalid A Hanafy ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Hydrocephalus after nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a common sequela that may require the placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS). Adjustable-pressure valves (APVs) are being widely used in this situation though more expensive than differential-pressure valves (DPVs). OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes between APV and DPV in SAH-induced hydrocephalus. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with nontraumatic SAH who underwent VPS placement for the treatment of hydrocephalus after SAH, between July 2007 and December 2016. Patients were classified according to the type of valve (APV vs DPV). We evaluated factors that could predict the type of valve used, outcomes in VPS revision/replacement rate, and complications. RESULTS A total of 66 patients underwent VPS placement who were equally distributed into the 2 groups of valves. VPS failure with the need for revision/replacement occurred in 13 (19.7%) cases. Ten (30.3%) patients with DPV had a VPS failure, while 3 (9.1%) patients with an APV had a similar failure with the need for revision/replacement (P = .03). VPS placement before discharge during the initial hospitalization (P = .02) was statistically significant associated with the use of a DPV, while the reason of external ventricular drain (EVD) failure (P = .03) was associated with the use of an APV. CONCLUSION APVs had a lower rate of surgical revisions compared to DPVs. Early placement of VPS was associated with the use of a DPV. The need for EVD replacement due to EVD infection or malfunction was associated with higher rates of APV use.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J Kole ◽  
Aaron P Wessell ◽  
Beatrice Ugiliweneza ◽  
Gregory J Cannarsa ◽  
Enzo Fortuny ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients who survive aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are at risk for delayed neurological deficits (DND) and cerebral infarction. In this exploratory cohort comparison analysis, we compared in-hospital outcomes of aSAH patients administered a low-dose intravenous heparin (LDIVH) infusion (12 U/kg/h) vs those administered standard subcutaneous heparin (SQH) prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (DVT; 5000 U, 3 × daily). OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of LDIVH in aSAH patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 556 consecutive cases of aSAH patients whose aneurysm was secured by clipping or coiling at a single institution over a 10-yr period, including 233 administered the LDIVH protocol and 323 administered the SQH protocol. Radiological and outcome data were compared between the 2 cohorts using multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS The unadjusted rate of cerebral infarction in the LDIVH cohort was half that in SQH cohort (9 vs 18%; P = .004). Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients in the LDIVH cohort were significantly less likely than those in the SQH cohort to have DND (odds ratio (OR) 0.53 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.85]) or cerebral infarction (OR 0.40 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.71]). Analysis following IPTW showed similar results. Rates of hemorrhagic complications, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and DVT were not different between cohorts. CONCLUSION This cohort comparison analysis suggests that LDIVH infusion may favorably influence the outcome of patients after aSAH. Prospective studies are required to further assess the benefit of LDIVH infusion in patients with aSAH.


Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (20) ◽  
pp. e2385-e2394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody L. Nesvick ◽  
Soliman Oushy ◽  
Lorenzo Rinaldo ◽  
Eelco F. Wijdicks ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo define the in-hospital course, complications, short- and long-term functional outcomes of patients with angiographically negative subarachnoid hemorrhage (anSAH), particularly those with aneurysmal-pattern anSAH (aanSAH).MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), aanSAH, and perimesencephalic-pattern anSAH (panSAH) treated at a single tertiary referral center between January 2006 and April 2018. Ninety-nine patients with anSAH (33 aanSAH and 66 panSAH) and 464 patients with aSAH were included in this study. Outcomes included symptomatic hydrocephalus requiring CSF drainage, need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt, radiographic vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), radiographic infarction, disability level within 1 year of ictus, and at last clinical follow-up as defined by the modified Rankin Scale.ResultsPatients with aanSAH and panSAH had similar rates of DCI and radiologic infarction, and patients with aanSAH had significantly lower rates compared to aSAH (p ≤ 0.018). Patients with aanSAH were more likely than those with panSAH to require temporary CSF diversion and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (p ≤ 0.03), with similar rates to those seen in aSAH. Only one patient with anSAH died in the hospital. Compared to those with aSAH, patients with aanSAH were significantly less likely to have a poor functional outcome within 1 year of ictus (odds ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.090–0.75) and at last follow-up (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.49, p = 0.002).ConclusionsDCI is very uncommon in anSAH, but patients with aanSAH have a similar need for short- and long-term CSF diversion to patients with aSAH. Nevertheless, patients with aanSAH have significantly better short- and long-term outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 90-94
Author(s):  
Layton Lamsam ◽  
Hriday P. Bhambhvani ◽  
Ajith Thomas ◽  
John K Ratliff ◽  
Justin M. Moore

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 753-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olatilewa O Awe ◽  
L Fernando Gonzalez ◽  
David Hasan ◽  
Mitchell Maltenfort ◽  
Robert Rossenwasser ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: The incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage is increasing, especially in the elderly as life expectancy increases. Aggressive treatment of aneurysms in the elderly is usually avoided because of a presumed poor prognosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of treatment in patients older than 70 years old. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 150 patients aged 70 years and older who were treated at Jefferson Hospital from 2004 to 2009. Data including World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade and Hunt and Hess classification, specific management components, and treatment outcome on discharge were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients had aneurysms coiled, 9 patients had aneurysms clipped, 11 patients had aneurysms that were not treated, and 20 patients had no visible aneurysms. Overall, increased World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grades correlated strongly with poor clinical outcome. Statistical tests indicate that patients who died (mean, 78.8, n = 35) or who went into rehabilitation (mean, 76.5, n = 81) were significantly older than patients who were discharged home (mean, 73.1, n = 20). However, day of presentation after initial symptom(s) of subarachnoid hemorrhage and placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunt also influenced clinical outcome. Patients who had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt were more likely to go into rehabilitation than patients who did not, and patients without a ventriculoperitoneal shunt were more likely to die. CONCLUSION: Older age should not preclude a patient from aneurysm treatment. Factors such as low Hunt and Hess or World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grades, earlier presentation to the hospital after initial symptoms, early shunting, prompt interventions, and tailored postoperative management can result in favorable clinical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document