Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery Using the Mazor XTM System: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. E123-E123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee A Tan ◽  
Ronald A Lehman
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Illustrative Case ◽  
Robotic Assistance ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Patient Consent ◽  
System 2 ◽  
Screw Malposition ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle

Abstract We demonstrate the setup and workflow of performing robotic spine surgery using the Mazor XTM system (MAZOR Robotics Inc, Orlando, Florida) in this video. An illustrative case was presented, including detailed steps for S2AI screw and lumbar pedicle screw placement using robotic assistance. A step-by-step narration is provided along with discussion of surgical nuances. Robotic spine surgery can be a safe and efficient method for screw placement, which can potentially reduce the risk of screw malposition. Spine surgeons should be familiar with this technology and keep this technique in their armamentarium. There is no identifying information in this video. A patient consent was obtained for publishing of the material included in the video.

Robotic-Assisted Endoscopic Laminotomy: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingda Li ◽  
Michael Y Wang
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Human Error ◽  
Robotic Assistance ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Surgical Ergonomics ◽  
Patient Consent ◽  
Potential Synergy ◽  
And Robotics

Abstract Endoscopy and robotics represent two emerging technologies within the field of spine surgery, the former an ultra-MIS approach minimizing the perioperative footprint and the latter leveraging accuracy and precision. Herein, we present the novel incorporation of robotic assistance into endoscopic laminotomy, applied to a 27-yr-old female with a large caudally migrated L4-5 disc herniation. Patient consent was obtained. Robotic guidance was deployed in (1) planning of a focussed laminotomy map, pivoting on a single skin entry point; (2) percutaneous targeting of the interlaminar window; and (3) execution of precision drilling, controlled for depth. Through this case, we illustrated the potential synergy between these 2 technologies in achieving precise bony removal tailored to the patient's unique pathoanatomy while simultaneously introducing safety mechanisms against human error and improving surgical ergonomics.1,2 The physicians consented to the publication of their images.

scholarly journals Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement During Spine Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0020-e0020
Author(s):  
Isador H. Lieberman ◽  
Stanley Kisinde ◽  
Shea Hesselbacher
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Robotic Assisted

scholarly journals Does the accuracy of pedicle screw placement differ between the attending surgeon and resident in navigated robotic-assisted minimally invasive spine surgery?

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold B. Vardiman ◽  
David J. Wallace ◽  
Grant A. Booher ◽  
Neil R. Crawford ◽  
Jessica R. Riggleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Robotic Assistance ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Spine Surgeon

Abstract Robotic assistance with integrated navigation is an area of high interest for improving the accuracy of minimally invasive pedicle screw placement. This study analyzes the accuracy of pedicle screw placement between an attending spine surgeon and a resident by comparing the left and right sides of the first 101 consecutive cases using navigated robotic assistance in a private practice clinical setting. A retrospective, Institutional Review Board-exempt review of the first 106 navigated robot-assisted spine surgery cases was performed. One attending spine surgeon and one resident performed pedicle screw placement consistently on either the left or right side (researchers were blinded). A CT-based Gertzbein and Robbins system (GRS) was used to classify pedicle screw accuracy, with grade A or B considered accurate. There were 630 consecutive lumbosacral pedicle screws placed. Thirty screws (5 patients) were placed without the robot due to surgeon discretion. Of the 600 pedicle screws inserted by navigated robotic guidance (101 patients), only 1.5% (9/600) were repositioned intraoperatively. Based on the GRS CT-based grading of pedicle breach, 98.67% (296/300) of left-side screws were graded A or B, 1.3% (4/300) were graded C, and 0% (0/300) were graded D. For the right-side screws, 97.67% (293/300) were graded A or B, 1.67% (5/300) were graded C, and 0.66% (2/300) were graded D. This study demonstrated a high level of accuracy (based on GRS) with no significant differences between the left- and right-side pedicle screw placements (98.67% vs. 97.67%, respectively) in the clinical use of navigated, robot-assisted surgery.

scholarly journals Overview of Robotic Technology in Spine Surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110266
Author(s):  
Ram K. Alluri ◽  
Fedan Avrumova ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Avani S. Vaishnav ◽  
Darren R. Lebl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Impact ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Robotic Technology ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
The Past ◽  
Compare And Contrast

As robotics in spine surgery has progressed over the past 2 decades, studies have shown mixed results on its clinical outcomes and economic impact. In this review, we highlight the evolution of robotic technology over the past 30 years, discussing early limitations and failures. We provide an overview of the history and evolution of currently available spinal robotic platforms and compare and contrast the available features of each. We conclude by summarizing the literature on robotic instrumentation accuracy in pedicle screw placement and clinical outcomes such as complication rates and briefly discuss the future of robotic spine surgery.

scholarly journals Confirmation of accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement using postoperative computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Arnaout ◽  
Magdy O. ElSheikh ◽  
Mansour A. Makia
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle ◽  
Ct Studies

Background: Transpedicular screws are extensively utilized in lumbar spine surgery. The placement of these screws is typically guided by anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. Here, we utilized 2-week postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies to confirm the accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement in 145 patients and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Methods: Over 6 months, we prospectively evaluated the location of 612 pedicle screws placed in 145 patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusions addressing diverse pathology with instability. Routine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs were obtained 48 h after the surgery, while CT scans were obtained at 2 postoperative weeks (i.e., ideally these should have been performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery). Results: Of the 612 screws, minor misplacement of screws (≤2 mm) was seen in 104 patients, moderate misplacement in 34 patients (2–4 mm), and severe misplacement in 7 patients (>4 mm). Notably, all the latter 7 (4.8% of the 145) patients required repeated operative intervention. Conclusion: Transpedicular screw insertion in the lumbar spine carries the risks of pedicle medial/lateral violation that is best confirmed on CT rather than X-rays/fluoroscopy alone. Here, we additional found 7 patients (4.8%) who with severe medial/lateral pedicle breach who warranting repeated operative intervention. In the future, CT studies should be performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery to confirm the location of pedicle screws and rule in our out medial or lateral pedicle breaches.

806 Virtual Fluoroscopy Improves Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy

Neurosurgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 530-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Foley ◽  
Ramesh L. Sahjpaul ◽  
Gerald R. Rodts
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Placement Accuracy ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document