Nuances of Endovascular Treatment of Transverse/Sigmoid Sinus Stenosis With Stenting Venoplasty in a Patient With Pseudotumor Cerebri: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-394
Author(s):  
Leonardo Rangel-Castilla ◽  
Adnan H Siddiqui
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Pseudotumor Cerebri ◽  
Sigmoid Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
Patient Consent ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Abstract We present a case of a patient with pseudotumor cerebri (PC) and transverse/sigmoid junction sinus (TSJS) stenosis treated with stenting venoplasty. A 54-yr-old man with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease presented with subacute onset of progressive headaches, blurred vision, and papilledema. He was clinically diagnosed with PC. Left TSJS stenosis was suspected on magnetic resonance venography and confirmed with digital subtraction angiography and venography. During angiography, venous pressures were measured along the intracranial venous system revealing a significant drop compared with pressures obtained from the superior sagittal and sigmoid sinuses. For 7 d prior to venous sinus stenting, he was prescribed antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (350 mg/d) and clopidogrel (75 mg/d). Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure; institutional board approval is not required for the report of a single case. Under conscious sedation and systemic heparinization, the patient underwent endovascular stenting of the left TSJS with an open-cell carotid stent (Precise 7 × 40 mm; Cordis, Milpitas, California). Successful left TSJS reconstruction transpired with no procedure-related complications. The patient was discharged home 1 d postprocedure. After 2 mo of dual antiplatelet therapy, clopidogrel was discontinued. At the 1-yr follow-up, he had resolution of papilledema and notably less intense headaches. Venous sinus stenting is an effective endovascular treatment for symptomatic patients with PC and sinus stenosis. Venous pressure measurement is imperative for patient selection. Adequate venous access with a 6-French guide catheter into the sigmoid sinus and an intermediate catheter into the transverse sinus is crucial to navigate a stent through the acute angles of the TSJS and jugular vein.

Abstract 1122‐000232: The Importance of Performing Venous Pressure Measurements Following Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Sigmoid Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
The Right

Introduction : Although venous sinus stenting is an established treatment for medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension, a subset of patients shows little or no improvement of symptoms after stenting. While this could be related to a number of factors, failure to sufficiently address the pressure gradient is one that can be recognized during the treatment procedure. We describe two patients who had a persistent venous pressure gradient after stent placement. Once identified, a second stent was placed with subsequent resolution of the pressure gradient. Methods : This retrospective chart review identified patients at a single institution who underwent venous sinus stenting and required immediate placement of a second venous sinus stent for a persistent pressure gradient. Results : Two patients with refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension underwent cerebral angiography with venous manometry. In the first patient, unilateral venous sinus stenosis was present with a maximum pressure of 50 mmHg, which only decreased to 30 mmHg after placement of a right transverse‐sigmoid sinus stent. Subsequent manometry revealed a persistent gradient between the superior sagittal sinus and the right transverse sinus, which resolved after placement of a second stent in this location. In the second patient, bilateral stenosis was observed at the transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction; the maximum venous pressure was 40 mmHg, and a gradient of 30 mmHg was measured at the right transverse‐sigmoid junction, where a venous sinus stent was placed. Venous sinus pressure measurements performed immediately after the stent placement demonstrated a persistent pressure gradient of 20 mmHg in the contralateral transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction, which resolved after contralateral stent placement. Both patients showed sustained improvement in their symptoms at 1 year follow up. Conclusions : In some patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and venous sinus stenosis, a single stent may not sufficiently reduce the pressure gradient. A second stent may be required; however, this is only detectable with post‐stent pressure measurements. Performing manometry after stent placement should be routinely performed in order to detect persistent venous pressure gradient.

scholarly journals Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension caused by multiple venous sinus stenoses

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudai Morisaki ◽  
Ichiro Nakagawa ◽  
Koji Omoto ◽  
Takeshi Wada ◽  
Kimihiko Kichikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Sagittal Sinus ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Cerebral Venous Pressure

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) shows symptoms by elevating intracranial pressure. Although sinus stenosis has been detected in many patients with IIH, the role of sinus stenosis in IIH remains obscure. Endovascular treatment for IIH due to transverse sinus stenosis has been frequently documented; however, IIH due to multiple sinus stenoses including the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is rare. Here, we report a case of IIH due to multiple sinus stenoses treated by sinus stenting. Case Presentation: A 47-year-old woman suffered from intractable headache with IIH presented with stenosis of the right transverse and SSS. Stent placement was carried out since intracranial hypertension and trans-stenotic cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) were presented, and her intractable headache disappeared. Conclusion: IIH can be caused by venous sinus stenoses and stent placement could be an appropriate treatment in patients who demonstrated a CVPG.

Accuracy and precision of venous pressure measurements of endovascular microcatheters in the setting of dural venous sinus stenosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B Avery ◽  
Sheryl Sambrano ◽  
Javed Khader Eliyas ◽  
Muneer Eesa ◽  
Alim P Mitha
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Dynamic Flow ◽  
Increased Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Pressure Transducers ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus ◽  
Focal Stenosis

IntroductionDural venous sinus stenosis (DVSS) may lead to increased intracranial pressure, sometimes requiring a stent if a high pressure gradient exists. Many neuroendovascular physicians use microcatheters to measure gradients, yet there are no studies comparing the accuracies and precisions of modern day microcatheters. We examined pressure recordings from five commonly used microcatheters in an experimental DVSS model.MethodsUsing a programmable pump, dynamic flow was established in a closed circuit mimicking the venous sinus waveform. Microcatheters with 150 cm effective lengths were connected proximally to pressure transducers. Mean recording pressures were compared with a high fidelity microcatheter (HFM) in several configurations including no stenosis, proximal to a focal stenosis, and distal to a focal stenosis in opposing orientations.ResultsAll microcatheters recorded lower pressures than the HFM. Three of the five microcatheters successfully met intracranial pressure monitoring device standards in all conditions, while one did not meet standards in any configuration. The performance of the final microcatheter was variable, with inaccuracies occurring in unrestricted flow. All microcatheters demonstrated relatively high precision, but with variable accuracies. The larger diameter microcatheters displayed the least damping and therefore the greatest accuracies. Of the three smaller microcatheters, dimensions did not predict performance, suggesting that microcatheter construction may also play a role in pressure accuracy.ConclusionThe use of microcatheters to record dural venous sinus pressures must be done with an understanding of the inherent limitations and inaccuracies, especially if clinical decisions are made from the results.

Venous waveform morphological changes associated with treatment of symptomatic venous sinus stenosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1108-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L West ◽  
Rebecca M Garner ◽  
Garret P Greeneway ◽  
Justin R Traunero ◽  
Carol A Aschenbrenner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
High Amplitude ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Group A ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Group B

IntroductionVenous outflow obstruction is recognized as a contributing factor in a subset of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Little is known about venous sinus waveform morphology or how it changes after stenting.MethodsFifteen patients with IIH underwent waveform recording during catheter venography and manometry. Ten patients (Group A) with venous sinus stenosis and pressure gradient ≥7 mm Hg underwent waveform recording during awake venography and during stenting under general anesthesia. Five control IIH patients (Group B) without a gradient underwent awake recording only.ResultsGroup A patients underwent successful stenting with reduction of their gradient from 15.1±6.19 mm Hg to 1.2±0.60 mm Hg. This resulted in an amplitude reduction from 8.3 mm Hg to 2.8 mm Hg (P=0.02). Qualitative evaluation of the waveform yielded a number of novel findings. In Group A before stenting, the observed waveform progressed from an intracranial pressure (ICP)-dominated to central venous pressure (CVP)-dominated waveform. Stenting abolished the high amplitude waveform and smoothed the transition from the intracranial to central venous measurement points. Group B displayed primarily CVP-influenced waveforms distal and proximal to the transverse-sigmoid junction along with respiratory variability of the waveform, absent in 8/10 Group A patients. General anesthesia appeared to blunt the waveform in 5/10 Group A patients.ConclusionThe cerebral venous waveform appears to be influenced by both the ICP and CVP waveforms. As measurement moves proximally, the waveform progressively changes to mirror the CVP waveform. Venous sinus stenosis results in a high amplitude waveform which improves with treatment of the stenosis.

Correlation between angiographic stenosis and physiologic venous sinus outflow obstruction in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L West ◽  
Garret P Greeneway ◽  
Rebecca M Garner ◽  
Carol A Aschenbrenner ◽  
Jasmeet Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Arterial Stenosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Venous Phase ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Clinically Significant

IntroductionThe relationship between degree of angiographic venous sinus stenosis and the trans-stenosis pressure gradient magnitude in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is poorly understood. The present study aimed to assess the utility of angiography, venography, and non-invasive imaging (MRV or CTV) for the diagnosis and characterization of clinically significant VSS.MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed to identify patients with medically refractory IIH who were evaluated by angiography and venous manometry for the presence of VSS with associated clinically significant pressure gradient. Angiographic stenosis was measured by two independent raters using novel methodology.ResultsThirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria for the study. In total, 70% of patients had clinically significant pressure gradients and were selected for stenting. The optimal percentage stenosis for detection of a significant pressure gradient was 34% stenosis on venous phase arteriography (sensitivity 0.81 and specificity 0.91) and 31% stenosis on venography (0.92 and 0.73). For every 10% increase in stenosis, an approximate increase in pressure gradient of 3.5 mmHg is seen. MRV/CTV had a calculated sensitivity of 0.42, and a negative predictive value of 22%.ConclusionThe degree of stenosis predictive of a clinically significant pressure gradient (30–35%) in the venous sinuses is considerably lower than the arterial stenosis at which pathologic hemodynamic alterations occur. While highly predictive of a venous pressure gradient when a stenosis is identified, non-invasive imaging does not appear to be a suitable diagnostic evaluation for the purpose of ruling out clinically significant cerebral VSS.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Venous Sinus Pressures in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Patients Before and After Endovascular Stenting

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M S Raper ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
Thomas J Buell ◽  
R Webster Crowley ◽  
Robert M Starke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Hypertension ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Abstract BACKGROUND Elevated body mass index (BMI) has been correlated with worse outcomes after treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for a subset of patients with IIH and evidence of venous sinus stenosis. However, the association between BMI and the efficacy of VSS remains poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE To determine, in a retrospective cohort study, the effect of BMI on preoperative mean intracranial venous pressure (MVP) and post-VSS outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected database of patients with IIH and intracranial venous sinus stenosis who underwent VSS. Patient demographics and treatment factors, including pre- and postprocedural trans-stenosis pressure gradients, were analyzed to identify the relationship between BMI and outcomes after VSS. RESULTS Increasing BMI was significantly correlated with higher maximum MVP (P = .013) and higher trans-stenosis pressure gradient (P = .043) prior to treatment. The degrees of improvement in maximum MVP and pressure gradient after VSS were greatest for obese and morbidly obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m2). Maximum poststent MVP, clinical outcomes, and stent-adjacent stenosis requiring retreatment after VSS were not significantly associated with BMI. CONCLUSION We provide direct evidence for a positive correlation between BMI and intracranial venous pressure in patients with IIH. VSS affords a significantly greater amelioration of intracranial venous hypertension and stenosis for IIH patients with higher BMIs. As such, obesity should not be a deterrent for the use of VSS in the management of IIH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document