A Novel Junctional Tether Weave Technique for Adult Spinal Deformity: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. E45-E46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J Buell ◽  
Jeffrey P Mullin ◽  
James H Nguyen ◽  
Davis G Taylor ◽  
Juanita Garces ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Iliac Crest Bone Graft ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Medical Publication ◽  
Iliac Screw

Abstract Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common problem after multilevel spine instrumentation for adult spinal deformity. Various anti-PJK techniques such as junctional tethers for ligamentous augmentation have been proposed. We present an operative video demonstrating technical nuances of junctional tether “weave” application. A 70-yr-old male with prior L2-S1 instrumented fusion presented with worsening back pain and posture. Imaging demonstrated pathological loss of lumbar lordosis (flat back deformity), proximal junctional failure, and pseudarthrosis. The patient had severe global and segmental sagittal malalignment, with sagittal vertical axis (SVA, C7-plumbline) measuring 22.3 cm, pelvic incidence (PI) 55°, lumbar lordosis (LL) 8° in kyphosis, pelvic tilt (PT) 30°, and thoracic kyphosis (TK) 6°. The patient gave informed consent for surgery and use of imaging for medical publication. Briefly, surgery first involved re-instrumentation with bilateral pedicle screws from T10 to S1. After right-sided iliac screw fixation (left-sided iliac screw fixation was not performed due to extensive prior iliac crest bone graft harvesting), we then completed a L2-3 Smith–Petersen osteotomy, extended L4 pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and L3-4 interbody arthrodesis with a 12° lordotic cage (9 × 14 × 40 mm). Cobalt Chromium rods were placed spanning the instrumentation bilaterally, and accessory supplemental rods spanning the PSO were attached. An anti-PJK junctional tether “weave” was then implemented using 4.5 mm polyethylene tape (Mersilene tape [Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey]). Postoperative imaging demonstrated improved alignment (SVA 2.8 cm, PI 55°, LL 53°, PT 25°, TK 45°) and no significant neurological complications occurred during convalescence or at 6 mo postop.

scholarly journals Comparison of Radiographic And Clinical Outcomes Observed After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Using Iliac Screw Versus S2-Alar-Iliac Screw

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Luo ◽  
Yong-Chan Kim ◽  
Ki-Tack Kim ◽  
Kee-Yong Ha ◽  
Joonghyun Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Postoperative Change ◽  
Iliac Screw ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Correction Surgery

Abstract Background: To date, there is a paucity of reports clarifying the change of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent long segment spinal fusion using iliac screw (IS) and S2-alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixation.Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients underwent deformity correction surgery for ASD between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether IS or S2AI fixation was performed. All radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and the last follow-up. Demographics, intraoperative and clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Additionally, the cohort was subdivided according to the postoperative change in pelvic incidence (PI): subgroup (C) was defined as change in PI ≥5° and subgroup (NC) with change <5°. In subgroup analyses, the 2 different types of postoperative change of PI were directly compared.Results: A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria: 111 who received IS and 31 received S2AI fixation. The IS group (65.6 ± 26, 39.8 ± 13.8) showed a significantly higher change in lumbar lordosis (LL) and upper lumbar lordosis (ULL) than the S2AI group (54.4 ± 17.9, 30.3 ± 9.9) (p<0.05). In subgroup (C), PI significantly increased from 53° preoperatively to 59° postoperatively at least 50% of IS cohort, with a mean change of 5.8° (p<0.05). The clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were significantly better in IS group than in S2AI group in terms of VAS scores for back and leg. The occurrence of sacroiliac joint pain and pelvic screw fracture were significantly greater in S2AI group than in IS group (25.8% vs 9%, p<0.05) and (16.1% vs 3.6%, p<0.05).Conclusions: IS fixation showed a greater change in LL and ULL than S2AI fixation in ASD surgery. PI may be changed under certain circumstances.

scholarly journals Supine Imaging Is a Superior Predictor of Long-Term Alignment Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822096075
Author(s):  
Jonathan Charles Elysee ◽  
Francis Lovecchio ◽  
Renaud Lafage ◽  
Bryan Ang ◽  
Alex Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Multilinear Regression ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Type Curve ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Correlation Analyses

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To investigate correlations between preoperative supine imaging and postoperative alignment. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of a single-institution database of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Patients were stratified by fusion location in the lumbar or thoracic spine. Outcomes of interest were postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK). Sagittal alignment parameters were compared and correlation analyses were performed. Multilinear stepwise regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of postoperative LL or TK. Regression analyses were repeated within the lumbar and thoracic fusion cohorts. Results: A total of 99 patients were included (mean age 63.2 years, 83.1% female, mean body mass index 27.3 kg/m2). Scoliosis Research Society classification demonstrated moderate to severe sagittal and/or coronal deformity (pelvic tile modifier, 18.2% ++; sagittal vertical axis, 27.3% ++, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, 29.3% ++, SRS type, 29.3% N type curve and 68.7% L or D type curve). A total of 73 patients (73.7%) underwent lumbar fusion and 50 (50.5%) underwent thoracic fusion. Correlation analyses demonstrated a significant association between pre- and postoperative LL and TK. Multilinear regression demonstrated that LL supine and pelvic incidence were significant predictors of postoperative LL ( r 2 = 0.568, P < .001). LL supine, TK supine, and age were significant predictors of postoperative TK ( r 2 = 0.490, P < .001). Conclusion: Preoperative supine films are superior to standing in predicting postoperative alignment at 1-year follow-up. Anticipation of undesired alignment changes through supine imaging may be useful in mitigating the risk of iatrogenic malalignment.

scholarly journals S-1 and S-2-alar-iliac screw fixation via intraoperative navigation

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Martin H. Pham ◽  
Andre M. Jakoi ◽  
Patrick C. Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Intraoperative Navigation ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Adult Deformity ◽  
Sacropelvic Fixation ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
Iliac Screw ◽  
Bicortical Screw

Adult deformity patients often require fixation to the sacrum and pelvis for construct stability and improved fusion rates. Although certain sacropelvic fixation techniques can be challenging, the availability of intraoperative navigation has made many of these techniques more feasible. In this video case presentation, the authors demonstrate the techniques of S-1 bicortical screw and S-2-alar-iliac screw fixation under intraoperative navigation in a 67-year-old female. This instrumentation placement was part of an overall T-10–pelvis construct for the correction of adult spinal deformity.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/3HZo-80jQr8.

scholarly journals Association between bicortical screw fixation at upper instrumented vertebra and risk for upper instrumented vertebra fracture

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Seop Park ◽  
Seung-Jae Hyun ◽  
Ho Yong Choi ◽  
Ki-Jeong Kim ◽  
Tae-Ahn Jahng
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Upper Instrumented Vertebra ◽  
Bicortical Screw

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to investigate the risk of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) fractures associated with UIV screw fixation (unicortical vs bicortical) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation after adult spinal deformity surgery.METHODSA single-center, single-surgeon consecutive series of adult patients who underwent lumbar fusion for ≥ 4 levels (that is, the lower instrumented vertebra at the sacrum or pelvis and the UIV of the thoracolumbar spine [T9–L2]) were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, follow-up duration, sagittal UIV angle immediately postoperatively including several balance-related parameters (lumbar lordosis [LL], pelvic incidence, and sagittal vertical axis), bone mineral density, UIV screw fixation type, UIV PMMA augmentation, and UIV fracture were evaluated. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group U, 15 patients with unicortical screw fixation at the UIV; Group P, 16 with bicortical screw fixation and PMMA augmentation at the UIV; and Group B, 21 with bicortical screw fixation without PMMA augmentation at the UIV.RESULTSThe mean number of levels fused was 6.5 ± 2.5, 7.5 ± 2.5, and 6.5 ± 2.5; the median age was 50 ± 29, 72 ± 6, and 59 ± 24 years; and the mean follow-up was 31.5 ± 23.5, 13 ± 6, and 24 ± 17.5 months in Groups U, P, and B, respectively (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in balance-related parameters (LL, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence–LL, and so on) among the groups. UIV fracture rates in Groups U (0%), P (31.3%), and B (42.9%) increased in sequence by group (p = 0.006). UIV bicortical screw fixation increased the risk for UIV fracture (OR 5.39; p = 0.02).CONCLUSIONSBicortical screw fixation at the UIV is a major risk factor for early UIV compression fracture, regardless of whether a thoracolumbosacral orthosis is used. To reduce the proximal junctional failure, unicortical screw fixation at the UIV is essential in adult spinal deformity correction surgery.

The lexicon of multirod constructs in adult spinal deformity: a concise description of when, why, and how

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Lumbosacral Junction ◽  
Coronal Balance ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Iliac Screw ◽  
Correction Surgery ◽  
Rod Fracture ◽  
Concise Description

The use of multirod constructs in the setting of adult spinal deformity (ASD) began to prevent rod fracture and pseudarthrosis near the site of pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) and 3-column osteotomies (3COs). However, there has been unclear and inconsistent nomenclature, both clinically and in the literature, for the various techniques of supplemental rod implantation. In this review the authors aim to provide the first succinct lexicon of multirod constructs available for the treatment of ASD, providing a universal nomenclature and definition for each type of supplementary rod. The primary rod of ASD constructs is the longest rod that typically spans from the bottom of the construct to the upper instrumented vertebrae. The secondary rod is shorter than the primary rod, but is connected directly to pedicle screws, albeit fewer of them, and connects to the primary rod via lateral connectors or cross-linkers. Satellite rods are a 4-rod technique in which 2 rods span only the site of a 3CO via pedicle screws at the levels above and below, and are not connected to the primary rod (hence the term “satellite”). Accessory rods are connected to the primary rods via side connectors and buttress the primary rod in areas of high rod strain, such as at a 3CO or the lumbosacral junction. Delta rods span the site of a 3CO, typically a PSO, and are not contoured to the newly restored lordosis of the spine, thus buttressing the primary rod above and below a 3CO. The kickstand rod itself functions as an additional means of restoring coronal balance and is secured to a newly placed iliac screw on the side of truncal shift and connected to the primary rod; distracting against the kickstand then helps to correct the concavity of a coronal curve. The use of multirod constructs has dramatically increased over the last several years in parallel with the increasing prevalence of ASD correction surgery. However, ambiguity persists both clinically and in the literature regarding the nomenclature of each supplemental rod. This nomenclature of supplemental rods should help unify the lexicon of multirod constructs and generalize their usage in a variety of scientific and clinical scenarios.

Minimum 2-Year Analysis of S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation for Adult Spinal Deformity

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822098447
Author(s):  
Alex S. Ha ◽  
Daniel Y. Hong ◽  
Andrew J. Luzzi ◽  
Josephine R. Coury ◽  
Meghan Cerpa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Coronal Alignment ◽  
Pain Group ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Radiographic Findings

Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: Determine the rate and risk factors for S2AI screw-related pain after adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods: A consecutive 83 spinal deformity patients undergoing surgical treatment between August 2015 and December 2017 with minimum 2-year follow-up for S2AI screw complication and screw-related pain were included. Linear regression was performed on various risk factors and postoperative S2AI screw-related pain. Subset analysis of 53 patients was performed on preoperative and postoperative SRS and ODI scores, operative data, and radiographic data. Results: The overall proportion of S2AI screw-related pain was 9.6%. An S2AI screw complication was identified radiographically in 10.8% of patients; among these, 22.2% experienced S2AI screw-related pain. 3.4% of all patients underwent S2A1 screw removal. The SRS, ODI, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and coronal alignment scores/measurements improved following treatment in all patients. However, the mean difference for the pre and postoperative SRS function score (1.2 ± 0.5 vs 0.9 ± 0.8) and SVA (4.0 ± 4.9 cm vs 2.1 ± 4.8 cm) were higher for the pain group. Conclusions: A minimum 2-year analysis of S2AI screw fixation in adult spinal deformity patients showed that 9.6% of patients experienced S2AI screw-related pain and 3.4% of patients had S2A1 screws removed. The size and the number of S2AI screws did not predict postoperative pain, nor were radiographic findings correlated with clinical outcomes. The patient outcome scores, coronal alignment, and SVA improved for all patients, but within the pain group there was an overall larger change in the SVA and SRS function score.

scholarly journals Use of iliac screw associated with more correction of lumbar lordosis than S2-alar-iliac screw for adult spinal deformity

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Luo ◽  
Yong-Chan Kim ◽  
Ki-Tack Kim ◽  
Kee-Yong Ha ◽  
Joonghyun Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Postoperative Change ◽  
Iliac Screw ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Correction Surgery

Abstract Background To date, there is a paucity of reports clarifying the change of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent long segment spinal fusion using iliac screw (IS) and S2-alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixation. Methods A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent deformity correction surgery for ASD between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether IS or S2AI fixation was performed. All radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and the last follow-up. Demographics, intraoperative and clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Additionally, the cohort was subdivided according to the postoperative change in pelvic incidence (PI): subgroup (C) was defined as change in PI ≥5° and subgroup (NC) with change < 5°. In subgroup analyses, the 2 different types of postoperative change of PI were directly compared. Results A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria: 111 who received IS and 31 received S2AI fixation. The IS group (65.6 ± 26°, 39.8 ± 13.8°) showed a significantly higher change in lumbar lordosis (LL) and upper lumbar lordosis (ULL) than the S2AI group (54.4 ± 17.9°, 30.3 ± 9.9°) (p < 0.05). In subgroup (C), PI significantly increased from 53° preoperatively to 59° postoperatively at least 50% of IS cohort, with a mean change of 5.8° (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were significantly better in IS group than in S2AI group in terms of VAS scores for back and leg. The occurrence of sacroiliac joint pain and pelvic screw fracture were significantly greater in S2AI group than in IS group (25.8% vs 9%, p < 0.05) and (16.1% vs 3.6%, p < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with the S2AI technique, the IS technique usable larger cantilever force demonstrated more correction of lumbar lordosis, and possible increase in pelvic incidence. Further study is warranted to clarify the clinical impaction of these results.

Assessment of Symptomatic Rod Fracture After Posterior Instrumented Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 862-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
Jason Demakakos ◽  
Kai-Ming G. Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Posterior Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Rod Fracture

Abstract BACKGROUND: Improved understanding of rod fracture (RF) in adult spinal deformity could be valuable for implant design, surgical planning, and patient counseling. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate symptomatic RF after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review of RF in adult spinal deformity was performed. Inclusion criteria were spinal deformity, age older than 18 years, and more than 5 levels posterior instrumented fusion. Rod failures were divided into early (⩽12 months) and late (&gt;12 months). RESULTS: Of 442 patients, 6.8% had symptomatic RF. RF rates were 8.6% for titanium alloy, 7.4% for stainless steel, and 2.7% for cobalt chromium. RF incidence after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) was 15.8%. Among patients with a PSO and RF, 89% had RF at or adjacent to the PSO. Mean time to early RF (63%) was 6.4 months (range, 2-12 months). Mean time to late RF (37%) was 31.8 months (range, 14-73 months). The majority of RFs after PSO (71%) were early (mean, 10 months). Among RF cases, mean sagittal vertical axis improved from preoperative (163 mm) to postoperative (76.9 mm) measures (P &lt; .001); however, 16 had postoperative malalignment (sagittal vertical axis &gt;50 mm; mean, 109 mm). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic RF occurred in 6.8% of adult spinal deformity cases and in 15.8% of PSO patients. The rate of RF was lower with cobalt chromium than with titanium alloy or stainless steel. Early failure was most common after PSO and favored the PSO site, suggesting that RF may be caused by stress at the PSO site. Postoperative sagittal malalignment may increase the risk of RF.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Loosening of S2 Alar Iliac Screw: Surgical Outcomes of Adult Spinal Deformity

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-871
Author(s):  
Yasushi Iijima ◽  
Toshiaki Kotani ◽  
Tsuyoshi Sakuma ◽  
Keita Nakayama ◽  
Tsutomu Akazawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Loosening ◽  
Lumbosacral Fusion ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Iliac Screw ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Upper Instrumented Vertebra

Study Design: Retrospective study.Purpose: To determine the risk factors for S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screw loosening and its association with lumbosacral fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).Overview of Literature: S2AI screws have been widely used for ASD surgery in recent years. However, no studies have analyzed the risk factors for loosening of S2AI screws and its association with lumbosacral fusion.Methods: Cases of 50 patients with ASD who underwent long spinal fusion (>9 levels) with S2AI screws were retrospectively reviewed. Loosening of S2AI screws and S1 pedicle screws and bone fusion at the level of L5–S1 at 2 years after surgery were investigated using computed tomography. In addition, risk factors for loosening of S2AI screws were determined in patients with ASD. Results: At 2 years after surgery, 33 cases (66%) of S2AI screw loosening and six cases (12%) of S1 pedicle screw loosening were observed. In 40 of 47 cases (85%), bone fusion at L5–S1 was found. Pseudarthrosis at L5–S1 was not significantly associated with S2AI screw loosening (19.3% vs. 6.3%, <i>p</i>=0.23), but significantly higher in patients with S1 screw loosening (83.3% vs. 4.9%, <i>p</i><0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analyses, high upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) level (T5 or above) (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0–18.6; <i>p</i>=0.045) and obesity (OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 1.2–107.2; <i>p</i>=0.033) were independent risk factors for S2AI screw loosening.Conclusions: High UIV level (T5 or above) and obesity were independent risk factors for S2AI screw loosening in patients with lumbosacral fixation in surgery for ASD. The incidence of lumbosacral fusion is associated with S1 screw loosening, but not S2AI screw loosening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document