The Use of Skin Staples as Fiducial Markers to Confirm Intraoperative Spinal Navigation Registration and Accuracy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge ◽  
Matthew Muir ◽  
Laurence D Rhines ◽  
Claudio E Tatsui
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Fiducial Marker ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Skin Staples ◽  
Spinal Navigation

Abstract BACKGROUND With the advent of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) for image guidance, numerous examples of accurate navigation being applied to cranial and spinal pathology have come to light. For spinal disorders, the utilization of image guidance for the placement of percutaneous spinal instrumentation, complex osteotomies, and minimally invasive approaches are frequently utilized in trauma, degenerative, and oncological pathologies. The use of intraoperative CT for navigation, however, requires a low target registration error that must be verified throughout the procedure to confirm the accuracy of image guidance. OBJECTIVE To present the use of skin staples as a sterile, economical fiducial marker for minimally invasive spinal procedures requiring intraoperative CT navigation. METHODS Staples are applied to the skin prior to obtaining the registration CT scan and maintained throughout the remainder of the surgery to facilitate confirmation of image guidance accuracy. RESULTS This low-cost, simple, sterile approach provides surface landmarks that allow reliable verification of navigation accuracy during percutaneous spinal procedures using intraoperative CT scan image guidance. CONCLUSION The utilization of staples as a fiducial marker represents an economical and easily adaptable technique for ensuring accuracy of image guidance with intraoperative CT navigation.

Intraoperative computed tomography image–guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Tormenti ◽  
Dean B. Kostov ◽  
Paul A. Gardner ◽  
Adam S. Kanter ◽  
Richard M. Spiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery

Object Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws in spinal deformity surgery has a reported inaccuracy rate as high as 30%. At present, image-guided navigation systems designed to improve instrumentation accuracy typically use intraoperative fluoroscopy or preoperative CT scans. The authors report the prospective evaluation of the accuracy of posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation using a new intraoperative CT operative suite with an integrated image guidance system. They compare the accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement using intraoperative CT image guidance with instrumentation placement utilizing fluoroscopy. Methods Between December 2007 and July 2008, 12 patients underwent posterior spinal instrumentation for spinal deformity correction using intraoperative CT-based image guidance. An intraoperative CT scan of the sterile surgical field was obtained after decompression and before instrumentation. Instrumentation was placed, and a postinstrumentation CT scan was obtained before wound closure to assess the accuracy of instrumentation placement and the potential need for revision. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was later reviewed and recorded by independent observers. A comparison group of 14 patients who underwent thoracolumbar instrumentation utilizing fluoroscopy and postoperative CT scanning during the same time period was evaluated and included in this analysis. Results In the intraoperative CT-based image guidance group, a total of 164 thoracolumbar pedicle screws were placed. Two screws were found to have breached the pedicle wall (1.2%). Neither screw was deemed to need revision due to misplacement. In the comparison group, 211 pedicle screws were placed. Postoperative CT scanning revealed that 11 screws (5.2%) had breached the pedicle. One patient in the fluoroscopy group awoke with a radiculopathy attributed to a misplaced screw, which required revision. The difference in accuracy was statistically significant (p = 0.031). Conclusions Intraoperative CT-based image guidance for placement of thoracolumbar instrumentation has an accuracy that exceeds reported rates with other image guidance systems, such as virtual fluoroscopy and 3D isocentric C-arm-based stereotactic systems. Furthermore, with the use of intraoperative CT scanning, a postinstrumentation CT scan allows the surgeon to evaluate the accuracy of instrumentation before wound closure and revise as appropriate.

Combined Image Guidance and Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Facilitating Endoscopic Orientation within and around the Paranasal Sinuses

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah K. Wise ◽  
Richard J. Harvey ◽  
John C. Goddard ◽  
Patrick O. Sheahan ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Paranasal Sinus ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Preoperative Ct ◽  
Anatomic Region

Background The utility of image guidance (image-guided surgery [IGS]) and intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning as a tool for less experienced endoscopic surgeons to aid in localization of paranasal sinus and skull base anatomic structures was evaluated. Methods Partial endoscopic dissection was performed on cadaver specimens by three fellowship trained rhinologists. Anatomic sites within and around the sinuses were tagged with radio-opaque markers. Otolaryngology residents identified tagged anatomic sites using four successive levels of technology: endoscopy alone (simulating outpatient clinic), endoscopy plus preoperative CT (simulating endoscopic sinus surgery [ESS] without IGS), endoscopy plus IGS registered to preoperative CT (simulating current ESS with IGS), and endoscopy plus IGS registered to real-time intraoperative CT. Responses were graded as follows: consensus rhinologist answer (4 points), close answer without clinically significant difference (3 points), within anatomic region but definite clinical difference (2 points), outside of anatomic region (1 point), no answer (0 points). Results Eleven residents participated. Of 20 specific anatomic sites, IGS-intraoperative CT provided the most accurate anatomic identification at 16 sites. For 8 sites, IGS-intraoperative CT had a significantly higher score than endoscopy alone (p < 0.05; eta2 = 0.29-0.67). For 6 sites, IGS-preoperative CT scan had a significantly higher score than endoscopy alone (p < 0.05; eta2 = 0.30-0.67). All participants found that IGS-intraoperative CT scan made them most comfortable in identifying anatomy. Conclusion Combined IGS and intraoperative CT scan technology may be an instructional adjunct for less experienced paranasal sinus surgeons for dissection and evaluation of unfamiliar or distorted anatomy.

scholarly journals Radiographic Accuracy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Fluoroscopic- Versus CT Navigation-Guided Lumbar Spine Instrumentation

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-Ting Cong ◽  
Avani Vaishnav ◽  
Joseph Barbera ◽  
Hiroshi Kumagai ◽  
James Dowdell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spine Instrumentation ◽  
Surgical Methods

Abstract INTRODUCTION Posterior spinal instrumentation for fusion using intraoperative computed tomography (CT) navigation is gaining traction as an alternative to the conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopic-guided approach to percutaneous pedicle screw placement. However, few studies to date have directly compared outcomes of these 2 minimally invasive instrumentation methods. METHODS A consecutive cohort of patients undergoing primary percutaneous posterior lumbar spine instrumentation for spine fusion was retrospectively reviewed. Revision surgeries or cases converted to open were excluded. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed using a postoperative CT scan with blinding to the surgical methods used. The Gertzbein-Robbins classification was used to grade cortical breach: Grade 0 (<0 mm cortical breach), Grade I (<2 mm), Grade II (2-4 mm), Grade III (4-6 mm), and Grade IV (>6 mm). RESULTS CT navigation was found to significantly improve accuracy of screw placement (P < .022). There was significantly more facet violation of the unfused level in the fluoroscopy group vs the CT group (9% vs 0.5%; P < .0001). There was also a higher proportion of poor screw placement in the fluoroscopy group (10.1% vs 3.6%). No statistical difference was found in the rate of tip breach, inferomedial breach, or lateral breach. Regression analysis showed that fluoroscopy had twice the odds of incurring poor screw placement as compared to CT navigation. CONCLUSION This radiographic study comparing screw placement in minimally invasive fluoroscopy- vs CT navigation-guided lumbar spine instrumentation provides evidence that CT navigation significantly improves accuracy of screw placement, especially in optimizing the screw trajectory so as to avoid facet violation. Long-term follow-up studies should be performed to ascertain whether this difference can contribute to an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Validation and accuracy of intraoperative CT scan using the Philips AlluraXper FD20 angiography suite for assessment of spinal instrumentation

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 741-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edin Nevzati ◽  
Javier Fandino ◽  
Bawarjan Schatlo ◽  
Michel Heimberg ◽  
Serge Marbacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Angiography Suite

Navigated Spinal Robotics in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, With Preoperative and Intraoperative Workflows: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. E422-E422
Author(s):  
Martin H Pham ◽  
Joseph A Osorio ◽  
Ronald A Lehman
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery ◽  
Patient Consent ◽  
Minimally Invasive Spine

Abstract The use of robotic guidance for spinal instrumentation has become promising for its ability to offer the advantages of precision, accuracy, and reproducibility. However, the utilization and adoption of robotic platforms for spine surgery remain limited, especially in comparison to other surgical fields. We present here a case of a 52-yr-old man with a grade 1 L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis causing severe claudication and radiculopathy who subsequently underwent a minimally invasive L4-5 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with navigated spinal robotic assistance (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Mazor Robotics Ltd, Caesarea, Israel). This platform allows for planning and registration via (1) a preoperative thin-cut computed tomography (CT) scan, or (2) an intraoperative CT “scan-and-plan” method. We show here the preoperative CT method that we use in the majority of our patients. To our knowledge, this is the first video demonstrating the preoperative software and intraoperative surgical registration and instrument workflow of navigated spinal robotic guidance using the Mazor X Stealth Edition for the insertion of pedicle screws in a minimally invasive spine surgery procedure. There is no identifying information in this video. Patient consent was obtained for the surgical procedure and for publishing of the material included in the video.

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance and Intraoperative Computed Tomography Fusion for Real-Time Neuronavigation in Intramedullary Lesion Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Costa ◽  
Alessandro Ortolina ◽  
Andrea Cardia ◽  
Marco Riva ◽  
Martina Revay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Intramedullary Lesion ◽  
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Dural Opening

Abstract BACKGROUND: Image-guided surgery techniques in spinal surgery are usually based upon fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT) scan, which allow for a real-time navigation of bony structures, though not of neural structures and soft tissue remains. OBJECTIVE: To verify the effectiveness and efficacy of a novel technique of imaging merging between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative CT scan during removal of intramedullary lesions. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients were treated for intramedullary lesions using a navigation system aid. Preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI was merged in the navigation software, with an intraoperative CT acquisition, performed using the O-armTM system (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Dosimetric and timing data were also acquired for each patient. RESULTS: The fusion process was achieved in all cases and was uneventful. The merged imaging information was useful in all cases for defining the exact area of laminectomy, dural opening, and the eventual extension of cordotomy, without requiring exposition corrections. The radiation dose for the patients was 0.78 mSv. Using the authors’ protocol, it was possible to merge a preoperative MRI with navigation based on intraoperative CT scanning in all cases. Information gained with this technique was useful during the different surgical steps. However, there were some drawbacks, such as the merging process, which still remains partially manual. CONCLUSION: In this initial experience, MRI and CT merging and its feasibility were tested, and we appreciated its safety, precision, and ease.

Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation Assisted by Intraoperative CT Scan Combined to Neuronavigation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. e441-e448
Author(s):  
Sonia Duret ◽  
Caroline Guigou ◽  
Mickael Grelat ◽  
Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Intraoperative Ct
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document