Cervical 1-2 Posterior Instrumented Fusion Utilizing Computer-Assisted Navigation With Harvest of Rib Strut Autograft: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J Yee ◽  
Michael J Strong ◽  
Matthew S Willsey ◽  
Mark E Oppenlander

Abstract Nonunion of a type II odontoid fracture after the placement of an anterior odontoid screw can occur despite careful patient selection. Countervailing factors to successful fusion include the vascular watershed zone between the odontoid process and body of C2 as well as the relatively low surface area available for fusion. Patient-specific factors include osteoporosis, advanced age, and poor fracture fragment apposition. Cervical 1-2 posterior instrumented fusion is indicated for symptomatic nonunion. The technique leverages the larger posterolateral surface area for fusion and does not rely on bony growth in a watershed zone. Although loss of up to half of cervical rotation is expected after C1-2 arthrodesis, this may be better tolerated in the elderly, who may have lower physical demands than younger patients. In this video, we discuss the case of a 75-yr-old woman presenting with intractable mechanical cervicalgia 7 mo after sustaining a type II odontoid fracture and undergoing anterior odontoid screw placement at an outside institution. Cervical radiography and computed tomography exhibited haloing around the screw and nonunion across the fracture. We demonstrate C1-2 posterior instrumented fusion with Goel-Harms technique (C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws), utilizing computer-assisted navigation, and modified Sonntag technique with rib strut autograft.  Posterior C1-2-instrumented fusion with rib strut autograft is an essential technique in the spine surgeon's armamentarium for the management of C1-2 instability, which can be a sequela of type II dens fracture. Detailed video demonstration has not been published to date.  Appropriate patient consent was obtained.

Author(s):  
Peter Brumat ◽  
Rene Mihalič ◽  
Črt Benulič ◽  
Anže Kristan ◽  
Rihard Trebše

ABSTRACT Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for pelvic fracture sequelae presents a challenge in hip preservation surgery due to a combination of complex conditions involving post-traumatic altered anatomy and technically demanding procedure, with high surgical risk involved. To address these challenging conditions and evade potential devastating complications, a combination of patient-specific template (PST) and electromagnetic navigation (EMN) guidance can be used to increase the safety of the procedure and the accuracy of the acetabular reorientation. Herein we report our experience utilizing a combined PST- and EMN-assisted bilateral PAO for staged correction of bilateral severe, injury-induced hip dysplasia. The presented case report describes a unique method of successful surgical treatment of severe, bilateral injury-induced hip dysplasia with combined 3-D printing technology (PST) and intra-operative electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation (EMN) aided technically demanding surgical procedure (PAO), which emphasizes the benefits of PST and EMN use in hip preservation surgery in patients with complex pathoanatomic circumstances.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian M. Puttlitz ◽  
Vijay K. Goel ◽  
Charles R. Clark

Abstract Fractures of the odontoid process of the second cervical vertebra comprise 7–13% of all cervical spine fractures. Anderson and D’Alzono [1974] have classified these fractures into three categories: Type I, Type II, and Type III. Type I fractures are oblique, usually avulsion, fractures of the superior-most aspect of the odontoid. Type II fractures, the most commonly-occurring, are produced at the juxtaposition of the process and the C2 body. Type III fractures involve propagation of the fracture through the C2 body.


2021 ◽  
pp. 45-47
Author(s):  
B.D. B.S. Naik ◽  
M.V. Vijayasekhar ◽  
P Prahaladhu ◽  
K Satyavaraprasad ◽  
Nikhil Tadwalkar

Introduction- Odontoid fractures occur as a result of high impact trauma to the cervical spine. Hyperextension of the cervical spine is The most common mechanism of injury. Odontoid fractures occurs in 10 to 15% of all cervical spine fractures . Fracture of the odontoid process is classied into one of three types which are type I, type II, or type III fractures. Of all the types of odontoid fractures, type II is the most common and accounts for over 50% of all odontoid fractures . Materials and Methods- This is a prospective study conducted over 2 years in Neurosurgery Department, Andhra Medical College & King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam. Result: A total of 18 odontoid fractures were managed in the period of two years, out of which 2 were kept conservative and 16 were operated. Out of 16, 11were operated with odontoid screw and 2 underwent C1-C2 xation and 3 patients underwent Transoral Odontoidectomy with posterior occipito-cervical xation Conclusion: The treatment of odontoid fracture is complex and should be planned according to the type of odontoid fracture and neurological decit. Odontoid screw will sufce in patients with type II fracture with undisplaced fragments. Posterior C1-C2 xation is a better choice for complex odontoid fractures. Transoral odontoidectomy and occipito-cervical xation is reserved as the last option.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
SHAMS RAZA BROHI ◽  
MUZAMIL DILBAR ◽  
FAHMIDA ARAB MALLAH ◽  
SUNNY THAPA

odontoid fracture AOSF with lag screw is the reference technique in unstable fracture. Various other treatment modalities have been described in the literature; however author finds the ASOF technique to be reasonable with less intraoperative and post-operative complications. Moreover the rate of bony fusion is also high and post-operative mobilization in case of ASOF. Material and Methods:  This is prospective observational case series. Two cases of odontoid fractures (type II) are reported. Results and Conclusion:  Our cases illustrated that odontoid fracture type II can successfully be managed with AOSF with good post-operative outcome. Union rate of this fracture is high with lag screw fixation (AOSF technique). Nevertheless, due to a limited number of cases author would also like to add that outcome could be better assessed in a larger group of study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Adam ◽  
R. Cergan ◽  
D. Iftimie ◽  
Cristiana Moisescu

Abstract Background: There is a significant variety of odontoid fracture classifications along with corresponding treatment strategies. There are though cases which cannot be framed within the existing classifications. Clinical presentation: We report the case of a 91 years old female patient who suffered a cervical trauma secondary to a ground level fall. The cervical CT scan revealed a particular type of odontoid fracture, unframeable within existing classifications. The fracture line was at the base of the odontoid process and continued in an oblique trajectory through the right pedicle of the axis. As treatment strategy, we opted for external immobilization in a Minerva jacket and, after 3 months, the patient is symptom free, with partial bone fusion. Conclusion: We named this rare case of odontoid fracture type II B for which external immobilization seems sufficient.


SURG Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Marc Johnston ◽  
Shawn Ranieri ◽  
William De Wit

A novel method for treating type II odontoid fractures is presented. The use of a sintered titanium odontoid prosthetic could eliminate long healing times associated with external fixation methods, and the neurological deficits associated with non-union events in odontoid fracture treatment. Finite element experiments provide early indications that the axis vertebral body could accommodate a titanium odontoid prosthetic. Strain of 3.5 % and stresses of up to 10.5 MPa on the reamed opening of the axis vertebral body are considered as the local maximums. Conventional and emerging implant fixation and non-fouling techniques are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document