scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Techniques for Iliac Bolt Placement: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. E292-E292
Author(s):  
Travis Hamilton ◽  
Mohamed Macki ◽  
Thomas M Zervos ◽  
Victor Chang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Imaging System ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Spinal Diseases ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Pelvic Fixation ◽  
Iliac Screws ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Abstract As the popularity of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) continues to grow, novel techniques are needed to meet the demands of multisegment fixation for advanced spinal diseases. In one such example, iliac bolts are often required to anchor large fusion constructs, but MIS technical notes are missing from the literature.  A 67-yr-old female presented with a symptomatic coronal deformity: preoperative pelvic incidence = 47°, pelvic tilt = 19°, and lumbar lordosis = 29°, sagittal vertical axis = +5.4 cm with 30° of scoliosis. The operative plan included T10-ilium fusion with transforaminal interbody grafts at L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1. The intraoperative video is of minimally invasive placement of iliac bolts using the O-Arm Surgical Imaging System (Medtronic®). The patient consented to the procedure.  A mini-open exposure that remains above the fascial planes allows for multilevel instrumentation with appropriate decompression at the interbody segments. After the placement of the pedicle screws under image-guidance, the direction is turned to the minimally invasive iliac bolts. Following the trajectory described in the standard open approach,1 the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) is identified with the navigation probe, which will guide the Bovie cautery through the fascia. This opening assists in the trajectory of the navigated-awl tap toward the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). Next, 8.5 mm x 90 mm iliac screws were placed in the cannulated bone under navigation. After intraoperative image confirmation of screw placement, the contoured rods are threaded under the fascia. The setscrews lock the rod in position. MIS approaches obviate cross-linking the rods, rendering pelvic fixation more facile.  This technique allows for minimal dissection of the posterior pelvic soft tissue while maintaining adequate fixation.

Clinical Assessment of Percutaneous Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Using the O-Arm Multidimensional Surgical Imaging System

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 990-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Houten ◽  
Rani Nasser ◽  
Nrupen Baxi
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Imaging System ◽  
Intraoperative Imaging ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Clinical Series

Abstract BACKGROUND: Increasing popularity of minimally invasive surgery for lumbar fusion has led to dependence upon intraoperative fluoroscopy for pedicle screw placement, because limited muscle dissection does not expose the bony anatomy necessary for traditional, freehand techniques nor for registration steps in image-guidance techniques. This has raised concerns about cumulative radiation exposure for both surgeon and operating room staff. The recent introduction of the O-arm Multidimensional Surgical Imaging System allows for percutaneous placement of pedicle screws, but there is limited clinical experience with the technique and data examining its accuracy. OBJECTIVE: We present the first large clinical series of percutaneous screw placement using navigation of O-arm imaging and compare the results with the fluoroscopy-guided method. METHODS: A retrospective review of a 24-month period identified patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. The O-arm was introduced in the middle of this period and was used for all subsequent patients. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed by examination of axial computed tomography or O-arm scans. RESULTS: The fluoroscopy group included 141 screws in 42 patients, and the O-arm group included 205 screws in 52 patients. The perforation rate was 12.8% in the fluoroscopy group and 3% in the O-arm group (P < .001). Single-level O-arm procedures took a mean 200 (153–241) minutes, whereas fluoroscopy took 221 (178–302) minutes (P < .03). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous pedicle screw placement with the O-arm Multidimensional Intraoperative Imaging System is a safe and effective technique and provided improved overall accuracy and reduced operative time compared with conventional fluoroscopic techniques.

scholarly journals Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after iliac screw fixation in lumbar degenerative kyphoscoliosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901668472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Il Kim ◽  
Kee-Yong Ha ◽  
Dong-Whan Suh ◽  
In-Soo Oh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Iliac Screw ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: To analyze pre- and postoperative spinopelvic parameters and sagittal profiles in lumbar degenerative kyphoscoliosis (LDK) patients who underwent surgery using iliac screw (IS) and the incidence and risk factor of radiological adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods: A total of 32 patients, who had undergone surgical correction and lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screws and IS instrumentation for LDK with a minimum 2-year follow-up, were included. Ten cases with ASD (group 1) and 22 cases without ASD (group 2) were compared to see pre- and postoperative change in sagittal view of spine and adjacent segment. Parameters of both groups were analyzed before and after surgery with each parameters being tested on correlativity. All deformity types of patients were classified using Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification. Risk factors of ASD were evaluated using variables of SRS-Schwab classification. Results: Group 1, rather than group 2, showed significant increment in pelvic incidence (PI). Curve types, classified using SRS-Schwab classification, were all corrected using IS; and after correction, coronal curve type was N curve and PI minus lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic tilt showed tendency to decrease. Cases with preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) more than 10 cm and with postoperative PI minus LL more than 20° were at higher risk of developing ASD. Conclusion: For those with high PI, it might be a risk to cause ASD. Maintaining normal thoracic and lumbar angle, correction of SVA less than 4 cm, and PI minus LL below 20° are proper ways to avoid ASD after surgery.

scholarly journals The Role of Minimally Invasive Techniques in Scoliosis Correction Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Michael B. Cloney ◽  
Jack A. Goergen ◽  
Angela M. Bohnen ◽  
Zachary A. Smith ◽  
Tyler Koski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Selection Effect ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Scoliosis Correction ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
Correction Surgery ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Objective. Recently, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been included among the treatment modalities for scoliosis. However, literature comparing MIS to open surgery for scoliosis correction is limited. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for scoliosis correction patients undergoing MIS versus open approach. Methods. We retrospectively collected data on demographics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes for 207 consecutive scoliosis correction surgeries at our institution between 2009 and 2015. Results. MIS patients had lower number of levels fused (p<0.0001), shorter surgeries (p=0.0023), and shorter overall lengths of stay (p<0.0001), were less likely to be admitted to the ICU (p<0.0001), and had shorter ICU stays (p=0.0015). On multivariable regression, number of levels fused predicted selection for MIS procedure (p=0.004), and multiple other variables showed trends toward significance. Age predicted ICU admission and VTE. BMI predicted any VTE, and DVT specifically. Comorbid disease burden predicted readmission, need for transfusion, and ICU admission. Number of levels fused predicted prolonged surgery, need for transfusion, and ICU admission. Conclusions. Patients undergoing MIS correction had shorter surgeries, shorter lengths of stay, and shorter and fewer ICU stays, but there was a significant selection effect. Accounting for other variables, MIS did not independently predict any of the outcomes.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery: A Novel Technique in Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Sarwahi ◽  
Terry Amaral ◽  
Stephen Wendolowski ◽  
Rachel Gecelter ◽  
Melanie Gambassi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Neuromuscular Scoliosis ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Scoliosis Surgery ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Pelvic Fixation

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been described in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult scoliosis. The advantages of this approach include less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, earlier mobilization, less tissue disruption, and relatively less pain. However, despite these significant benefits, MIS approach has not been reported in neuromuscular scoliosis patients. This is possibly due to concerns with longer surgery time, which is further increased due to more levels fused and instrumented, challenges of pelvic fixation, size and number of incisions, and prolonged anesthesia. We modified the MIS approach utilized in our AIS patients to be implemented in our neuromuscular patients. Our technique allows easy passage of contoured rods, placement of pedicle screws without image guidance, partial/complete facet resection, and all standard reduction maneuvers. Operative time needed to complete this surgery is comparable to the standard procedure and the majority of our patients have been extubated at the end of procedure, spending 1 day in the PICU and 5-6 days in the hospital. We feel that MIS is not only a feasible but also a superior option in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. Long-term results are unavailable; however, short-term results have shown multiple benefits of this approach and fewer limitations.

Patients with High Pelvic Tilt Achieve the Same Clinical Success as Those with Low Pelvic Tilt After Minimally Invasive Adult Deformity Surgery

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan S Uribe ◽  
Jacob Januszewski ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
Neel Anand ◽  
David O Okonkwo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Adult Deformity ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Hrqol Data

Abstract BACKGROUND Pelvic tilt (PT) is a compensatory mechanism for adult spinal deformity patients to mitigate sagittal imbalance. The association between preop PT and postop clinical and radiographic outcomes has not been well studied in patients undergoing minimally invasive adult deformity surgery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients with high and low preoperative PT treated surgically using less invasive techniques. METHODS Retrospective case-control, institutional review board-approved study. A multicenter, minimally invasive surgery spinal deformity patient database was queried for 2-yr follow-up with complete radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data. Hybrid surgery patients were excluded. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age &gt; 18 and either coronal Cobb angle &gt; 20, sagittal vertical axis &gt; 5 cm, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) &gt; 10 or PT &gt; 20. Patients were stratified by preop PT as per Schwab classification: low (PT&lt; 20), mid (PT 20-30), or high (&gt;30). Postoperative radiographic alignment parameters (PT, PI, LL, Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis) and HRQOL data (Visual Analog Scale Back/Leg, Oswestry Disability Index) were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS One hundred sixty-five patients had complete 2-yr outcomes data, and 64 patients met inclusion criteria (25 low, 21 mid, 18 high PT). High PT group had higher preop PI-LL mismatch (32.1 vs 4.7; P &lt; .001). At last follow-up, 76.5% of patients in the high PT group had continued PI-LL mismatch compared to 34.8% in the low PT group (P &lt; .006). There was a difference between groups in terms of postop changes of PT (–3.9 vs 1.9), LL (8.7 vs 0.5), and PI-LL (–9.5 vs 0.1). Postoperatively, HRQOL data (Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale) were significantly improved in both groups (P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION Adult deformity patients with high preoperative PT treated with minimally invasive surgical techniques had less radiographic success but equivalent clinical outcomes as patients with low PT.

Does Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Reduce Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Paul Park ◽  
Kai-Ming Fu ◽  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Proximal Junctional Kyphosis ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery ◽  
Junctional Kyphosis

Abstract BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a known complication after spinal deformity surgery. One potential cause is disruption of posterior muscular tension band during pedicle screw placement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on PJK. METHODS: A multicenter database of patients who underwent deformity surgery was propensity matched for pelvic incidence (PI) to lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch and change in LL. Radiographic PJK was defined as proximal junctional angle &gt;10°. Sixty-eight patients made up the circumferential MIS (cMIS) group, and 68 were in the hybrid (HYB) surgery group (open screw placement). RESULTS: Preoperatively, there was no difference in age, body mass index, PI-LL mismatch, or sagittal vertical axis. The mean number of levels treated posteriorly was 4.7 for cMIS and 8.2 for HYB (P &lt; .001). Both had improved LL and PI-LL mismatch postoperatively. Sagittal vertical axis remained physiological for the cMIS and HYB groups. Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly improved in both groups. Radiographic PJK developed in 31.3% of the cMIS and 52.9% of the HYB group (P = .01). Reoperation for PJK was 4.5% for the cMIS and 10.3% for the HYB group (P = .20). Subgroup analysis for patients undergoing similar levels of posterior instrumentation in the cMIS and HYB groups found a PJK rate of 48.1% and 53.8% (P = .68) and a reoperation rate of 11.1% and 19.2%, respectively (P = .41). Mean follow-up was 32.8 months. CONCLUSION: Overall rates of radiographic PJK and reoperation for PJK were not significantly decreased with MIS pedicle screw placement. However, a larger comparative study is needed to confirm that MIS pedicle screw placement does not affect PJK.

scholarly journals Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. E13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raqeeb M. Haque ◽  
Gregory M. Mundis ◽  
Yousef Ahmed ◽  
Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh ◽  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Hybrid Surgery ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Hybrid Group

Object Various surgical approaches, including open, minimally invasive, and hybrid techniques, have gained momentum in the management of adult spinal deformity. However, few data exist on the radiographic outcomes of different surgical techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the surgical techniques used in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective review of two adult spinal deformity patient databases, a prospective open surgery database and a retrospective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and hybrid surgery database. The time frame of enrollment in this study was from 2007 to 2012. Spinal deformity patients were stratified into 3 surgery groups: MIS, hybrid surgery, and open surgery. The following pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters were assessed: lumbar major Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI−LL), sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic tilt. Scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for both back and leg pain were also obtained from each patient. Results Of the 234 patients with adult spinal deformity, 184 patients had pre- and postoperative radiographs and were thus included in the study (MIS, n = 42; hybrid, n = 33; open, n = 109). Patients were a mean of 61.7 years old and had a mean body mass index of 26.9 kg/m2. Regarding radiographic outcomes, the MIS group maintained a significantly smaller mean lumbar Cobb angle (13.1°) after surgery compared with the open group (20.4°, p = 0.002), while the hybrid group had a significantly larger lumbar curve correction (26.6°) compared with the MIS group (18.8°, p = 0.045). The mean change in the PI−LL was larger for the hybrid group (20.6°) compared with the open (10.2°, p = 0.023) and MIS groups (5.5°, p = 0.003). The mean sagittal vertical axis correction was greater for the open group (25 mm) compared with the MIS group (≤ 1 mm, p = 0.008). Patients in the open group had a significantly larger postoperative thoracic kyphosis (41.45°) compared with the MIS patients (33.5°, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of pre- and postoperative mean ODI and VAS scores at the 1-year follow-up. However, patients in the MIS group had much lower estimated blood loss and transfusion rates compared with patients in the hybrid or open groups (p < 0.001). Operating room time was significantly longer with the hybrid group compared with the MIS and open groups (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 14% of patients in the MIS group, 14% in the hybrid group, and 45% in the open group (p = 0.032). Conclusions This study provides valuable baseline characteristics of radiographic parameters among 3 different surgical techniques used in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Each technique has advantages, but much like any surgical technique, the positive and negative elements must be considered when tailoring a treatment to a patient. Minimally invasive surgical techniques can result in clinical outcomes at 1 year comparable to those obtained from hybrid and open surgical techniques.

scholarly journals Contemporary Management of Benign Parapharyngeal Lesions Using Minimally Invasive Techniques: Case Discussion and Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Tiffany Peng Hwa ◽  
Michael Cheng ◽  
Babak Sadoughi
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Retropharyngeal Space ◽  
Ktp Laser ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Contemporary Management ◽  
The Right ◽  
Invasive Techniques ◽  
Total Parotidectomy ◽  
Severe Airway Obstruction ◽  
Branchial Anomalies

Branchial anomalies can present in the parapharyngeal space, creating unique challenges in management. Historically, this approach warranted an open approach, including transcervical, transparotid with total parotidectomy and retromandibular dissection, or transmandibular dissection with mandibulotomy. However, the advent of minimally invasive transoral techniques and laser resection have allowed for successful resection of masses in this anatomical region without an external approach. We illustrate these advancements with the case of a 30-year-old man with globus sensation and throat discomfort, found to have a mass of the right posterolateral oropharynx causing severe airway obstruction. Imaging showed a parapharyngeal mass with extension to the carotid sheath and retropharyngeal space, which was successfully resected with potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser using a minimally invasive transoral approach with no major complications. Transoral excision offers decreased morbidity and a cosmetically favorable outcome compared to transcervical excision. KTP laser may be safely used for transoral excision of a benign parapharyngeal mass.

scholarly journals Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khoi D. Than ◽  
Paul Park ◽  
Kai-Ming Fu ◽  
Stacie Nguyen ◽  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are increasingly used to treat adult spinal deformity. However, standard minimally invasive spinal deformity techniques have a more limited ability to restore sagittal balance and match the pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) than traditional open surgery. This study sought to compare “best” versus “worst” outcomes of MIS to identify variables that may predispose patients to postoperative success. METHODS A retrospective review of minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery cases was performed to identify parameters in the 20% of patients who had the greatest improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores versus those in the 20% of patients who had the least improvement in ODI scores at 2 years' follow-up. RESULTS One hundred four patients met the inclusion criteria, and the top 20% of patients in terms of ODI improvement at 2 years (best group, 22 patients) were compared with the bottom 20% (worst group, 21 patients). There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, pre- and postoperative Cobb angles, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, levels fused, operating room time, and blood loss between the best and worst groups. However, the mean preoperative ODI score was significantly higher (worse disability) at baseline in the group that had the greatest improvement in ODI score (58.2 vs 39.7, p < 0.001). There was no difference in preoperative PI-LL mismatch (12.8° best vs 19.5° worst, p = 0.298). The best group had significantly less postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 3.4 vs 6.9 cm, p = 0.043) and postoperative PI-LL mismatch (10.4° vs 19.4°, p = 0.027) than the worst group. The best group also had better postoperative visual analog scale back and leg pain scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend that spinal deformity surgeons using MIS techniques focus on correcting a patient's PI-LL mismatch to within 10° and restoring SVA to < 5 cm. Restoration of these parameters seems to impact which patients will attain the greatest degree of improvement in ODI outcomes, while the spines of patients who do the worst are not appropriately corrected and may be fused into a fixed sagittal plane deformity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document