scholarly journals Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Septic Thrombosis: The Role of Anticoagulation Therapy and Duration of Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Wilson Dib ◽  
Anne-Marie Chaftari ◽  
Ray Y Hachem ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
Dima Dandachi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter-related septic thrombosis is suspected in patients with persistent central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) after 72 hours of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The clinical diagnosis and management of this entity can be challenging as limited data are available. We retrospectively studied the clinical characteristics of patients with Staphylococcus aureus catheter-related septic thrombosis and the outcomes related to different management strategies. Methods This retrospective study included patients with CLABSI due to S. aureus who had concomitant radiographic evidence of catheter site thrombosis treated at our institution between the years 2005 and 2016. We collected data pertaining to patients’ medical history, clinical presentation, management, and outcome within 3 months of bacteremia onset. Results A total of 128 patients were included. We found no significant difference in overall outcome between patients who had deep vs superficial thrombosis. Patients with superficial thrombosis were found to have a higher rate of pulmonary complications (25% vs 6%; P = .01) compared with those with deep thrombosis. Patients who received less than 28 days of intravascular antibiotic therapy had higher all-cause mortality (31 vs 5%; P = .001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 2 predictors of treatment failure: ICU admission during their illness (odds ratio [OR], 2.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–6.99; P = .034) and not receiving anticoagulation therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11–0.54; P < .001). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the presence of S. aureus CLABSI in the setting of catheter-related thrombosis may warrant prolonged intravascular antimicrobial therapy and administration of anticoagulation therapy in critically ill cancer patients.

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 204589321875488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa K. McCarthy ◽  
Michelle T. Ogawa ◽  
Rachel K. Hopper ◽  
Jeffrey A. Feinstein ◽  
Hayley A. Gans

Treatment of pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH) with IV prostanoids has greatly improved outcomes but requires a central line, posing inherent infection risk. This study examines the types of infections, infection rates, and importantly the effect of line management strategies on reinfection in children receiving IV prostanoids for PH. This study is a retrospective review of all pediatric PH patients receiving intravenous epoprostenol (EPO) or treprostinil (TRE) at one academic tertiary care center between 2000 and 2014. No patients declined participation in the study or were otherwise excluded. Infectious complications were characterized by organism(s), infection rates, time to next infection, and line management decisions (salvage vs. replace). Of the 40 patients followed, 13 sustained 38 infections involving 49 pathogens, with a predominance of gram-positive (GP) organisms (n = 35). The pooled infection rate was 1.06 per 1000 prostanoid days with no difference between EPO and TRE. No significant difference in reinfection rate was observed when comparing line salvage to replacement, regardless of organism type. Both overall and organism-type comparisons suggest longer time between line infections following line salvage compared with line replacement (732 vs. 410 days overall; 793 vs. 363 days for GP; 611 vs. 581 days for gram-negative [GN]; P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Central line replacement following blood stream infections in pediatric PH patients does not improve subsequent infection rates or time to next infection, and may lead to unnecessary risks associated with line replacement, including potential loss of vascular access. A revised approach to central line infections in pediatric PH is proposed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasir Hamad ◽  
Lee Connor ◽  
Thomas C Bailey ◽  
Ige A George

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Ceftriaxone is convenient for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), but data for this indication are limited. Methods Adult patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) BSI discharged on OPAT with cefazolin, oxacillin, or ceftriaxone for at least 7 days were included. We compared outcomes of ceftriaxone vs either oxacillin or cefazolin. Ninety-day all-cause mortality, readmission due to MSSA infection, and microbiological failure were examined as a composite outcome and compared among groups. Rates of antibiotic switches due to intolerance were assessed. Results Of 243 patients included, 148 (61%) were discharged on ceftriaxone and 95 (39%) were discharged on either oxacillin or cefazolin. The ceftriaxone group had lower rates of intensive care unit care, endocarditis, and shorter duration of bacteremia, but higher rates of cancer diagnoses. There was no significant difference in the composite adverse outcome in the oxacillin or cefazolin group vs the ceftriaxone group (18 [19%] vs 31 [21%]; P = .70), comprising microbiological failure (6 [6.3%] vs 9 [6.1%]; P = .94), 90-day all-cause mortality (7 [7.4%] vs 15 [10.1%]; P = .46), and readmission due to MSSA infection (10 [10.5%] vs 13 [8.8%]; P = .65). Antibiotic intolerance necessitating a change was similar between the 2 groups (4 [4.2%] vs 6 [4.1%]; P = .95). Conclusions For patients with MSSA BSI discharged on OPAT, within the limitations of the small numbers and retrospective design we did not find a significant difference in outcomes for ceftriaxone therapy when compared with oxacillin or cefazolin therapy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Guillet ◽  
Valérie Zeller ◽  
Vincent Dubée ◽  
Françoise Ducroquet ◽  
Nicole Desplaces ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe frequency and risk factors for central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) during prolonged intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic therapy have rarely been reported. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency, incidence, and risk factors for CRT among patients being treated with prolonged i.v. antibiotic therapy. The secondary objective was to describe the clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and clinical management. This cohort study was conducted between August 2004 and May 2010 in a French referral center for osteoarticular infections. All patients treated for bone and joint infections with i.v. antimicrobial therapy through a central venous catheter (CVC) for ≥2 weeks were included. Risk factors were identified using nonparametric tests and logistic regression. A case-control study investigated the role of vancomycin and catheter malposition. A total of 892 patients matched the inclusion criteria. CRT developed in 16 infections occurring in 16 patients (incidence, 0.39/1,000 catheter days). The median time to a CRT was 29 days (range, 12 to 48 days). Local clinical signs, fever, and secondary complications of CRT were present in 15, 8, and 4 patients, respectively. The median C-reactive protein level was 95 mg/liter. The treatment combined catheter removal and a median of 3 months (1.5 to 6 months) of anticoagulation therapy. The outcome was good in all patients, with no recurrence of CRT. Three risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis: male sex (odds ratio [OR], 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 26.6), catheter malposition (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 17.9), and use of vancomycin (OR, 22.9; 95% CI, 2.8 to 188). Catheter-related thrombosis is a rare but severe complication in patients treated with prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Vancomycin use was the most important risk factor identified.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S367-S367
Author(s):  
J Alex Viehman ◽  
Gordon Scott ◽  
Eli S Goshorn ◽  
Peter Volpe ◽  
Rachel V Marini ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Literature demonstrates short course (e.g., 7 days) of antibiotic therapy for EBSI is appropriate in low-risk patients. Real-world experience with the implementation of this approach is not known. Methods In January 2019, a prospective ASP pathway was implemented to review all ESBI. The ASP contacted treatment teams of patients (patients) with low-risk ESBI between day 4–6 of antibiotic therapy to recommend short-course antimicrobial therapy (SC, ≤10 days). Low-risk ESBI was defined as: (1) venous catheter-associated infection (with removal), or an uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and 2) absence of: organ transplant, polymicrobial or persistent bacteremia ( ≥3d), or lack of improvement at 72h. Controls were pre-intervention patients with low-risk EBSI between July 2016-December 2017. Carbapenem-resistant isolates were excluded; multi-drug-resistant (MDR, ≥3 class acquired resistance) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) bacteria were included. Results Pre-intervention, 107 patients met low-risk ESBI criteria. In the intervention period, 15 patients had low-risk ESBI. The ASP pathway was executed in 13/15 patients (87%) with an 85% success rate. Charlson Comorbidity Index scores and Pitt Bacteremia Scores were similar pre- and post-intervention. The post-intervention group was older (median 71y vs. 63y, P = 0.02). Otherwise, clinical characteristics did not differ pre- and post-intervention: cirrhosis (8 vs. 13%), renal failure (4% vs. 0%), ICU admission (29% vs. 33%) and BSI with ESBL or MDR bacteria (8% vs. 7%) and (21% vs. 20%). UTI was the most common source pre- and post-intervention (61% and 73%) Time to active therapy did not differ (median 0.15d vs. 0.12d). The median duration of active therapy for ESBI was 15d pre-intervention and 8d post-intervention (P < 0.001). SC rate improved from 11% to 67% post-intervention. There was no significant difference in recurrence (2% vs. 0%), mortality (2% vs. 0%) or readmission rates (25% vs. 20%) at 30d. Conclusion A multidisciplinary ASP pathway for low-risk ESBI resulted in the decreased duration of antimicrobial therapy without increased rates of recurrence, readmission, or morality at 30d. SC therapy was also effective for BSI due to MDR or ESBL producing bacteria. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1361-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter N Johnson ◽  
Robert P Rapp ◽  
Christopher T Nelson ◽  
JS Butler ◽  
Sue Overman ◽  
...  

Background: Limited data exist concerning characteristics of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infections (CA-SAI) in central and eastern Kentucky. Objective: To describe the incidence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2005, compare the number of CA-MRSA infections between years, and contrast treatment interventions and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of CA-SAI. Methods: A concurrent and retrospective study was conducted in 125 patients less than 18 years of age with CA-SAI admitted to the hospital/clinic based on criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data on demographics, length of stay, antibiotic therapy, and antibiotic susceptibilities were collected. Results: Seventy patients were included for analysis (CA-MRSA, n = 51; community-acquired methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [CA-MSSA], n = 19). No statistically significant differences were noted between the number of CA-MRSA infections and the total CA-SAI (9/15 in 2004 vs 42/55 in 2005; p = 0.15). Approximately 75% of patients with CA-SAI were admitted to the hospital with no significant difference in length of stay. Ninety percent of CA-SAI were skin and soft tissue infections. There was a significant difference between groups with cutaneous abscesses (CA-MRSA, n = 37 vs CA-MSSA, n = 6; p = 0.002). Greater than 95% of all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Half of CA-MRSA patients received inappropriate antibiotic therapy with β-lactam antibiotics or clindamycin without confirmatory disk diffusion test. Twenty-five (49%) patients with CA-MRSA received surgical debridement (S/D) and/or incision and drainage (I/D) with concomitant antibiotic therapy. Four patients with CA-MRSA were rehospitalized for subsequent infections; all 4 received appropriate antibiotic therapy. Conclusions: A noticeable increase in CA-MRSA infections with cutaneous abscess between 2004 and 2005 was noted. In patients receiving inappropriate antibiotic therapy, treatment success was attributed to concomitant S/D and I/D. Further analysis should focus on the impact of antibiotic therapy alone or in combination with S/D and I/D on the incidence of subsequent CA-MRSA infections.


Author(s):  
Supreetha B. Shenoy ◽  
Raveendra P. Gadag ◽  
Somanath B. Megalamani ◽  
Annapurna S. Mushannavar

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Chronic otorrhea in chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) has become a difficult task to treat for ENT specialists because of emerging resistance to the available antibiotics and patient’s affordability for its cost. Also biofilms have been responsible for the chronicity of disease. Use of vinegar as an antiseptic and altering the pH of middle ear to treat otorrhea in CSOM needs to be studied<span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 120 patients with active CSOM were recruited randomly for either vinegar wash or antibiotic therapy. Vinegar diluted with water in 1:1 ratio at pH 4 was used twice a day for 3weeks to one group. Oral antibiotics based on culture sensitivity report were given to other group for 3weeks. Both groups were followed up for a month and observed for resolution of ear discharge<span lang="EN-IN">.  </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <em>Pseudomonas </em>(40%) and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (25%) were the most common organisms detected. 96.2% of <em>Pseudomonas</em> and 50% of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> ears became dry with vinegar wash. 81.67% of antibiotic group and 68.33% of vinegar group ears became dry in 3weeks. No statistically significant difference between vinegar wash and culture based oral antibiotic therapy in resolution of ear discharge was seen in active CSOM (p &gt;0.05)<span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Management of otorrhea is long term in CSOM and vinegar can be used as an alternative to costly oral antibiotics for resolution of ear discharge in active CSOM. Two fold dilution of vinegar prevents chance of ototoxicity<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Filippo Pieralli ◽  
Antonio Mancini ◽  
Andrea Crociani

Severe sepsis and septic shock are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients in and outside Intensive Care Units. Early hemodynamic and respiratory support, along with prompt appropriate antimicrobial therapy and source control of the infectious process are cornerstone management strategies to improve survival. Antimicrobial therapy should be as much appropriate as possible, since inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy is associated with poorer outcome in different clinical settings. When prescribing antibiotic therapy, drug’s characteristics, along with dosing, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic properties related to the drug and to the clinical scenario should be well kept in mind in order to achieve maximal success.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S19-S19
Author(s):  
Stephanie N Welch ◽  
Rupal Patel ◽  
Lee Morris ◽  
Aimee Dassner ◽  
Nigel L Rozario ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) in combination with antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has been associated with improved outcomes in adults with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Data in children are lacking. In January 2017, Atrium Health implemented a pediatric ASP with blood culture RDT. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of those interventions. Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter, quasi-experimental study of children ≤18 years with monomicrobial SAB from March 2015 to August 2016 (pre-intervention; PRE) and March 2017 to August 2018 (post-intervention; POST). The primary outcome was time to an optimal antibiotic. Secondary outcomes included time to effective antibiotic, total antibiotic exposure in the first 5 days, duration of bacteremia, infectious diseases (ID) consultation, time to central line removal, hospital and pediatric ICU length of stay (LOS), need for vasopressors or intubation, recurrence of SAB within 90 days, and inpatient mortality. Results Of 101 patients with SAB, 32 and 36 met inclusion criteria for the PRE and POST groups, respectively. The median time to optimal antimicrobial therapy decreased by 23 hours (PRE 44.3 hours vs. POST 21.3 hours; P = 0.008). Duration of bacteremia (65h vs. 40.9 hours; P = 0.028) and mortality (12.5% vs. 0%; P = 0.044) was also significantly reduced. Differences in median time to effective therapy (7 hours vs. 5.1 hours; P = 0.74), total antibiotic exposure in the first 5 days (160.4 hours vs. 152 hours; P = 0.4), hospital LOS (9.9 vs. 8.5 days; P = 0.25), and pediatric ICU LOS (7 vs. 4 days; P = 0.11) did not meet statistical significance, but trended downward. The POST group had more patients with ID consultation (78% vs. 89%, P = 0.23) and shorter time to central line removal (68 hours vs. 20 hours; P = 0.037). There was no difference in the need for vasopressors (3 vs. 3 patients; P = 0.99) or intubation (2 vs. 4 patients; P = 0.68). Throughout the study period, recurrence of SAB only occurred in one patient (PRE). Conclusion Concurrent implementation of RDT and an ASP in pediatric patients with SAB decreased time to optimal antimicrobial therapy, duration of bacteremia, and mortality. RDT coupled with timely feedback from an ASP contributed to improved SAB management and clinical outcomes in children. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.


2020 ◽  
pp. 224-226
Author(s):  
O.M. Nesterenko

Background. The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) currently dominates all health problems. Adequate initial antimicrobial therapy of viral and bacterial pneumonia in patients with COVID-19 requires compliance with a number of features that are fundamentally important in the context of global growth of resistance of pathogenic flora to antimicrobial drugs. Objective. To describe the features of antimicrobial therapy of viral and bacterial pneumonia in patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods. Analysis of literature data on this issue. Results and discussion. Severe coronavirus infection triggers an avalanche-like generalized inflammatory response with rapid vascular endothelial damage. Lungs is the main target organ of this aggression. A significant part of all endothelial cells of the body is concentrated in the lungs, so the cascade of multiorgan disorders begins with them. Liver, intestines, kidneys and muscles are the organs that suffer from extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 сoronavirus also has neurotropism, so it is able to affect the nervous system, both central and peripheral. The pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 should be considered in terms of the approaches used in sepsis. This disease is characterized by the following laboratory changes: increased content of C-reactive protein, leukocytosis or leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutrophilia, increased activity of alanine and aspartate aminotransferases, creatine phosphokinase, lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin and creatinine concentrations. However, sufficiently sensitive and specific markers for the diagnosis and prediction of COVID-19 are currently lacking. Until the results of the polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 and, consequently, the confirmation of COVID-19, are absent, all patients with severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome should be treated as patients with acute severe community-acquired pneumonia. Empirical combination antibiotic therapy should be started immediately. Patients over 60 years of age with pre-existing comorbidities need special attention. The spectrum of microbial flora in such patients includes Streptococcus pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, gram-negative enterobacteria. This must be taken into account when choosing an antibiotic. In presence of intracellular pathogens, fluoroquinolones have an advantage over macrolides and tetracyclines. Due to the growing resistance of hospital flora to macrolides and the high risk of resistance to them in outpatient flora, the initial use of fluoroquinolones is one of the main trends in modern antibiotic therapy. The advantages of levofloxacin are the possibility of administration in short courses (750 mg once a day for 5 days), a wide activity spectrum, the ability to overcome the basic mechanisms of resistance, a good safety profile. Intravenous administration of levofloxacin is not inferior to the effectiveness of the combination of β-lactams and macrolides and can be completed by transferring the patient to oral treatment. For the treatment of patients at risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, combination therapy is prescribed – antipseudomonad cephalosporins of III-IV generation in combination with aminoglycosides, ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin. Alternatively, carbapenems are prescribed in combination with aminoglycosides (tobramycin – Braxon, “Yuria-Pharm”) or fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin – Leflocin, “Yuria-Pharm”). When methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is detected, the use of linezolid (Linelid, “Yuria-Pharm”) is advisable. Antibiotic therapy is often accompanied by fungal infections. In severe cases of the latter, as well as in pulmonary aspergillosis voriconazole (Vizealot, “Yuria-Pharm”) is prescribed. Conclusions. 1. Severe coronavirus infection triggers an avalanche-like generalized inflammatory reaction with rapid damage to the vascular endothelium. 2. In the presence of intracellular pathogens, fluoroquinolones have an advantage over macrolides and tetracyclines. 3. The initial use of fluoroquinolones is one of the main trends in modern antibiotic therapy. 4. In the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, it is advisable to use linezolid. 5. In severe fungal infections and pulmonary aspergillosis, voriconazole is prescribed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document