scholarly journals Implication of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy Choice on Second-Line Options

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema T Meloni ◽  
Chika K Onwuamah ◽  
Oche Agbaji ◽  
Beth Chaplin ◽  
David O Olaleye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Virologic Failure ◽  
Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Paired Samples ◽  
Therapy Choice ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Although there are a number of studies comparing the currently recommended preferred and alternative first-line (1L) antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens on clinical outcomes, there are limited data examining the impact of 1L regimen choice and duration of virologic failure (VF) on accumulation of drug resistance mutations (DRM). The patterns of DRM from patients failing zidovudine (AZT)-containing versus tenofovir (TDF)-containing ART were assessed to evaluate the predicted susceptibility to second-line (2L) nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone options in the context of an ongoing programmatic setting that uses viral load (VL) monitoring. Methods Paired samples from Nigerian ART patients who experienced VF and switched to 2L ART were retrospectively identified. For each sample, the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 polymerase gene was sequenced at 2 time points, and DRM was analyzed using Stanford University’s HIVdb program. Results Sequences were generated for 191 patients. At time of 2L switch, 28.2% of patients on AZT-containing regimens developed resistance to TDF, whereas only 6.8% of patients on TDF-containing 1L had mutations compromising susceptibility to AZT. In a stratified evaluation, patients with 0–6 months between tested VL samples had no difference in proportion compromised to 2L, whereas those with >6 months between samples had a statistically significant difference in proportion with compromised 2L NRTI. In multivariate analyses, patients on 1L AZT had 9.90 times higher odds of having a compromised 2L NRTI option than patients on 1L TDF. Conclusions In the context of constrained resources, where VL monitoring is limited, we present further evidence to support use of TDF as the preferred 1L NRTI because it allows for preservation of the recommended 2L NRTI option.

scholarly journals Resistance in Pediatric Patients Experiencing Virologic Failure With First-line and Second-line Antiretroviral Therapy

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Orrell ◽  
Julie Levison ◽  
Andrea Ciaranello ◽  
Linda-Gail Bekker ◽  
Daniel R. Kuritzkes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Virologic Failure ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Antiretroviral Therapy

scholarly journals Timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic patients over 75 years of age: the earlier the better

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
Virginie Fossey-Diaz ◽  
Stéphane Culine
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The impact of ageing on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) effectiveness remains controversial. However, data from clinical studies do not show any difference between patients over 65 years and those under 65 years. We focused our study on patients over 75 and looked at the potential impact of timing in the use of ICIs. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning ICIs versus standard therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Overall Survival (OS) among the older (≥75 years) was compared with that of younger patients (< 75 years). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled. Results Fifteen phase III studies evaluating anti-PD-1(nivolumab or pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab or avelumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) were included. Patients were enrolled for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer, Renal-Cell-Carcinoma, Melanoma, Head-and-Neck-Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma or Gastric Cancer. Eight studies assessed treatment in first-line setting and seven in the second line. The median age was 64 years, with 906 patients over 75 years of age and 5233 youngers. In first-line setting, HRs for death were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.99) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) in younger. In second line setting, HRs for death were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.36) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.75) in younger with a statistically significant difference observed between subgroups (p interaction = 0.009). Conclusions ICIs appears to be effective in patients over 75 years of age. However, the survival benefit is mainly observed in first-line treatment.

scholarly journals Drug Resistance Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Virologic Failure of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy and Response to Second-Line Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 566-573
Author(s):  
Vinie Kouamou ◽  
Bhavini Varyani ◽  
Tinei Shamu ◽  
Tichaona Mapangisana ◽  
Cleophas Chimbetete ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Virologic Failure ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line

scholarly journals AntiRetroviral Therapy In Second-line: investigating Tenofovir-lamivudine-dolutegravir (ARTIST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Claire Keene ◽  
Rulan Griesel ◽  
Kaneez Sayed ◽  
Zimasa Gcwabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Informal Settlement ◽  
Viral Fitness ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Virologic Suppression ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line

Background: Dolutegravir has superior efficacy and tolerability than lopinavir-ritonavir in second-line antiretroviral therapy after failure of a first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors-based regimen, when dolutegravir is accompanied by at least one fully active nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). Resistance testing to select NRTIs is not feasible in low- and middle-income countries due to cost and limited laboratory capacity. Evidence suggests that recycling tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine backbone with dolutegravir could provide an effective second-line option. This study aims to determine the virologic efficacy of tenofovir-lamivudine-dolutegravir (TLD) with and without a lead-in supplementary dose of dolutegravir (to counteract the inducing effect of efavirenz) in patients failing a first-line regimen of tenofovir-emtricitabine-efavirenz (TEE). Methods: We will perform a parallel group, randomised (1:1), double blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial, comparing TLD fixed dose combination daily with a lead-in supplementary 50 mg dolutegravir dose versus matching placebo taken 12 hours later for the first 14 days, in patients failing a first-line TEE regimen. The trial will be set in two primary care clinics in Khayelitsha; a large, peri-urban informal settlement in Cape Town, South Africa. We will enrol 130 participants, with follow-up to 48 weeks. The primary endpoint is proportion achieving viral load <50 copies/mL at week 24 using a modified intention-to-treat analysis and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm. Secondary endpoints include virologic suppression at weeks 12 and 48, time to suppression, emergence of dolutegravir and new NRTI resistance mutations, safety, and tolerability. Discussion: Impaired viral fitness due to NRTI resistance mutations and dolutegravir’s high barrier to resistance provide rationale for switching patients from a failing TEE regimen to TLD; however, clinical evidence regarding virologic efficacy is lacking. This study provides estimates of such a strategy’s early virologic efficacy with and without a supplementary dolutegravir dosing. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03991013 (19/06/2019).

scholarly journals First Line and Second Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma and Impact of Dose Reduction of Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Möhring ◽  
Jan Feder ◽  
Raphael U. Mohr ◽  
Farsaneh Sadeghlar ◽  
Alexandra Bartels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Therapy Regimen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivePrognosis of patients with irresectable cholangiocarcinoma is still poor. The ABC-02 trial established the current first line (1L) standard systemic chemotherapy (CT) with gemcitabine/platinum derivate for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. However, the majority of patients needed therapy adaptions. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate 1L and second line (2L) therapy regimens and the impact of therapy adaptions in an unselected real-life cohort of patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma.Materials and MethodsThis is a single institution retrospective analysis of patients with irresectable cholangiocarcinoma who were treated with gemcitabine/platinum derivate from 2010 to 2018. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed for all patients, especially with regard to CT de-escalation.ResultsFifty-eight patients receiving gemcitabine/platinum derivate were included in the analysis. Median OS and PFS were 12.2 and 6.9 months. Interestingly, 41 patients (71%) needed therapy de-escalation. However, despite reduced CT exposition, there was no-significant difference in OS (10.8 months vs. 15.6 months, p = 0.127), and patients suffered from less adverse events during CT. 21 (36%) patients reached 2L CT, most often with FOLFIRI (57%). Survival beyond the end of 1L CT was 7.1 months with 2L CT vs. 2.9 months with BSC.ConclusionIn our study, the combination of gemcitabine/platinum derivate showed similar OS and PFS as randomized prospective phase II/III trials. Therapy regimen adaptions were needed in the majority of patients. However, individualized modifications of the therapy regimen allowed better tolerance as well as continuation of therapy and did not significantly influence median OS. Furthermore, our study revealed a potential survival benefit with 2L CT for selected patients.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 718-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Cong Ruan ◽  
Yue-Ping Che ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Hai-Feng Li
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pre-treated patients with first-line treatment can be offered a second treatment with the aim of improving their poor clinical prognosis. The therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not respond to first-line therapy has limited treatment options. Recently, many studies have paid much attention to the efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with bevacizumab-naive based chemotherapy as second-line treatment in people with metastatic CRC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies updated to March 2018. Randomized-controlled trials comparing addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy without bevacizumab in MCRC patients were included, of which, the main interesting results were the efficacy and safety profiles of the addition of bevacizumab in patients with MCRC as second-line therapy. Result: Five trials were eligible in the meta-analysis. Patients who received the combined bevacizumab and chemotherapy treatment in MCRC as second-line therapy showed a longer overall survival (OS) (OR=0.80,95%CI=0.72-0.89, P<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.77, P<0.00001). In addition, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.36,95%CI=0.82-2.24, P=0.23) or severe adverse event (SAE) (RR=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.19, P=0.78) between bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and bevacizumabnaive based chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy therapy could be an efficient and safe treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as second-line therapy and without increasing the risk of an adverse event.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document