scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Oritavancin Relative to Vancomycin for Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI) in the Outpatient Setting: Results From the SOLO Clinical Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Lodise ◽  
Mark Redell ◽  
Shannon O. Armstrong ◽  
Katherine A. Sulham ◽  
G. Ralph Corey
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Background The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oritavancin compared with vancomycin for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) who received treatment in the outpatient setting in the Phase 3 SOLO clinical trials. Methods SOLO I and SOLO II were 2 identically designed comparative, multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single 1200-mg dose of intravenous (IV) oritavancin versus 7–10 days of twice-daily IV vancomycin for the treatment of ABSSSI. Protocols were amended to allow enrolled patients to complete their entire course of antimicrobial therapy in an outpatient setting. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite endpoint (cessation of spread or reduction in size of the baseline lesion, absence of fever, and no rescue antibiotic at early clinical evaluation [ECE]) (48 to 72 hours). Key secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed clinical cure 7 to 14 days after end of treatment (posttherapy evaluation [PTE]) and 20% or greater reduction in lesion area at ECE. Safety was assessed until day 60. Results Seven hundred ninety-two patients (oritavancin, 392; vancomycin, 400) received entire course of treatment in the outpatient setting. Efficacy response rates at ECE and PTE were similar (primary composite endpoint at ECE: 80.4% vs 77.5% for oritavancin and vancomycin, respectively) as was incidence of adverse events. Five patients (1.3%) who received oritavancin and 9 (2.3%) vancomycin patients were subsequently admitted to a hospital. Conclusions Oritavancin provides a single-dose alternative to multidose vancomycin for treatment of ABSSSI in the outpatient setting.

scholarly journals Maintenance of Acromegaly Control in Patients Switching From Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Octreotide

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. e3785-e3797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L Samson ◽  
Lisa B Nachtigall ◽  
Maria Fleseriu ◽  
Murray B Gordon ◽  
Marek Bolanowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Receptor Ligands ◽  
Biochemical Control ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor Ligands ◽  
End Of Treatment

Abstract Purpose The phase 3 CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial (NCT03252353) evaluated efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOCs) in patients with acromegaly who previously demonstrated biochemical control while receiving injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). Methods In this double-blind study, patients (N = 56) stratified by prior SRL dose were randomly assigned 1:1 to OOC or placebo for 36 weeks. The primary end point was maintenance of biochemical control at the end of treatment (mean insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] ≤ 1.0 × upper limit of normal [ULN]; weeks 34 and 36). Time to loss of IGF-1 response and proportion requiring reversion to injectable SRLs were assessed as broader control measures. Results Mean IGF-1 measurements were 0.80 and 0.97 × ULN for OOC and 0.84 and 1.69 × ULN for placebo, at baseline and end of treatment, respectively. Mean growth hormone (GH) changed from 0.66 to 0.60 ng/mL for OOCs and 0.90 to 2.57 ng/mL for placebo. Normalization of IGF-1 levels (≤ 1.0 × ULN) was maintained in 58.2% for OOCs vs 19.4% for placebo (P = .008); GH levels were maintained (< 2.5 ng/mL) in 77.7% for OOC vs 30.4% for placebo (P = .0007). Median time to loss of response (IGF-1 > 1.0 or ≥ 1.3 × ULN definitions) for patients receiving placebo was 16 weeks; for patients receiving OOCs, it was not reached for both definitions during the 36-week trial (P < .0001). Of the patients in the OOC group, 75% completed the trial on oral therapy. The OOC safety profile was consistent with previous SRL experience. Conclusions OOCs may be an effective therapy for patients with acromegaly who previously were treated with injectable SRLs.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Tigecycline in the Treatment of Skin and Skin‐Structure Infections: Results of 2 Double‐Blind Phase 3 Comparison Studies with Vancomycin‐Aztreonam

2005 ◽  
Vol 41 (s5) ◽  
pp. S341-S353 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Ellis‐Grosse ◽  
T. Babinchak ◽  
N. Dartois ◽  
G. Rose ◽  
E. Loh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure

scholarly journals 110. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in Chinese Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S67-S68
Author(s):  
Yihong Sun ◽  
Jia Fan ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
Xiaofei Chen ◽  
Xiaoling Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Cure ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Study Drug Administration ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Abdominal Infections

Abstract Background In China, the prevalence of infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria is high and additional treatment options for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) are needed. This study compared the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) + metronidazole (MTZ) versus meropenem (MEM) + placebo (pbo) for the treatment of cIAI in adult Chinese participants. Methods This was a phase 3, double-blind study conducted at 21 centers in China (NCT03830333). Participants aged 18-75 years with cIAI requiring surgical intervention within 24 hours of study drug administration were stratified by site of infection and randomized 1:1 to receive 1.5 g C/T (1 g ceftolozane and 0.5 g tazobactam) + 0.5 g MTZ administered intravenously (IV) every 8 hours (q8h) or 1 g MEM + pbo administered IV q8h for 4-14 days. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at test of cure (TOC) in the clinically evaluable (CE) population. Secondary endpoints included rates of clinical cure, per-participant microbiologic response, per-pathogen microbiologic response, and adverse events (AE). Non-inferiority for clinical cure at TOC in the CE population was confirmed if the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% CI for the between-treatment difference in the clinical cure rate was larger than −12.5%. Results A total of 134 participants were randomized to each treatment group. Demographics and baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between treatment groups (Table 1). The median (range) age in the ITT population was 50 (18-75) years and 61% were men. The most frequent sites of infection were the appendix (C/T + MTZ, 50.0%; MEM + pbo, 49.3%) and gallbladder (C/T + MTZ, 27.6%; MEM + pbo, 29.1%). Overall, the most frequently isolated pathogens were Escherichia coli (61.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.3%); few anaerobes were isolated (Table 1). C/T + MTZ was non-inferior to MEM + pbo for clinical cure in the CE population (C/T + MTZ, 95.2%; MEM + pbo, 93.1%; difference, 2.1% [95% CI, −4.7% to 8.8%]). Results for key secondary endpoints were comparable between treatment groups (Table 2). Rates of AEs were generally similar between treatment groups (Table 3). Conclusion C/T + MTZ was non-inferior to MEM + pbo in the treatment of adult Chinese participants with cIAI and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Disclosures Xiaofei Chen, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Xiaoling Du, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Ye Wang, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Hui Wang, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Fang Sun, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Matthew G. Johnson, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Mekki Bensaci, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Jennifer A. Huntington, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Christopher Bruno, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee)

scholarly journals Primary Outcomes From a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial of Surotomycin in Subjects With Clostridium difficile Infection

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Boix ◽  
Richard N. Fedorak ◽  
Kathleen M. Mullane ◽  
Yves Pesant ◽  
Uschi Stoutenburgh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Although the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is increasing, available CDI treatment options are limited in terms of sustained response after treatment. This phase 3 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of surotomycin, a novel bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide, versus oral vancomycin in subjects with CDI. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, international trial, subjects with CDI confirmed by a positive toxin result were randomized to receive surotomycin (250 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily) orally for 10 days. The primary endpoints were clinical response at end of treatment and evaluation of surotomycin safety. The key secondary endpoints were clinical response over time and sustained clinical response through a 30- to 40-day follow-up period. Clostridium difficile infection recurrence during follow-up and time to diarrhea resolution were also analyzed. Results In total, 570 subjects were randomized and had confirmed CDI; 290 subjects received surotomycin and 280 subjects received vancomycin. Surotomycin clinical cure rates at end of treatment (surotomycin/vancomycin: 79.0%/83.6%; difference of −4.6%; 95% confidence interval, −11.0 to 1.9]), clinical response over time (stratified log-rank test, P = .832), and sustained clinical response at end of trial (Day 40–50) (60.6%/61.4%; difference of −0.8%; 95% CI, −8.8 to 7.1) in the microbiological modified intent to treat population did not meet noninferiority or superiority criteria versus vancomycin. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Conclusions Surotomycin failed to meet the criteria for noninferiority versus vancomycin for the primary and key secondary endpoints in this trial.

scholarly journals Use of Ribotyping To Retrospectively Identify Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Tigecycline That Are Genotypically Related to Community-Associated Isolates

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 4521-4529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fionnuala McAleese ◽  
Ellen Murphy ◽  
Timothy Babinchak ◽  
Guy Singh ◽  
Battouli Said-Salim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Encoding Genes

ABSTRACT A retrospective study was performed to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates obtained from patients enrolled in phase 3 clinical trials for tigecycline that were genotypically similar to known community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains. The clinical trials were double-blind comparator studies for complicated skin and skin structure infections or complicated intra-abdominal infections. We obtained 85% of the MRSA isolates from patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Using ribotyping, MRSA isolates were compared with well-characterized North American CA-MRSA strains and negative-control hospital-associated (HA) MRSA strains by cluster analysis; 91 of the 173 isolates clustered with two groups of known CA-MRSA strains, 60% of which shared an indistinguishable ribotype. These isolates were subsequently tested for the presence of SCCmec type IV and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-encoding genes as well as susceptibility to clindamycin, characteristics that are typically associated with CA-MRSA; 89 of the 91 isolates carried the type IV SCCmec element and 76 were also positive for the PVL-encoding genes; 73 of these isolates were susceptible to clindamycin. A similar analysis performed on 26 nonclustering isolates identified only four with these characteristics; 89 of the 91 clustering isolates were inhibited by tigecycline at MICs of ≤0.5 μg/ml. On the basis of clustering information and preliminary genetic characterization, it appears that ribotyping is a useful tool in identifying potential CA-MRSA isolates and 76 MRSA isolates from patients enrolled in the tigecycline phase 3 trials have genetic markers typically associated with CA-MRSA.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-221048
Author(s):  
Andrew Östör ◽  
Filip Van den Bosch ◽  
Kim Papp ◽  
Cecilia Asnal ◽  
Ricardo Blanco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

ObjectivesRisankizumab is an interleukin-23 inhibitor under study for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab versus placebo in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response or intolerance to ≤2 biological therapies (Bio-IR) and/or ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). Results through week 24 are reported here.MethodsAdults with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR were randomised to receive subcutaneously administered risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 during a 24-week, double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR20) at week 24. Secondary endpoints assessed key domains of PsA and patient-reported outcomes.ResultsA total of 444 patients (median age 53 years, range 23–84 years) were randomised to risankizumab (n=224) or placebo (n=220); 206 patients (46.5%) were Bio-IR. At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 (51.3% vs 26.5%, p<0.001) and all secondary endpoints (p<0.05) compared with placebo. Serious adverse events were reported for 4.0% and 5.5% of risankizumab-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively; serious infections were reported for 0.9% and 2.3%, respectively.ConclusionTreatment with risankizumab resulted in significant improvements versus placebo in key disease outcomes and was well tolerated in patients with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR.Trial registration numberNCT03671148.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document