scholarly journals Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Is an Underrecognized Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eloise D. Austin ◽  
Sean B. Sullivan ◽  
Susan Whittier ◽  
Franklin D. Lowy ◽  
Anne-Catrin Uhlemann
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Life Threatening Complication ◽  
Intravenous Catheters

Abstract Few studies have focused on the risks of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVs) as sources for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), a life-threatening complication. We identified 34 PIV-related infections (7.6%) in a cohort of 445 patients with SAB. Peripheral intravenous catheter-related SAB was associated with significantly longer bacteremia duration and thrombophlebitis at old PIV sites rather than current PIVs.

Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion: The Nurse’s Manual

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
Lauren Morata ◽  
Mark Bowers
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Acute Care Nursing ◽  
Intravenous Catheters ◽  
Difficult Venous Access ◽  
Central Catheters

Peripheral intravenous catheter placement is a skill that is used daily in the hospital. However, many nurses face the challenge of cannulating increasingly complex and difficult-to-access vasculature. Although emergency department clinicians have been using ultrasound to facilitate this procedure for the last 18 years, ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement has not been as rapidly adopted in the critical and acute care nursing realms. Given the benefits of this procedure, including increased patient satisfaction and reduced use of central catheters, its use should be encouraged among all acute care clinicians. The aim of this article is to provide the bedside nurse with a basic understanding of the techniques involved in placing ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters in patients with difficult venous access.

scholarly journals Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection in patients with prosthetic joint included in the prospective VIRSTA cohort study: frequency and time of occurrence of periprosthetic joint infection

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Dufour ◽  
Lionel Piroth ◽  
Catherine Chirouze ◽  
Pierre Tattevin ◽  
Agathe Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection

Abstract Among 143 patients of the VIRSTA cohort study having Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and an arthroplasty implanted for more than a year, S. aureus periprosthetic joint infection was observed in 19%. Signs of infection (pain and swelling) were always present, in median 1 day (extremes: 0- 21) after onset of bacteremia.

Impact of immunosuppressive agents on clinical manifestations and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection – A propensity score matched analysis in two large, prospectively evaluated cohorts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Camp ◽  
Lina Glaubitz ◽  
Tim Filla ◽  
Achim J Kaasch ◽  
Frieder Fuchs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Competing Risk ◽  
Immunosuppressed Patients ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) is a common, life-threatening infection. The impact of immunosuppressive agents on the outcome of patients with SAB is incompletely understood. Methods Data from two large prospective, international, multicenter cohort studies (INSTINCT and ISAC) between 2006 and 2015 were analyzed. Patients receiving immunosuppressive agents were identified and a 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics of patients. Overall survival and time to SAB-related late complications (SAB relapse, infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or other deep-seated manifestations) were analyzed by Cox regression and competing risk analyses, respectively. This approach was then repeated for specific immunosuppressive agents (corticosteroids [CSMT] and immunosuppressive agents other than steroids [IMOTS]). Results Of 3,188 analyzed patients, 309 were receiving immunosuppressive treatment according to our definitions and were matched to 309 non-immunosuppressed patients. After PS matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. In the Cox regression analysis, we observed no significant difference in survival between the two groups (death during follow-up: 105/309 (33.9 %) immunosuppressed patients vs. 94/309 (30.4 %) non-immunosuppressed, hazard ratio 1.20 (95% CI 0.84–1.71). Competing risk analysis showed a cause-specific hazard ratio (CSHR) of 1.81 (95% CI 0.85–3.87) for SAB-related late-complications in patients receiving immunosuppressive agents. CSHR was higher in patients taking IMOTS (3.69; 95% CI 1.41–9.68). Conclusions Immunosuppressive agents were not associated with an overall higher mortality. The risk for SAB-related late complications in patients receiving specific immunosuppressive agents such as IMOTs warrants further investigations.

scholarly journals Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: risk factors and clinical outcome in non-intensive-care units

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karinne Spirandelli Carvalho Naves ◽  
Natália Vaz da Trindade ◽  
Paulo Pinto Gontijo Filho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistance ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Disk Diffusion Method ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection

INTRODUCTION: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is spread out in hospitals across different regions of the world and is regarded as the major agent of nosocomial infections, causing infections such as skin and soft tissue pneumonia and sepsis. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) and the predictive factors for death. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of fifty-one patients presenting bacteraemia due to S. aureus between September 2006 and September 2008 was analysed. Staphylococcu aureus samples were obtained from blood cultures performed by clinical hospital microbiology laboratory from the Uberlândia Federal University. Methicillinresistance was determined by growth on oxacillin screen agar and antimicrobial susceptibility by means of the disk diffusion method. RESULTS: We found similar numbers of MRSA (56.8%) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (43.2%) infections, and the overall hospital mortality ratio was 47%, predominantly in MRSA group (70.8% vs. 29.2%) (p=0.05). Age (p=0.02) was significantly higher in MRSA patients as also was the use of central venous catheter (p=0.02). The use of two or more antimicrobial agents (p=0.03) and the length of hospital stay prior to bacteraemia superior to seven days (p=0.006) were associated with mortality. High odds ratio value was observed in cardiopathy as comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite several risk factors associated with MRSA and MSSA infection, the use of two or more antimicrobial agents was the unique independent variable associated with mortality.

scholarly journals Blurred molecular epidemiological lines between the two dominant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C. Dupper ◽  
Mitchell J. Sullivan ◽  
Kieran I. Chacko ◽  
Aaron Mishkin ◽  
Brianne Ciferri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Healthcare Associated

AbstractBackgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes life-threatening infections in both community and hospital settings and is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We sought to describe the molecular epidemiological landscape of patients with MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs) at an urban medical center by evaluating the clinical characteristics associated with the two dominant endemic clones.MethodsComprehensive clinical data extraction from the electronic health records of 227 hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with MRSA BSI over a 33-month period in New York City were collected. The descriptive epidemiology and mortality associated with the two dominant clones was compared using logistic regression.ResultsMolecular analysis revealed that 91% of all single-patient MRSA BSIs were due to two equally represented genotypes, clonal complex (CC) 5 (N=117) and CC8 (N=110). MRSA BSIs were associated with a 90-day mortality of 27%. CC8 caused disease more frequently in younger age groups (56 ± 17 vs 67 ± 17 years old; p<0.001) and in non-White race (OR=3.45 95% CI [1.51-7.87]; p=0.003), with few other major distinguishing features. Morbidity and mortality also did not differ significantly between the two clones. CC8 caused BSIs more frequently in the setting of peripheral intravenous catheters (OR=5.96; 95% CI [1.51-23.50]; p=0.01).ConclusionThe clinical features distinguishing dominant MRSA clones continue to converge. The association of CC8 with peripheral intravenous catheter infections underscores the importance of classical community clones causing hospital-onset infections. Ongoing monitoring and analysis of the dynamic epidemiology of this endemic pathogen is crucial to inform management to prevent disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document