scholarly journals Determinants of Clostridium difficile Infection Incidence Across Diverse United States Geographic Locations

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda C. Lessa ◽  
Yi Mu ◽  
Lisa G. Winston ◽  
Ghinwa K. Dumyati ◽  
Monica M. Farley ◽  
...  

Abstract Background.  Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is no longer restricted to hospital settings, and population-based incidence measures are needed. Understanding the determinants of CDI incidence will allow for more meaningful comparisons of rates and accurate national estimates. Methods.  Data from active population- and laboratory-based CDI surveillance in 7 US states were used to identify CDI cases (ie, residents with positive C difficile stool specimen without a positive test in the prior 8 weeks). Cases were classified as community-associated (CA) if stool was collected as outpatients or ≤3 days of admission and no overnight healthcare facility stay in the past 12 weeks; otherwise, cases were classified as healthcare-associated (HA). Two regression models, one for CA-CDI and another for HA-CDI, were built to evaluate predictors of high CDI incidence. Site-specific incidence was adjusted based on the regression models. Results.  Of 10 062 cases identified, 32% were CA. Crude incidence varied by geographic area; CA-CDI ranged from 28.2 to 79.1/100 000 and HA-CDI ranged from 45.7 to 155.9/100 000. Independent predictors of higher CA-CDI incidence were older age, white race, female gender, and nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) use. For HA-CDI, older age and a greater number of inpatient-days were predictors. After adjusting for relevant predictors, the range of incidence narrowed greatly; CA-CDI rates ranged from 30.7 to 41.3/100 000 and HA-CDI rates ranged from 58.5 to 94.8/100 000. Conclusions.  Differences in CDI incidence across geographic areas can be partially explained by differences in NAAT use, age, race, sex, and inpatient-days. Variation in antimicrobial use may contribute to the remaining differences in incidence.

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1401-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Khanna ◽  
Larry M. Baddour ◽  
W. Charles Huskins ◽  
Patricia P. Kammer ◽  
William A. Faubion ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael El-Matary ◽  
Zoann Nugent ◽  
B. Nancy Yu ◽  
Lisa M. Lix ◽  
Laura E. Targownik ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. S-131
Author(s):  
Sahil Khanna ◽  
Larry Baddour ◽  
W. Charles Huskins ◽  
Patricia P. Kammer ◽  
William S. Harmsen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Khanna ◽  
Darrell S Pardi ◽  
Scott L Aronson ◽  
Patricia P Kammer ◽  
Robert Orenstein ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S157
Author(s):  
Yael Nobel ◽  
Peter H.R. Green ◽  
Martin J. Blaser ◽  
Benjamin Lebwohl ◽  
Jonas F. Ludvigsson

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S1-S1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bye ◽  
Tory Whitten ◽  
Stacy Holzbauer

Abstract Background Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) are the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Two of the most significant risk factors for CDI are antibiotic use and healthcare exposure. Dentists write approximately 10% of all outpatient prescriptions in the USA; however, limited data are available regarding dental prescribing’s impact on CDI. We described characteristics of community-associated (CA) CDI cases following antibiotics for dental procedures. Methods The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) performs active population- and laboratory-based surveillance for CDI as part of the CDC’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP). A case was defined as a positive C. difficile toxin or molecular assay on a stool specimen from a person >1 years old without a positive test in the prior 8 weeks, living in one of the five EIP catchment counties. Cases were classified as CA if stool was collected ≤3 days of admission or as an outpatient, with no overnight stay in a healthcare facility in the past 12 weeks. Medical records were reviewed and interviews performed to assess CDI risk factors and potential exposures. Differences in antibiotic prescribing and documentation among CA CDI cases receiving dental procedures were explored. Results During 2009–2015, 2176 presumptive CA CDI cases were reported to MDH; 1626 (75%) were confirmed as CA and interviewed. In total, 926 (57%) were prescribed antibiotics and 136 (15%) for dental procedures. Cases prescribed antibiotics for dental procedures were significantly older (median age: 57 vs. 45 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be prescribed clindamycin (50% vs. 10%, P < 0.001), and less likely to be prescribed fluoroquinolones (6% vs. 19%, P < 0.001) and cephalosporins (7% vs. 30%, P < 0.001) than those prescribed antibiotics for other indications. Among cases who received antibiotics for a dental procedure, 31 (23%) reported antibiotics on interview which were also documented in the medical record and 46 (34%) reported antibiotics for any reason on interview without documentation in the medical record. Conclusion Dental antibiotic prescribing rates are likely underestimated. Stewardship programs should address dental prescribing and alert dentists to CDI subsequent to antibiotics prescribed for dental procedures. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (7) ◽  
pp. 636-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Khanna ◽  
Scott L. Aronson ◽  
Patricia P. Kammer ◽  
Larry M. Baddour ◽  
Darrell S. Pardi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document