scholarly journals Evaluation of no-touch technologies for decontamination of toys in pediatric healthcare settings

Author(s):  
Hanan Haydar ◽  
Jessica A Kumar ◽  
Jennifer L Cadnum ◽  
Emily Zangla ◽  
Claudia K Hoyen ◽  
...  

Abstract No-touch technologies could be useful to decontaminate shared toys in healthcare settings. A high-level disinfection cSabinet and electrostatic sprayer were effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), bacteriophage MS2, and Clostridioides difficile spores on toys. An ultraviolet-C light box was less effective but reduced MRSA and bacteriophage MS2 by >2 log10.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s229-s229
Author(s):  
Hanan Haydar ◽  
Jessica Kumar ◽  
Jennifer Cadnum ◽  
Claudia Hoyen ◽  
Curtis Donskey

Background: Toys in playrooms are often shared among patients in pediatric healthcare settings; they can present a risk for transmission of bacterial and viral pathogens. Effective cleaning and disinfection of toys using disinfectant wipes is labor intensive and difficult due to irregular surfaces. Methods: We conducted a point-prevalence culture survey to determine the frequency of contamination of in-use toys and high-touch surfaces in playrooms in a pediatric healthcare facility with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and Clostridioides difficile. Using a variety of toys inoculated with pathogens, we evaluated efficacy and ease-of-use of 3 novel “no-touch” technologies: (1) an electrostatic sprayer, (2) a small ultraviolet-C (UV-C) box (18.9 × 9.9 × 1.8 inches) for smaller toys, and (3) a high-level disinfection cabinet using ultrasonic submicron droplets of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide. Test pathogens included C. difficile, MRSA, and Candida auris. Results: Of 135 items cultured in playrooms, 6 (4.4%) were contaminated with MRSA, 1 (0.7%) was contaminated with VRE, and none were contaminated with C. difficile. Each of the technologies reduced all pathogens by >4 log10 CFU on all types of toys tested (plastic, soft rubber, and tablet). The electrostatic sprayer was considered the easiest to use by all users because large numbers of toys could be processed much more quickly (ie, spray for 20 seconds and allow to air dry) than with disinfectant wipes. The disinfection cabinet required 21 minutes for cycle completion, whereas the decontamination cycle for the UV box was only 30–90 seconds but with limited capacity to hold toys. Conclusions: Three “no-touch” technologies were effective for disinfection of toys contaminated with healthcare-associated pathogens. The electrostatic spray application of disinfectant was considered the easiest to use for rapid decontamination of toys.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (12) ◽  
pp. 2071-2081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Guthrie ◽  
Sarah Teatero ◽  
Sotaro Hirai ◽  
Alex Fortuna ◽  
Daniel Rosen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections remain challenging. In-depth surveillance integrating patient and isolate data can provide evidence to better inform infection control and public health practice. Methods We analyzed MRSA cases diagnosed in 2010 (n = 212) and 2016 (n = 214) by hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Case-level clinical and demographic data were integrated with isolate characteristics, including antimicrobial resistance (AMR), classic genotyping, and whole-genome sequencing results. Results Community-associated MRSA (epidemiologically defined) increased significantly from 23.6% in 2010 to 43.0% in 2016 (P < .001). The MRSA population structure changed over time, with a 1.5× increase in clonal complex (CC)8 strains and a concomitant decrease in CC5. The clonal shift was reflected in AMR patterns, with a decrease in erythromycin (86.7% to 78.4%, P = .036) and clindamycin resistance (84.3% to 47.9%, P < .001) and a >2-fold increase in fusidic acid resistance (9.0% to 22.5%, P < .001). Isolates within both CC5 and CC8 were relatively genetically diverse. We identified 6 small genomic clusters—3 potentially related to transmission in healthcare settings. Conclusions Community-associated MRSA is increasing among hospitalized individuals in Ontario. Clonal shifting from CC5 to CC8 has impacted AMR. We identified a relatively high genetic diversity and limited genomic clustering within these dominant CCs.


2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Angela Rossney ◽  
S O'Connell

High-level mupirocin resistance was detected among 37 of 2,586 (1.4%) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) blood-stream isolates sent to the Ireland's National MRSA Reference Laboratory between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2005, compared with 29 of 997 isolates (2.9%) sent between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2007.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-114
Author(s):  
Nancy M. Attia ◽  
Abeer Abd El Rahim Ghazal ◽  
Omnia M. Khaleel ◽  
Ahmed Gaballah

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization is considered a major risk factor for nosocomial infections and its decolonization has reduced these infections. Mupirocin (MUP) is the topical antibiotic of choice for decolonization. MUP decolonization failure is attributed to MUP resistance. Objective: The aim of the current study is to assess MUP resistance among MRSA isolates phenotypically and genotypically. Methodology: Fifty MRSA isolates were identified in Microbiology Department in the Medical Research Institute hospital, Alexandria University. Antibiotic susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics by disk diffusion method was done. MUP minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined phenotypically by MUP Ezy MIC™ Strips. MUP resistance was determined genetically by multiplex PCR detection of mupA and mupB. Results: Of all MRSA isolates, 6% exhibited high level and none showed low level MUP resistance. Only mupA was detected in all resistant isolates. Conclusion: Despite low prevalence of MUP resistance, it is appropriate to test MUP resistance prior nasal decolonization


1996 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOSHINOBU YOKOYAMA ◽  
JUNICHI HONDA ◽  
TOMOTAKA KAWAYAMA ◽  
KATSUNARI KAJIMURA ◽  
KOTARO OIZUMI

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 2735-2742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary K. Hayden ◽  
Karen Lolans ◽  
Katherine Haffenreffer ◽  
Taliser R. Avery ◽  
Ken Kleinman ◽  
...  

Whether targeted or universal decolonization strategies for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) select for resistance to decolonizing agents is unresolved. The REDUCE-MRSA trial (ClinicalTrials registration no. NCT00980980) provided an opportunity to investigate this question. REDUCE-MRSA was a 3-arm, cluster-randomized trial of either screening and isolation without decolonization, targeted decolonization with chlorhexidine and mupirocin, or universal decolonization without screening to prevent MRSA infection in intensive-care unit (ICU) patients. Isolates from the baseline and intervention periods were collected and tested for susceptibility to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) by microtiter dilution; mupirocin susceptibility was tested by Etest. The presence of the qacA or qacB gene was determined by PCR and DNA sequence analysis. A total of 3,173 isolates were analyzed; 2 were nonsusceptible to CHG (MICs, 8 μg/ml), and 5/814 (0.6%) carried qacA or qacB . At baseline, 7.1% of MRSA isolates expressed low-level mupirocin resistance, and 7.5% expressed high-level mupirocin resistance. In a mixed-effects generalized logistic regression model, the odds of mupirocin resistance among clinical MRSA isolates or MRSA isolates acquired in an ICU in intervention versus baseline periods did not differ across arms, although estimates were imprecise due to small numbers. Reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine and carriage of qacA or qacB were rare among MRSA isolates in the REDUCE-MRSA trial. The odds of mupirocin resistance were no different in the intervention versus baseline periods across arms, but the confidence limits were broad, and the results should be interpreted with caution.


Burns ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Effat Abbasi-Montazeri ◽  
Azar Dokht Khosravi ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi ◽  
Hamed Goodarzi ◽  
Seyed Sajjad Khoramrooz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document