scholarly journals Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older Persons With HIV

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aroonsiri Sangarlangkarn ◽  
Jonathan S Appelbaum

Abstract With increased longevity related to the advent of antiretroviral therapy, there are increasing proportions of older persons with HIV (PWH). Prior studies have demonstrated increased prevalence of geriatric syndromes in older PWH and recommended the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in this population. However, there is currently no peer-reviewed literature that outlines how to perform the CGA in PWH in the clinical setting. In this article, we offer a review on how to perform the CGA in PWH, outline domains of the CGA and their importance in PWH, and describe screening tools for each domain focusing on tools that have been validated in PWH, are easy to administer, and/or are already commonly used in the field of geriatrics.

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1009-1017
Author(s):  
Aroonsiri Sangarlangkarn ◽  
Tanakorn Apornpong ◽  
Amy C Justice ◽  
Anchalee Avihingsanon

Many people living with HIV (PLWH) are aging with geriatric syndromes, but few undergo comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) due to limited resources. Our study evaluates tools to identify aging PLWH who may forego CGA. We conducted a cross-sectional study on 357 PLWH ≥50 years old at the Red Cross, Thailand. Tools evaluated were the Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACSI) and G-8, which is predictive among older cancer patients. CGA consists of eight tests: history of fall within 12 months, timed-up-and-go test (TUG), activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), Thai depression scale (TDS), mini nutritional assessment (MNA), and HIV symptom index (HSI). We considered ≥2 impaired domains on CGA to be abnormal results. Forty-nine percent (n = 175) had ≥2 impaired domains on CGA. Few participants had experienced a fall (11%) or abnormal TUG/ADL/IADL (<2%), and only MoCA/TDS/MNA/HSI were analyzed. A VACSI < 17 produces 85% sensitivity (Se) and 30% specificity (Sp) (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 63, 95%CI 58–69) and G-8 > 15.5 produces 90%Se and 33%Sp (AUC = 74, 95%CI 69–79) in identifying patients with <2 impaired domains. A G-8 > 13.5 produces 91%Se and 77%Sp (AUC = 89, 95%CI 86–92) in ruling out abnormal nutrition. Patients with VACSI < 17 and G-8 > 15.5 may forego CGA due to low likelihood of abnormal cognition, mood, nutrition, or symptom burden.


2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasi Lampela ◽  
Piia Lavikainen ◽  
Risto Huupponen ◽  
Esko Leskinen ◽  
Sirpa Hartikainen

2013 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
MJ Molina-Garrido ◽  
Carmen Guillén-Ponce ◽  
Nieves Bravo Delgado ◽  
Antonia Mora-Rufete ◽  
◽  
...  

The incidence of cancer increases dramatically with age and is reported to be 12 to 36 times higher in patients 65 years or older compared with those aged 25 to 44 years. The challenge for oncologists is to determine the optimum treatment for elderly patients. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is the main tool to take decisions in elderly patients diagnosed with cancer. And many screening tools have been tested to select which patients should be taken or not a complete CGA. Matters that influence geriatric assessment in the oncologic population will be highlighted in this article.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-177
Author(s):  
Kate Granger ◽  
◽  
Sean Ninan ◽  
Elizabeth Stopford ◽  
◽  
...  

Patients may be referred to Acute Medical Units (AMUs) with a diagnosis of ‘acopia’. This term is offensive and lazy, implying fault on the part of the patient and allowing the assessing doctor to erroneously label the patient as a ‘social admission’ when, in fact, such patients are likely to be frail with co-morbidities and have an acute (potentially reversible) illness. Frail older patients should be assessed using the principles of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, informed by an understanding of the concept of frailty and of geriatric syndromes such as falls and delirium.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2307-2307
Author(s):  
Brady E. Beltrán ◽  
Rodrigo Motta ◽  
María P. Gamarra ◽  
Roger Araujo ◽  
Jorge J. Castillo

Abstract Introduction: The incidence of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) is increasing, especially in people over 60 years of age. This population usually has a worse prognosis, probably due to comorbidities, functional deterioration and decreased tolerance to treatment. Therefore, a pre-therapeutic evaluation would be important to make decisions. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is the recommended tool for this evaluation, but it is a complex process that demands time and resources. We performed a study to evaluate the characteristics of the CGA in patients >64 years of age with NHL and to determine which domains can constitute a simplified model. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection of geriatric evaluations performed in >64 years with aggressive NHL (90% DLBCL, 10% PTCL) admitted to our institution between September 2015 and August 2017. Number of drugs, prescriptions in older adults was evaluated (STOPP), Lawton scale, Barthel scale, KATZ index, walking speed, Up and Go time (TUG), Mini-mental test, Yesavage scale, Gijón scale, Mini-nutritional, Geriatric syndromes (Incontinence, Falls, Pressure ulcers, Immobility, Sensory Deficits, Osteoporosis), and Accumulated Disease Scale in Geriatrics (CIRS-G). The CGA included 9 domains, and fragility was defined as deterioration in >2 domains. The different evaluations were compared with fragility. Multivariate models were constructed using logistic regression. Results: We included 253 patients with an average age of 76 years. 62% had >1 affected domain, and 40% were considered fragile (>2 affected domains). In the bivariate analysis, age >85 years, and all the geriatric scales except STOPP, were strongly associated with fragility. The final model had 6 variables: Use of >5 drugs ( OR 773.1, 95% CI,4.5-132134.4;p=0.011), Lawton scale <7 (OR 385.2,95%CI, 20.1-7363.5;p<0.001), TUG >20 (OR 124.6,95%CI, 6.2-2489.8;p=0.002), Mini-mental <23 (OR 53.5,95%CI, 3.7-778.8;p=0.004),Yesavage scale >5 (OR 118.7,95%CI, 11.2-1254.5;p<0.001), and presence of at least one geriatric syndrome (OR 235.6,95%CI, 13.3-4158.7;p<0.001). Removing the Mini-mental minimally affected the model, but suppressing two or more variables does weaken the model. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients older than 64 years with aggressive NHL, a model based on five measurements (i.e. number of drugs, TUG, Lawton scale, Yesavage scale and Geriatric Syndromes) could constitute an evaluation with an efficiency similar to a complete CGA. Disclosures Castillo: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document