scholarly journals Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for Treatment of Severe ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales Infections: A Multicenter Nationwide Clinical Experience (CEFTABUSE II Study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Bassetti ◽  
Antonio Vena ◽  
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe ◽  
Marco Falcone ◽  
Giusy Tiseo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Few data are reported in the literature about the outcome of patients with severe extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) infections treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), in empiric or definitive therapy. Methods A multicenter retrospective study was performed in Italy (June 2016–June 2019). Successful clinical outcome was defined as complete resolution of clinical signs/symptoms related to ESBL-E infection and lack of microbiological evidence of infection. The primary end point was to identify predictors of clinical failure of C/T therapy. Results C/T treatment was documented in 153 patients: pneumonia was the most common diagnosis (n = 46, 30%), followed by 34 cases of complicated urinary tract infections (22.2%). Septic shock was observed in 42 (27.5%) patients. C/T was used as empiric therapy in 46 (30%) patients and as monotherapy in 127 (83%) patients. Favorable clinical outcome was observed in 128 (83.7%) patients; 25 patients were considered to have failed C/T therapy. Overall, 30-day mortality was reported for 15 (9.8%) patients. At multivariate analysis, Charlson comorbidity index >4 (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–3.5; P = .02), septic shock (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 3.8–7.9; P < .001), and continuous renal replacement therapy (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9–5.3; P = .001) were independently associated with clinical failure, whereas empiric therapy displaying in vitro activity (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01–0.34; P < .001) and adequate source control of infection (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14–0.55; P < .001) were associated with clinical success. Conclusions Data show that C/T could be a valid option in empiric and/or targeted therapy in patients with severe infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of clinical failure with standard-dose C/T therapy in septic patients receiving CRRT.

scholarly journals Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy

Diseases ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Katie E. Barber ◽  
J. Taylor Loper ◽  
Austin R. Morrison ◽  
Kayla R. Stover ◽  
Jamie L. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Klebsiella Species ◽  
Single Temperature ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Standard Set ◽  
Clinical Worsening

Background: Ceftriaxone has standard, set dosing regimens that may not achieve adequate serum concentrations in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy when used as definitive monotherapy to treat infections. Methods: This retrospective cohort included adult inpatients treated with ceftriaxone monotherapy for ≥72 h between July 01, 2015–July 31, 2017. Patients were excluded if their infection lacked source control within 72 h or if they had polymicrobial infections requiring more than one antibiotic for definitive therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical failure between obese versus non-obese patients, defined as a composite of (1) change in definitive therapy > 72 h due to clinical worsening; (2) residual leukocytosis (white blood cell count (WBC) > 10 × 109/L) > 72 h after treatment initiation; (3) presence of a fever (single temperature > 100.9 °F) > 72 h after treatment initiation; or (4) readmission within 30 days due to re-infection with the same organism. Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the study: 39 obese and 62 non-obese. The most common indications for ceftriaxone were urinary tract (52.5%), respiratory tract (24.8%), and bloodstream (24.8%) infections. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli (48.5%) and Klebsiella species (15.8%). Most patients received 1g every 24 h. Clinical failure was observed in 61.5% of obese patients versus 40.3% of non-obese patients (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Obese patients treated with ceftriaxone were more likely to experience clinical failure when compared to non-obese patients. Further analyses are warranted to determine if weight-based dosing is required in obese patients treated with ceftriaxone.

scholarly journals 1380. Effect of Absolute Body Weight on Clinical Outcomes of Obese Patients Treated with Cefepime

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S423-S423
Author(s):  
Jamie L Wagner ◽  
Austin R Morrison ◽  
J Taylor Loper ◽  
Katie E Barber ◽  
Kayla R Stover
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Package Insert ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Single Temperature ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Clinical Worsening

Abstract Background Differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for obese (OB) patients compared with nonobese (NOB) patients are well known, but drug safety and efficacy when using package insert dosing remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cefepime (FEP) for OB patients vs. NOB patients. Methods This retrospective cohort included inpatient adults ≥18 years treated with FEP monotherapy for ≥72 hours between July 2015 and July 2017. Exclusion criteria were source control not achieved within 72 hours and polymicrobial infections requiring > 1 antibiotic for definitive therapy. Additional data collected were demographics, comorbid conditions, laboratory markers, site of infection, and microbiology. The primary endpoint was clinical treatment failure, defined as change in definitive therapy at >72 hours due to clinical worsening, leukocytosis (WBC > 10 × 109/L) for >72 hours after treatment initiation, fever (single temperature >100.9°F) after >72 hours of treatment initiation, or readmission within 30 days due to re-infection. Secondary outcomes were 30-day inpatient all-cause mortality and 30-day readmission. Results One hundred fourteen subjects were included (58 OB; 56 NOB). Median (IQR) age 58[46–66] years; 66(58%) males. Median [IQR] weight 107[95–124] kg OB patients; 75[63–84] kg NOB patients. Median Charlson score was 3[2–5] (P = 0.478). Sixty-two percent OB patients vs. 46% NOB patients experienced a respiratory infection (P = 0.094); 28% OB patients vs. 39% NOB patients experienced a urinary tract infection (P = 0.185). 62% OB patients and 59% NOB patients received FEP 1g q8h (P = 0.732). Most common minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in both groups was 1 mg/L (74% OB vs. 83% NOB; P = 0.289). Clinical failure occurred in 52% (67% OB vs. 36% NOB; P = 0.001). OB patients more likely to need a second antibiotic (31% vs. 14%; P = 0.033) and have persistent leukocytosis (50% vs. 30%; P = 0.033). Inpatient all-cause mortality occurred in 17% (22% OB vs. 12% NOB; P = 0.164). 72% of patients were not readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Conclusion OB patients experienced higher treatment failure than NOB patients. Further examination is needed to assess impact of FEP dose and organism MIC on clinical failure in OB patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Septic Shock Attributed to Candida Infection: Importance of Empiric Therapy and Source Control

2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1739-1746 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kollef ◽  
S. Micek ◽  
N. Hampton ◽  
J. A. Doherty ◽  
A. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Candida Infection ◽  
Source Control

Effect of Vasopressin Dose on Hemodynamic Response in Obese Patients With Septic Shock: A Retrospective Observational Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110072
Author(s):  
Casey A. Dubrawka ◽  
Kevin D. Betthauser ◽  
Hannah E. Pope ◽  
Gabrielle A. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Hemodynamic Response ◽  
Percentage Change ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Higher Doses

Background No clear association between standard vasopressin doses and body mass index exists, despite potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability among patients with septic shock. It is unknown if higher doses may alter hemodynamic response. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of vasopressin dose on hemodynamic response in obese patients with septic shock. Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult, obese patients with septic shock receiving catecholamine vasopressors and vasopressin. Patients were analyzed according to vasopressin dose received: standard dose (≤0.04 U/min) and high dose (>0.04 U/min). The primary outcome was percentage change in norepinephrine equivalent (NEQ) dose. Results A total of 182 patients were included in the analysis, with 136 in the standard-dose vasopressin group and 46 in the high-dose vasopressin group. There was no difference in percentage change in NEQ dose at 6 hours after standard- or high-dose vasopressin attainment (−28.6% vs −19.1%; P = 0.166). A greater increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 6 hours was observed with receipt of high-dose vasopressin (23.3% vs 15.3%; P = 0.023). Duration of shock and length of stay were significantly longer in patients who received high-dose vasopressin, with no difference in in-hospital mortality. Conclusion and Relevance This represents the first analysis comparing standard and higher doses of vasopressin in obese patients with septic shock. Receipt of high-dose vasopressin was not associated with a difference in catecholamine requirement or improved outcomes. Further studies are warranted to provide guidance on the use of high-dose vasopressin in septic shock.

scholarly journals Effect of Obesity on Clinical Failure of Patients Treated with Beta-Lactams

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A Pinner ◽  
Natalie G Tapley ◽  
Katie E Barber ◽  
Kayla R Stover ◽  
Jamie L Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Altered pharmacokinetics in obese patients raise concerns over worse clinical outcomes. This study assessed whether obese patients receiving a beta-lactam (BL) have worse clinical outcomes compared to non-obese patients and to identify if therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be beneficial. Methods This multi-center, retrospective cohort included hospitalized adults admitted from July 2015-July 2017 treated with a BL as definitive monotherapy against a Gram-negative bacilli for ≥72 hours. Patients were excluded if there was lack of source control or if polymicrobial infections required >1 antibiotic for definitive therapy. Patients were classified based on body mass index (BMI): non-obese (BMI ≤29.9 kg/m 2) and obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m 2). The primary outcome was clinical treatment failure, and secondary were hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient all-cause mortality, and 30-day all-cause readmission. Results There were 257 (43.6%) obese patients and 332 (56.4%) non-obese patients included. The most common infections were urinary (50.9%) and respiratory (31.4%). Definitive treatment was driven by 3 rd generation cephalosporins (46.9%) and cefepime (44.7%). Treatment failure occurred in 131 (51%) obese patients and 109 (32.8%) non-obese patients (p<0.001). Obesity and respiratory source were independently associated with increased likelihood of treatment failure. Obese patients were hospitalized longer than non-obese patients (p=0.002), but no differences were found for all-cause mortality (p=0.117) or infection-related readmission (0=0.112). Conclusions Obese patients treated with BLs have higher rates of treatment failure and longer hospitalization periods than non-obese patients. Future studies are needed to assess the impact of TDM and specific dosing recommendations for targeted infection types.

scholarly journals 216. Are Automatic Antimicrobial Stop Orders an Effective Stewardship Tool for Urinary Tract and Intra-Abdominal Infections?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S110-S110
Author(s):  
Christina Maguire ◽  
Dusten T Rose ◽  
Theresa Jaso
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Length Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Automatic antimicrobial stop orders (ASOs) are a stewardship initiative used to decrease days of therapy, prevent resistance, and reduce drug costs. Limited evidence outside of the perioperative setting exists on the effects of ASOs on broad spectrum antimicrobial use, discharge prescription duration, and effects of missed doses. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an ASO policy across a health system of adult academic and community hospitals for treatment of intra-abdominal (IAI) and urinary tract infections (UTI). ASO Outcome Definitions ASO Outcomes Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study compared patients with IAI and UTI treated before and after implementation of an ASO. Patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of UTI or IAI and 48 hours of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial administration were included. Patients unable to achieve IAI source control within 48 hours or those with a concomitant infection were excluded. The primary outcome was the difference in sum length of antimicrobial therapy (LOT). Secondary endpoints include length and days of antimicrobial therapy (DOT) at multiple timepoints, all cause in hospital mortality and readmission, and adverse events such as rates of Clostridioides difficile infection. Outcomes were also evaluated by type of infection, hospital site, and presence of infectious diseases (ID) pharmacist on site. Results This study included 119 patients in the pre-ASO group and 121 patients in the post-ASO group. ASO shortened sum length of therapy (LOT) (12 days vs 11 days respectively; p=0.0364) and sum DOT (15 days vs 12 days respectively; p=0.022). This finding appears to be driven by a decrease in outpatient LOT (p=0.0017) and outpatient DOT (p=0.0034). Conversely, ASO extended empiric IV LOT (p=0.005). All other secondary outcomes were not significant. Ten patients missed doses of antimicrobials due to ASO. Subgroup analyses suggested that one hospital may have influenced outcomes and reduction in LOT was observed primarily in sites without an ID pharmacist on site (p=0.018). Conclusion While implementation of ASO decreases sum length of inpatient and outpatient therapy, it may not influence inpatient length of therapy alone. Moreover, ASOs prolong use of empiric intravenous therapy. Hospitals without an ID pharmacist may benefit most from ASO protocols. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document