scholarly journals Exploratory Evaluation of Bezlotoxumab on Outcomes Associated With Clostridioides difficile Infection in MODIFY I/II Participants With Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver A Cornely ◽  
Kathleen M Mullane ◽  
Thomas Birch ◽  
Sabine Hazan-Steinberg ◽  
Richard Nathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Treatment ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Single Infusion ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is reportedly higher and the cure rate lower in individuals with cancer vs those without cancer. An exploratory post hoc analysis of the MODIFY I/II trials (NCT01241552/NCT01513239) investigated how bezlotoxumab affected the rate of CDI-related outcomes in participants with cancer. Methods Participants received a single infusion of bezlotoxumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo during anti-CDI antibacterial treatment. A post hoc analysis of CDI-related outcomes was conducted in subgroups of MODIFY I/II participants with and without cancer. Results Of 1554 participants in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, 382 (24.6%) were diagnosed with cancer (bezlotoxumab 190, placebo 192). Of participants without cancer, 591 and 581 received bezlotoxumab and placebo, respectively. In the placebo group, initial clinical cure (ICC) was achieved by fewer cancer participants vs participants without cancer (71.9% vs 83.1%; absolute difference, –11.3%; 95% CI, –18.6% to –4.5%); however, CDI recurrence (rCDI) rates were similar in cancer (30.4%) and noncancer (34.0%) participants. In participants with cancer, bezlotoxumab treatment had no effect on ICC rate compared with placebo (76.8% vs 71.9%), but resulted in a statistically significant reduction in rCDI vs placebo (17.8% vs 30.4%; absolute difference, –12.6%; 95% CI, –22.5% to –2.7%). Conclusions In this post hoc analysis of participants with cancer enrolled in MODIFY I/II, the rate of rCDI in bezlotoxumab-treated participants was lower than in placebo-treated participants. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results. Clinical Trial Registration MODIFY I (NCT01241552), MODIFY II (NCT01513239).

scholarly journals Influence of Diagnostic Method on Outcomes in Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Bezlotoxumab for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Post Hoc Analysis of MODIFY I/II

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H Wilcox ◽  
Galia Rahav ◽  
Erik R Dubberke ◽  
Lori Gabryelski ◽  
Kerrie Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Difference ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Toxigenic Culture ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The optimum diagnostic test method for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains controversial due to variation in accuracy in identifying true CDI. This post hoc analysis examined the impact of CDI diagnostic testing methodology on efficacy outcomes in phase 3 MODIFY I/II trials. Methods In MODIFY I/II (NCT01241552/NCT01513239), participants received bezlotoxumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo during anti-CDI treatment for primary/recurrent CDI (rCDI). Using MODIFY I/II pooled data, initial clinical cure (ICC) and rCDI were assessed in participants diagnosed at baseline using direct detection methods (enzyme immunoassay [EIA]/cell cytotoxicity assay [CCA]) or indirect methods to determine toxin-producing ability (toxin gene polymerase chain reaction [tgPCR]/toxigenic culture). Results Of 1554 participants who received bezlotoxumab or placebo in MODIFY I/II, 781 (50.3%) and 773 (49.7%) were diagnosed by tgPCR/toxigenic culture and toxin EIA/CCA, respectively. Participants diagnosed by toxin EIA/CCA were more likely to be inpatients, older, and have severe CDI. In bezlotoxumab recipients, ICC rates were slightly higher in the toxin EIA/CCA subgroup (81.7%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (78.4%). Bezlotoxumab significantly reduced the rCDI rate vs placebo in both subgroups; however, the magnitude of reduction was substantially larger in participants diagnosed by toxin EIA/CCA (relative difference, –46.6%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (–29.1%). In bezlotoxumab recipients, the rCDI rate was lower in the toxin EIA/CCA subgroup (17.6%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (23.6%; absolute difference, –6.0%; 95% confidence interval, –12.4 to 0.3; relative difference, –25.4%). Conclusions Diagnostic tests that detect fecal C. difficile toxins are of fundamental importance to accurately diagnosing CDI, including in clinical trial design, ensuring that therapeutic efficacy is not underestimated.

scholarly journals 1211. Response to Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) in Refractory Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) is Modest Compared to Recurrent CDI in Hospitalized Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S627-S627
Author(s):  
Jae Hyun Shin ◽  
R Ann Hays ◽  
Cirle Warren
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
University Of Virginia ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplant ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background There are limited options for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) refractory to conventional antibiotic therapy (metronidazole, vancomycin, or fidaxomicin). Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is considered a safe and effective treatment for recurrent CDI but has not been widely utilized for refractory CDI due to concerns about safety. Even when included in studies, refractory CDI has not been analyzed separately from recurrent CDI. We reviewed cases of FMT performed in the inpatient setting for CDI to evaluate its safety and efficacy for refractory CDI. Methods Patients who received FMT inpatient at University of Virginia Health System for recurrent or refractory CDI after Infectious Diseases and Gastroenterology consultation signed informed consent acknowledging that FMT was considered investigational use in CDI not responding to standard of care as per 2014 FDA guidance. Charts were reviewed as part of quality improvement efforts to evaluate safety and efficacy of FMT in inpatient setting. Results Starting in July 2014, 13 patients received FMT for CDI as inpatients. Six received FMT for recurrent CDI, with four having complete resolution, one had recurrent CDI, and one had persistent C. difficile-negative diarrhea, for cure rate of 83%, comparable to published studies. Seven patients received FMT for refractory CDI, with three resulting in complete resolution. One responded to FMT but refused further care, one died from multiorgan failure after initial response to FMT that was possibly related to CDI, strongyloides, and/or CMV. Two patients had ongoing diarrhea suggestive of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome, one was C. difficile-negative and one was not tested. The cure rate was 57%, lower than that of the recurrent CDI, but without any clear evidence of microbiologic failure. Outcome of patients undergoing FMT for CDI in the inpatient setting at University of Virginia Health System Conclusion Cure rate for FMT for refractory CDI was lower than recurrent CDI, but review of the cases of treatment failures did not reveal any microbiologic evidence of failure. FMT should be considered an alternative option when treating refractory CDI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Similar glycaemic control and risk of hypoglycaemia with patient- versus physician-managed titration of insulin glargine 300 U/mL across subgroups of patients with T2DM: a post hoc analysis of ITAS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Giaccari ◽  
R. C. Bonadonna ◽  
R. Buzzetti ◽  
G. Perseghin ◽  
D. Cucinotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Insulin Glargine ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Antihyperglycaemic Drugs ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Patient Subgroups

Abstract Aims The Italian Titration Approach Study (ITAS) demonstrated comparable HbA1c reductions and similarly low hypoglycaemia risk at 6 months in poorly controlled, insulin-naïve adults with T2DM who initiated self- or physician-titrated insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in the absence of sulphonylurea/glinide. The association of patient characteristics with glycaemic and hypoglycaemic outcomes was assessed. Methods This post hoc analysis investigated whether baseline patient characteristics and previous antihyperglycaemic drugs were associated with HbA1c change and hypoglycaemia risk in patient- versus physician-managed Gla-300 titration. Results HbA1c change, incidence of hypoglycaemia (any type) and nocturnal rates were comparable between patient- and physician-managed arms in all subgroups. Hypoglycaemia rates across subgroups (0.03 to 3.52 events per patient-year) were generally as low as observed in the full ITAS population. Small increases in rates of 00:00–pre-breakfast and anytime hypoglycaemia were observed in the ≤ 10-year diabetes duration subgroup in the patient- versus physician-managed arm (heterogeneity of effect; p < 0.05). Conclusions Comparably fair glycaemic control and similarly low hypoglycaemia risk were achieved in almost all patient subgroups with patient- versus physician-led Gla-300 titration. These results reinforce efficacy and safety of Gla-300 self-titration across a range of phenotypes of insulin-naïve people with T2DM. Clinical trial registration EudraCT 2015-001167-39

scholarly journals Analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Spetzler ◽  
Joseph M. Zabramski ◽  
Cameron G. McDougall ◽  
Felipe C. Albuquerque ◽  
Nancy K. Hills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ruptured Aneurysm ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Initial Hospitalization ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Saccular Aneurysms

OBJECTIVEThe Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT) is a prospective, randomized trial in which treatment with clipping was compared to treatment with coil embolization. Patients were randomized to treatment on presentation with any nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Because all other randomized trials comparing these 2 types of treatments have been limited to saccular aneurysms, the authors analyzed the current BRAT data for this subgroup of lesions.METHODSThe primary BRAT analysis included all sources of SAH: nonaneurysmal lesions; saccular, blister, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms; and SAHs from an aneurysm associated with either an arteriovenous malformation or a fistula. In this post hoc review, the outcomes for the subgroup of patients with saccular aneurysms were further analyzed by type of treatment. The extent of aneurysm obliteration was adjudicated by an independent neuroradiologist not involved in treatment.RESULTSOf the 471 patients enrolled in the BRAT, 362 (77%) had an SAH from a saccular aneurysm. Patients with saccular aneurysms were assigned equally to the clipping and the coiling cohorts (181 each). In each cohort, 3 patients died before treatment and 178 were treated. Of the 178 clip-assigned patients with saccular aneurysms, 1 (1%) was crossed over to coiling, and 64 (36%) of the 178 coil-assigned patients were crossed over to clipping. There was no statistically significant difference in poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score > 2) between these 2 treatment arms at any recorded time point during 6 years of follow-up. After the initial hospitalization, 1 of 241 (0.4%) clipped saccular aneurysms and 21 of 115 (18%) coiled saccular aneurysms required retreatment (p < 0.001). At the 6-year follow-up, 95% (95/100) of the clipped aneurysms were completely obliterated, compared with 40% (16/40) of the coiled aneurysms (p < 0.001). There was no difference in morbidity between the 2 treatment groups (p = 0.10).CONCLUSIONSIn the subgroup of patients with saccular aneurysms enrolled in the BRAT, there was no significant difference between modified Rankin Scale outcomes at any follow-up time in patients with saccular aneurysms assigned to clipping compared with those assigned to coiling (intent-to-treat analysis). At the 6-year follow-up evaluation, rates of retreatment and complete aneurysm obliteration significantly favored patients who underwent clipping compared with those who underwent coiling.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01593267 (clinicaltrials.gov)

491 Efficacy of FT218, a Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate Formulation, by Narcolepsy Subtype: A Post Hoc Analysis From the REST-ON Study

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A194-A194
Author(s):  
Asim Roy ◽  
Anne Marie Morse ◽  
Jordan Dubow ◽  
David Seiden ◽  
Richard Bogan
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Sodium Oxybate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Release Formulation ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Subtype A ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Introduction FT218 is an investigational, once-nightly, controlled-release formulation of sodium oxybate for the treatment of narcolepsy. The purpose of this post hoc analysis of the REST-ON study was to evaluate the effect of FT218 on measures of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with narcolepsy subtypes 1 (NT1) and 2 (NT2). Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in patients with narcolepsy ≥16 years old. Patients were stratified by narcolepsy subtypes and randomized 1:1 to receive FT218 or matching placebo: 4.5 g/night for 1 week, 6.0 g/night for 2 weeks, 7.5 g/night for 5 weeks, and 9.0 g/night for 5 weeks (maximum treatment duration, 13 weeks). Assessments of EDS included mean sleep latency (minutes) on maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) in sleepiness. Results A total of 190 patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat population (NT1: FT218, n=72; placebo, n=73; NT2: FT218, n=21, placebo, n=24). Patients with NT1 or NT2 receiving FT218 had significant improvement in MWT. LS mean difference in mean sleep latency (minutes) vs placebo for NT1 was 5.97 for 9.0 g (week 13), 7.02 for 7.5 g (week 8), and 4.89 for 6.0 g (week 3; all P&lt;0.001), and for NT2, 6.27 for 9.0 g (P=0.020), 4.01 for 7.5 g (P=0.162), and 5.33 for 6.0 g (P=0.020). A higher proportion of NT1 patients receiving FT218 had significant improvement on CGI-I vs placebo (9.0 g: 75.5% vs 35.9%; 7.5 g: 66.9% vs 27.9%; 6.0 g: 39.9% vs 7.8%; all P&lt;0.001). A higher number of NT2 patients receiving FT218 were consistently rated as much/very much improved vs placebo, based on descriptive statistics. FT218 was generally well tolerated. Conclusion FT218 had similar efficacy on EDS at evaluated doses in NT1 and NT2, with improvement in MWT and CGI-I greater than placebo. FT218 may provide effective treatment for EDS in patients with narcolepsy, with or without cataplexy. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals.

Reduction in migraine pain intensity in patients treated with erenumab: A post hoc analysis of two pivotal randomized studies

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 033310242110289
Author(s):  
Richard B Lipton ◽  
David W Dodick ◽  
David Kudrow ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Nadia Tenenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Episodic Migraine ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Monthly Average ◽  
Migraine Pain ◽  
Post Hoc

Background Erenumab (erenumab-aooe in the US) effectively reduces monthly migraine days in episodic and chronic migraine. This traditional outcome does not capture the intensity of headache pain on days with migraine. Methods This post hoc analysis of two pivotal randomized, placebo-controlled studies in patients with episodic migraine and chronic migraine examined the effect of erenumab 70 and 140 mg on migraine pain. Cumulative monthly migraine pain intensity is the sum of the peak pain intensity scores (0 = no migraine to 3 = migraine day with severe pain) on migraine days. Change from baseline in cumulative monthly migraine pain and average monthly pain intensity was assessed over months 4 to 6 for episodic migraine and month 3 for chronic migraine; change in average monthly pain intensity was assessed among monthly migraine days responders/non-responders. Results Efficacy analysis included 946 patients for the episodic migraine study and 656 patients for the chronic migraine study. Cumulative monthly migraine pain decreased significantly with erenumab versus placebo ( p < 0.001, for episodic migraine and chronic migraine). In addition, monthly average migraine pain intensity decreased significantly with erenumab versus placebo for episodic migraine ( p < 0.01); decreases were non-significant for chronic migraine. In comparison with placebo-treated patients, a greater proportion of erenumab-treated patients were pain intensity responders regardless of threshold used. Episodic migraine and chronic migraine patients with a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (responders) had a greater reduction in monthly average pain intensity than non-responders. Conclusions Erenumab reduced cumulative monthly migraine pain in episodic migraine and chronic migraine patients and significantly reduced monthly average migraine pain in episodic migraine, demonstrating treatment benefit beyond reduction in migraine frequency. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02456740; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02066415

scholarly journals Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in advanced-illness patients with or without active cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce H Chamberlain ◽  
Michelle Rhiner ◽  
Neal E Slatkin ◽  
Nancy Stambler ◽  
Robert J Israel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Opioid Analgesia ◽  
Advanced Illness ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Active Cancer

Aim: To evaluate methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with and without cancer. Methods: This post hoc analysis comprises two Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies of advanced-illness patients who received methylnaltrexone subcutaneous injection or placebo. Results: Significantly more patients treated with methylnaltrexone than placebo experienced laxation within 4 (cancer = 55.5 vs 15.5%; noncancer = 55.6 vs 12.8%) and 24 (cancer = 64.7 vs 29.8%; noncancer = 64.4 vs 30.8%) h after the first dose (p < 0.01 vs placebo). Regardless of cancer status, methylnaltrexone reduced median time to laxation and improved constipation relief without impacting opioid analgesia or withdrawal symptoms. Conclusion: Methylnaltrexone provided significant improvements in opioid-induced constipation over placebo in advanced-illness patients with and without cancer. Clinical trial registration numbers: study 301: NCT00401362; study 302: NCT00402038.

Sex differences in implantable cardiac defibrillator therapy according to arrhythmia detection times

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (7) ◽  
pp. 520-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Gasparini ◽  
Axel Kloppe ◽  
Maurizio Lunati ◽  
Niraj Varma ◽  
Jose B Martinez-Ferrer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Arrhythmia Detection ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Post Hoc

ObjectiveIn implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs), long-detection times safely reduce unnecessary and inappropriate therapies. We aimed to evaluate ICD treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in women, compared with men, also taking into account ICD detection.MethodsThe Advance III trial randomised patients implanted with an ICD for primary or secondary prevention in two arms—long and nominal ventricular arrhythmias detection times before therapy delivering (number of intervals needed to detect (NID) 30/40 and 18/24, respectively). The main endpoint of this post hoc analysis was the incidence of ICD therapies evaluated through Kaplan-Meier method and univariate Cox regression models.ResultsOverall, 1902 patients (304 women, 65±11 years) were randomised. Women showed a lower risk of ICD therapy (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.93, p=0.022); this difference was observed only in the long-detection arm (HR 0.37, p=0.013) and not in the short detection arm (HR 0.82, p=0.414). No significant sex differences were observed concerning inappropriate therapies and mortality rate. Long-detection settings significantly reduced overall ICD therapies and appropriate ICD therapies, both in women (overall HR 0.31, p=0.007; appropriate HR 0.33, p=0.033) and in men (overall HR 0.69, p=0.006; appropriate HR 0.73, p=0.048).ConclusionsIn patients with ICDs, the strategy of setting a long-detection time to treat ventricular arrhythmias (NID 30/40) reduces overall delivered therapies, both in women and men, when compared with nominal setting (NID 18/24). The reduction was significantly higher in women. Overall, women were less likely to experience ICD therapies than men; this result was only observed in the long-detection arm.Clinical trial registrationNCT00617175.

Timing and Magnitude of Initial Change in Disease Activity Score 28 Predicts the Likelihood of Achieving Low Disease Activity at 1 Year in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Certolizumab Pegol: A Post-hoc Analysis of the RAPID 1 Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 1326-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
DÉSIRÉE VAN DER HEIJDE ◽  
EDWARD C. KEYSTONE ◽  
JEFFREY R. CURTIS ◽  
ROBERT B. LANDEWÉ ◽  
MICHAEL H. SCHIFF ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Certolizumab Pegol ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Post Hoc

Objective.To determine the relationship between timing and magnitude of Disease Activity Score [DAS28(ESR)] nonresponse (DAS28 improvement thresholds not reached) during the first 12 weeks of treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP) plus methotrexate, and the likelihood of achieving low disease activity (LDA) at 1 year in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Methods.In a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 study, patients achieving LDA [DAS28(ESR) ≤ 3.2] at Year 1 were assessed according to DAS28 nonresponse at various timepoints within the first 12 weeks.Results.Seven-hundred eighty-three patients were included (CZP 200 mg, n = 393; CZP 400 mg, n = 390). A total of 86.9% of patients in the CZP 200 mg group had a DAS28 improvement of ≥ 1.2 by Week 12. Of the 13.1% of patients with DAS28 improvement < 1.2 by Week 12, only 2.0% had LDA at Year 1. Failure to achieve LDA at Year 1 depended on timing of nonresponse — 22.3%, 8.4%, and 2.0% of patients with DAS28 improvement < 1.2 by Weeks 1, 6, and 12, respectively, had LDA at Year 1 — and magnitude of initial lack of DAS28 improvement; for example, compared with the patients with DAS28 < 1.2 improvement, fewer patients with DAS28 < 0.6 had LDA at Year 1 (17.4%, 2.4%, and 0.0% at Weeks 1, 6, and 12, respectively).Conclusion.Failure to achieve improvement in DAS28 within the first 12 weeks of therapy was predictive of a low probability of achieving LDA at Year 1. Moreover, the accuracy of the prediction was found to be strongly dependent on the magnitude and timing of the lack of the response. (Clinical Trial Registration Nos. NCT00152386 and NCT00175877).

scholarly journals Extended-release naltrexone/bupropion is safe and effective among subjects with type 2 diabetes already taking incretin agents: a post-hoc analysis of the LIGHT trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Wharton ◽  
Peter Yin ◽  
Melonie Burrows ◽  
Errol Gould ◽  
Jessica Blavignac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Mean Absolute Difference ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trial ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background Extended-release naltrexone/bupropion (NB) is indicated for chronic weight management. Incretin agents are recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes. This analysis looked at the add-on of NB to incretins to see if weight loss could occur in patients already stabilized on incretin agents. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of NB vs. placebo (PL) among subjects with type 2 diabetes stable on an incretin agent prior to randomization in a double-blind, PL-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial (N = 1317). Results Over 1 year, mean weight loss was significantly greater among NB patients vs. PL among those taking DPP-4i (mean absolute difference 4.6% [p < 0.0001]) and those taking GLP-1RAs (mean absolute difference 5.2%, p < 0.0001). Proportions of subjects achieving 5% weight loss were significantly greater for NB vs. PL at weeks 26 and 52 among those taking DPP-4is or GLP-1RAs. There were no significant differences in effectiveness observed between NB + DPP-4i and NB + GLP-1RA or between PL + DPP-4i and PL + GLP-1RA in any of the analyses. Serious adverse events were reported by 9.1% and 11.1% for PL + DPP-4i and PL + GLP-1RA, respectively, and 13.3% and 12.4% of NB + DPP-4i and NB + GLP-1RA, respectively. Conclusion NB appears to be effective in reducing weight in patients with T2DM and obesity/overweight who are taking DPP-4ihibitors or GLP-1RA. The SAE rates in all arms of this analysis were lower than have been reported in other cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document