scholarly journals Solution structure of a 2:1 complex of anticancer drug XR5944 with TFF1 estrogen response element: insights into DNA recognition by a bis-intercalator

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 6012-6024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clement Lin ◽  
Raveendra I. Mathad ◽  
Zhenjiang Zhang ◽  
Neil Sidell ◽  
Danzhou Yang
Keyword(s):  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Solution Structure ◽  
Dna Recognition ◽  
Estrogen Response Element ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Estrogen Response

scholarly journals Mouse Estrogen Receptor β Forms Estrogen Response Element-Binding Heterodimers with Estrogen Receptor α

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1486-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarina Pettersson ◽  
Kaj Grandien ◽  
George G. J. M. Kuiper ◽  
Jan-Åke Gustafsson
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Β ◽  
Estrogen Response Element ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Estrogen Response

scholarly journals Aromatase: Contributions to Physiology and Disease in Women and Men

Physiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Blakemore ◽  
Fredrick Naftolin
Keyword(s):  
Human Physiology ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Reproductive System ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Estrogen Response Element ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Estrogen Response ◽  
Health And Disease

Aromatase (estrogen synthetase; EC 1.14.14.1) catalyzes the demethylation of androgens' carbon 19, producing phenolic 18-carbon estrogens. Aromatase is most widely known for its roles in reproduction and reproductive system diseases, and as a target for inhibitor therapy in estrogen-sensitive diseases including cancer, endometriosis, and leiomyoma (141, 143). However, all tissues contain estrogen receptor-expressing cells, the majority of genes have a complete or partial estrogen response element that regulates their expression (61), and there are plentiful nonreceptor effects of estrogens (79); therefore, the effect of aromatase through the provision of estrogen is almost universal in terms of health and disease. This review will provide a brief but comprehensive overview of the enzyme, its role in steroidogenesis, the problems that arise with its functional mutations and mishaps, the roles in human physiology of aromatase and its product estrogens, its current clinical roles, and the effects of aromatase inhibitors. While much of the story is that of the consequences of the formation of its product estrogens, we also will address alternative enzymatic roles of aromatase as a demethylase or nonenzymatic actions of this versatile molecule. Although this short review is meant to be thorough, it is by no means exhaustive; rather, it is meant to reflect the cutting-edge, exciting properties and possibilities of this ancient enzyme and its products.

scholarly journals The High Mobility Group Protein 1 Enhances Binding of the Estrogen Receptor DNA Binding Domain to the Estrogen Response Element

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorene E. Romine ◽  
Jennifer R. Wood ◽  
LuAnne A. Lamia ◽  
Paul Prendergast ◽  
Dean P. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
High Mobility ◽  
High Mobility Group ◽  
Estrogen Response Element ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
High Mobility Group Protein ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Estrogen Response ◽  
Group Protein

Abstract We have examined the ability of the high-mobility group protein 1 (HMG1) to alter binding of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain (DBD) to the estrogen response element (ERE). HMG1 dramatically enhanced binding of purified, bacterially expressed DBD to the consensus vitellogenin A2 ERE in a dose-dependent manner. The ability of HMG1 to stabilize the DBD-ERE complex resulted in part from a decrease in the dissociation rate of the DBD from the ERE. Antibody supershift experiments demonstrated that HMG1 was also capable of forming a ternary complex with the ERE-bound DBD in the presence of HMG1-specific antibody. HMG1 did not substantially affect DBD-ERE contacts as assessed by methylation interference assays, nor did it alter the ability of the DBD to induce distortion in ERE-containing DNA fragments. Because HMG1 dramatically enhanced estrogen receptor DBD binding to the ERE, and the DBD is the most highly conserved region among the nuclear receptor superfamily members, HMG1 may function to enhance binding of other nuclear receptors to their respective response elements and act in concert with coactivator proteins to regulate expression of hormone-responsive genes.

Regulation of HOXA10 expression by phytoestrogens

2007 ◽  
Vol 292 (2) ◽  
pp. E435-E442 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Eda Akbas ◽  
Xiaolan Fei ◽  
Hugh S. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
In Utero ◽  
Estrogen Response Element ◽  
Mouse Uterus ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Estrogen Response ◽  
Uterine Anomalies ◽  
Mrna And Protein Expression ◽  
Adult Exposure

HOXA10 is necessary for normal development of the Müllerian duct, and continued adult expression in the uterus is necessary for female fertility. HOXA10 expression is altered by diethylstilbestrol, leading to uterine anomalies. Other endocrine disruptors may potentially lead to reproductive anomalies or dysfunction by altering HOXA10 expression. Here we investigated the effect of isoflavones on HOXA10 expression after in utero or adult exposure in the mouse. Genistein, but not diadzein, regulated HOXA10 mRNA and protein expression in the adult mouse uterus. In contrast, in utero genistein or diadzein exposure had no lasting effect on HOXA10 expression in the exposed offspring. Reporter gene expression driven by the HOXA10 estrogen response element was increased in a dose-responsive manner by genistein, but not daidzein. Neither estrogen receptor-α nor estrogen receptor-β binding to the HOXA10 estrogen response element was affected by genistein or daidzein. In utero exposure to isoflavones is unlikely to result in HOXA10-mediated developmental anomalies. Adult genistein exposure alters uterine HOXA10 expression, a potential mechanism by which this agent affects fertility.

scholarly journals Role of Estrogen Response Element in the Human Prolactin Gene: Transcriptional Response and Timing

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne V. McNamara ◽  
Antony D. Adamson ◽  
Lee S. S. Dunham ◽  
Sabrina Semprini ◽  
David G. Spiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Estrogen Response Element ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Estrogen Response ◽  
Prolactin Gene ◽  
Human Prolactin

scholarly journals Interactions of Estrogen- and Thyroid Hormone Receptors on a Progesterone Receptor Estrogen Response Element (ERE) Sequence: a Comparison with the Vitellogenin A2 Consensus ERE

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1581-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderick E. M. Scott ◽  
X. Sharon Wu-Peng ◽  
Paul M. Yen ◽  
William W. Chin ◽  
Donald W. Pfaff
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Hormone ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Reproductive Behavior ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Receptors ◽  
Estrogen Response Element ◽  
Hormone Response ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Estrogen Response

Abstract The identification of hormone response elements in the promoter regions of hormonally regulated genes has revealed a striking similarity between the half-site of the estrogen-response element (ERE) and a consensus sequence constituting the thyroid hormone-response element. Because of the potential for thyroid hormone (T3) to affect estrogen (E)- and progesterone-dependent female reproductive behavior via EREs, we have begun to investigate the activity of an ERE identified in the progesterone receptor (PR) proximal promoter and its interactions with the estrogen receptor (ER) and thyroid hormone receptors (TR). In addition, we have compared ER and TR interactions on the PR ERE construct with that of the vitellogenin A2 (vit A2) consensus ERE. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that TR binds to the PR ERE as well as to the consensus ERE sequence in vitro. Further, these two EREs were differentially regulated by T3 in the presence of TR. T3 in the presence of TRα increased transcription from a PR ERE construct ∼5-fold and had no inhibitory effect on E induction. Similarly, T3 also activated a β-galactosidase reporter construct containing PR promoter sequences spanning −1400 to +700. In addition, the TR isoforms β1 and β2 also stimulated transcription from the PR ERE construct by 5- to 6-fold. A TRα mutant lacking the ability to bind AGGTCA sequences in vitro failed to activate transcription from the PR ERE construct, demonstrating dependence on DNA binding. In contrast to its actions on the PR ERE construct, TRα did not activate transcription from the vit A2 consensus ERE but rather attenuated E-mediated transcriptional activation. Attenuation from the vit A2 consensus ERE is not necessarily dependent on DNA binding as the TRα DNA binding mutant was still able to inhibit E-dependent transactivation. In contrast to TRα, the isoforms TRβ1 and TRβ2 failed to inhibit E-induced activation from the vit A2 consensus ERE. These results demonstrate that the PR ERE construct differs from the vit A2 consensus ERE in its ability to respond to TRs and that divergent pathways exist for activation and inhibition by TR. Since ERs, PRs, and TRs are all present in hypothalamic neurons, these findings may be significant for endocrine integration, which is important for reproductive behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document