scholarly journals FRalanyzer: a tool for functional analysis of fold-recognition sequence-structure alignments

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (Web Server) ◽  
pp. W499-W502 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. K. Saini ◽  
D. Fischer
Microbiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1111-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beata Furmanek-Blaszk ◽  
Robert Boratynski ◽  
Natalia Zolcinska ◽  
Marian Sektas

Methylation of a base in a specific DNA sequence protects the DNA from nucleolytic cleavage by restriction enzymes recognizing the same sequence. The MboII restriction–modification (R–M) system of Moraxella bovis ATCC 10900 consists of a restriction endonuclease gene and two methyltransferase genes. The enzymes encoded by this system recognize an asymmetrical sequence 5′-GAAGA-3′/3′-CTTCT-5′. M1.MboII modifies the last adenine in the recognition sequence 5′-GAAGA-3′ to N 6-methyladenine. A second methylase, M2.MboII, was cloned and purified to electrophoretic homogeneity using a four-step chromatographic procedure. It was demonstrated that M2.MboII modifies the internal cytosine in the recognition sequence 3′-CTTCT-5′, yielding N 4-methylcytosine, and moreover is able to methylate single-stranded DNA. The protein exists in solution as a monomer of molecular mass 30 000±1000 Da under denaturing conditions. Divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+) inhibit M2.MboII methylation activity. It was found that the isomethylomer M2.NcuI from Neisseria cuniculi ATCC 14688 behaves in the same manner. Functional analysis showed that the complete MboII R–M system, consisting of two methyltransferases genes and the mboIIR gene, is the most stable and the least harmful to bacterial cells.


Meta Gene ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 100680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajamanikandan Sundarraj ◽  
Nihar Nalini Mohanty ◽  
Revanaiah Yogisharadhya ◽  
Jeyaraman Jeyakanthan ◽  
Awadesh Prajapati ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo M. Bennett‐Lovsey ◽  
Alex D. Herbert ◽  
Michael J. E. Sternberg ◽  
Lawrence A. Kelley

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 976-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew V. McDonnell ◽  
Matthew Menke ◽  
Nathan Palmer ◽  
Jonathan King ◽  
Lenore Cowen ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen N. Haynes ◽  
Andrew E. Williams

Summary: We review the rationale for behavioral clinical case formulations and emphasize the role of the functional analysis in the design of individualized treatments. Standardized treatments may not be optimally effective for clients who have multiple behavior problems. These problems can affect each other in complex ways and each behavior problem can be influenced by multiple, interacting causal variables. The mechanisms of action of standardized treatments may not always address the most important causal variables for a client's behavior problems. The functional analysis integrates judgments about the client's behavior problems, important causal variables, and functional relations among variables. The functional analysis aids treatment decisions by helping the clinician estimate the relative magnitude of effect of each causal variable on the client's behavior problems, so that the most effective treatments can be selected. The parameters of, and issues associated with, a functional analysis and Functional Analytic Clinical Case Models (FACCM) are illustrated with a clinical case. The task of selecting the best treatment for a client is complicated because treatments differ in their level of specificity and have unequally weighted mechanisms of action. Further, a treatment's mechanism of action is often unknown.


1958 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 158-160
Author(s):  
LAWRENCE SCHLESINGER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document