scholarly journals Zinc Finger Tools: custom DNA-binding domains for transcription factors and nucleases

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (Web Server) ◽  
pp. W516-W523 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Mandell ◽  
C. F. Barbas
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

scholarly journals The DNA binding domains of the yeast Ga14 and human c-Jun transcription factors interact through the zinc-finger and bZIP motifs

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Sollerbrant ◽  
Göran Akusjärvi ◽  
Stig Linder ◽  
Catharina Svensson
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

scholarly journals Mechanistic Heterogeneity in Site Recognition by the Structurally Homologous DNA-binding Domains of the ETS Family Transcription Factors Ets-1 and PU.1

2014 ◽  
Vol 289 (31) ◽  
pp. 21605-21616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Miles H. Linde ◽  
Manoj Munde ◽  
Victor D. Carvalho ◽  
W. David Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Ets Family ◽  
Site Recognition

scholarly journals Dissecting the Repertoire of DNA-Binding Transcription Factors of the Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus DSM 3638

Life ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Denis ◽  
Mario Alberto Martínez-Núñez ◽  
Silvia Tenorio-Salgado ◽  
Ernesto Perez-Rueda
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Pyrococcus Furiosus ◽  
Structural Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Cellular Domain

In recent years, there has been a large increase in the amount of experimental evidence for diverse archaeal organisms, and these findings allow for a comprehensive analysis of archaeal genetic organization. However, studies about regulatory mechanisms in this cellular domain are still limited. In this context, we identified a repertoire of 86 DNA-binding transcription factors (TFs) in the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus DSM 3638, that are clustered into 32 evolutionary families. In structural terms, 45% of these proteins are composed of one structural domain, 41% have two domains, and 14% have three structural domains. The most abundant DNA-binding domain corresponds to the winged helix-turn-helix domain; with few alternative DNA-binding domains. We also identified seven regulons, which represent 13.5% (279 genes) of the total genes in this archaeon. These analyses increase our knowledge about gene regulation in P. furiosus DSM 3638 and provide additional clues for comprehensive modeling of transcriptional regulatory networks in the Archaea cellular domain.

Dimeric transcription factor families: it takes two to tango but who decides on partners and the venue?

1992 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Experimental Evidence ◽  
Cdna Cloning ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Effector Functions ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Elements

Dimeric transcription factors that bind to DNA are often grouped into families on the basis of dimerization and DNA-binding specificities. cDNA cloning studies have established that members of the same family have structurally related dimerisation and DNA-binding domains but diverge in other regions that are important for transcriptional activation. These features lead to the straightforward suggestion that although all members of a family bind to similar DNA elements, individual members exhibit distinct transcriptional effector functions. This simple view is now supported by experimental evidence from those systems that have proved amenable to study. There are however some largely unaddressed questions that concern the mechanisms that allow family members to go about their business without interference from their highly related siblings. Here I will discuss some insights from studies of the bZIP class of transcription factors.

Biologic significance of GATA-1 activities in Ras-mediated megakaryocytic differentiation of hematopoietic cell lines

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 2440-2450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itaru Matsumura ◽  
Akira Kawasaki ◽  
Hirokazu Tanaka ◽  
Junko Sonoyama ◽  
Sachiko Ezoe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Myeloid Cell ◽  
Megakaryocytic Differentiation ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Endogenous Expression ◽  
Ras Activation

Abstract Lineage-specific transcription factors play crucial roles in the development of hematopoietic cells. In a previous study, it was demonstrated that Ras activation was involved in thrombopoietin-induced megakaryocytic differentiation. In this study, constitutive Ras activation by H-rasG12V evoked megakaryocytic maturation of erythroleukemia cell lines F-36P and K562, but not of myeloid cell line 32D cl3 that lacks GATA-1. However, the introduction of GATA-1 led to reprogramming of 32D cl3 toward erythrocytic/megakaryocytic lineage and enabled it to undergo megakaryocytic differentiation in response to H-rasG12V. In contrast, the overexpression of PU.1 and c-Myb changed the phenotype of K562 from erythroid to myeloid/monocytic lineage and rendered K562 to differentiate into granulocytes and macrophages in response to H-rasG12V, respectively. In GATA-1–transfected 32D cl3, the endogenous expression of PU.1 and c-Myb was easily detectable, but their activities were reduced severely. Endogenous GATA-1 activities were markedly suppressed in PU.1-transfected and c-myb–transfected K562. As for the mechanisms of these reciprocal inhibitions, GATA-1 and PU.1 were found to associate through their DNA-binding domains and to inhibit the respective DNA-binding activities of each other. In addition, c-Myb bound to GATA-1 and inhibited its DNA-binding activities. Mutant GATA-1 and PU.1 that retained their own transcriptional activities but could not inhibit the reciprocal partner were less effective in changing the lineage phenotype of 32D cl3 and K562. These results suggested that GATA-1 activities may be crucial for Ras-mediated megakaryocytic differentiation and that its activities may be regulated by the direct interaction with other lineage-specific transcription factors such as PU.1 and c-Myb.

scholarly journals Artificial Zinc Finger DNA Binding Domains: Versatile Tools for Genome Engineering and Modulation of Gene Expression

2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (11) ◽  
pp. 2435-2444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mir A. Hossain ◽  
Joeva J. Barrow ◽  
Yong Shen ◽  
MD Imdadul Haq ◽  
Jörg Bungert
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Genome Engineering ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Modulation Of Gene Expression

scholarly journals Activated Notch Inhibits Myogenic Activity of the MADS-Box Transcription Factor Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2C

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 2853-2862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Wilson-Rawls ◽  
Jeffery D. Molkentin ◽  
Brian L. Black ◽  
Eric N. Olson
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Notch Signaling Pathway ◽  
Mads Box ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Muscle Gene Expression ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Myocyte Enhancer Factor ◽  
Bhlh Proteins ◽  
Enhancer Factor

ABSTRACT Skeletal muscle gene expression is dependent on combinatorial associations between members of the MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors and the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) family of MADS-box transcription factors. The transmembrane receptor Notch interferes with the muscle-inducing activity of myogenic bHLH proteins, and it has been suggested that this inhibitory activity of Notch is directed at an essential cofactor that recognizes the DNA binding domains of the myogenic bHLH proteins. Given that MEF2 proteins interact with the DNA binding domains of myogenic bHLH factors to cooperatively regulate myogenesis, we investigated whether members of the MEF2 family might serve as targets for the inhibitory effects of Notch on myogenesis. We show that a constitutively activated form of Notch specifically blocks DNA binding by MEF2C, as well as its ability to cooperate with MyoD and myogenin to activate myogenesis. Responsiveness to Notch requires a 12-amino-acid region of MEF2C immediately adjacent to the DNA binding domain that is unique to this MEF2 isoform. Two-hybrid assays and coimmunoprecipitations show that this region of MEF2C interacts directly with the ankyrin repeat region of Notch. These findings reveal a novel mechanism for Notch-mediated inhibition of myogenesis and demonstrate that the Notch signaling pathway can discriminate between different members of the MEF2 family.

scholarly journals Structural Dynamics of the Heterodimerization Between the DNA-Binding Domains from Human FoxP1 and FoP2 Transcription Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 127a
Author(s):  
Exequiel Medina ◽  
Ricardo Coñuecar ◽  
Cesar A. Ramirez-Sarmiento ◽  
Hugo Sanabria ◽  
Jorge Babul
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Structural Dynamics ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

scholarly journals Role of the C-Terminal Binding Protein PXDLS Motif Binding Cleft in Protein Interactions and Transcriptional Repression

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (21) ◽  
pp. 8202-8213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate G. R. Quinlan ◽  
Alexis Verger ◽  
Alister Kwok ◽  
Stella H. Y. Lee ◽  
José Perdomo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Gene Repression ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Cleft ◽  
Partner Proteins

ABSTRACT C-terminal binding proteins (CtBPs) are multifunctional proteins that can mediate gene repression. CtBPs contain a cleft that binds Pro-X-Asp-Leu-Ser (PXDLS) motifs. PXDLS motifs occur in numerous transcription factors and in effectors of gene repression, such as certain histone deacetylases. CtBPs have been depicted as bridging proteins that self-associate and link PXDLS-containing transcription factors to PXDLS-containing chromatin-modifying enzymes. CtBPs also recruit effectors that do not contain recognizable PXDLS motifs. We have investigated the importance of the PXDLS binding cleft to CtBP's interactions with various partner proteins and to its ability to repress transcription. We used CtBP cleft mutant and cleft-filled fusion derivatives to distinguish between partner proteins that bind in the cleft and elsewhere on the CtBP surface. Functional assays demonstrate that CtBP mutants that carry defective clefts retain repression activity when fused to heterologous DNA-binding domains. This result suggests that the cleft is not essential for recruiting effectors. In contrast, when tested in the absence of a fused DNA-binding domain, disruption of the cleft abrogates repression activity. These results demonstrate that the PXDLS binding cleft is functionally important but suggest that it is primarily required for localization of the CtBP complex to promoter-bound transcription factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document