scholarly journals Chromatin remodeler Ino80C acts independently of H2A.Z to evict promoter nucleosomes and stimulate transcription of highly expressed genes in yeast

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (15) ◽  
pp. 8408-8430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongfang Qiu ◽  
Emily Biernat ◽  
Chhabi K Govind ◽  
Yashpal Rawal ◽  
Răzvan V Chereji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Histone Variant ◽  
Yeast Genome ◽  
Chromatin Remodeler ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Highly Expressed Genes ◽  
Induced Genes ◽  
Yeast Genes

Abstract The chromatin remodelers SWI/SNF and RSC function in evicting promoter nucleosomes at highly expressed yeast genes, particularly those activated by transcription factor Gcn4. Ino80 remodeling complex (Ino80C) can establish nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) in reconstituted chromatin, and was implicated in removing histone variant H2A.Z from the −1 and +1 nucleosomes flanking NDRs; however, Ino80C’s function in transcriptional activation in vivo is not well understood. Analyzing the cohort of Gcn4-induced genes in ino80Δ mutants has uncovered a role for Ino80C on par with SWI/SNF in evicting promoter nucleosomes and transcriptional activation. Compared to SWI/SNF, Ino80C generally functions over a wider region, spanning the −1 and +1 nucleosomes, NDR and proximal genic nucleosomes, at genes highly dependent on its function. Defects in nucleosome eviction in ino80Δ cells are frequently accompanied by reduced promoter occupancies of TBP, and diminished transcription; and Ino80 is enriched at genes requiring its remodeler activity. Importantly, nuclear depletion of Ino80 impairs promoter nucleosome eviction even in a mutant lacking H2A.Z. Thus, Ino80C acts widely in the yeast genome together with RSC and SWI/SNF in evicting promoter nucleosomes and enhancing transcription, all in a manner at least partly independent of H2A.Z editing.

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Activation in Yeast Cells Lacking Transcription Factor IIA

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 1573-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Chou ◽  
Sukalyan Chatterjee ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Large Subunit ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
General Transcription Factor

Abstract The general transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) forms a complex with TFIID at the TATA promoter element, and it inhibits the function of several negative regulators of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) subunit of TFIID. Biochemical experiments suggest that TFIIA is important in the response to transcriptional activators because activation domains can interact with TFIIA, increase recruitment of TFIID and TFIIA to the promoter, and promote isomerization of the TFIID-TFIIA-TATA complex. Here, we describe a double-shut-off approach to deplete yeast cells of Toa1, the large subunit of TFIIA, to <1% of the wild-type level. Interestingly, such TFIIA-depleted cells are essentially unaffected for activation by heat shock factor, Ace1, and Gal4-VP16. However, depletion of TFIIA causes a general two- to threefold decrease of transcription from most yeast promoters and a specific cell-cycle arrest at the G2-M boundary. These results indicate that transcriptional activation in vivo can occur in the absence of TFIIA.

scholarly journals Arsenic Directly Binds to and Activates the Yeast AP-1-Like Transcription Factor Yap8

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 913-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nallani Vijay Kumar ◽  
Jianbo Yang ◽  
Jitesh K. Pillai ◽  
Swati Rawat ◽  
Carlos Solano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Yeast Protein ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Arsenic Tolerance ◽  
Arsenic Sensing

The AP-1-like transcription factor Yap8 is critical for arsenic tolerance in the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae. However, the mechanism by which Yap8 senses the presence of arsenic and activates transcription of detoxification genes is unknown. Here we demonstrate that Yap8 directly binds to trivalent arsenite [As(III)]in vitroandin vivoand that approximately one As(III) molecule is bound per molecule of Yap8. As(III) is coordinated by three sulfur atoms in purified Yap8, and our genetic and biochemical data identify the cysteine residues that form the binding site as Cys132, Cys137, and Cys274. As(III) binding by Yap8 does not require an additional yeast protein, and Yap8 is regulated neither at the level of localization nor at the level of DNA binding. Instead, our data are consistent with a model in which a DNA-bound form of Yap8 acts directly as an As(III) sensor. Binding of As(III) to Yap8 triggers a conformational change that in turn brings about a transcriptional response. Thus, As(III) binding to Yap8 acts as a molecular switch that converts inactive Yap8 into an active transcriptional regulator. This is the first report to demonstrate how a eukaryotic protein couples arsenic sensing to transcriptional activation.

E1A-mediated activation of the adenovirus E4 promoter can occur independently of the cellular transcription factor E4F

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4297-4305
Author(s):  
C Jones ◽  
K A Lee
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Hela Cells ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Promoter Activity ◽  
Core Motif ◽  
Cellular Transcription Factor ◽  
The Core ◽  
Cellular Factors

The cellular factors E4F and ATF-2 (a member of the activating transcription factor [ATF] family) bind to common sites in the adenovirus E4 promoter and have both been suggested to mediate transcriptional activation by the viral E1A protein. To assess the role of E4F, we have introduced mutations into the E4F/ATF binding sites of the E4 promoter and monitored promoter activity in HeLa cells. We find that the core motif (TGACG) of the E4F/ATF binding site is important for E4 promoter activity. However, a point mutation adjacent to the core motif that reduces E4F binding (but has no effect on ATF binding) has no effect on E4 promoter activity. Together with previous results, these findings indicate that there are at least two cellular factors (a member of the ATF family and E4F) that can function with E1A to induce transcription of the E4 promoter. We also find that certain mutations strongly reduce E4 transcription in vivo but have no effect on ATF-2 binding in vitro. These results are therefore incompatible with the possibility that (with respect to members of the ATF family) ATF-2 alone can function with E1A to transactivate the E4 promoter in HeLa cells.

scholarly journals The histone variant H2A.Z in yeast is almost exclusively incorporated into the +1 nucleosome in the direction of transcription

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dia N Bagchi ◽  
Anna M Battenhouse ◽  
Daechan Park ◽  
Vishwanath R Iyer
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
General Feature ◽  
Antisense Transcription ◽  
Histone Variant ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Transcription Start Sites ◽  
Bidirectional Transcription

Abstract Transcription start sites (TSS) in eukaryotes are characterized by a nucleosome-depleted region (NDR), which appears to be flanked upstream and downstream by strongly positioned nucleosomes incorporating the histone variant H2A.Z. H2A.Z associates with both active and repressed TSS and is important for priming genes for rapid transcriptional activation. However, the determinants of H2A.Z occupancy at specific nucleosomes and its relationship to transcription initiation remain unclear. To further elucidate the specificity of H2A.Z, we determined its genomic localization at single nucleosome resolution, as well as the localization of its chromatin remodelers Swr1 and Ino80. By analyzing H2A.Z occupancy in conjunction with RNA expression data that captures promoter-derived antisense initiation, we find that H2A.Z’s bimodal incorporation on either side of the NDR is not a general feature of TSS, but is specifically a marker for bidirectional transcription, such that the upstream flanking −1 H2A.Z-containing nucleosome is more appropriately considered as a +1 H2A.Z nucleosome for antisense transcription. The localization of H2A.Z almost exclusively at the +1 nucleosome suggests that a transcription-initiation dependent process could contribute to its specific incorporation.

scholarly journals The TEA Transcription Factor Tec1 Confers Promoter-Specific Gene Regulation by Ste12-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Heise ◽  
Julia van der Felden ◽  
Sandra Kern ◽  
Mario Malcher ◽  
Stefan Brückner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TEA transcription factor Tec1 is known to regulate target genes together with a second transcription factor, Ste12. Tec1-Ste12 complexes can activate transcription through Tec1 binding sites (TCSs), which can be further combined with Ste12 binding sites (PREs) for cooperative DNA binding. However, previous studies have hinted that Tec1 might regulate transcription also without Ste12. Here, we show that in vivo, physiological amounts of Tec1 are sufficient to stimulate TCS-mediated gene expression and transcription of the FLO11 gene in the absence of Ste12. In vitro, Tec1 is able to bind TCS elements with high affinity and specificity without Ste12. Furthermore, Tec1 contains a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain that confers Ste12-independent activation of TCS-regulated gene expression. On a genome-wide scale, we identified 302 Tec1 target genes that constitute two distinct classes. A first class of 254 genes is regulated by Tec1 in a Ste12-dependent manner and is enriched for genes that are bound by Tec1 and Ste12 in vivo. In contrast, a second class of 48 genes can be regulated by Tec1 independently of Ste12 and is enriched for genes that are bound by the stress transcription factors Yap6, Nrg1, Cin5, Skn7, Hsf1, and Msn4. Finally, we find that combinatorial control by Tec1-Ste12 complexes stabilizes Tec1 against degradation. Our study suggests that Tec1 is able to regulate TCS-mediated gene expression by Ste12-dependent and Ste12-independent mechanisms that enable promoter-specific transcriptional control.

scholarly journals A yeast ARS-binding protein activates transcription synergistically in combination with other weak activating factors.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
A R Buchman ◽  
R D Kornberg
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Essential Gene ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Yeast Genes

ABFI (ARS-binding protein I) is a yeast protein that binds specific DNA sequences associated with several autonomously replicating sequences (ARSs). ABFI also binds sequences located in promoter regions of some yeast genes, including DED1, an essential gene of unknown function that is transcribed constitutively at a high level. ABFI was purified by specific binding to the DED1 upstream activating sequence (UAS) and was found to recognize related sequences at several other promoters, at an ARS (ARS1), and at a transcriptional silencer (HMR E). All ABFI-binding sites, regardless of origin, provided weak UAS function in vivo when examined in test plasmids. UAS function was abolished by point mutations that reduced ABFI binding in vitro. Analysis of the DED1 promoter showed that two ABFI-binding sites combine synergistically with an adjacent T-rich sequence to form a strong constitutive activator. The DED1 T-rich element acted synergistically with all other ABFI-binding sites and with binding sites for other multifunctional yeast activators. An examination of the properties of sequences surrounding ARS1 left open the possibility that ABFI enhances the initiation of DNA replication at ARS1 by transcriptional activation.

scholarly journals Transcription Factor Fli1 Regulates Collagen Fibrillogenesis in Mouse Skin

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihide Asano ◽  
Margaret Markiewicz ◽  
Masahide Kubo ◽  
Gabor Szalai ◽  
Dennis K. Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Mrna Level ◽  
Mouse Skin ◽  
Dermal Fibroblasts ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Fibrillar Collagen ◽  
Cultured Fibroblasts

ABSTRACT Biosynthesis of fibrillar collagen in the skin is precisely regulated to maintain proper tissue homeostasis; however, the molecular mechanisms involved in this process remain largely unknown. Transcription factor Fli1 has been shown to repress collagen synthesis in cultured dermal fibroblasts. This study investigated the role of Fli1 in regulation of collagen biosynthesis in mice skin in vivo using mice with the homozygous deletion of the C-terminal transcriptional activation (CTA) domain of the Fli1 gene (Fli1ΔCTA/ΔCTA). Skin analyses of the Fli1 mutant mice revealed a significant upregulation of fibrillar collagen genes at mRNA level, as well as increased collagen content as measured by acetic acid extraction and hydroxyproline assays. In addition, collagen fibrils contained ultrastructural abnormalities including immature thin fibrils and very thick irregularly shaped fibrils, which correlated with the reduced levels of decorin, fibromodulin, and lumican. Fibroblasts cultured from the skin of Fli1ΔCTA/ΔCTA mice maintained elevated synthesis of collagen mRNA and protein. Additional experiments in cultured fibroblasts have revealed that although Fli1 ΔCTA retains the ability to bind to the collagen promoter in vitro and in vivo, it no longer functions as transcriptional repressor. Together, these results establish Fli1 as a key regulator of the collagen homeostasis in the skin in vivo.

scholarly journals Functional analysis of the heterotrimeric NF-Y transcription factor complex in cassava disease resistance

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1185-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyi He ◽  
Guoyin Liu ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Yanwei Xie ◽  
Yunxie Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Disease Resistance ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Plant Disease Resistance ◽  
Plant Defence ◽  
Virus Induced Gene Silencing ◽  
Cassava Bacterial Blight ◽  
Transcription Factor Complex

Abstract Background and Aims The nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) transcription factor complex is important in plant growth, development and stress response. Information regarding this transcription factor complex is limited in cassava (Manihot esculenta). In this study, 15 MeNF-YAs, 21 MeNF-YBs and 15 MeNF-YCs were comprehensively characterized during plant defence. Methods Gene expression in MeNF-Ys was examined during interaction with the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis (Xam). The yeast two-hybrid system was employed to investigate protein–protein interactions in the heterotrimeric NF-Y transcription factor complex. The in vivo roles of MeNF-Ys were revealed by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in cassava. Key Results The regulation of MeNF-Ys in response to Xam indicated their possible roles in response to cassava bacterial blight. Protein–protein interaction assays identified the heterotrimeric NF-Y transcription factor complex (MeNF-YA1/3, MeNF-YB11/16 and MeNF-YC11/12). Moreover, the members of the heterotrimeric NF-Y transcription factor complex were located in the cell nucleus and conferred transcriptional activation activity to the CCAAT motif. Notably, the heterotrimeric NF-Y transcription factor complex positively regulated plant disease resistance to Xam, confirmed by a disease phenotype in overexpressing plants in Nicotiana benthamiana and VIGS in cassava. Consistently, the heterotrimeric NF-Y transcription factor complex positively regulated the expression of pathogenesis-related genes (MePRs). Conclusions The NF-Y transcription factor complex (MeNF-YA1/3, MeNF-YB11/16 and MeNF-YC11/12) characterized here was shown to play a role in transcriptional activation of MePR promoters, contributing to the plant defence response in cassava.

scholarly journals In vivo binding of NF-κB to the IκBβ promoter is insufficient for transcriptional activation

2006 ◽  
Vol 400 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan D. Griffin ◽  
Paul N. Moynagh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Nuclear Factor Κb ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Il Interleukin

Despite certain structural and biochemical similarities, differences exist in the function of the NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) inhibitory proteins IκBα (inhibitory κBα) and IκBβ. The functional disparity arises in part from variance at the level of gene regulation, and in particular from the substantial induction of IκBα, but not IκBβ, gene expression post-NF-κB activation. In the present study, we probe the differential effects of IL (interleukin)-1β on induction of IκBα and perform the first characterization of the human IκBβ promoter. A consensus NF-κB-binding site, capable of binding NF-κB both in vitro and in vivo, is found in the IκBβ gene 5′ flanking region. However, the IκBβ promoter was not substantially activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and tumour necrosis factor α, that are known to cause strong activation of NF-κB. Furthermore, in contrast with IκBα, NF-κB activation did not increase expression of endogenous IκBβ as assessed by analysis of mRNA and protein levels. Unlike κB-responsive promoters, IκBβ promoter-bound p65 inefficiently recruits RNA polymerase II, which stalls at the promoter. We present evidence that this stalling is likely due to the absence of transcription factor IIH engagement, a prerequisite for RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and transcriptional initiation. Differences in the conformation of promoter-bound NF-κB may underlie the variation in the ability to engage the basal transcriptional apparatus at the IκBβ and κB-responsive promoters. This accounts for the differential expression of IκB family members in response to NF-κB activation and furthers our understanding of the mechanisms involved in transcription factor activity and IκBβ gene regulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document