scholarly journals Avacopan, a Selective C5a Receptor Antagonist, for Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayoshi Harigai ◽  
Hideto Takada

Abstract Avacopan, an orally administered C5a receptor (C5aR) antagonist, has been approved for the treatment of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) in Japan and the United States. In ADVOCATE Phase III clinical trial, patients with active MPA or GPA received either 30 mg avacopan twice daily or prednisone on a tapering schedule in combination with rituximab or cyclophosphamide (followed by azathioprine). The trial met its two primary endpoints: avacopan showed non-inferiority to prednisone for achieving remission at week 26 (avacopan, 72.3%; prednisone, 70.1%; p < 0.001 for non-inferiority and p = 0.24 for superiority) and superiority for maintaining remission at week 52 (65.7% for avacopan, 54.9% prednisone, p < 0.001 for non-inferiority and p = 0.007 for superiority). Of several key secondary endpoints tested, the glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI)-cumulative worsening score and GTI-aggregate improvement score were significantly lower in the avacopan group than in the prednisone group at both weeks 26 and 52. Serious adverse events related and unrelated to the worsening vasculitis were reported at 10.2% and 37.3% in the avacopan group and at 14.0% and 39.0% in the prednisone group, respectively. Avacopan has set the stage for the semi-glucocorticoid-free or glucocorticoid-free treatment of MPA and GPA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4001-LBA4001
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Yuichiro Doki ◽  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Jianming Xu ◽  
Lucjan Wyrwicz ◽  
...  

LBA4001 Background: NIVO demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) vs chemo in previously treated patients (pts) with ESCC (ATTRACTION-3). We report OS and progression-free survival (PFS) from CheckMate 648, the first global phase III study to evaluate both an immuno-oncology (I-O)/chemo combination and an I-O/I-O combination in advanced ESCC. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC were enrolled regardless of tumor cell PD-L1 expression. Pts were randomized to NIVO (240 mg Q2W) + chemo (fluorouracil + cisplatin Q4W), NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), or chemo alone. Primary endpoints for both comparisons were OS and PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%. Hierarchically tested secondary endpoints included OS and PFS in all randomized pts. Results: 970 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo, NIVO + IPI, and chemo arms (49% with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%). With 13 months (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI led to statistically significant improvement in OS vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and all randomized pts (Table). Statistically significant PFS benefit was also observed for NIVO + chemo vs chemo (HR 0.65 [98.5% CI 0.46–0.92]; P = 0.0023) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%. PFS in NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% did not meet the prespecified boundary for significance. The objective response rate (per BICR) was 53% (NIVO + chemo), 35% (NIVO + IPI), and 20% (chemo) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and in all randomized pts was 47%, 28%, and 27%, respectively; longer median (95% CI) duration of response was observed vs chemo for pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%: 8.4 (6.9–12.4), 11.8 (7.1–27.4), and 5.7 (4.4–8.7) mo and for all randomized pts: 8.2 (6.9–9.7), 11.1 (8.3–14.0), and 7.1 (5.7–8.2) mo, respectively. No new safety signals were identified (Table). Conclusions: NIVO plus chemo and NIVO plus IPI both demonstrated superior OS vs chemo, along with durable objective responses and acceptable safety, in pts with advanced ESCC, and each represents a potential new 1L treatment option. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7033-7033
Author(s):  
N. Helbekkmo ◽  
S. H. Sundtroem ◽  
U. Aaseboe ◽  
P. F. Brunsvig ◽  
C. L. Von Plessen ◽  
...  

7033 Background: Carboplatin/vinorelbine (CV) and carboplatin/gemcitabine (CG) are novel 2-drug combinations in the treatment of NSCLC. In a randomized national multicenter phase III study in stage IIIB and IV patients (pts), we compared these regimens with respect to efficacy, toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Chemonaive pts with histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, stage IIIB or IV and ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2 were eligible. There was no upper age limit. Pts received vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, both administered on day 1 and 8, in combination with carboplatin (Chatelut AUC 4) at day 1. Three courses were administered in 3-week cycles. QoL questionnaires were completed at baseline, before each cycle and then every 8 weeks up to one year. Primary endpoints were survival and QoL and secondary endpoints toxicity and time to progression (TTP). Stratification was done for age, stage and PS, and the planned sample size per arm was minimum 200. The analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis Results: From Oct 2003 through Dec 2004, 433 pts from 33 institutions were randomized to CV (n=218) or CG (n=215). Follow-up was minimum one year. There was no difference in overall survival between the two arms (p=0.89). Median survival was 7.3 vs. 6.5 months and 1-year survival 28% and 31% in the CV and CG arm respectively. TTP was significantly longer in the CG arm (p=0.006) with median TTP 4.2 vs. 3.9 months. There was significantly more grade 3–4 anemia and thrombocytopenia in the CG arm (p<0.001) and more grade 3–4 leucopenia in the CV arm (p= 0.001). More pts in the CG arm needed transfusions of blood (p=0.003) or platelets (p=0.001). There was no difference between the arms with respect to neutropenic infections (p=0.87). QoL data are still being analyzed and will be presented at ASCO. Conclusions: Overall survival was similar in the two treatment arms. In the CG arm, the median TTP was longer, but grade 3–4 toxicity requiring interventions, was more frequent when compared to the VC arm. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 387-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
Yevhen Hotko ◽  
Andres Cervantes-Ruiperez ◽  
...  

387 Background: In the primary analysis of study 181, pmab+FOLFIRI significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients (pts) with wild-type (WT) KRAS mCRC. Here, we report the results of a prespecified final descriptive analysis planned for 30 months (mos) after the last pt was enrolled. Methods: Pts were randomised 1:1 to pmab 6.0 mg/kg Q2W+FOLFIRI (Arm 1) vs FOLFIRI alone (Arm 2). Pts had one prior fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen for mCRC and ECOG 0-2. The co-primary endpoints were PFS (central assessment) and OS, and were independently tested. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), and safety. KRAS status was determined by a blinded central lab. Results: 1,186 pts were randomised and received treatment (tx): 591 in Arm 1, 595 In Arm 2. 1,083/1,186 pts (91%) had KRAS results. Adverse event rates were consistent with the primary analysis. Results are shown in the table . Conclusions: In Arm 1, PFS (standard and on-treatment definition) and ORR were improved, and there was a trend toward improved OS in pts with WT KRAS mCRC. The large proportion of pts receiving post-progression anti-EGFR therapy may have affected the ability to observe a difference in OS between the tx arms. In pts with MT KRAS there was no difference in efficacy. KRAS testing is critical to select appropriate pts for tx with pmab. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3535-3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
Yevhen Hotko ◽  
Andres Cervantes-Ruiperez ◽  
...  

3535 Background: The primary analysis of study 20050181 showed that in patients (pts) with wild-type (WT) KRAS mCRC, pmab plus FOLFIRI given as second-line therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs FOLFIRI alone. Here, we report on a prespecified descriptive analysis planned for 30 months (mos) after the last pt was enrolled. Methods: Pts with mCRC, ECOG 0-2, who had one prior fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen were randomized 1:1 to pmab 6.0 mg/kg Q2W+FOLFIRI (Arm 1) vs FOLFIRI (Arm 2). Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS (central assessment). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Tumor KRAS status was determined by a blinded central lab. Results: 1186 pts were randomised and received tx: 591 in Arm 1, 595 In Arm 2. 1083 pts (91%) had KRAS results. Adverse event rates were consistent with the primary analysis. Results are shown below. Conclusions: In pts with WT KRAS mCRC receiving pmab+FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI, PFS and ORR were significantly improved, and there was a trend toward improved OS. Post-progression anti-EGFR tx may have attenuated any significant difference in OS between tx arms. In pts with MT KRAS mCRC, no difference in efficacy was observed between tx arms. KRAS testing is critical to select appropriate pts for tx with pmab. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1546.1-1546
Author(s):  
S. Klapa ◽  
A. Müller ◽  
A. Koch ◽  
A. Kerstein-Staehle ◽  
W. Kaehler ◽  
...  

Background:Activation of the alternative and final common pathways have been shown in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) (1). Circulating titers of C5a are elevated and correlate with disease activity in AAV. Binding to the corresponding G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) C5aR1 enhances the influx of neutrophils, leading to ROS generation and severe necrotizing of vascular walls (2). Moreover, subsequent interaction of C5a with C5aR1 may represent a proinflammatory amplification loop (3). Blocking of the receptor is protective in a murine model in AAV (4). In humans, avacopan, a C5aR1-inhibitor showed promising results as glucocorticoid-sparing agent in two randomized phase II and one ongoing phase III clinicals trials in AAV (NCT02994927). Notably, disease-specific anti-GPCR autoantibody (aab) signatures have been found in different autoimmune diseases (5).Objectives:The aim of the present study was to examine whether (patho)physiological anti-C3aR and anti-C5aR1 aabs correlate with clinical findings in AAV, and whether this is linked to the clinical outcome.Methods:Sera and plasma of AAV patients [granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), n=64; microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), n=26; eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), n=11] were measured by Elisa for circulating autoantibodies against complement receptors C3a (anti-C3aR aab) and C5a (anti-C5aR1 aab) and plasma levels of C3a and C5a. Expression of C3aR and C5aR1 on T-cells was determined using flow cytometry. Clinical data were assessed at the time of serum sampling and during follow-up for 48 monthsResults:GPA displayed low titers of anti-C3aR aab (GPA:5.33±2.54vs. HD:6.47±2.61, P=0.0031). Anti-C5aR1 aab were decreased in AAV, especially in GPA (GPA:1.02±1.07vs. HD:6.63±2.91, P=<0.0001). Plasma levels of C5a and anti-C5aR aab yielded an inverse correlation in AAV (r=-0.6813, P=0.0127). C5aR1 expression was increased on T-cells in GPA (CD4+C5aR1+T-cells: GPA:10.76±2.55%vs. HD:3.44±0.68%, P=0.0021; CD8+C5aR1+T-cells GPA:9.74±2.10%vs.HD:4.11±0.92%, P=0.0198). Reduced titers of anti-C5aR1 aab <0.45U/ml displayed an increased relapse risk for major organ involvement in GPA (HR 12.85, P=0.0014).Conclusion:As potential diagnostic marker, anti-C5aR1 aab titer may additionally be useful to monitor disease activity in AAV.References:[1]Chen M et al.Complement deposition in renal histopathology of patients with ANCA-associated pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2009;24:1247-1252[2]Schreiber A et al.C5a receptor mediates neutrophil activation an ANCA-induced glomerulonephritis.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20:289-298[3]Lamprecht P et al.: Pathogenetic and clinical aspects of Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-associated vasculitides.Front Immunol.2018 Apr 9;9-680[4]Xiao H et al.C5a receptor (CD88) blockade protects against MPO-ANCA GN.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(2):225-31[5]Klapa S et al. Decreased endothelin receptor A autoantibody levels are associated with early ischaemic events in patients with giant-cell arteritis.Ann Rheum Dis2019 Oct;78(19):1443-1444Disclosure of Interests:Sebastian Klapa Grant/research support from: Actelion, Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Antje Müller: None declared, Andreas Koch: None declared, Anja Kerstein-Staehle: None declared, Wataru Kaehler: None declared, Harald Heidecke Shareholder of: Cell Trend GmbH, Employee of: Cell Trend GmbH, Speakers bureau: Cell Trend GmbH, Susanne Schinke Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Markus Huber-Lang: None declared, Martin Nitschke: None declared, Silke Pitann: None declared, Christian Karsten: None declared, Gabriela Riemekasten Consultant of: Cell Trend GmbH, Janssen, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Speakers bureau: Actelion, Novartis, Janssen, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Peter Lamprecht: None declared


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1316-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Hartmut Doehner ◽  
Anthony D. Ho ◽  
Norbert Schmitz ◽  
Henning Bredenfeld ◽  
...  

Abstract The German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group has previously demonstrated that dose-escalated BEACOPP chemotherapy administered every 21 days with filgrastim significantly improved failure-free and overall survival compared to COPP-ABVD in patients with advanced Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (Diehl et al, Annals of Oncology 1998). An alternative approach to dose escalation is reduction of cycle length to 14 days. BEACOPP given every 14 days (BEACOPP-14) with filgrastim has been demonstrated to be feasible and effective with moderate acute toxicity (Sieber et al, JCO 2003). The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of pegfilgrastim to support full delivery of BEACOPP-14 in high-risk Hodgkin’s lymphoma. All patients received BEACOPP-14 for up to 8 cycles. Patients were randomised to receive a single, 6mg, subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim on day 4 (d4) or 8 (d8) of each cycle. Primary endpoints were proportion of chemotherapy cycles given at planned dose and on time and proportion of patients receiving all administered cycles of chemotherapy at planned dose and on time. A cycle was considered “on time” if it started ≤ 17 days after the start of the previous cycle, and at “planned dose” if a dose of &gt;75% was administered for each myelosuppresive agent. Secondary endpoints included incidence of severe neutropenia (SN: absolute neutrophil count [ANC] &lt;0.5 x 109/L) and response to chemotherapy. This exploratory study used descriptive statistics; therefore, no formal comparisons were made between groups. A total of 41 patients were randomised (d4: n=21, d8: n=20). In both groups 81% of chemotherapy cycles were given at planned dose and on time (d4: 122/151 cycles, d8: 116/143 cycles). Three of 29 cycles (d4) and 5/27 cycles (d8) had a delay and a reduction. Twenty-one of 29 cycles (d4) and 15/27 cycles (d8) were delayed only. Lack of haematological recovery (ANC &lt;2x109/L and/or platelet count &lt;80x109/L) led to delays in 9/21 (d4) and 2/15 (d8) cycles. Dose delays/reductions occurred more frequently in later chemotherapy cycles. Over 80% of patients in cycle 4, &gt;70% patients in cycle 6, and &gt;50% of patients in cycle 8 received chemotherapy at planned dose on time in both groups. Over all cycles administered, 33% d4 and 40% d8 patients received chemotherapy at planned dose and on time. Nine of 21 patients (43%) in the d4 group compared to 15/20 patients (75%) in the d8 group had at least one incidence of SN. Serious adverse events reported by more than one subject were pneumonia, fever, febrile neutropenia, anaemia and syncope, which were similar in incidence between groups. At least 85% of patients had a response to BEACOPP-14, the remaining patients (d4: 14%, d8: 15%) had no response recorded. This exploratory study suggests that full delivery of BEACOPP-14 with pegfilgrastim administered on d4 or d8 is feasible. The safety profile for the 2 groups was similar although the incidence of SN in the d4 group may indicate that administration of pegfilgrastim immediately after the end of myelosuppressive chemotherapy could offer enhanced protection against SN.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina A. Ran ◽  
Aimee S. Payne

Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the B cell marker CD20, was initially approved in 1997 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Since that time, rituximab has been FDA-approved for rheumatoid arthritis and vasculitides such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Additionally, rituximab has been used off-label in the treatment of numerous other autoimmune diseases, with notable success in pemphigus, an autoantibody-mediated skin blistering disease. The efficacy of rituximab therapy in pemphigus has spurred interest in its potential to treat other autoantibody-mediated diseases. This review summarizes the efficacy of rituximab in pemphigus and examines its off-label use in other select autoantibody-mediated diseases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud A. Khaimi ◽  
Justin D. Dvorak ◽  
Kai Ding

Purpose. To report 3-year results investigating the safety and efficacy of canaloplasty for open-angle glaucoma. Setting. University of Oklahoma, Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma, United States of America. Design. Nonrandomized single-center retrospective chart review. Methods. Adult open-angle glaucoma eyes underwent canaloplasty or combined cataract-canaloplasty surgery. A tensioning suture was placed into Schlemm’s canal in all eyes. Primary endpoints included the mean IOP and mean number of glaucoma medications at each follow-up visit. Secondary endpoints included visual acuity and surgical/postsurgical complications. Results. The study cohort included 277 eyes (mean age, 72.8 years). Overall, the mean baseline IOP of 19.7 mmHg was reduced to 14.3 mmHg,14.0 mmHg, and 15.2 mmHg at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively (p<0.001). The average medicine use was reduced from 2.1 preoperatively to 0.4 at 12 months, and 0.5 and 0.6 at two and three years, respectively (p<0.001). The frequency of surgical and postsurgical complications was low with no serious adverse events recorded. Conclusion. Canaloplasty was safe and effective in achieving long-term IOP reductions and reduced dependence on antiglaucoma medications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
Ralph Corey ◽  
David Hooper ◽  
Sue Cammarata

Abstract Background Fluoroquinolones have been widely used for a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections, and by 2002 they had become the most commonly prescribed class of antibiotics for adults in the United States. With widespread use, the class has become associated with a range of adverse events. Delafloxacin is a fluoroquinolone approved in the United States for the treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Delafloxacin is differentiated from other fluoroquinolones due to structural differences and in its activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, including quinolone-resistant strains. This paper reviews the safety profile of delafloxacin across clinical studies with an emphasis on the incidence of adverse events of special interest that are associated with fluoroquinolones. Methods Data from 2 completed phase III studies of delafloxacin for the treatment of ABSSSIs were pooled and are the primary focus of this paper. Additional support from the full safety analysis set (30 completed phase I to phase III clinical studies) is included where applicable. Results Fewer patients in the pooled delafloxacin group had AESIs than in the comparator group (7.0% vs 9.2%, respectively). Delafloxacin had a low rate of discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events (&lt;1%). Serious adverse events occurred at similar rates in patients treated with delafloxacin vs comparators. Conclusions Serious adverse events occurred at similar rates in patients treated with delafloxacin vs nonquinolone comparators used to treat ABSSSIs. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01984684 and NCT01811732


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Saima Chohan ◽  
Saeed Fatenejad ◽  
Sergey Grishin ◽  
Elena Korneva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Aims  Olokizumab (OKZ) is a new humanised monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6 directly. Here we present the results of a global randomised clinical trial (RCT) in patients (pts) with RA. Methods  This double-blind, placebo (PBO) and active controlled, RCT in pts with moderately to severely active RA despite MTX (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02760407, CREDO2) was carried out in 18 counties. Pts were randomized 2:2:2:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of OKZ 64 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks (q4w), adalimumab (ADA) 40mg q2w or PBO for 24 weeks, plus MTX. After week 24, subjects either rolled over into an open-label study or entered the Safety Follow-Up Period for another 20 weeks. The primary endpoint was ACR 20% (ACR20) response rate at week 12. Secondary endpoints included: percentage of subjects with DAS28-CRP &lt;3.2 and improvement of HAQ-DI from baseline at week 12, ACR50 and percentage of subjects with remission (CDAI) ≤2.8 at week 24. Safety outcomes, including adverse events, serious adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were assessed. Results  1,648 subjects were randomised to OKZ 64mg q2w (n = 464), OKZ 64mg q4w (n = 479), ADA 40mg (n = 462) or PBO (n = 243). Baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment arms. The vast majority of the pts completed 24 weeks treatment period 421 (90.7%) in q2w, 437 (91.2%) in q4w, 413 (89.4%) in ADA and 208 (85.6%) in PBO arms and enrolled to open-label extension study: 410 (88.4%), 422 (88.1%), 397 (85.9%) and 199 (81.9%) pts, respectively. Both regimens of OKZ were significantly better than PBO in all primary and secondary endpoints. Furthermore, non-inferiority to ADA was demonstrated for the pre-defined endpoints of ACR20 and DAS28-CRP&lt;3.2 for both OKZ treatment groups. The efficacy outcomes were maintained throughout the 24-week period of the study. Overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 70.0% in OKZ q2w arm; 70.9% in OKZ q4w arm, 65.4% in ADA arm and 63.4% in PBO, TEAEs leading to study treatment discontinuation were reported in 4.5%, 6.3%, 5.6% and 3.7% pts, respectively. The number of deaths were comparable among arms: 3 (0.6%; 2 infections, 1 cerebrovascular accident) in the OKZ q2w arm, 2 (0.4%; 1 infection, 1 myocardial ischemia) in OKZ q4w arm, 1 (0.2%; infection) in ADA arm and 1 (0.4%; sudden death) in PBO. The most common treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were infections. Conclusion  In this global Phase III trial, treatment with OKZ plus MTX in both regimes (OKZ 64 mg q2w and OKZ 64 mg q4w) was associated with significant improvements in the signs, symptoms and physical function of RA compared to PBO plus MTX and non-inferior to ADA plus MTX over a 24-week period. OKZ was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed. Disclosure  E. Feist: Consultancies; R-Pharm, Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Chugai, Sanofi. Honoraria; R-Pharm, Abbvie, AB2Bio, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, Sobi, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; R-Pharm, Abbvie, AB2Bio, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, Sobi, UCB. Grants/research support; Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Chugai. S. Chohan: None. S. Fatenejad: Consultancies; RPharm International. Shareholder/stock ownership; Pfizer. S. Grishin: Corporate appointments; Employed by R-Pharm. E. Korneva: Corporate appointments; Employed by R-Pharm. E.L. Nasonov: Honoraria; Lilly, Abbnie, Prizer, Biocad, R-Pharm. Member of speakers’ bureau; Lilly, Abbnie, Prizer, Biocad, R-Pharm. A. Rowińska-Osuch: Consultancies; R-Pharm. M. Samsonov: Corporate appointments; Employed by R-Pharm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document