scholarly journals An Explicit Signature of Balancing Selection for Color-Vision Variation in New World Monkeys

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hiwatashi ◽  
Y. Okabe ◽  
T. Tsutsui ◽  
C. Hiramatsu ◽  
A. D. Melin ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1828) ◽  
pp. 20160067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josmael Corso ◽  
Mark Bowler ◽  
Eckhard W. Heymann ◽  
Christian Roos ◽  
Nicholas I. Mundy

Colour vision is highly variable in New World monkeys (NWMs). Evidence for the adaptive basis of colour vision in this group has largely centred on environmental features such as foraging benefits for differently coloured foods or predator detection, whereas selection on colour vision for sociosexual communication is an alternative hypothesis that has received little attention. The colour vision of uakaris ( Cacajao ) is of particular interest because these monkeys have the most dramatic red facial skin of any primate, as well as a unique fission/fusion social system and a specialist diet of seeds. Here, we investigate colour vision in a wild population of the bald uakari, C. calvus , by genotyping the X-linked opsin locus. We document the presence of a polymorphic colour vision system with an unprecedented number of functional alleles (six), including a novel allele with a predicted maximum spectral sensitivity of 555 nm. This supports the presence of strong balancing selection on different alleles at this locus. We consider different hypotheses to explain this selection. One possibility is that trichromacy functions in sexual selection, enabling females to choose high-quality males on the basis of red facial coloration. In support of this, there is some evidence that health affects facial coloration in uakaris, as well as a high prevalence of blood-borne parasitism in wild uakari populations. Alternatively, the low proportion of heterozygous female trichromats in the population may indicate selection on different dichromatic phenotypes, which might be related to cryptic food coloration. We have uncovered unexpected diversity in the last major lineage of NWMs to be assayed for colour vision, which will provide an interesting system to dissect adaptation of polymorphic trichromacy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Matsushita ◽  
Hiroki Oota ◽  
Barbara J. Welker ◽  
Mary S. Pavelka ◽  
Shoji Kawamura

1998 ◽  
Vol 95 (23) ◽  
pp. 13749-13754 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Boissinot ◽  
Y. Tan ◽  
S.-K. Shyue ◽  
H. Schneider ◽  
I. Sampaio ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda D. Melin ◽  
Linda M. Fedigan ◽  
Hilary C. Young ◽  
Shoji Kawamura

Abstract Invertebrates are the main source of protein for many small-to-medium sized monkeys. Prey vary in size, mobility, degree of protective covering, and use of the forest, i.e. canopy height, and whether they are exposed or embed themselves in substrates. Sex-differentiation in foraging patterns is well documented for some monkey species and recent studies find that color vision phenotype can also affect invertebrate foraging. Since vision phenotype is polymorphic and sex-linked in most New World monkeys - males have dichromatic vision and females have either dichromatic or trichromatic vision - this raises the possibility that sex differences are linked to visual ecology. We tested predicted sex differences for invertebrate foraging in white-faced capuchins Cebus capucinus and conducted 12 months of study on four free-ranging groups between January 2007 and September 2008. We found both sex and color vision effects. Sex: Males spent more time foraging for invertebrates on the ground. Females spent more time consuming embedded, colonial invertebrates, ate relatively more “soft” sedentary invertebrates, and devoted more of their activity budget to invertebrate foraging. Color Vision: Dichromatic monkeys had a higher capture efficiency of exposed invertebrates and spent less time visually foraging. Trichromats ate relatively more “hard” sedentary invertebrates. We conclude that some variation in invertebrate foraging reflects differences between the sexes that may be due to disparities in size, strength, reproductive demands or niche preferences. However, other intraspecific variation in invertebrate foraging that might be mistakenly attributed to sex differences actually reflects differences in color vision.


1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (47) ◽  
pp. 30298
Author(s):  
Robert M. Johnson ◽  
Steven Buck ◽  
Chi-hua Chiu ◽  
Horacio Schneider ◽  
Iracilda Sampaio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Walter Carl Hartwig ◽  
Alfred L Rosenberger
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document