scholarly journals Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Stoletzki ◽  
A. Eyre-Walker
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Codon Usage ◽  
Synonymous Codon ◽  
Synonymous Codon Usage ◽  
Translational Accuracy ◽  
Selection For

scholarly journals The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.

Genetics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 897-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Bulmer
Keyword(s):  
Codon Usage ◽  
Genetic Model ◽  
Synonymous Codon ◽  
Growth Yield ◽  
Synonymous Codon Usage ◽  
Synonymous Codons ◽  
Drift Theory ◽  
Highly Expressed Genes ◽  
Unicellular Organisms ◽  
Selection For

Abstract It is argued that the bias in synonymous codon usage observed in unicellular organisms is due to a balance between the forces of selection and mutation in a finite population, with greater bias in highly expressed genes reflecting stronger selection for efficiency of translation. A population genetic model is developed taking into account population size and selective differences between synonymous codons. A biochemical model is then developed to predict the magnitude of selective differences between synonymous codons in unicellular organisms in which growth rate (or possibly growth yield) can be equated with fitness. Selection can arise from differences in either the speed or the accuracy of translation. A model for the effect of speed of translation on fitness is considered in detail, a similar model for accuracy more briefly. The model is successful in predicting a difference in the degree of bias at the beginning than in the rest of the gene under some circumstances, as observed in Escherichia coli, but grossly overestimates the amount of bias expected. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.

scholarly journals Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Genetics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 927-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Akashi
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Codon Usage ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Synonymous Codon ◽  
Synonymous Codon Usage ◽  
Drosophila Virilis ◽  
Codon Preference ◽  
Translational Accuracy

Abstract I present evidence that natural selection biases synonymous codon usage to enhance the accuracy of protein synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Since the fitness cost of a translational misincorporation will depend on how the amino acid substitution affects protein function, selection for translational accuracy predicts an association between codon usage in DNA and functional constraint at the protein level. The frequency of preferred codons is significantly higher at codons conserved for amino acids than at nonconserved codons in 38 genes compared between D. melanogaster and Drosophila virilis or Drosophila pseudoobscura (Z = 5.93, P < 10(-6)). Preferred codon usage is also significantly higher in putative zinc-finger and homeodomain regions than in the rest of 28 D. melanogaster transcription factor encoding genes (Z = 8.38, P < 10(-6)). Mutational alternatives (within-gene differences in mutation rates, amino acid changes altering codon preference states, and doublet mutations at adjacent bases) do not appear to explain this association between synonymous codon usage and amino acid constraint.

Codon Usage Bias Covaries With Expression Breadth and the Rate of Synonymous Evolution in Humans, but This Is Not Evidence for Selection

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 1191-1199
Author(s):  
Araxi O Urrutia ◽  
Laurence D Hurst
Keyword(s):  
Codon Usage ◽  
Codon Bias ◽  
Synonymous Codon ◽  
Nucleotide Composition ◽  
Synonymous Codon Usage ◽  
Synonymous Substitutions ◽  
Numerous Species ◽  
Nucleotide Content ◽  
Expression Breadth ◽  
Human Genes

Abstract In numerous species, from bacteria to Drosophila, evidence suggests that selection acts even on synonymous codon usage: codon bias is greater in more abundantly expressed genes, the rate of synonymous evolution is lower in genes with greater codon bias, and there is consistency between genes in the same species in which codons are preferred. In contrast, in mammals, while nonequal use of alternative codons is observed, the bias is attributed to the background variance in nucleotide concentrations, reflected in the similar nucleotide composition of flanking noncoding and exonic third sites. However, a systematic examination of the covariants of codon usage controlling for background nucleotide content has yet to be performed. Here we present a new method to measure codon bias that corrects for background nucleotide content and apply this to 2396 human genes. Nearly all (99%) exhibit a higher amount of codon bias than expected by chance. The patterns associated with selectively driven codon bias are weakly recovered: Broadly expressed genes have a higher level of bias than do tissue-specific genes, the bias is higher for genes with lower rates of synonymous substitutions, and certain codons are repeatedly preferred. However, while these patterns are suggestive, the first two patterns appear to be methodological artifacts. The last pattern reflects in part biases in usage of nucleotide pairs. We conclude that we find no evidence for selection on codon usage in humans.

scholarly journals Effect of genome composition and codon bias on infectious bronchitis virus evolution and adaptation to target tissues

BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Franzo ◽  
Claudia Maria Tucciarone ◽  
Matteo Legnardi ◽  
Mattia Cecchinato
Keyword(s):  
Codon Usage ◽  
Codon Bias ◽  
Synonymous Codon ◽  
Synonymous Codon Usage ◽  
Accessory Proteins ◽  
Effective Number ◽  
Genome Composition ◽  
Infectious Bronchitis ◽  
Selective Forces ◽  
Effective Number Of Codons

Abstract Background Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is one of the most relevant viruses affecting the poultry industry, and several studies have investigated the factors involved in its biological cycle and evolution. However, very few of those studies focused on the effect of genome composition and the codon bias of different IBV proteins, despite the remarkable increase in available complete genomes. In the present study, all IBV complete genomes were downloaded (n = 383), and several statistics representative of genome composition and codon bias were calculated for each protein-coding sequence, including but not limited to, the nucleotide odds ratio, relative synonymous codon usage and effective number of codons. Additionally, viral codon usage was compared to host codon usage based on a collection of highly expressed genes in IBV target and nontarget tissues. Results The results obtained demonstrated a significant difference among structural, non-structural and accessory proteins, especially regarding dinucleotide composition, which appears under strong selective forces. In particular, some dinucleotide pairs, such as CpG, a probable target of the host innate immune response, are underrepresented in genes coding for pp1a, pp1ab, S and N. Although genome composition and dinucleotide bias appear to affect codon usage, additional selective forces may act directly on codon bias. Variability in relative synonymous codon usage and effective number of codons was found for different proteins, with structural proteins and polyproteins being more adapted to the codon bias of host target tissues. In contrast, accessory proteins had a more biased codon usage (i.e., lower number of preferred codons), which might contribute to the regulation of their expression level and timing throughout the cell cycle. Conclusions The present study confirms the existence of selective forces acting directly on the genome and not only indirectly through phenotype selection. This evidence might help understanding IBV biology and in developing attenuated strains without affecting the protein phenotype and therefore immunogenicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document