scholarly journals Bacterial Group II Intron Genomic Neighborhoods Reflect Survival Strategies: Hiding and Hijacking

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 1942-1948
Author(s):  
Justin Waldern ◽  
Nicholas J Schiraldi ◽  
Marlene Belfort ◽  
Olga Novikova

Abstract Group II (gII) introns are mobile retroelements that can spread to new DNA sites through retrotransposition, which can be influenced by a variety of host factors. To determine if these host factors bear any relationship to the genomic location of gII introns, we developed a bioinformatic pipeline wherein we focused on the genomic neighborhoods of bacterial gII introns within their native contexts and sought to determine global relationships between introns and their surrounding genes. We found that, although gII introns inhabit diverse regions, these neighborhoods are often functionally enriched for genes that could promote gII intron retention or proliferation. On one hand, we observe that gII introns are frequently found hiding in mobile elements or after transcription terminators. On the other hand, gII introns are enriched in locations in which they could hijack host functions for their movement, potentially timing expression of the intron with genes that produce favorable conditions for retrotransposition. Thus, we propose that gII intron distributions have been shaped by relationships with their surrounding genomic neighbors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 3081-3081
Author(s):  
Justin Waldern ◽  
Nicholas J Schiraldi ◽  
Marlene Belfort ◽  
Olga Novikova

2015 ◽  
Vol 127 (33) ◽  
pp. 9823-9826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Pechlaner ◽  
Daniela Donghi ◽  
Veronika Zelenay ◽  
Roland K. O. Sigel

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1845-1853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Monat ◽  
Benoit Cousineau

Genome ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyo Kagami ◽  
Hironori Nagano ◽  
Yoshiya Takahashi ◽  
Tetsuo Mikami ◽  
Tomohiko Kubo

Introns may be considered as optional because they are removed from mRNA molecules, but introns are fairly preserved for unknown reasons. Previously, the mitochondrial rps3 gene of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., Caryophyllales) was shown to represent a unique example of an intron loss. We have determined the distribution of the rps3 intron in 19 Caryophyllalean species. The intron was absent from the Amaranthaceae and the Achatocarpaceae. In the Caryophyllaceae, Dianthus japonicus rps3 was pseudogenized, but the intronic sequence was retained. Intact intron-bearing rps3 copies were cloned from Portulaca grandiflora and Myrtillocactus geometrizans , members of the sister clade of the Amaranthaceae–Achatocarpaceae–Caryophyllaceae clade. Most of the C-to-U RNA-editing sites in P. grandiflora and M. geometrizans rps3 transcripts were homologous in the two species, as well as in the sugar beet rps3, which, unlike the other 12 rps3 transcripts, lacks editing in the exonic regions around the intron. Provided that the loss of editing preceded the loss of rps3 intron, it appears conceivable that a requirement for editing could have prevented the loss of group II introns retained in angiosperm mitochondrial genomes. This interpretation is an alternative to the conventional one that views the loss of editing as a mere trace of RNA-mediated gene conversion.


2003 ◽  
Vol 326 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
José I Jiménez-Zurdo ◽  
Fernando M Garcı́a-Rodrı́guez ◽  
Antonio Barrientos-Durán ◽  
Nicolás Toro

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e84056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Nisa-Martínez ◽  
Philippe Laporte ◽  
José Ignacio Jiménez-Zurdo ◽  
Florian Frugier ◽  
Martin Crespi ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 404 (6781) ◽  
pp. 1018-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Cousineau ◽  
Stacey Lawrence ◽  
Dorie Smith ◽  
Marlene Belfort

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document