scholarly journals Lifetimes and rotation within the solar mean magnetic field

2021 ◽  
Vol 502 (4) ◽  
pp. 5603-5611
Author(s):  
Eddie Ross ◽  
William J Chaplin ◽  
Steven J Hale ◽  
Rachel Howe ◽  
Yvonne P Elsworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Power Spectrum ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Rotation Period ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Background Component ◽  
Sidereal Rotation ◽  
First Time ◽  
Very High ◽  
High Cadence

ABSTRACT We have used very high-cadence (sub-minute) observations of the solar mean magnetic field (SMMF) from the Birmingham Solar Oscillations Network (BiSON) to investigate the morphology of the SMMF. The observations span a period from 1992 to 2012, and the high-cadence observations allowed the exploration of the power spectrum up to frequencies in the mHz range. The power spectrum contains several broad peaks from a rotationally modulated (RM) component, whose linewidths allowed us to measure, for the first time, the lifetime of the RM source. There is an additional broadband, background component in the power spectrum which we have shown is an artefact of power aliasing due to the low fill of the data. The sidereal rotation period of the RM component was measured as 25.23 ± 0.11 d and suggests that the signal is sensitive to a time-averaged latitude of ∼12°. We have also shown the RM lifetime to be 139.6 ± 18.5 d. This provides evidence to suggest that the RM component of the SMMF is connected to magnetic flux concentrations (MFCs) and active regions (ARs) of magnetic flux, based both on its lifetime and location on the solar disc.

Emergence of Twisted Magnetic Flux Related Sigmoidal Brightening

2000 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 263-264
Author(s):  
K. Sundara Raman ◽  
K. B. Ramesh ◽  
R. Selvendran ◽  
P. S. M. Aleem ◽  
K. M. Hiremath
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Ultra Violet ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Morphological Properties ◽  
Energy Storage And Conversion ◽  
The Sun ◽  
X Rays ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Extended AbstractWe have examined the morphological properties of a sigmoid associated with an SXR (soft X-ray) flare. The sigmoid is cospatial with the EUV (extreme ultra violet) images and in the optical part lies along an S-shaped Hαfilament. The photoheliogram shows flux emergence within an existingδtype sunspot which has caused the rotation of the umbrae giving rise to the sigmoidal brightening.It is now widely accepted that flares derive their energy from the magnetic fields of the active regions and coronal levels are considered to be the flare sites. But still a satisfactory understanding of the flare processes has not been achieved because of the difficulties encountered to predict and estimate the probability of flare eruptions. The convection flows and vortices below the photosphere transport and concentrate magnetic field, which subsequently appear as active regions in the photosphere (Rust & Kumar 1994 and the references therein). Successive emergence of magnetic flux, twist the field, creating flare productive magnetic shear and has been studied by many authors (Sundara Ramanet al.1998 and the references therein). Hence, it is considered that the flare is powered by the energy stored in the twisted magnetic flux tubes (Kurokawa 1996 and the references therein). Rust & Kumar (1996) named the S-shaped bright coronal loops that appear in soft X-rays as ‘Sigmoids’ and concluded that this S-shaped distortion is due to the twist developed in the magnetic field lines. These transient sigmoidal features tell a great deal about unstable coronal magnetic fields, as these regions are more likely to be eruptive (Canfieldet al.1999). As the magnetic fields of the active regions are deep rooted in the Sun, the twist developed in the subphotospheric flux tube penetrates the photosphere and extends in to the corona. Thus, it is essentially favourable for the subphotospheric twist to unwind the twist and transmit it through the photosphere to the corona. Therefore, it becomes essential to make complete observational descriptions of a flare from the magnetic field changes that are taking place in different atmospheric levels of the Sun, to pin down the energy storage and conversion process that trigger the flare phenomena.

Axial dipole moments of solar active regions in cycles 21-24

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iiro Virtanen ◽  
Ilpo Virtanen ◽  
Alexei Pevtsov ◽  
Kalevi Mursula
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Dipole Moment ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Opposite Sign ◽  
Dipole Moments ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Photospheric Magnetic Field ◽  
Axial Dipole ◽  
Axial Moment ◽  
Cycle 24

<p>The axial dipole moments of emerging active regions control the evolution of the axial dipole moment of the whole photospheric magnetic field and the strength of polar fields. Hale's and Joy's laws of polarity and tilt orientation affect the sign of the axial dipole moment of an active region, determining the normal sign for each solar cycle. If both laws are valid (or both violated), the sign of the axial moment is normal. However, for some active regions, only one of the two laws is violated, and the signs of these axial dipole moments are the opposite of normal. The opposite-sign axial dipole moments can potentially have a significant effect on the evolution of the photospheric magnetic field, including the polar fields.</p><p>We determine the axial dipole moments of active regions identified from magnetographic observations and study how the axial dipole moments of normal and opposite signs are distributed in time and latitude in solar cycles 21-24.We use active regions identified from the synoptic maps of the photospheric magnetic field measured at the National Solar Observatory (NSO) Kitt Peak (KP) observatory, the Synoptic Optical Long term Investigations of the Sun (SOLIS) vector spectromagnetograph (VSM), and the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) aboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).</p><p>We find that, typically, some 30% of active regions have opposite-sign axial dipole moments in every cycle, often making more than 20% of the total axial dipole moment. Most opposite-signed moments are small, but occasional large moments, which can affect the evolution of polar fields on their own, are observed. Active regions with such a large opposite-sign moment may include only a moderate amount of total magnetic flux. We find that in cycles 21-23 the northern hemisphere activates first and shows emergence of magnetic flux over a wider latitude range, while the southern hemisphere activates later, and emergence is concentrated to lower latitudes. We also note that cycle 24 differs from cycles 21-23 in many ways. Cycle 24 is the only cycle where the northern butterfly wing includes more active regions than the southern wing, and where axial dipole moment of normal sign emerges on average later than opposite-signed axial dipole moment. The total axial dipole moment and even the average axial moment of active regions is smaller in cycle 24 than in previous cycles.</p>

Coherent Curvature Emission in Pulsar Magnetospheres: Non-dipolar Geometric Effects

1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinghuan Luo
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Field Line ◽  
Rotation Period ◽  
Lorentz Factor ◽  
Maser Emission ◽  
Specific Geometry ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
First Time ◽  
The Magnetic Field ◽  
Geometric Effects

AbstractThe effects of the specific geometry of the magnetic field (such as field lines with torsion) on curvature emission and absorption in pulsar magnetospheres are discussed. Curvature maser emission can arise from two effects: the curvature drift, as has already been discussed in the literature, and field line torsion as discussed here in detail for the first time. Maser emission due to field line torsion can operate only when the Lorentz factor is larger than a certain value. However, when the Lorentz factor of electrons or positrons is sufficiently high, curvature masering is due to both curvature drift and magnetic field line torsion. The optical depth in the case of field line torsion is estimated. It is shown that if torsion is due to rotation, the resultant luminosity should be dependent on the rotation period in such a way that shorter periods correspond to larger luminosities.

scholarly journals Magnetohydrodynamic evolution of magnetic skeletons

2007 ◽  
Vol 463 (2080) ◽  
pp. 1097-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L Haynes ◽  
Clare E Parnell ◽  
Klaus Galsgaard ◽  
Eric R Priest
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Heating Process ◽  
Initial State ◽  
Fundamental Building Block ◽  
New Type ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
First Time ◽  
The Magnetic Field

The heating of the solar corona is probably due to reconnection of the highly complex magnetic field that threads throughout its volume. We have run a numerical experiment of an elementary interaction between the magnetic field of two photospheric sources in an overlying field that represents a fundamental building block of the coronal heating process. The key to explaining where, how and how much energy is released during such an interaction is to calculate the resulting evolution of the magnetic skeleton. A skeleton is essentially the web of magnetic flux surfaces (called separatrix surfaces) that separate the coronal volume into topologically distinct parts. For the first time, the skeleton of the magnetic field in a three-dimensional numerical magnetohydrodynamic experiment is calculated and carefully analysed, as are the ways in which it bifurcates into different topologies. A change in topology normally changes the number of magnetic reconnection sites. In our experiment, the magnetic field evolves through a total of six distinct topologies. Initially, no magnetic flux joins the two sources. Then, a new type of bifurcation, called a global double-separator bifurcation , takes place. This bifurcation is probably one of the main ways in which new separators are created in the corona (separators are field lines at which three-dimensional reconnection takes place). This is the first of five bifurcations in which the skeleton becomes progressively more complex before simplifying. Surprisingly, for such a simple initial state, at the peak of complexity there are five separators and eight flux domains present.

scholarly journals Distinguishing between flaring and nonflaring active regions

2020 ◽  
Vol 639 ◽  
pp. A44
Author(s):  
Soumitra Hazra ◽  
Gopal Sardar ◽  
Partha Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Active Region ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Time Evolution ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Magnetic Helicity ◽  
Magnetic Parameters ◽  
Solar Eruptions ◽  
Very High

Context. Large-scale solar eruptions significantly affect space weather and damage space-based human infrastructures. It is necessary to predict large-scale solar eruptions; it will enable us to protect the vulnerable infrastructures of our modern society. Aims. We investigate the difference between flaring and nonflaring active regions. We also investigate whether it is possible to forecast a solar flare. Methods. We used photospheric vector magnetogram data from the Solar Dynamic Observatory’s Helioseismic Magnetic Imager to study the time evolution of photospheric magnetic parameters on the solar surface. We built a database of flaring and nonflaring active regions observed on the solar surface from 2010 to 2017. We trained a machine-learning algorithm with the time evolution of these active region parameters. Finally, we estimated the performance obtained from the machine-learning algorithm. Results. The strength of some magnetic parameters such as the total unsigned magnetic flux, the total unsigned magnetic helicity, the total unsigned vertical current, and the total photospheric magnetic energy density in flaring active regions are much higher than those of the non-flaring regions. These magnetic parameters in a flaring active region evolve fast and are complex. We are able to obtain a good forecasting capability with a relatively high value of true skill statistic. We also find that time evolution of the total unsigned magnetic helicity and the total unsigned magnetic flux provides a very high ability of distinguishing flaring and nonflaring active regions. Conclusions. We can distinguish a flaring active region from a nonflaring region with good accuracy. We confirm that there is no single common parameter that can distinguish all flaring active regions from the nonflaring regions. However, the time evolution of the top two magnetic parameters, the total unsigned magnetic flux and the total unsigned magnetic helicity, have a very high distinguishing capability.

scholarly journals A Model of Solar X-ray Bright Points and Ephemeral Active Regions

1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 671 ◽  
Author(s):  
JH Piddington
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Activity Cycle ◽  
Solar Magnetic Fields ◽  
Flux Tubes ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Field System

Solar ephemeral active regions may provide a larger amount of emerging magnetic flux than the active regions themselves, and the origin and disposal of this flux pose problems. The related X-ray bright points are a major feature of coronal dynamics, and the two phenomena may entail a revision of our ideas of the activity cycle. A new large-scale subsurface magnetic field system has been suggested, but it is shown that such a system is neither plausible nor necessary. The emerging magnetic bipoles merely represent loops in pre-existing vertical flux tubes which are parts of active regions or the remnants of active regions. These loops result from the kink (or helical) instability in a twisted flux tube. Their observed properties are explained in terms of the flux-rope theory of solar fields. The model is extended to some dynamical effects in emerging loops. Further observations of ephemeral active regions may provide important tests between the traditional and flux-rope theories of solar magnetic fields.

scholarly journals Two classes of eruptive events during Solar Minimum

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prantika Bhowmik ◽  
Anthony Yeates
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Free Energy ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Solar Surface ◽  
Coronal Holes ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Coronal Magnetic Field ◽  
The Magnetic Field

<p>During Solar Minimum, the Sun is perceived to be quite inactive with barely any spots emerging on the solar surface. Consequently, we observe a drop in the number of highly energetic events such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which are often associated with active regions on the photosphere. However, our magnetofrictional simulations during the minimum period suggest that the solar corona could still be significantly dynamic while evolving in response to the large-scale shearing velocities on the solar surface. The non-potential evolution of the corona leads to the accumulation of magnetic free energy and helicity, which is periodically lost through eruptive events. Our study shows that these events can be categorised into two distinct classes. One set of events are caused due to full-scale eruption of low-lying coronal flux ropes and could be associated with occasional filament erupting CMEs observed during Solar Minimum. The other set of events are not driven by destabilisation of low-lying structures but rather by eruption from overlying sheared arcades. These could be linked with streamer blowouts or stealth CMEs. The two classes differ considerably in the amount of magnetic flux and helicity shed through the outer coronal boundary. We additionally investigate how other measurables such as current, open magnetic flux, free energy, coronal holes area, and the horizontal component of the magnetic field on the outer model boundary vary during the two classes of event. This study demonstrates and emphasises the importance and necessity of understanding the dynamics of the coronal magnetic field during Solar Minimum.</p>

scholarly journals Numerical Simulations of Large-scale Solar Magnetic Fields

1985 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 999 ◽  
Author(s):  
CR DeVore ◽  
NR Sheeley Jr ◽  
JP Boris ◽  
TR Young Jr ◽  
KL Harvey
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Sunspot Cycle ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
The Sun ◽  
Solar Magnetic Fields ◽  
Field Patterns ◽  
Large Scale Magnetic Field ◽  
The Magnetic Field

We have solved numerically a transport equation which describes the evolution of the large-scale magnetic field of the Sun. Data derived from solar magnetic observations are used to initialize the computations and to account for the emergence of new magnetic flux during the sunspot cycle. Our objective is to assess the ability of the model to reproduce the observed evolution of the field patterns. We discuss recent results from simulations of individual active regions over a few solar rotations and of the magnetic field of the Sun over sunspot cycle 21.

scholarly journals Investigation of Spatially Unresolved Magnetic Field Outside Sunspots Using Hinode/SOT Observations

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (S325) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Olga Botygina ◽  
Mykola Gordovskyy ◽  
Vsevolod Lozitsky
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Zeeman Effect ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Line Ratio ◽  
Optical Telescope ◽  
Flux Tubes ◽  
Magnetic Flux Tubes ◽  
The Magnetic Field

AbstractThe structure of photospheric magnetic fields outside sunspots is investigated in three active regions using Hinode/Solar Optical Telescope(SOT) observations. We analyze Zeeman effect in FeI 6301.5 and FeI 6302.5 lines and determine the observed magnetic field value Beff for each of them. We find that the line ratio Beff(6301)/Beff(6302) is close to 1.3 in the range Beff < 0.2 kG, and close to 1.0 for 0.8 kG < Beff < 1.2 kG. We find that the observed magnetic field is formed by flux tubes with the magnetic field strengths 1.3 − 2.3 kG even in places with weak observed magnetic field fluxes. We also estimate the diameters of smallest magnetic flux tubes to be 15 − 20 km.

scholarly journals Reconstructing solar magnetic fields from historical observations

2018 ◽  
Vol 616 ◽  
pp. A134 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. O. I. Virtanen ◽  
I. I. Virtanen ◽  
A. A. Pevtsov ◽  
K. Mursula
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Surface Flux ◽  
Magnetic Activity ◽  
Maunder Minimum ◽  
Photospheric Magnetic Field ◽  
Sunspot Activity

Aims. Sunspot activity is often hemispherically asymmetric, and during the Maunder minimum, activity was almost completely limited to one hemisphere. In this work, we use surface flux simulation to study how magnetic activity limited only to the southern hemisphere affects the long-term evolution of the photospheric magnetic field in both hemispheres. The key question is whether sunspot activity in one hemisphere is enough to reverse the polarity of polar fields in both hemispheres. Methods. We simulated the evolution of the photospheric magnetic field from 1978 to 2016 using the observed active regions of the southern hemisphere as input. We studied the flow of magnetic flux across the equator and its subsequent motion towards the northern pole. We also tested how the simulated magnetic field is changed when the activity of the southern hemisphere is reduced. Results. We find that activity in the southern hemisphere is enough to reverse the polarity of polar fields in both hemispheres by the cross-equatorial transport of magnetic flux. About 1% of the flux emerging in the southern hemisphere is transported across the equator, but only 0.1%–0.2% reaches high latitudes to reverse and regenerate a weak polar field in the northern hemisphere. The polarity reversals in the northern hemisphere are delayed compared to the southern hemisphere, leading to a quadrupole Sun lasting for several years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document