scholarly journals Analysis of a complete galaxy redshift survey - II. The field-galaxy luminosity function

1988 ◽  
Vol 232 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Efstathiou ◽  
R. S. Ellis ◽  
B. A. Peterson
1996 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 446-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Sprayberry ◽  
C. D. Impey ◽  
G. D. Bothun ◽  
M. J. Irwin

We have developed a catalog of local low surface brightness galaxies (LSBGs) which is selected by objective criteria. We present here a luminosity function (LF) for LSBGs based on that catalog. This LF includes the effects of the completeness corrections to the LSBG catalog, and includes only galaxies with surface brightnesses (22.25 ≤ μB(0) ≤ 24.5) fainter than those included in the CfA Redshift Survey (see Marzke et al. 1994, AJ 108, 437). The best-fitting Schechter function has parameters α = –1.42, M∗B = −18.34, and Φ∗ = 0.0036 h3 Mpc–3 mag–1. Thus, surveys which do not take account of the observational selection bias imposed by surface brightness are missing a substantial fraction of the local galaxies, but, this missed fraction is not large enough to explain the counts of faint blue galaxies observed at moderate redshift.


2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Colless

AbstractA summary of the main results from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey of over 221 000 galaxies on the galaxy luminosity function and its dependence on surface brightness, spectral type, environment, and local density.


2006 ◽  
Vol 647 (2) ◽  
pp. 853-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. N. A. Willmer ◽  
S. M. Faber ◽  
D. C. Koo ◽  
B. J. Weiner ◽  
J. A. Newman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. G Carlberg ◽  
H. K. C. Yee ◽  
S. L. Morris ◽  
H. Lin ◽  
M. Sawicki ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 29002 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Sylos Labini ◽  
N. L. Vasilyev ◽  
Y. V. Baryshev

2004 ◽  
Vol 607 (2) ◽  
pp. 751-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Hoyle ◽  
Michael S. Vogeley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document