Review: Anil Gupta: Empiricism and Experience

Mind ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 117 (465) ◽  
pp. 187-191
Author(s):  
Richard Gaskin
Keyword(s):  
Anil Gupta

Empiricism and Experience - by Anil Gupta

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-166
Author(s):  
george botterill
Keyword(s):  
Anil Gupta

scholarly journals Reply to Beall and Priest

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Eklund
Keyword(s):  
Revision Theory ◽  
Australasian Journal ◽  
Revision Theory Of Truth ◽  
Cast Doubt ◽  
The Liar ◽  
Anil Gupta

In my “Deep Inconsistency” (Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2002), I compared my meaning-inconsistency view on the liar with Graham Priest’s dialetheist view, using my view to help cast doubt on Priest’s arguments for his view. Jc Beall and Priest have recently published a reply to my article (Australasian Journal of Logic, 2007). I here respond to their criticisms. In addition, I compare the meaning–inconsistency view with Anil Gupta and Nuel Belnap’s revision theory of truth, and discuss how best to deal with the strengthened liar.

Conscious Experience: a Logical Inquiry, by Anil Gupta

Philosophia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 1255-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Sophie Barwich
Keyword(s):  
Conscious Experience ◽  
Anil Gupta

Gupta on Sellars’s Theory of Perception

Dialogue ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
BYEONG D. LEE
Keyword(s):  
Viable Approach ◽  
Anil Gupta

Recently, Anil Gupta raised several important objections against Wilfrid Sellars’s theory of perception. The purpose of this paper is to defend Sellars’s theory of perception against these objections. I admit that some aspects of his theory are problematic: for example, there are good reasons to reject Sellars’s view that the ultimate referent of a perceptual taking is a sense impression. Nonetheless, I argue that a Sellarsian account of perception is still a viable approach to perception, despite Gupta’s powerful objections.

scholarly journals IRDP Credit for the Poor: What is the Evidence?

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-72
Author(s):  
Inderjit Khanna
Keyword(s):  
Careful Analysis ◽  
Development Programme ◽  
Rural Credit ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Rural Development Programme ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Integrated Rural Development ◽  
Adequate Understanding ◽  
Anil Gupta ◽  
Quantitative Evaluations

Among schemes for alleviating poverty, the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP) is unparalleled in its size and spread. Its evaluation, therefore, has to take account of its size and the fact that it has been in operation for less than eight years. What is disturbing is that the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the Programme are at variance. Based on action research and careful analysis, Anil Gupta and Manu Shroff ("Rural Credit: How do the Poor See It?" Vikalpa October-December 1987) argued that the plight of the poor had not changed much because the Programme did not reflect an adequate understanding of the nature of poverty. Commenting on that article, Inderjit Khanna counters their conclusion to provide figures on credit flows as well as official survey findings to show that beneficiaries have expressed satisfaction. Detailed research and analysis on both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the Programme at various levels are called for to reconcile these differences to identify the problems and devise better ways to reduce poverty

Empiricism and Experience - Anil Gupta

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (230) ◽  
pp. 180-185
Author(s):  
Derek H. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Anil Gupta

A. Reply To Anil Gupta And Jose Martinez-Fernandez

2005 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-128
Author(s):  
Hartry Field
Keyword(s):  
Anil Gupta
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document